Asian Providers

**FreeWally** · 05-15-24 15:57

Originally Posted by Lion1 [View Original Post]

I could go on and on about their system, but some of the lowest lowlights:

Profile is generally set by first review, which is often a shill or agency fanboy. Pics accurate, body type, age, services offered.

Performance scores are max 7 UNLESS she either BBBJ, LFK / DFK, or greek or some combo. Just plain stupid system.

Guys let bookers and escorts know their TER handle so they can get discounts or references after a good review, so incentive to drive up scores.

I generally believe the worst reviews.

Hi, I'd like to provide an alternate view. If a girl has a few TER reviews, it's fair to assume many are shills or fanboys. But I have also created new reviews for several girls and sometimes reading the reviews right after me it's clear they are accurate even if I have different criteria. I can tell that another reviewer saw her because of unique things about her they mention. So it does happen where a girl is mainly real reviews, and other guys are not going to give her the same number as me. This is clear when a popular girl works for just 2 months and gets several pages of reviews. A shilled girl won't even fill a page despite working just as long, for the same agency.

Read the reviews more than the rating. Skip the ones that are generic or all positive unless they contain factual useful info (detailed physical description of the girl, her routine, English skills, etc.) that aren't useful for shilling.

Personal preference makes review numbers not that useful. There are several girls I'd rate a 6 and other people will rate an 8. Girls who have no looks but are amazing service, often milfs. I believe that other people find her an 8, but I am not interested. So that number doesn't help me. What I want to say here is that 90% of the time other people have a much higher or lower rating than me, it is not because they are shilling or being a fanboy. Having talked with some of them here on USAG, they want something that I really don't want, and vice versa. I do not want service oriented milfs. Other people do not want my young fresh girls who are just learning. I love to teach those girls, most people don't. So I say we can all get along, by honestly describing a girl so each type of person picks the type they want.

I think I'm the minority when I'd rate a girl high if she looks amazing, because I can make it work. She just needs a good attitude and be beautiful. Maybe I'd rate her an 8. Other people will rate her a 6. There are two different groups of people rating the same girls, you see it all the time. You see it here. So when I recommend a girl I always clarify I am in group 2, I like a girl on looks and attitude, not how many crazy things she knows how to do. So I will give a girl an 8, and other people will give her a 6. There is no contradiction, it's a limit of the system. The system shines when you see independents from HX, because there are a few girls bad enough to get 1-6's consistently as a warning to others.

I have written many reviews and never gotten paid or a discount. After all, the very last thing I'd want is for the booker to know my handle. I wait a randomly 1-3 days before reviewing even now. I will give out lower reviews to girls that deserve it if I bother making the review. What you can always do is click on a reviewers name and see a long list of who they reviewed and the ratings they gave. I always do this. Surprisingly, there are reviews that say a girl is beautiful, wonderful, great, then the rating is a 6. You click on that guys reviews, and they're all 5 and 6's! Every one! And this is the only 6 in pages of a girl's reviews. More often, there are guys that only give 7's and 8's. So the number is meaningless.

My motivation of writing reviews is to remember a girl and enjoy her again. I write about women a lot as a hobby in itself. If a girl was memorable (good or bad) and has few reviews, I might write a review just to contribute. It also helps that 20 years ago other people showed me the way online through their writings. Saved me a bit of time.

**BrainLara** · 05-15-24 14:55

Pics are not her but I knew that going in as reverse image search yields some improbable hits. But she is very pretty, young, tall and slender. Would definitely turn heads. Service is decent but it is her beauty that will leave a lasting impression.

Originally Posted by FryingPanAss [View Original Post]

Anyone have intel on Drea? Particularly interested in more info about her looks. Is she as skinny as her pics? Is her face pretty?

**BrainLara** · 05-15-24 14:48

Met her when I was up in OC. Pics are real and recent. I was quite pleased with her statuesque beauty. She is quite new to this still and has this civvie vibe that I prefer over the one from a more seasoned pro. She literally jumped my bones at the door as if I had just returned from overseas deployment LOL. Very authentic, unjaded and dtf. Speaks surprisingly good English. Some real winners from this org lately.

**Lion1** · 05-15-24 13:04

Thanks, and I completely missed Wally's info posted on 5/5.

Originally Posted by BrainLara [View Original Post]

They are not on hx (yet). Another booker for some of the SAG ladies.

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post6887327

**BrainLara** · 05-15-24 10:16

They are not on hx (yet). Another booker for some of the SAG ladies.

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post6887327

Originally Posted by Lion1 [View Original Post]

Is this a new booker / agency or a rebrand? Do they have ads or a presence on HX? Anyone know?

Also, couldn't find any posts on the OC forum about them. They are organized a little different, but searched Paradise with no results. If someone has a link to any one review from OC it would help.
Thanks

**Lion1** · 05-15-24 09:42

Originally Posted by GG1234 [View Original Post]

While browsing the OC forums, I noticed a new k-org serving both OC and SD: SKParadise.

https://www.skparadise.com/

Is this a new booker / agency or a rebrand? Do they have ads or a presence on HX? Anyone know?

Also, couldn't find any posts on the OC forum about them. They are organized a little different, but searched Paradise with no results. If someone has a link to any one review from OC it would help.
Thanks

**BigHose1975** · 05-15-24 06:41

Originally Posted by SmallPenis14 [View Original Post]

Visited xoxo again due to having an amazing initial experience, decided to go with another provider, Lucy is thin, long legs, almost like a ballerina, she is very gorgeous, enthusiastic and fun to be around. Her pictures arguably look worse than she does in real life. She was enthusiastic and beautiful, passionate, and took her time with the session. Overall I will be sprinting back while she is still there. Link below.

https://www.xoxo-club.com/lucy

I have seen Lucy when she came to LV. She have nice boobs, speak English. Very submissive pretty face tall. Always drop two creampies when I see her. Very pretty girl.

**Jash198** · 05-15-24 01:07

Originally Posted by Lion1 [View Original Post]

I could go on and on about their system, but some of the lowest lowlights:

Profile is generally set by first review, which is often a shill or agency fanboy. Pics accurate, body type, age, services offered.

Performance scores are max 7 UNLESS she either BBBJ, LFK / DFK, or greek or some combo. Just plain stupid system.

Guys let bookers and escorts know their TER handle so they can get discounts or references after a good review, so incentive to drive up scores.

I generally believe the worst reviews.

Don't believe any of them. I keep telling myself going in that this will be the one. I always end up leaving disappointed. Majority of the reviews on TER and here are fake.

**AmericanNinja** · 05-15-24 00:03

It was nice to catch up with a past flame here in the SD LJ area, saw Eden before in the oc and she remembered the fun we had there and gave me a warm welcome.

She looked good in a form fitting dress with heels on, smiled when she saw me and it was a sweet surprise to see her again. Fairly ok English, korean gal with a happy personality. Petite tight body flirty girl Attractive face and open for a good time.

Lfk to start warm kisses throughout, Happy Dfk, Daty FIV Dato DT 69 BBBJ Light spanking, Face sitting in 69, Russian play in between those nice titties, i enjoyed the way she stuffed her panties in my mouth and stroked me with her panties wrapped around my Jr to get me back up for second serving , open for a good time , multi positions all the ones I can think of, passionate play. In conclusion I enjoyed myself very much I did not get a chance to write about her before; just happy to see her.

She is at a different number from what is on her ter, in town with www.cakdolls.net/product/eden-options-avail/ which is the new site for Fec.

Ter 337910.

**RCK9985** · 05-14-24 21:28

Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]

Whoa wait a fkn minute! If she had a left-shoulder tat of a fanged snake with fork tongue about to strike then Ms. Aruko is rebranded Ms. Koi. In fact, I know it is based on the ad pics that they are using, which are definitely doing some heavy lifting. Jacked up teeth. Pancake titties that droop, unless she got MMs since she debuted in SD two years ago.

Yep goofy teeth first thing noticed, and still the saggy B-cup titties was disappointing on looks. Good service, but no repeat.

**Lion1** · 05-14-24 18:52

Originally Posted by DrPornDawger [View Original Post]

This is probably old news, how do people feel about the TER rating system. IMHO, There's no 10 out there (or is there).

What is a 10? 9 8 etc.

I would like to know what you guys think.

I could go on and on about their system, but some of the lowest lowlights:

Profile is generally set by first review, which is often a shill or agency fanboy. Pics accurate, body type, age, services offered.

Performance scores are max 7 UNLESS she either BBBJ, LFK / DFK, or greek or some combo. Just plain stupid system.

Guys let bookers and escorts know their TER handle so they can get discounts or references after a good review, so incentive to drive up scores.

I generally believe the worst reviews.

**Zehe123** · 05-14-24 18:01

There seems to be lots of good reviews. The last Asian I got was Mali and for me, the whole ordeal was a 3 out of 10. Too weird, attitude was like she didn't give a fuck. Anyway, is there any recommendations for a provider that's tight and petite? Mid 30's at most unless she looks young and is tight it can be an exception LOL.

**RogOne** · 05-14-24 15:15

Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]

Whoa wait a fkn minute! If she had a left-shoulder tat of a fanged snake with fork tongue about to strike then Ms. Aruko is rebranded Ms. Koi. In fact, I know it is based on the ad pics that they are using, which are definitely doing some heavy lifting. Either way she's still cute. Tight snatch. Seems to be multiorgasmic from having her cervix pummeled in DG. Jacked up teeth. Pancake titties that droop… (TER: 381491).

Yes to the snake tats, yes to the teeth, and yes to the tight poon. Never got around to trying Koi, but nice to know they're one and the same.

**DrPornDawger** · 05-14-24 14:14

I agree, it's all subjective.

Saw this on twitter and Avamarie is on T3 R.

Originally Posted by ArrogantBstrd [View Original Post]

Ratings are subjective. Emotionally based. Post-nut clarity or lack thereof. They're as helpful as any other review / comment section.

I wouldn't rate a provider a 9 because someone else says she's pretty.

**SmallPenis14** · 05-14-24 13:36

Visited xoxo again due to having an amazing initial experience, decided to go with another provider, Lucy is thin, long legs, almost like a ballerina, she is very gorgeous, enthusiastic and fun to be around. Her pictures arguably look worse than she does in real life. She was enthusiastic and beautiful, passionate, and took her time with the session. Overall I will be sprinting back while she is still there. Link below.

https://www.xoxo-club.com/lucy