Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 4,621 to 4,635 of 49124
-
10-18-24 12:40 #44504
Posts: 667Originally Posted by CreamFire [View Original Post]
-
10-18-24 12:08 #44503
Posts: 1937Kbliss Friday roster.
Rona Amber Linda Sumatra and Juicy Prada Sawtelle.
-
10-18-24 11:57 #44502
Posts: 1564Nadia
Nadia is on the LA roster now, moved from OC. She has great looks, tits and ass. A fuck doll to quote ResilientJohn. Close to real pics, 100 bb. Was very popular in OC. I recognize these other reviewers from other accurate reviews:
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post6967175
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7011012
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7010957
Other Reference:
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7046309 Comparing Victory to Nadia.
My ATF told me recently that LA is a bit harder on girls than OC. Don't know if it's true, but hope you can keep her since she definitely has the looks.
Originally Posted by AsianAssEater [View Original Post]
I mean isn't it the most basic common sense that if someone says a girl is a nasty rimmer who also squirts, that maybe she isn't a HYA? Unless specifically stated otherwise? I just don't get how someone reads that and thinks "Wow she must be young and beautiful" when it said no such thing.
For that reason alone, Ada consumed 2 whole pages of discussions on SD and OC over this concept. 6 reviewers from best to worst more or less agreed completely with each other, yet there was constant confusion of people reading things that weren't written. People assumed a positive review meant she was young or very good looking. She is 30's and just regular good looking. Notice not great or amazing, not medicore or okay. Don't assume what isn't written, good at bbbj doesn't somehow mean "must be young and beautiful". Not on planet Earth.
The problem was her ad made her look young and beautiful. Don't believe the ads, believe the multiple reviews. Even her worst review had a good time and said she was good at bbbj. In later discussion, his complaint was about the ad. He was disappointed she didn't look like the ad, even though he had a good time. Every booker's wet dream right? But it needs to be pointed out, the reviews were accurate. She is "just" good looking, above average. Not like the ad.
Ada is extremely good at BBBJ, the best I and others have ever seen. Several people called her a BBBJ PhD, it's true. She is good looks, good, attitude, good skill, good elsewhere. People also kept assuming a girl being fantastic at BBBJ meant she was fantastic at BBFS. People without much experience with women, I guess. She is just normal good at bbfs, meaning above average. This is Ada's meta-review with 6 different reviewers:
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7066392
-
10-18-24 01:56 #44501
Posts: 2365Originally Posted by AsianAssEater [View Original Post]
-
10-18-24 01:36 #44500
Posts: 2365Originally Posted by DigiPromoGuy [View Original Post]
-
10-18-24 01:10 #44499
Posts: 756Originally Posted by AsianAssEater [View Original Post]
-
10-18-24 00:14 #44498
Posts: 1022Originally Posted by CreamFire [View Original Post]
-
10-18-24 00:07 #44497
Posts: 2365Originally Posted by CreamFire [View Original Post]
-
10-17-24 22:36 #44496
Posts: 567Originally Posted by CreamFire [View Original Post]
-
10-17-24 22:33 #44495
Posts: 106Originally Posted by LARckr720 [View Original Post]
-
10-17-24 22:14 #44494
Posts: 205Originally Posted by JohnHada [View Original Post]
-
10-17-24 22:12 #44493
Posts: 378Linda overhyped
Originally Posted by TDLeafs [View Original Post]
-
10-17-24 21:48 #44492
Posts: 667Juicy
Originally Posted by JohnHada [View Original Post]
I haven't seen her so I can't comment on whether or not she is overhyped or not. That said, I don't think it's too difficult to see why she's getting a fair amount of attention. I'll address the obvious first, she's not a looker based off the posted photos (to me anyway). Considering that it's P.S. 'd too, I can only imagine how she looks like in real life. So if your preference is weighted heavily into looks, I can see where the confusion lies. However, keep in mind that she's located in WLA where it's commonly known that the "girls" there are mainly known for their BBFS service.
Take a look at the preference and statements of those that are giving her praise on this board. That should provide you the clearest reason for why people are going to see her. In addition, Juicy's reviews on the other site also aligns with what they've said here. In short (pun intended), she's a MILF service queen that squirts a ton and on the far spectrum of debauchery. And there are many here and elsewhere where those characteristics perfectly line up with what they are seeking in a provider.
I've pointed it out before and I think it bears repeating again. Look for and / or compare with posters / reviewers that closely match your own taste in kgirls or what you are looking for in providers. It'll take some time at first to sort through and assign mental notes of what this person likes or who should I pay closer attention to but in the end it will help streamline the intel presented here.
-
10-17-24 21:39 #44491
Posts: 1327After taste
Originally Posted by AsianAssEater [View Original Post]
You can't guarantee that mouth is free of brownies. And make sure you don't walk in the door starting DFK before the blue toast, you might just get some brownie point, LOL.
I will wait for the hype to come down.
-
10-17-24 21:29 #44490
Posts: 1327Over hyped?
Originally Posted by JohnHada [View Original Post]