|
This blog is moderated by Admin
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 67
 Originally Posted by IronClad999
[View Original Post]
Too many grey zones hence many forums to weed out duds and play the best for our sake. But we don't need any troublemakers otherwise it'll just make things worse to point of no return. Seems like dramas in terms of crimes / trickery on green tickets are raising to next level on both west and east side lately these months.
My point is that everything is already priced in.
Free markets are highly efficient - especially illicit ones where there is effectively no form of regulatory intervention, economics reign supreme.
Whatever providers (sellers) do (in terms of pricing, misleading advertising, etc) they do because they can and will continue to until it no longer makes economic sense for them - in other words there is a built in self-correcting mechanism that prevents providers from stepping too far out of line.
Uninformed market participants (buyers) can certainly affect supply/demand but their net impact is imo minimal as they likely make up a small percentage of total transaction activity. They are also limited by economic contraints (scarcity of money) and their negative impacts are also mitigated by their tendency to become more informed over time. I also think it's largely a pointless endeavor to lobby for collusion efforts as most buyers' (especially uninformed) motivations are price insensitive aka most people are thinking with their small heads when it comes down to pulling the trigger.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 2422
Anti-hypes
 Originally Posted by NewLegion
[View Original Post]
What you just described is in fact, how markets work sir (shock and horror).
Too many grey zones hence many forums to weed out duds and play the best for our sake. But we don't need any troublemakers otherwise it'll just make things worse to point of no return. Seems like dramas in terms of crimes / trickery on green tickets are raising to next level on both west and east side lately these months.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 67
 Originally Posted by IronClad999
[View Original Post]
These agencies and girls are taking advantage of the vulnerable supply market for majority of the peeps (tackling their weak souls to easily give up wallets aka white armors); whether its inflation or not, if it doesn't help us in the long run, then those simps are toxic to the markets.
What you just described is in fact, how markets work sir (shock and horror).
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 442
 Originally Posted by Phazze93
[View Original Post]
She's 27 - at least that's what she told me. Again, she's hot but the age shows between her and Maia.
Maia seems like she's only gotten her tits done. Whereas Ina has clearly gotten work done on her face.
And her boobjob is starting to sag. Korean style? Fake base, natural feeling topper idk.
Either way she's great, but she's a little too seasoned for me.
Since I have not performed I'd check on Ina, I am agreeing and guessing that Ina age is range between 27-32. So the age of 28 make sense to me, so as the age of low 30.
Either way, Ina is great to me and I like her. So, I really do not care even if she was an actually 40 years old, an age that is top of my threshold for my liking someone.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 1942
Kbliss new flesh alert. A new piece of meat to savor over, unknown if a rebrand, but is all inclusive no upsell.
Viki Jangmi Hana Maia Juni Ina.
-
Banned Member
 Posts: 180
 Originally Posted by BuildingGuy
[View Original Post]
I knew many of the women from the good old days. Moli, Rebecca, La Sera; Meagan, Shannon, Avani, Roya, Cona and many more I don't remember. They were beautiful and gave great service. The fact is that the providers of the New Good Days are equally gorgeous. Stella, Amber, Yoco, Asia, Elle, Cami and Jane, to name a few. Their age doesn't bother me. Yes prices have gone up but no one is forced to partake.
The people accusing these women of GPS syndrome are having a different experience than I am. I can't guess at the reason but as one provider said to me: "I am not a robot. ".
I have seen all of them in the last two months or so (except Stella) and have been thoroughly pleased. The HYAs and the BBF girls are generally not worth seeing. That's my two cents.
By the way there was a period in the '90's when co-eds from UCLA and SC were providing. $150 dollars would get Sally sorority sister to do outcall.
Shannon is down in the OC.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 2422
Supply and demand chains
 Originally Posted by KGConn
[View Original Post]
It's simple, because they can. When Baby Joo was in town, she was $350 with $100 BBFS and $50 MSOG or something like that. And she told me that she was busy the entire day and only had 15 minutes to eat on most days. I asked if those clients were actually paying the upcharges and she said yes.
These agencies and girls are taking advantage of the vulnerable supply market for majority of the peeps (tackling their weak souls to easily give up wallets aka white armors); whether its inflation or not, if it doesn't help us in the long run, then those simps are toxic to the markets.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 711
 Originally Posted by Phazze93
[View Original Post]
Have you tried any of these girls before & know the rates? Being new, can I use simply tell other agencies that I'm verified with kbliss and they can validate me that way?
TER seems somewhat unreliable at times when it comes to age. Range says 21-25, but reviews might state she's 35+ or whatever.
This is the Kgirl marketplace. Age is just a number. Seldom will you get a under 30 kigril. If young is your sole or #1 criteria then go to clubs and get a young civvie there.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 568
 Originally Posted by KGConn
[View Original Post]
It's simple, because they can. When Baby Joo was in town, she was $350 with $100 BBFS and $50 MSOG or something like that. And she told me that she was busy the entire day and only had 15 minutes to eat on most days. I asked if those clients were actually paying the upcharges and she said yes.
Damn, I saw her once and went covered. It was a one and done for me because her face and body isn't my type!
I think so too. But the first time I thought she is mid 20's at first too!
 Originally Posted by BuildingGuy
[View Original Post]
I knew many of the women from the good old days. Moli, Rebecca, La Sera; Meagan, Shannon, Avani, Roya, Cona and many more I don't remember. They were beautiful and gave great service. The fact is that the providers of the New Good Days are equally gorgeous. Stella, Amber, Yoco, Asia, Elle, Cami and Jane, to name a few. Their age doesn't bother me. Yes prices have gone up but no one is forced to partake.
The people accusing these women of GPS syndrome are having a different experience than I am. I can't guess at the reason but as one provider said to me: "I am not a robot. ".
I have seen all of them in the last two months or so (except Stella) and have been thoroughly pleased. The HYAs and the BBF girls are generally not worth seeing. That's my two cents.
By the way there was a period in the '90's when co-eds from UCLA and SC were providing. $150 dollars would get Sally sorority sister to do outcall.
Stella is finally back after a half year vacation.
Funny thing, I've never repeated with any kgirls on MW except Stella. This includes the likes of NG, Elle, Jazmin, Baby Joo, etc.
I have to agree that the legends like Asia and Stella provide the best combination of service and looks.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 126
 Originally Posted by SsStuntCock
[View Original Post]
Better question is why aren't the other girls charging LESS? But let's really put the rat on the table and ask why dudes succumb to such dastardly upcharges to begin with.
It is quite high tbh if comparing to other international destinations. Especially considering you're stuck in a shithole apartment and the red light is so excessive my eyes took an hour to adjust after leaving LOL.
But all things considering, the convenience is quite nice. And the Kgirl providers definitely provide more consistence service than say a TJ / HK chica.
All I know is. If it was say $250 all in (BB+MSOG), I'd be there 2-3 times a week LOL.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 126
 Originally Posted by KGConn
[View Original Post]
It's simple, because they can. When Baby Joo was in town, she was $350 with $100 BBFS and $50 MSOG or something like that. And she told me that she was busy the entire day and only had 15 minutes to eat on most days. I asked if those clients were actually paying the upcharges and she said yes.
Dudes def got the money to spend. If I were to do other providers which each session was $400+, I might reduce my visits to once /2 weeks.
But as an asian guy in his early 30's, I don't really want to drop $400+ on someone who is older than me tbh. There's nothing wrong with them, I just prefer it if they were younger is all.
IE: Vicky over at Kbliss looks like she's almost 40. I completed the session, but was not into it. LOL.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 126
 Originally Posted by SolarisMan
[View Original Post]
Hard to tell the age of an Asian woman but I would not be surprised if she is over 30 years of age!
She's 27 - at least that's what she told me. Again, she's hot but the age shows between her and Maia.
Maia seems like she's only gotten her tits done. Whereas Ina has clearly gotten work done on her face.
And her boobjob is starting to sag. Korean style? Fake base, natural feeling topper idk.
Either way she's great, but she's a little too seasoned for me.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 118
 Originally Posted by SolarisMan
[View Original Post]
Hard to tell the age of an Asian woman but I would not be surprised if she is over 30 years of age!
Facts but not just women. I am Asian and in my mid 30's. Most people still think I am 18-21 LOL.
But ya you can tell with the looseness on her belly when she's CG or DS.
Maia and Juni have become my favorites because of this; well and they have a nice peach bottom. Ina does have a great personality but with all the other talent around hard for me to see her again.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 442
Hard to tell the age of an Asian woman but I would not be surprised if she is over 30 years of age!
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 2367
 Originally Posted by KGConn
[View Original Post]
It's simple, because they can. When Baby Joo was in town, she was $350 with $100 BBFS and $50 MSOG or something like that. And she told me that she was busy the entire day and only had 15 minutes to eat on most days. I asked if those clients were actually paying the upcharges and she said yes.
It was a rhetorical question. One based off of the premise -dare I say fallacy- of the OP: That girls in LA should charge more, not less.
Posting Limitations
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
|
|