Thread: Hot Young Asian Girls
+
Add Report
Results 4,486 to 4,500 of 9921
-
07-13-23 19:52 #5436
Posts: 172Ice Cream. Major letdown
https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/ice-cream
I saw Ice Cream and was very underwhelmed. I thought I was going to get the hot, curvy girl in the pics above because she's not a "budget girl" (BBFS and / or MSOG free). I was fooled. Sugar, Mini, and Barbie all look much better than her and are budget girls. This just proves to me that there's not a perfect correlation between pricing and quality with the kgirls.
P. Heavily edited. De-aged. Given a tiny waist and flat stomach. Given the appearance of shapely hips / butt and legs.
L. In her 40's. Rounder face. Waist does not curve at all; it runs straight down. Has a belly. No ass. Back fat fills the low back area, eliminating any potential for "top bum" curvature. Ass is as bad as CL's, and CL is Skinny. Terrific natural Ds, though. I'll give her that. They really are beautiful.
E. Basically no English.
A. Chill. She's like that cool older sister type who looks out for you and sets you straight when you need it.
S. Mediocre BJ, the toothiest I've ever received from a provider. Good kisser. Box is not very tight, so I needed a handy to get finished of for round 2.
E. Standard $320 for an hour, excluding BBFS and MSOG upcharges. Not worth it.
Overall, not worth it IMO. As was my experience with Holly, I expected hour glass, but got Oompa Loompa. Comparing them directly:
Ice cream.
Worse overall body. Better face. Better attitude and more engaged. Box is not tight.
Holly.
"Less bad" waist. Butt is actually full, despite being rather frumpy. Face is very unattractive. Very disengaged in my session. Very tight box, which gave me a "confused boner. ".
If slightly bigger girls are more your speed, have at it. It's just that they are portrayed as more conventionally attractive, but are anything but.
-
07-13-23 19:11 #5435
Posts: 258Session time
Yes for popular girls they are booked back to back all. I personally don't try to stay for an hour. I think sessions are typically 45/50 minutes; especially if I had a good time I try to be considerate and give them a few minutes back.
Originally Posted by HanSolo8888 [View Original Post]
-
07-13-23 17:12 #5434
Posts: 2367Originally Posted by HanSolo8888 [View Original Post]
-
07-13-23 16:47 #5433
Posts: 7Tiny
Originally Posted by ImJustAHornyBo [View Original Post]
I originally tried to see Limey based on her slightly petite descriptions through new booker but she was not available so I tried.
Tiny. -https://playtwinkle.com/.
I would consider her HYA, definitely under 30, and would rate her close to Hari / Suzy in terms of looks and service.
Tiny is a bit more service oriented and PSE.
-
07-13-23 12:54 #5432
Posts: 191 hour = 45 minutes
Been out of the game for a bit but it seems like more and more, hobbyists are saying that a visit is rushed or ended before full allotted 1 hour visit. Back in the day, 1 hour paid meant 1 hour of service even if the pop is quick and it's just massage and conversation afterwards. Getting the vibe that the appointments are booked literally back to back and no time in between for the girls to freshen up or take a quick smoke break. Cray, cray.
Thoughts anyone? Or is this just a false impression on my part.
-
07-13-23 11:22 #5431
Posts: 311Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty [View Original Post]
-
07-13-23 10:25 #5430
Posts: 271?
Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]
-
07-13-23 03:21 #5429
Posts: 3432Top 10 K-Beauties in LA
My list may change if I do it again. I don't even know what kind of face / body type that I like.
* Celine at http://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/celine26 (fake pics but certified #1 HYA).
* Cami at https://www.kdollsla.com/cami (face pics real but 7 yrs ago).
* NG at http://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/ng (similar to profile pic but prettier).
* Elle at https://www.kdollsla.com/elle (similar to profile pic).
* Hana at https://www.sesanggirls.com/superstarhana (real photoshop pics).
* Ina at https://www.sesanggirls.com/models-ina (real photoshop pics).
* Chloe at http://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/chloe89 (fake pics but certified CYA).
* Haven at http://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/haven11 (face masked pics are real and certified CYA).
* Harper at click here (fake pics but certified CYA).
* Hari at https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/hari (fake pics but certified HYA).
Originally Posted by Cm1310 [View Original Post]
-
07-13-23 03:06 #5428
Posts: 3432Elle
Elle is in my Superior tier for looks but I disagree that 2010 Elle would blow away all current girls in looks. Everyone has their own taste. Her body was and probably still is top tier model for sure. I like her demeanor. She never complains and shows displeasure. Very compliant. I never have to think about impressing her. She's like comfort food.
Originally Posted by Kent747 [View Original Post]
-
07-13-23 02:59
Senior Member
-
07-13-23 00:33 #5427
Posts: 451Celine
Originally Posted by KLoverPanda [View Original Post]
-
07-12-23 22:01 #5426
Posts: 172Originally Posted by PistolPete357 [View Original Post]
Also, how skinny is she?
-
07-12-23 21:29 #5425
Posts: 74You-mi CGLA
Saw her today and I would say she's late 20's skinny about 5'5, not a fan of her manmades. But surprised she had some booty on her. It was actually a pretty beautiful sight in doggy. I might repeat just for that.
-
07-12-23 19:33 #5424
Posts: 186Originally Posted by Member#2210 [View Original Post]
I feel bad because I wrote a raving review on her and you're not having a good experience man. LOL.
-
07-12-23 19:01 #5423
Posts: 451Celine
Originally Posted by PistolPete357 [View Original Post]
-
07-12-23 18:55 #5422
Posts: 112Jenny Tits
Originally Posted by TheKidFuture1 [View Original Post]