Thread: Asian Providers
+
Add Report
Results 2,461 to 2,475 of 8370
-
01-17-24 23:05 #5910Senior Member

Posts: 2406Essie LG
I dug up my review when I saw her a couple years ago in the Bay. If only still had the time to write reviews like this *sigh* I'll leave that to you young bucks.
Originally Posted by SsStuntCock
[View Original Post]
-
01-17-24 22:54 #5909Senior Member

Posts: 2406Essie LG
One of my best lays of 2022. I personally didn't think she was on the older side -at least not in a bad way- so I was a little surprised to read others make that remark. But I suppose if you only see early-20 somethings then you may want to think twice. Still, she's petite, submissive and DTF. That we clicked sexually made for a mutually beneficial experience. Find her at TER: 372011.
-
01-17-24 16:16 #5908Senior Member

Posts: 785Multiple K-orgs say upfront that if you have several recent positive network ratings on HX, that's the best way. Otherwise, you're a 'nobody' that nobody knows and can't even vouch for. That's why there's a process for vetting completely new people. Some people are flakes and HX weeds those out.
Originally Posted by Tijuaniko
[View Original Post]
-
01-17-24 14:50 #5907Senior Member

Posts: 466Tiffany at FEC (Cakdolls)
I see a new girl at FEC, image search shows she was in Boston recently and has Terr ID of 380255. I have. It seen her, but thought I would pass this along to anyone thinking about it. Reviews indicate a bit of a late 30's MILFy vibe, but I don't have full access and only can read the brief review blurbs.
-
01-17-24 02:59 #5906Senior Member

Posts: 283Thanks
Thanks for sharing, SirBishop. Your advice is always appreciated.
Originally Posted by SirBishop
[View Original Post]
-
01-17-24 01:43 #5905Banned Member

Posts: 904TJ I'm going to tell you that vetting is always a YMMV process. Keep a good relationship with the K-orgs and word about you is shared. I was able to bypass the vetting process having been a monger for over 20 years with no complaints from the girls or agencies. So, that question from the booker to me never came up. But your question is a valid one and be prepared with your alternate ego IDs.
Originally Posted by Tijuaniko
[View Original Post]
-
01-17-24 00:43 #5904Senior Member

Posts: 283LollyGirls Question for Sir Bishop
Thanks for sharing your experience, Sir Bishop. Would you mind sharing what if any vetting process this agency has for clients? Also, do they offer incall and if so, where?
Originally Posted by SirBishop
[View Original Post]
Thanks in advance.
- TJNiko.
-
01-16-24 23:09 #5903Banned Member

Posts: 3075Yeah, she has great reviews. Thank you, Sir!
Originally Posted by DRaj123
[View Original Post]
-
01-16-24 19:59 #5902Senior Member

Posts: 408Her ter I'd is TER I'd: 384595.
Originally Posted by RChangDatyKing
[View Original Post]
Pretty good ratings all above 8.
-
01-16-24 19:47 #5901Senior Member

Posts: 764You couldn't tell from my write-up of Ginna, which mentions Ginna six times that its a review of Ginna?
Originally Posted by TrustyHairlip
[View Original Post]
I did say they are using Ginnas photos for Ellie. I did provide a ter I'd link.
Have you missed that part?
I wanted to include the entire review, because I believe in public evaluations. And when it's someone I rated very low, I want to be able to tell the guys ASAP.
It's very simple. In all my experience, when a kgirl uses a picture that another kgirl used, around 95%of time it's her. The other 5% is girls stealing pics without the og girl permission (not cool at all, Mini had it happen to her a couple of months ago) or outrigjt fake insta model pics.
Even though the po says it's not her (LOL imagine trusting POs in anything that might affect their bottom line), there's a good chance it is her. Why would a girl or po take a pic of a girl who wasn't rated highly? I've heard stocky and boxy, which are often regular euphemisms for fat.
And if it is her, do you think I'd want for fellow mongers to fall on a knife?
-
01-16-24 19:31 #5900Senior Member

Posts: 645Agreed. I've seen Kendal / Tatum a few times. There's never been any hint of uncovered action, apart from her amazing BBBJ. She did do p2 p. With that insane body, she doesn't need to offer bare.
Originally Posted by TrustyHairlip
[View Original Post]
-
01-16-24 18:13 #5899Senior Member

Posts: 466Confusing
So you provided a review of Ginna, who is not even visiting San Diego. You could have just said that they are using Ginnas photos for Ellie and provided a link. I couldn't tell from your write up if you were commenting on Ellie at the end or still talking about Ginna. Not trying to be a dick, just was looking for clarification.
Originally Posted by RocketManP
[View Original Post]
-
01-16-24 12:51 #5898Senior Member

Posts: 466No BBFS for Tatum / kendal / shelby
Kendal does not allow bare penetration. This is an inaccurate report.
Originally Posted by RogOne
[View Original Post]
Regarding Petra, I doubt she ever comes back. She also goes by Flynn in OC. She has not been active since Oct. Or Nov 2022.
-
01-16-24 12:48 #5897Senior Member

Posts: 466Late 40's?
No way is she late 40's. She is in her 30's for sure, but late 40's? No way.
Originally Posted by TacoManVa
[View Original Post]
-
01-16-24 11:42 #5896Senior Member

Posts: 764What is confusing?
I don't get what's confusing. Pretty sure I state that the pics (at true time) of Ellie were used by a girl named Ginna in the bay area and I provided my review of Ginna. I haven't seen Ellie.
Originally Posted by TrustyHairlip
[View Original Post]
Since then, there was a clear damage control response and the situation is sus. Pictures were changed to another girl who's been around a lot in vegas / bay area, under "Candy" and other myriad of names. Considering that someone have claimed that the pics are still not correct and someone else also claimed that booker have allegedly said real pics were to be uploaded, the worst case scenario is that the girl is running away from her previous names and reviews. And "best" case scenario is that the org or girl (we can aggregate these as "seller") for some reason decided to use pics (or template) that were used by Ginna and now switched to another set o pics used by another girl.
If you ever needed further proof that orgs / girls read this board, LOL.














Reply With Quote











