Korean Agency BB

**SturdyBirdy** · 10-04-23 21:57

Originally Posted by PussyProwler [View Original Post]

On principle alone, I'm going to start using this booker since on their website it says who using real pics! I have spent thousands of dollars total getting riled up from various bookers websites profile pics to only be disappointed that the actual girl was 20+ years older and not even close in appearance. I understand it's supply and demand and most mongers aren't going to walk out but I hope other bookers follow suit and start listing whose pics are real. LOL, obviously the ones that don't say real pics are not the girl in the pic and then you just have to hope its at least close.

Has anyone tried GKS and can confirm that anyone they saw on this site (or another bookers site) that gks says real pics is actually using real pics? I get that these pics are airbrushed extremely and of course they'll always be much older than stated and breast cup size exaggerated but at least it's really them hopefully! That's all I want as a monger, to know that the picture is of the actual provider even if its from a decade ago LOL.

Yeah, good luck with that. I booked Viva through a different booker. She was also listed on GKS as having "real pics," which were the same ones she used with the other LA / OC bookers.

See this cached link for proof of the GKS ad:

https://webcache.googleusercontent.c...&ct=clnk&gl=us

Her old ad on CGLA, so you can see the photos enlarged:

https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/viva

She looked nothing like that. Her face wasn't merely Photoshopped. It's a completely different face. Also had absolutely no ass. Flat and frumpy. In dire need of some heavy squats and hip thrusts.

"Real pics" is hardly a hallmark of authenticity.

**Pussy Prowler** · 10-04-23 21:24

I see your point but as long as the picture (enhanced or 10 years ago) is actually of her, I don't mind. I don't mind them being older than stated because I expect that and don't mind Milfs etc.

But it's important that it's really them. Why? Because when I look at these profiles I'm picking based on their facial features. Not sure if you've been around a lot of Koreans / Asians but as a Korean myself, I'm very particular about what type of face I find attractive on these girls, and thus when I walk in and the girl isn't even close in terms of the face period, it's total disappointment. To me when I say real photo, it's not that complex, it's that the photo of the actual provider, with the assumption it's been heavily photoshopped, brightened, from 10 years ago etc. etc. at least it's of her and thus you know what type of face you're getting. To me that isn't subjective, it's either of them or it's not. Close is subjective. For now (and granted I have NO CLUE) if GKS website's claims of real pics on certain profiles will pan out, but what do I have to lose to test this? I assume that the pics are either real, or close, and the ones that don't say "real pic" are a bit further away from what they look like (and obviously not them period). A lot of non asian mongers I feel like can't really distinguish Korean faces on these providers well which is fine since they haven't been immersed around as many Koreans as for example, someone who grew up and was raised amongst Koreans. Anyhow, I'll end this rant now and am hoping someone will be kind enough to chime in on any of the GKS girls who they've seen that clearly are them (whether photoshopped or of them from many years ago).

Originally Posted by Vulcan1009 [View Original Post]

Well, to your point on "booker post saying real photo", its a tactic to draw you in. Over the course of 15 years in the game, I have came across many that said real photo and happens to be no where close or 10-20 years older. YES it was really her but 10-20 years ago or in reality, just someone look like her about 70%. The justification of real photo is subjective and no standard definition on how long ago, before and after plastic and etc. On the other hand, I have came across many that look exactly the same or even better than photo that the booker did not say it's real photo or not.

At the end, real photo or fake, we all depends on monger reviews and therefor we are here to do the reviews and find the truth, all bookers shares the same girls in L. A pretty much, so either you book from GKS or CGLA or M or KGLA or Melos or etc. You get what you get, LOL.

**DaeWrong** · 10-04-23 18:25

Originally Posted by Vulcan1009 [View Original Post]

LOL, the key word is OLDER, she is def early 40's.

One time I was with a provider who is friend with viki and after the deed while we were chichatting, viki called.

The way her voice sound and the way she talk in korean, def 40 and over, and I remember those rough hands of hers.

Yes she is a spinner but way pass her prime.

So which girls are okay and not okay with new clients for first time? Is Maia one of them because she was the first girl I saw.

**Vulcan1009** · 10-04-23 18:04

Originally Posted by Phazze93 [View Original Post]

Disclaimer for someone who had to try viki (only kbliss provider that accepted new clients). She's older than her photos.

She's pushing mid 30's if not older.

She's a pro, but she's not a HYA or CYA.

LOL, the key word is OLDER, she is def early 40's.

One time I was with a provider who is friend with viki and after the deed while we were chichatting, viki called.

The way her voice sound and the way she talk in korean, def 40 and over, and I remember those rough hands of hers.

Yes she is a spinner but way pass her prime.

**Vulcan1009** · 10-04-23 17:58

Originally Posted by PussyProwler [View Original Post]

On principle alone, I'm going to start using this booker since on their website it says who using real pics! I have spent thousands of dollars total getting riled up from various bookers websites profile pics to only be disappointed that the actual girl was 20+ years older and not even close in appearance. I understand it's supply and demand and most mongers aren't going to walk out but I hope other bookers follow suit and start listing whose pics are real. LOL, obviously the ones that don't say real pics are not the girl in the pic and then you just have to hope its at least close.

Has anyone tried GKS and can confirm that anyone they saw on this site (or another bookers site) that gks says real pics is actually using real pics? I get that these pics are airbrushed extremely and of course they'll always be much older than stated and breast cup size exaggerated but at least it's really them hopefully! That's all I want as a monger, to know that the picture is of the actual provider even if its from a decade ago LOL.

Well, to your point on "booker post saying real photo", its a tactic to draw you in. Over the course of 15 years in the game, I have came across many that said real photo and happens to be no where close or 10-20 years older. YES it was really her but 10-20 years ago or in reality, just someone look like her about 70%. The justification of real photo is subjective and no standard definition on how long ago, before and after plastic and etc. On the other hand, I have came across many that look exactly the same or even better than photo that the booker did not say it's real photo or not.

At the end, real photo or fake, we all depends on monger reviews and therefor we are here to do the reviews and find the truth, all bookers shares the same girls in L. A pretty much, so either you book from GKS or CGLA or M or KGLA or Melos or etc. You get what you get, LOL.

**Pussy Prowler** · 10-04-23 17:25

On principle alone, I'm going to start using this booker since on their website it says who using real pics! I have spent thousands of dollars total getting riled up from various bookers websites profile pics to only be disappointed that the actual girl was 20+ years older and not even close in appearance. I understand it's supply and demand and most mongers aren't going to walk out but I hope other bookers follow suit and start listing whose pics are real. LOL, obviously the ones that don't say real pics are not the girl in the pic and then you just have to hope its at least close.

Has anyone tried GKS and can confirm that anyone they saw on this site (or another bookers site) that gks says real pics is actually using real pics? I get that these pics are airbrushed extremely and of course they'll always be much older than stated and breast cup size exaggerated but at least it's really them hopefully! That's all I want as a monger, to know that the picture is of the actual provider even if its from a decade ago LOL.

**Vulcan1009** · 10-04-23 15:51

Originally Posted by LoveAsianGirls [View Original Post]

Yep. I saw Kona yesterday, her last day in OC. Had the same experience as MisterD. When Kona squirted into my mouth it was salty LOL. She showed me all her photos. Her new photos look exactly like her whereas her old photos did not look as much like her. Just as MisterD experienced, Kona greeted me in outfit she is wearing in 3rd and 5th photo.

So which one is better? New Kona or New Sharon?

Both D cup, both seem slim thick, both yummy.

https://myalbum.com/album/8sr6XVaTzsPc/

Anyone seem both that able to compare?

They are both on KGLA with photos stacked to each other.

**Phazze93** · 10-04-23 14:14

Originally Posted by GBenson3 [View Original Post]

Long time reader first time caller.

Did a lot of reading but dipped the toe, and well everything else in my first K Girl session with Viki.

Not the youngest or newest but I wanted a good experience and a known entity and that's exactly what I got.

Called booker and made easy appointment with all details provided.

Met at door by Viki. Matched the pics pretty well and good DFK right away. A good start.

Off to shower and mutual touching, washing, BBBJ, rimming and DFK.

Back to bed barely with DFK, BBBJ and sensual HJ being employed. Had no issue as she spun me around and I enjoyed a quality combo her tongue around and up my ass as she alternated between BBBJ and rimming me.

Pushed her back onto bed, more DFK and nipple caressing as my dick slid easily into her. Pounded it out in all positions and shot the first load deep into her. She has some great vag control as she squeezed it out of me into her some more long after I stopped pulsing into her. Felt good having cum drip out as I pulled out.

Clean up and onto round 2 - more BBBJ and into her again. More positions and doggie was a hit..

Disclaimer for someone who had to try viki (only kbliss provider that accepted new clients). She's older than her photos.

She's pushing mid 30's if not older.

She's a pro, but she's not a HYA or CYA.

**LoveAsianGirls** · 10-04-23 12:36

Originally Posted by MisterDotD [View Original Post]

I visited her last week when she was in OC, 3rd + 5th pic looks 99% like her, plus it the exact outfit she greet me with.

Face and Body: 7/10, cute, short. Tits have natural sag, prob D?, not firm. Ass is tone, soft, stack, and feels good to touch. Slightly bit of tummy fat but not too much. Shave kitty. No abnormal odor.

English: just giggle and some simple words.

Attitude: Engaging, aim to please, no rush.

Service: All except no FIV. I came in and loved her engaging attitude. Shower (no preview). Burst 1 nut in mish. Try for 2nd but couldn't (but not for the lack of trying). Make her squirt near the end. I left supper happy.

Cost: $320 (BBFS) with some tips.

Repeat: 100% if she returns to OC.

Yep. I saw Kona yesterday, her last day in OC. Had the same experience as MisterD. When Kona squirted into my mouth it was salty LOL. She showed me all her photos. Her new photos look exactly like her whereas her old photos did not look as much like her. Just as MisterD experienced, Kona greeted me in outfit she is wearing in 3rd and 5th photo.

**PumpNDump** · 10-04-23 11:55

Kbliss humpday harlots.

Viki Iris Maia Juni Hana Krystal and Nina (upcharge).

**Vulcan1009** · 10-04-23 05:50

Originally Posted by BastardChorum [View Original Post]

It's the same Kona, just a different photo set.

Wow, got to give it to the person who photo shopped, that looks completely different then the Kona I met when she first started.

I'm always one of the first to try D cups but that is def not the Kona I met, she was a lot meattier, LOL.

Anyway, pass.

**Bastard Chorum** · 10-04-23 02:20

Originally Posted by Vulcan1009 [View Original Post]

https://www.melosplayground.com/product-page/kona-1

Has anyone seen this new Kona from Melos?

M has a Kona too but their pictures seems different and the new Kona pictures look a lot skinnier but bigger tits.

Anyone? Yummmmm.

It's the same Kona, just a different photo set.

**Micca112** · 10-04-23 02:19

Originally Posted by BuildingGuy [View Original Post]

Emma / Bon can charge whatever she likes. It's an open market and no one is required to see her if they don't like her prices. I have always had good experiences with her.

Also, she is not GPS. Just the opposite. One time I had booked her for an hour but I had to cut the session short because of an emergency. I was ready to pay her the full fee but she told me to only pay her for half an hour. How many other providers would do that?

I saw her in OC when she was available for a short stay in July and she was just as great as I remember her from many years ago. She was still a tad kooky in her personality but I never got the GPS vibe from her. She still remembered me and I would probably see her again but I'm busy trying new talent.

**MisterDotD** · 10-04-23 00:07

Originally Posted by Vulcan1009 [View Original Post]

https://www.melosplayground.com/product-page/kona-1

Has anyone seen this new Kona from Melos?

M has a Kona too but their pictures seems different and the new Kona pictures look a lot skinnier but bigger tits.

Anyone? Yummmmm.

I visited her last week when she was in OC, 3rd + 5th pic looks 99% like her, plus it the exact outfit she greet me with.

Face and Body: 7/10, cute, short. Tits have natural sag, prob D?, not firm. Ass is tone, soft, stack, and feels good to touch. Slightly bit of tummy fat but not too much. Shave kitty. No abnormal odor.

English: just giggle and some simple words.

Attitude: Engaging, aim to please, no rush.

Service: All except no FIV. I came in and loved her engaging attitude. Shower (no preview). Burst 1 nut in mish. Try for 2nd but couldn't (but not for the lack of trying). Make her squirt near the end. I left supper happy.

Cost: $320 (BBFS) with some tips.

Repeat: 100% if she returns to OC.

**AsianAssEater** · 10-03-23 23:54

Originally Posted by BuildingGuy [View Original Post]

Emma / Bon can charge whatever she likes. It's an open market and no one is required to see her if they don't like her prices. I have always had good experiences with her.

Also, she is not GPS. Just the opposite. One time I had booked her for an hour but I had to cut the session short because of an emergency. I was ready to pay her the full fee but she told me to only pay her for half an hour. How many other providers would do that?

When did I say I had bad experiences with her? She's in my top 3 all time. She always complains when I see her that she's not busy enough though, I've never told her to drop her rates. I just said that she should prob drop it to the special since she's trying to charge prices of a HYA when she's well into her 40's.