Thread: Asian Providers
+
Add Report
Results 1,666 to 1,680 of 8263
-
06-12-24 23:53 #6598
Posts: 185Originally Posted by GoKipper [View Original Post]
Edit: Her body type was typical kgirl, slim and reasonably toned, but not like gym body or anything.
-
06-12-24 22:37 #6597
Posts: 161TER Reviews
Originally Posted by BlaneJames [View Original Post]
-
06-12-24 17:59 #6596
Posts: 122Originally Posted by GoKipper [View Original Post]
You can ask if anyone has seen a girl here, and maybe they were just hiding how good they were. But I've found that when a girl is worth it, she gets talked about on here.
TER has a bunch of shills, and outside of the 8+ reports, no reason to even look at it.
-
06-12-24 17:40 #6595
Posts: 785Originally Posted by GoKipper [View Original Post]
To illustrate, click on any reviewer's name to see who they reviewed, where, and what scores they gave. With shill reviews you get many guys who only review kgirls and give only 7's and 8's (or 9's and 10's!). Some of those high reviewers are honest but that number still doesn't help you because they rate girls different than you or I. Sometimes you get a simp where they saw the girl but give a much higher rating than you would give (either because they genuinely like the girl that much or because they want to hype their favorite girl). And worst are the guys who give a random 5 to a girl I know is good with some weird reason that could be made up (or could be true, who knows!), then a perfect 10 a girl who I know is really ugly. The thing is, they might be honest - him and I probably have opposite tastes. But the point is review numbers are misleading no matter why.
Lately, girls will ask me to write a review for them. That is a fair request and I feel I review honestly, but keep in mind other people are being asked the same thing. It is hard to give a girl a bad review if she asked you nicely. The girl didn't even ask me to make it good, one girl for example said "If you love me write a review". Most people do not write bad reviews for "slightly below average" girls, it has to be extra bad to bother.
I review girls on TER and give what I think is fair, but my rating won't help you because you will like different girls than me. However the content describing the girl and her skills will. Skinny or fat, tall or short. Tattoos, bbbj time and skill, etc..
The best is if you recognize another user on TER or here on USAG. I recognize BrianLara's posts which were accurate and helpful to me, his tastes match mine. But they might not match yours, so you have to figure that out for yourself. This is why you can click on my name or any other user and do "find all posts" and scroll through and see what other girls a person has talked about.
-
06-12-24 16:32 #6594
Posts: 607Skinny is subjective imo but to me Royce fits the bill. Her pics are real, glammed up ofc. She is tight asf. Very sweet gal, I enjoyed her company. She leaves soon. Make haste.
Originally Posted by GoKipper [View Original Post]
-
06-12-24 12:56 #6593
Posts: 110Elena, Zoe, Royce, Vivian
Anyone see any of these girls? See a lot of fake reviews that I don't trust. Mostly looking if any one of them are skinny. Vivian I know is from OC and seems to have the best body type, but haven't seen anything reliable about the other 3.
-
06-09-24 11:02 #6592
Posts: 126Originally Posted by RCK9985 [View Original Post]
-
06-09-24 00:50 #6591
Posts: 785Originally Posted by BrainLara [View Original Post]
Lucy is now Tony I believe. Pics are pretty accurate, the face is exactly her and the body has minimal P.S. She is a bit rounder. Girl next door look, nice personality reminding me of Nammy from last year. Good English.
She has really big natural boobs, they extend like towers when hanging with gravity, and they bang together in applause if you ride her. I actually looked up a sizing chart and they are between DD amd E. So bigger than Rosie which is the 2nd largest natural boobs I've seen on an Asian.
She is a larger girl and while I prefer thin / small, she has other things I like. What I liked were she has a nice smile, she has big boobs (with a slight tanline), and she is very obedient. As mentioned in other reviews she is newer and more amateur, but lets me take things slow. Seems to orgasm naturally, always a plus. MSOG friendly, as most SDAG girls are when I book the hour.
Size guide included.
-
06-09-24 00:38 #6590
Posts: 10Originally Posted by FreeWally [View Original Post]
-
06-08-24 19:38 #6589
Posts: 466Zoe's appearance
Originally Posted by SmallPenis14 [View Original Post]
-
06-08-24 15:10 #6588
Posts: 342Xoxo * Zoe
Originally Posted by SmallPenis14 [View Original Post]
-
06-08-24 14:25 #6587
Posts: 785Originally Posted by SDSalvi [View Original Post]
-
06-08-24 14:03 #6586
Posts: 23Zoe XOXO
I've seen a few girls with this agency and honestly every single time is a great time. Booked for an hour this time as I did 30 min last time. Zoe is the new girl so thought I'd give her a try. Booked very easily with the booker and arrived at the usual location. Zoe is really sexy, athletic build, young and tiny just how I like. She answered the door in a very nice one piece sheer black lingerie and led me to the room. Amazing time. She really does love to serve. Great BBBJ and really knows how to ride. After she asked if I wanted a massage and it was a great massage she truly is a great masseuse. Overall another amazing experience with xoxo and I am just very happy they are in town and providing so many great girls. Every session just gets better and better and Zoe is keeping that trend!
-
06-08-24 13:36 #6585
Posts: 49Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]
-
06-08-24 12:06 #6584
Posts: 466Gianna
Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]