Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 12,031 to 12,045 of 49705
-
09-07-23 21:49 #37675Senior Member

Posts: 1363Almost booked her last week but instead I went with reliable Maia
What a 2nd review we have on Candy? It is night and day from post.
Originally Posted by DailyFantasy
[View Original Post]
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...827&viewfull=1#post6579827.
I wonder what happened.
-
09-07-23 21:14 #37674Senior Member

Posts: 328Baby Nako video
Sent DM to op requesting link a couple of days ago but crickets so far.
Originally Posted by TheBude
[View Original Post]
-
09-07-23 21:00 #37673Senior Member

Posts: 328Sua
My post. #37325.
Originally Posted by SturdyBirdy
[View Original Post]
-
09-07-23 20:46 #37672Senior Member

Posts: 442Golden Rule#1: When it comes to the MW inventory of CGLA booker, do not pay attention to any of her MW ads. Only and only you can trust her, if the same girl is advertised with any other booker: The fakest advertising by CGLA booker is her MW / KT territory.
Originally Posted by Undftd88
[View Original Post]
Her West LA and OC crew are advertised by other bookers and you can seek some truth from other booker if you are a good customer.
-
09-07-23 18:16 #37671Banned Member

Posts: 466Thanks!
Fake pics too, I imagine?
Originally Posted by DailyFantasy
[View Original Post]
-
09-07-23 17:43 #37670Regular Member

Posts: 24Baby Nako. Video record?
I really would love to do this.
Has anyone done this? Can anyone provide a clip of the video so I can gauge the situation and lighting?
Would love to get this off my bucket list before I'm too old.
Thanks in advance and hope someone can help before she leaves.
-
09-07-23 16:56 #37669Senior Member

Posts: 37J-girl Natsume
Anyone seen new jgirl Natsume yet who can provide feedback? She's listed as B cup but those pictures are at least a D.
https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/natsume
-
09-07-23 16:46 #37668Senior Member

Posts: 442Candy left the WLA and she is at MW under a new name Belle. And I think that she is featured at MW with a TopAngel booker now.
Originally Posted by DailyFantasy
[View Original Post]
-
09-07-23 16:36 #37667Senior Member

Posts: 417LOL that looks like Lady Sol who worked for a few days at CG / Melo who was charging $340 no bb. She was also a huge rebranded through out the years starting at around 2020. Kinda looks like a Tran, bad attitude, overall doesn't look very clean and worse of all a low quality girl like this that also rush you out the door. Yeah I can totally see why you say to avoid at all cost. Personally I won't even fuck her for $120/ hr.
Originally Posted by DailyFantasy
[View Original Post]
-
09-07-23 15:18 #37666Senior Member

Posts: 46Avoid at all costs
15 years seeing KGirls and just when I thought I've encounter few bad apples in the past, Candy is by far the worst I've seen. I'll spare you the unpleasant details, since they are negative in many perspectives. That said, just avoid seeing her.
Originally Posted by TempletonRat
[View Original Post]
-
09-07-23 13:01 #37665Senior Member

Posts: 178There was a review of Sua in the LA forum somewhere
That review of Sua could have been a warning sign, but I just remembered that the search does not work on strings of 3 or fewer characters. So there's no way this lad could have seen that review. And that sucks, because the review says her waist doesn't curve at all and that she has a boxy build. I like tight boxes, not torsos shaped like you-Haul boxes.
Originally Posted by BobLove
[View Original Post]
-
09-07-23 11:54 #37664Senior Member

Posts: 2006Kbliss Thursday availability roster.
Viki Hana Tami Maia Juni Ina.
-
09-07-23 03:16 #37663Senior Member

Posts: 1245To be fair, M advertises her at 116 lb so you ignored all warning signs.
Originally Posted by BuildingGuy
[View Original Post]
-
09-07-23 00:43 #37662Senior Member

Posts: 442Haha! Isn't that just what I said at post#37667 ? I would say 5 is a right number if you want be generous but 4 or 5 is where I rate that experience also.
Originally Posted by Vulcan1009
[View Original Post]
-
09-07-23 00:11 #37661Senior Member

Posts: 1363One and done
Saw her once because of her initial pix were attractive, but when I see her in person, small A to B cup with overall baby fat body, yes she is young but her face were average at best.
Originally Posted by SsStuntCock
[View Original Post]
Her overall package would go at most a 5 to me. Too many 340 girls better than Sienna or what was her name when she 1st came out.
One thing, name change is always a sign of fishing new client who didn't know, LOL.
You have been warned.













Reply With Quote










