Hot Young Asian Girls

**Eddy68** · 11-14-23 18:53

Originally Posted by KLoverPanda [View Original Post]

Can someone translate? LOL.

It's easy guy. Highlight the words and on your drop down hit translate.

**PaenkeikeuPounder** · 11-14-23 05:34

Originally Posted by Goku17 [View Original Post]

Yes.

https://www.knewsla.com/kcommunity/202311097766444/

Can someone translate? LOL.

**BonerAppetitty** · 11-14-23 03:30

Not in CA for Korgs. Similar one was in Seattle few years ago. Very similar one in CA with a Thai org with 3 or so ringleaders operating in multi-states.

Originally Posted by Ghost626 [View Original Post]

Is there bust like this in the past? Even though I don't book much, I'm in my early 30's, still got loads of gas left in the tank.

**TempletonRat** · 11-14-23 00:24

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was edited or deleted because it appeared to be a public effort to discourage members from posting information. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.

**Tbtbfftb** · 11-14-23 00:19

Costco for Viagra or Cialiss bio similar and Good RX. Super cheap like 30 for $12 bucks. Can't beat it. They are all formulated the same.

Originally Posted by HotSpotNota [View Original Post]

A very good nights rest before usually does it for me. For added help you can try any of the online pills you can get easily. I've used Blue Chew before and it works well, lower dosage so you may need two. I've been meaning to try because the mints should taste better than the weird blueberry flavor of chews, but they are more expensive per pill. But be awry as they may be "too effective" and you still may leave your session with unfinished.

**Ghost626** · 11-13-23 23:24

Originally Posted by Panchito33 [View Original Post]

Time to pack it up boys.

Is there bust like this in the past? Even though I don't book much, I'm in my early 30's, still got loads of gas left in the tank.

**TempletonRat** · 11-13-23 23:08

Originally Posted by Panchito33 [View Original Post]

Time to pack it up boys.

I mean, it's just a Korean language news article, and the only result is that CGLA password protected their site.

Seems pretty minimal.

**Goku17** · 11-13-23 20:31

Originally Posted by DanJanson [View Original Post]

What's the paranoia about? Some bust going on?

Yes.

https://www.knewsla.com/kcommunity/202311097766444/

**PaenkeikeuPounder** · 11-13-23 20:07

Originally Posted by ZebraZebra [View Original Post]

I had the honor of sampling the fine young Korean girl that is Haven today. I missed her on her first tour and safe to say I'm definitely seeing her again.

Her face looks like a mix of Bae Suzy (70%) and the model Bora Kim @wanna._b (30%). Some people said she looks like Joy from Red Velvet and I can kind of see it.

Her face and body are both almost completely natural, very nice natural breasts with a natural shape and very grabbable butt in cowgirl.

Really enjoyed DFK and BBBJ with her and busted my nut right there in cowgirl.

She definitely looks a lot like Bae Suzy so if you like that look go see her.

Her English is also very conversationally fluent.

Never knew who Bae Suzy was till now. Good reference.

You should have seen her during her first tour. She was 10-15 pounds lighter and looked so much better. I still see her often now and she's still a part of my rotation. Just saying she used to look a bit thinner haha.

**TheAbc** · 11-13-23 18:58

Originally Posted by Blip [View Original Post]

This whole thing has turned into a clusterf**k. If we only use one booker and that booker shuts down, then that person is screwed. But if we use multiple bookers, then we still can't book because we are not a frequent enough customer. I guess another way to get around it would be to get the phone number of a couple girls you see a lot and then have them vouch for you. What a mess. Those east coast guys screwed us.

No one knows on how any other bookers / agencies will react to to what is going on. At the time of this post, only two have locked up and went private. A few others are open as they always were before this happened. These places run independently I think so every booker will have different requirements and will vary on how strict about their clients. We can assess things as they progress as the few and months go by after this is older news.

**TheAbc** · 11-13-23 18:49

Originally Posted by BastardChorum [View Original Post]

I wouldn't describe it as strange that we don't know. The whole point is keep the process and it's criteria as tight lipped as possible. However, it's not too hard to come up with an informed idea of what it might look like. Demographics of the client pool is not a consideration. Things like age and ethnicity has no bearing in a situation like this. Occupation could be possible but not all clients were vetted in this manner. And I highly doubt they will invest the man power needed to do so for those that did. Unless all clients were indexed in an easily filterable file, Excel for example. The possibility of which isn't too far-fetched. Visit frequency is a very good contender and is reasonable but it appears that it is either given a very low significance or not used at all. My guess is it's simply tenure, that is, how long has you been with them. In addition, they may be able to cross reference how long you been mongering as a whole by pinging other bookers. It's easy and straightforward and if I was a betting man anyone who became a client after Summer 2020 is either flatly denied or further scrutinized by secondary factors like frequency and general feedback from the girls.

Do keep in mind that this is simply an exercise in inference and imagination. This may be spot on, have only a kernel of truth, or flat out wrong.

I was half awake drinking coffee so my choice of words weren't the best. Agreed, since this hits hard at home for them, it's very understandable that they took these measures since this is a major bust in the scene. I just don't know enough about the inner workings of the bookers / agencies as well as law enforcement to know if anything will come from this. Baseless speculation will only breed fear so I'm not going to add anything. Though this does reinforce the idea that it may not be worth to give your real info to these places now that we know a bit more about when you do give it to them. I've skimmed through the complaint and it looks like that agency kept client's info?

This entire situation has gotten most of the K-girl parts of the forum all riled up and no knows what will be in the future. I've been doing this far longer than I ever thought I would and the scene still survives after FOSTA, COVID. Take what I say with a big grain of salt, if the scene is still here despite major hurdles, I'm sure the scene will survive but abet in a more low key manner.

**ZebraZebra** · 11-13-23 18:15

I had the honor of sampling the fine young Korean girl that is Haven today. I missed her on her first tour and safe to say I'm definitely seeing her again.

Her face looks like a mix of Bae Suzy (70%) and the model Bora Kim @wanna._b (30%). Some people said she looks like Joy from Red Velvet and I can kind of see it.

Her face and body are both almost completely natural, very nice natural breasts with a natural shape and very grabbable butt in cowgirl.

Really enjoyed DFK and BBBJ with her and busted my nut right there in cowgirl.

She definitely looks a lot like Bae Suzy so if you like that look go see her.

Her English is also very conversationally fluent.

**Blip** · 11-13-23 17:47

This whole thing has turned into a clusterf**k. If we only use one booker and that booker shuts down, then that person is screwed. But if we use multiple bookers, then we still can't book because we are not a frequent enough customer. I guess another way to get around it would be to get the phone number of a couple girls you see a lot and then have them vouch for you. What a mess. Those east coast guys screwed us.

Originally Posted by TheAbc [View Original Post]

The strangest part is we don't know what she's using to determine if someone gets the PW or not. On top of this, does she still let you book despite not having access to the website? These two go hand in hand so I'm not even sure how it will work. I don't even use her that often, much less than both of you and I still managed to get the PW. I have been going on and off with this place for a few years before they turned into CGLA.

**Bastard Chorum** · 11-13-23 16:11

Originally Posted by TheAbc [View Original Post]

The strangest part is we don't know what she's using to determine if someone gets the PW or not. On top of this, does she still let you book despite not having access to the website? These two go hand in hand so I'm not even sure how it will work. I don't even use her that often, much less than both of you and I still managed to get the PW. I have been going on and off with this place for a few years before they turned into CGLA.

I wouldn't describe it as strange that we don't know. The whole point is keep the process and it's criteria as tight lipped as possible. However, it's not too hard to come up with an informed idea of what it might look like. Demographics of the client pool is not a consideration. Things like age and ethnicity has no bearing in a situation like this. Occupation could be possible but not all clients were vetted in this manner. And I highly doubt they will invest the man power needed to do so for those that did. Unless all clients were indexed in an easily filterable file, Excel for example. The possibility of which isn't too far-fetched. Visit frequency is a very good contender and is reasonable but it appears that it is either given a very low significance or not used at all. My guess is it's simply tenure, that is, how long has you been with them. In addition, they may be able to cross reference how long you been mongering as a whole by pinging other bookers. It's easy and straightforward and if I was a betting man anyone who became a client after Summer 2020 is either flatly denied or further scrutinized by secondary factors like frequency and general feedback from the girls.

Do keep in mind that this is simply an exercise in inference and imagination. This may be spot on, have only a kernel of truth, or flat out wrong.