"Sugarbabies" / "Arrangements" Amateurs or Not?

**NiteLifed69** · 12-06-23 13:38

How did you get Premium access for one hour?

Originally Posted by GeechieDan [View Original Post]

I don't know if this has been brought up, but Seeking is doing this thing where they will give you premium access for 1 hr. I've done it about 3 times today already. Made a few connections, and didn't pay a dime.

**DoggieFan** · 12-06-23 03:10

Originally Posted by Eagle7415 [View Original Post]

https://members.seeking.com/member/3...b-e275bcdcc217

She reached out to me today with her phone number and let's meet in Richmond, anyone have any experience with her. Thank you!

So, I Googled her digits & up popped her escort ad. I have no issues with her being an escort, I'm looking for sex with someone in her prime & hot. Ya, I'm shallow like that!

Been texting, but the same issue, insists on FaceTime. That's my real cell number, er, no thanks! Won't do SnapChat, which is tied to my play number. Even offered to do a verification pic, like doing something she tells me to do, like put your hand on top of your head.

Super hot pics & videos in her ad, but I'm thinking with my big head today.

https://callescort.org/804-547-5293

**Tidad** · 12-05-23 19:14

Originally Posted by DoggieFan [View Original Post]

Me too. I had messaged her 14 days ago. She pushed hard for me to see her right away. Thought it was TGTBT so wasn't biting. She wanted to do FaceTime. I said I'd do SnapChat. She asked what's the difference.

FaceTime is my real cell number, my SnapChat has my Google Voice fake info. Felt like a set up for sure. Then again, if someone reports they went to the FC with her & she's real, I'll be bummed!

I'm either blocked or she deleted her profile.

Waaaaay too hot with really REALLY nice pics. No reason for her to be reaching to random dudes. With her looks, her inbox is BURIED and now her profile has gone away. Setup of some type for SURE. LEO? Deposit scam? It really doesn't matter which. They are both BS, just different flavors.

**DoggieFan** · 12-05-23 11:22

Originally Posted by Eagle7415 [View Original Post]

https://members.seeking.com/member/3...b-e275bcdcc217

She reached out to me today with her phone number and let's meet in Richmond, anyone have any experience with her. Thank you!

Me too. I had messaged her 14 days ago. She pushed hard for me to see her right away. Thought it was TGTBT so wasn't biting. She wanted to do FaceTime. I said I'd do SnapChat. She asked what's the difference.

FaceTime is my real cell number, my SnapChat has my Google Voice fake info. Felt like a set up for sure. Then again, if someone reports they went to the FC with her & she's real, I'll be bummed!

I'm either blocked or she deleted her profile.

**FarFarAway** · 12-03-23 21:01

Originally Posted by DrSugarD [View Original Post]

SA allows these female scammers to run rampant, but you let a paying male member do the least little thing out of line and they slap our hands or ban us. My account was put on hold until I submitted to the verification process. I told them to delete my profile and stick their scamming site up their ass. I have enough contacts to last for awhile. I think SA needs to reexamine their priorities. Making it tough on paying members doesn't seem like good business sense.

What they are doing makes impeccable business sense. They are getting rid of riff-raff guys who are going to patronize escorts who come on the site, and approach the non-pros on the site as if they are garden-variety hookers. That prevents the whole seeking site from getting shut down under the FOSTA / SESTA law. This is why all this stuff is happening. They are there to make a buck, but they can only do that if they are permitted into the lucrative US market.

That you are paying means nothing. That you aren't getting them in Dutch w / John Law is everything.

**Dr SugarD** · 12-03-23 15:45

Originally Posted by OriolesMagic [View Original Post]

I can understand SA's "need" to verify guys in case of assault, etc, but it doesn't seem they are verifying the women the same way. SA is chock full of female scammers. Is this need to verify I'd only apply to men? Doesn't really seem fair. I also can see why some men here feel they need to shield their true identity.

SA allows these female scammers to run rampant, but you let a paying male member do the least little thing out of line and they slap our hands or ban us. My account was put on hold until I submitted to the verification process. I told them to delete my profile and stick their scamming site up their ass. I have enough contacts to last for awhile. I think SA needs to reexamine their priorities. Making it tough on paying members doesn't seem like good business sense.

**FarFarAway** · 12-03-23 13:32

Originally Posted by Bugs2455 [View Original Post]

I wanted to give secret benefits a shot even though I've heard seeking is better. Has anyone paid for credits on there with a prepaid card? The prepaid cards that work on seeking for me don't work on secret benefits.

I have had the same experience. I have never found a prepaid that worked there. I only tried a few. I do think it is a trial-and-error process, and I have followed these boards for years, no one has ever described a process that works. Perhaps that site is only for single guys who will use their IRL credit cards.

One card that works on seeking is the blackhawk prepaid, IDK if I have ever heard of someone trying that on secret benefits. Someone should TOFTT.

**OriolesMagic** · 12-03-23 13:30

Originally Posted by DarkStar58 [View Original Post]

As Topgun9 found out the hard way was SA has partnered with a very stout fraud detection platform Au10tix.com to verify users. That being said good luck trying signup giving false information / payment type or using VPN or Spoofing device fingerprinting. You may be able to log-in once but the second time you log-in the platform will flag your account on hold until you provide verification as what happened toTopgun9. But I'm surprised they now want to verify with government I'd when a real "bank" credit card should suffice for I'd verification if you provided (somewhat?) correct information when you signed up. I'm only guessing if payment went through but you were flagged for some reason or another for being a bad actor, I'm assuming they want a Gov Id for Pii and profile biometric face identity verification to allow you to continue use SA.

I can understand SA's "need" to verify guys in case of assault, etc, but it doesn't seem they are verifying the women the same way. SA is chock full of female scammers. Is this need to verify I'd only apply to men? Doesn't really seem fair. I also can see why some men here feel they need to shield their true identity.

**Xaxado** · 12-03-23 09:12

Originally Posted by Bugs2455 [View Original Post]

I wanted to give secret benefits a shot even though I've heard seeking is better. Has anyone paid for credits on there with a prepaid card? The prepaid cards that work on seeking for me don't work on secret benefits.

From the SB site FAQ:

Can I use a prepaid credit, debit, or gift card to pay for credits?

CCBill, our payment processor, does accept prepaid Visa, Mastercard, Discover, and JCB cards. However, many of them are not configured for online purchases by default, and they also need to be able to make international transactions.

If you decide to use a prepaid card, please contact the card provider (the contact number should be on the back of the card) to make sure that they allow for online and international transactions.

If you've tried to buy credits using a prepaid card but it's been declined, please contact CCBill, they should be able to tell you the reason for the decline. They can be contacted as follows:

● 24/7 Support line 1-888-596-9279.

● consumersupport@ccbill.com.

● https://support.ccbill.com.

**Shampoo55** · 12-02-23 23:41

Anyone got the latest discount code for SA?

**Tidad** · 12-02-23 22:07

Originally Posted by ILikeHotWomen [View Original Post]

What makes you think that? I talked to her a few weeks ago and she didn't seem like she was. I assume this is taylor.

She had been claiming to be clean and going to meetings, but that was a while ago. Who knows what she's doing now? All I know is I've wrecked that snapper for relatively cheap over the years and she's trying to get top tier pricing now. No thanks.

**Eagle7415** · 12-02-23 18:25

https://members.seeking.com/member/3...b-e275bcdcc217

She reached out to me today with her phone number and let's meet in Richmond, anyone have any experience with her. Thank you!

**TopGun9** · 12-02-23 14:22

Bought a Play Card on Amazon then tried to add it to my Google Play account and it keep giving me error.

Anyone have the same problem? Tried on both the laptop and the Play app.

**ILikeHotWomen** · 12-02-23 01:25

What makes you think that? I talked to her a few weeks ago and she didn't seem like she was. I assume this is taylor.

Originally Posted by Tidad [View Original Post]

When a junkie hooker gets clean, they usually pack on the lbs and leave sexy behind but here's an exception. She is looking much hotter than before; I still refuse to pay SD rates for $40 pussy. In the good old days she and her sister did $100 outcall doubles. Miss that.

**DarkStar58** · 12-02-23 00:31

Originally Posted by FarFarAway [View Original Post]

IDK what your expertise is, but I don't find your statements consistent w / my experience on seeking or what I have read here from others.

I have a complete sugar identity I have used w / the site since the word go, a real address that isn't mine, a name that isn't mine, etc. I have never had any problems. I always use prepaid debit cards, and have posted multiple times for guys as to what cards will work on the site.

I have used browsers w / built-in VPN to access the site, including Tor, and I have used vanilla browsers in stealth mode (no saving of history) to keep my machine clean of evidence of my activities. If doing that, I use a separate VPN into a large corporate server. I find Tor can sometimes be very slow to access sites, I assume this is because one of the nodes that you bounce among could be a machine with limited bandwidth, you have no control over that.

It is flat out not true that seeking is now demanding verification of identity (w / government identification) from all of its users. They only do this for people they get suspicious about. Either because they were reported, or perhaps they scan their messages or profiles.

I have been on and off SA for a number of years, I've been verified without any issues, I'm single. I absolutely understand the circumstances are challenging if you are married. I don't have absolute expertise just basic knowledge on how still waters run deep. Enjoy and have fun with your Endeavors on SA.