Hot Young Asian Girls

**RockItAllNite** · 07-14-23 09:40

Originally Posted by HanSolo8888 [View Original Post]

Been out of the game for a bit but it seems like more and more, hobbyists are saying that a visit is rushed or ended before full allotted 1 hour visit. Back in the day, 1 hour paid meant 1 hour of service even if the pop is quick and it's just massage and conversation afterwards. Getting the vibe that the appointments are booked literally back to back and no time in between for the girls to freshen up or take a quick smoke break. Cray, cray.

Thoughts anyone? Or is this just a false impression on my part.

I have found that the girls boss / bookers that only let you in at the time or after the appointment time are the ones that book back-to-back.

You know who they are. The boss sets the pace the booker carries out the mandate even if they are from a different org.

Anyone get in early at sesanggirls or kbliss? They booked Erica, Eva, and are the current boss for Maia, Ina and a few others?

**RockItAllNite** · 07-14-23 09:35

Originally Posted by Tbtbfftb [View Original Post]

Yes for popular girls they are booked back to back all. I personally don't try to stay for an hour. I think sessions are typically 45/50 minutes; especially if I had a good time I try to be considerate and give them a few minutes back.

If you really want to get in their good graces you never ask to start your visit before the appointed time. If you schedule for 10 am don't go in before then that give them time back too. Don't forget to tip afterwards, because they don't make enough money off you as well. LOL.

**DankDonk** · 07-14-23 07:10

I noticed her rate went up even before her "first day".

Cool.

**HornyKorean82** · 07-14-23 01:08

I know looks can be subjective but Chloe is def HYA to me.

Looks: does not look like her pics at all and if anything looks closer to Ng's pictures. She has a very tone body and is proportionate all around. She def has had work done to her face including her eyes and nose but very pretty nonetheless. I would rate her a 9 and prettier than baby Yuna or Hana. Ng originally opened the door thinking I was her appointment so I got a good look at her and would rate her slightly above Chloe. Both are def hot and they know it.

E: 6, knows a little but def prefers to speak in Korean.

A: great attitude and was upbeat the whole time. Not a clock watcher and was very engaged to conversation.

S: very sensitive to daty and responsive. Like most, she started with BBBJ with me sitting at edge and had me lay down for another few minutes. She rode on too for several minutes and had great eye contact throughout. Asked her to switch to doggy and the have her lay flat on her stomach while lifting her hips slightly. This made me pop in the bad quick haha. We ended up just talking about Korea, music, places she's been while on travel here, etc.

Are: def on repeat till she leaves. She told me she's likely leaving in August and that I can see Ng after haha.

**SturdyBirdy** · 07-13-23 19:52

https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/ice-cream

I saw Ice Cream and was very underwhelmed. I thought I was going to get the hot, curvy girl in the pics above because she's not a "budget girl" (BBFS and / or MSOG free). I was fooled. Sugar, Mini, and Barbie all look much better than her and are budget girls. This just proves to me that there's not a perfect correlation between pricing and quality with the kgirls.

P. Heavily edited. De-aged. Given a tiny waist and flat stomach. Given the appearance of shapely hips / butt and legs.

L. In her 40's. Rounder face. Waist does not curve at all; it runs straight down. Has a belly. No ass. Back fat fills the low back area, eliminating any potential for "top bum" curvature. Ass is as bad as CL's, and CL is Skinny. Terrific natural Ds, though. I'll give her that. They really are beautiful.

E. Basically no English.

A. Chill. She's like that cool older sister type who looks out for you and sets you straight when you need it.

S. Mediocre BJ, the toothiest I've ever received from a provider. Good kisser. Box is not very tight, so I needed a handy to get finished of for round 2.

E. Standard $320 for an hour, excluding BBFS and MSOG upcharges. Not worth it.

Overall, not worth it IMO. As was my experience with Holly, I expected hour glass, but got Oompa Loompa. Comparing them directly:

Ice cream.

Worse overall body. Better face. Better attitude and more engaged. Box is not tight.

Holly.

"Less bad" waist. Butt is actually full, despite being rather frumpy. Face is very unattractive. Very disengaged in my session. Very tight box, which gave me a "confused boner. ".

If slightly bigger girls are more your speed, have at it. It's just that they are portrayed as more conventionally attractive, but are anything but.

**Tbtbfftb** · 07-13-23 19:11

Yes for popular girls they are booked back to back all. I personally don't try to stay for an hour. I think sessions are typically 45/50 minutes; especially if I had a good time I try to be considerate and give them a few minutes back.

Originally Posted by HanSolo8888 [View Original Post]

Been out of the game for a bit but it seems like more and more, hobbyists are saying that a visit is rushed or ended before full allotted 1 hour visit. Back in the day, 1 hour paid meant 1 hour of service even if the pop is quick and it's just massage and conversation afterwards. Getting the vibe that the appointments are booked literally back to back and no time in between for the girls to freshen up or take a quick smoke break. Cray, cray.

Thoughts anyone? Or is this just a false impression on my part.

**SsStuntCock** · 07-13-23 17:12

Originally Posted by HanSolo8888 [View Original Post]

Been out of the game for a bit but it seems like more and more, hobbyists are saying that a visit is rushed or ended before full allotted 1 hour visit. Back in the day, 1 hour paid meant 1 hour of service even if the pop is quick and it's just massage and conversation afterwards. Getting the vibe that the appointments are booked literally back to back and no time in between for the girls to freshen up or take a quick smoke break. Cray, cray.

Thoughts anyone? Or is this just a false impression on my part.

It's hard for a girl to watch the clock, when her eyes are rolling in the back of her head.

**Howie75** · 07-13-23 16:47

Originally Posted by ImJustAHornyBo [View Original Post]

Limey and Tiny in LA, Dorothy and Stephanie in OC.

Thanks for the recommendation for Tiny, I had an awesome session with her and would definitely see her again.

I originally tried to see Limey based on her slightly petite descriptions through new booker but she was not available so I tried.

Tiny. -https://playtwinkle.com/.

I would consider her HYA, definitely under 30, and would rate her close to Hari / Suzy in terms of looks and service.

Tiny is a bit more service oriented and PSE.

**HanSolo8888** · 07-13-23 12:54

Been out of the game for a bit but it seems like more and more, hobbyists are saying that a visit is rushed or ended before full allotted 1 hour visit. Back in the day, 1 hour paid meant 1 hour of service even if the pop is quick and it's just massage and conversation afterwards. Getting the vibe that the appointments are booked literally back to back and no time in between for the girls to freshen up or take a quick smoke break. Cray, cray.

Thoughts anyone? Or is this just a false impression on my part.

**Kent747** · 07-13-23 11:22

Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty [View Original Post]

My list may change if I do it again. I don't even know what kind of face / body type that I like.

* Celine at http://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/celine26 (fake pics but certified #1 HYA).

* Cami at https://www.kdollsla.com/cami (face pics real but 7 yrs ago).

* NG at http://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/ng (similar to profile pic but prettier).

* Elle at https://www.kdollsla.com/elle (similar to profile pic).

* Hana at https://www.sesanggirls.com/superstarhana (real photoshop pics).

* Ina at https://www.sesanggirls.com/models-ina (real photoshop pics).

* Chloe at http://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/chloe89 (fake pics but certified CYA).

* Haven at http://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/haven11 (face masked pics are real and certified CYA).

* Harper at click here (fake pics but certified CYA).

* Hari at https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/hari (fake pics but certified HYA).

Have not seen Celine or Harper so I can't judge on them. Chloe, Hari / Suzy, and Haven are not in this class to me though. Just my opinion so don't take this too hard.

**SunsetMando** · 07-13-23 10:25

Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]

330 hourly GFE base rate? Please no.

Why not? The normal bargain days are over. But thankfully there are still options for all.

**BonerAppetitty** · 07-13-23 03:21

My list may change if I do it again. I don't even know what kind of face / body type that I like.

* Celine at http://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/celine26 (fake pics but certified #1 HYA).

* Cami at https://www.kdollsla.com/cami (face pics real but 7 yrs ago).

* NG at http://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/ng (similar to profile pic but prettier).

* Elle at https://www.kdollsla.com/elle (similar to profile pic).

* Hana at https://www.sesanggirls.com/superstarhana (real photoshop pics).

* Ina at https://www.sesanggirls.com/models-ina (real photoshop pics).

* Chloe at http://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/chloe89 (fake pics but certified CYA).

* Haven at http://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/haven11 (face masked pics are real and certified CYA).

* Harper at click here (fake pics but certified CYA).

* Hari at https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/hari (fake pics but certified HYA).

Originally Posted by Cm1310 [View Original Post]

Hey guys.

I'm going to be coming to LA from tomorrow to Saturday for a trip.

Who would you say are the absolute top 5 prettiest faces / bodies in LA / OC.

I'm looking to get something of a treat to myself for a good year of work.

Much Appreciated!

**BonerAppetitty** · 07-13-23 03:06

Elle is in my Superior tier for looks but I disagree that 2010 Elle would blow away all current girls in looks. Everyone has their own taste. Her body was and probably still is top tier model for sure. I like her demeanor. She never complains and shows displeasure. Very compliant. I never have to think about impressing her. She's like comfort food.

Originally Posted by Kent747 [View Original Post]

Elle of 2010 would blow away all of the current girls in looks. Purely on visuals, she is probably my top 5-6 of all times. She does not have as warm of demeanor as say Stella or NG and that is probably a negative for many guys.

**Member #2210** · 07-13-23 00:33

Originally Posted by KLoverPanda [View Original Post]

Do you think she is YMMV? I'm not here to defend. As in my very first review I stated she is not a service queen but she's also super sweet and open during our sessions. No boob defense, DFK (not great at it but she let's me take the lead, DATY and FIV no problem, and let's me pound away easily 25-30 minutes no problem. I've seen her 3 times. 1 time as her first client and 2 times as her last and the experience was the same. Are you magnum? It could be she just can't handle a magnum if you are. I'm not so she handles it well. For me her service is great and she jumps through any hoops necessary to accommodate me. What she's lacking IMO is skillset due to being so new and innocent.

I feel bad because I wrote a raving review on her and you're not having a good experience man. LOL.

Don't feel bad bro. It's prob YMMV. I'm not magnum at all. She even said that I was a nice guy and she was very nice to me. She's very pretty and has a real nice body, esp. Those boobs. Maybe some guys suck too hard on her boobs that day and her nips are sored so she defended her boobs that day. Too bad because those boobs are really yummy. And her asking me to try to finish just killed my mood. I didn't consider seeing her a waste of money, it's just not worth repeating if her service doesn't improve.

**SturdyBirdy** · 07-12-23 22:01

Originally Posted by PistolPete357 [View Original Post]

You-mi, who is featured at the top of CGLA page is HYA to me. I don't know if her pictures are real, looks similar but she's damn hot in person. Tight petite body with some booty. I'm sure BA has investigated already. BA can you let us know if she is worthy of HYA status?

How tall is she? Another person here says she's 5'5", which is very different from the advertised 5'2" on CGLA.

Also, how skinny is she?