Los Angeles County Asian Providers

**KalvinHobbs** · 06-10-23 00:48

Originally Posted by Canon88 [View Original Post]

Since many providers are booked through multiple bookers these days. Is there any reason to go to one provider over another?

For example, if I'm verified with both CAK and SAG, and a provider is booked via both, any reason I would book through one booker over the other?

Perhaps if I have more history with one booker over another, maybe that's a reason to go with one over the other? Or maybe I should spread my business around to have more history with more bookers overall? Do any bookers cancel more frequently than others. Or do some providers like it when you book through one booker vs another?

I tried to keep using all my bookers to let them know I'm still active. Don't want to have to verify again specially since I had girls verify for me. Who knows, do they ever delete our info after inactive for a bit?

Not sure if booker from the girls main booker makes a difference or not. When Mila / Mira came to SoCal, I kakao'ed her and she gave me M's number to booker her. Guessing the other bookers go through M to get Mila appts? Not sure how it all works. So maybe booking through main booker would get you quicker response if other bookers are in fact going through M for Mila.

**Tbtbfftb** · 06-10-23 00:10

Agree. I purposely spread around. Rather than eggs in one basket.

Originally Posted by Canon88 [View Original Post]

Since many providers are booked through multiple bookers these days. Is there any reason to go to one provider over another?

For example, if I'm verified with both CAK and SAG, and a provider is booked via both, any reason I would book through one booker over the other?

Perhaps if I have more history with one booker over another, maybe that's a reason to go with one over the other? Or maybe I should spread my business around to have more history with more bookers overall? Do any bookers cancel more frequently than others. Or do some providers like it when you book through one booker vs another?

**BobLove** · 06-09-23 15:07

Originally Posted by Canon88 [View Original Post]

Since many providers are booked through multiple bookers these days. Is there any reason to go to one provider over another?

For example, if I'm verified with both CAK and SAG, and a provider is booked via both, any reason I would book through one booker over the other?

Perhaps if I have more history with one booker over another, maybe that's a reason to go with one over the other? Or maybe I should spread my business around to have more history with more bookers overall? Do any bookers cancel more frequently than others. Or do some providers like it when you book through one booker vs another?

Just book with whichever booker is: responsive, has accurate photos / measurements, updated website, gives good recommendations, not rude. I personally spread out my business so that I am not fked if I get blacklisted by one booker.

**Canon88** · 06-09-23 13:59

Since many providers are booked through multiple bookers these days. Is there any reason to go to one provider over another?

For example, if I'm verified with both CAK and SAG, and a provider is booked via both, any reason I would book through one booker over the other?

Perhaps if I have more history with one booker over another, maybe that's a reason to go with one over the other? Or maybe I should spread my business around to have more history with more bookers overall? Do any bookers cancel more frequently than others. Or do some providers like it when you book through one booker vs another?

**Micca112** · 06-08-23 14:57

Originally Posted by Ggininder [View Original Post]

How you compare Jane's look to Cami's?

Younger or older?

Cami looks younger and has better skin than Jane. Since Jane likes to be tan I noticed her hands were a bit more older and wrinkled. Jane is a bit more warmer than Cami though.

**Mmmmm00** · 06-08-23 09:33

Originally Posted by Ggininder [View Original Post]

How you compare Jane's look to Cami's?

Younger or older?

Haven't seen Cami in a while too but based on how both looked when I last saw Jane, Cami looks younger. Cami is also hotter IMHO.

**Ggininder** · 06-07-23 01:43

Originally Posted by Mmmmm00 [View Original Post]

Haven't seen Jane in 5+ years but she already looked old to me back then. Still fit, more tanned and taller than Elle if memories serve right. Elle has better BBBJ game.

How you compare Jane's look to Cami's?

Younger or older?

**WaffleEater** · 06-06-23 15:26

Originally Posted by MrChu [View Original Post]

Can confirm, excellent GFE service and available at late-hours for all the night-mongers. Had requested a civie-type provider with a natural appearance and Chu didn't disappoint, and exceeded my expectations. The whole experience was like coming home from work to a horny, sensual GF who wanted a good piping before bedtime. She was able to adjust to my rhythm and spent a lot of time DFK and exploring Chu's smooth petite body. Brief break-time between rounds was spent cuddling and finding sensitive spots which, was nice since some providers will jump right into the shower and avoid close-physical contact. Will definitely be adding her to the list of late-night providers on rotation and recommend to anyone looking for a sweetheart GFE-type of experience. Damage: 320.

I just finished a session with her as my first kgirl experience. Definitely a stark difference from what I'm used to. Chu was very personable and meticulous after given instruction of what I was looking for. Her BBBJ was superb and was exceptional in how she was able to DT and eventually letting me bust on those tits. I'm a 2-3 round type of guy and was able to get a 2nd pop in to be able to sample what I now believe to be the tightest snatch ever to come across my way. She said she enjoys doggy and riding more to keep the pace on her time as she's able to cum easier when she rocks her hips in a certain way. Being the gentleman than I am, I allowed her to cum as well before she got flipped back around to get a proper pounding from the back. She was very sweet I will add as she does hold a conversation well while I let junior rest. Superb session overall and she set the bar high for future providers.

The only complaint is that I asked to have her again after the hour was up but none of you must've booked her afterwards and I had to make an appointment for tomorrow.

**Mmmmm00** · 06-06-23 14:11

Originally Posted by AlexisDavis [View Original Post]

Looks like Jane from CAKD OC is in LA for a bit. Always wanted to try her, but OC was always too much of a hassle for me. Anyone know if it's worth the visit? I know she's a fit MILF type, but wondering how she compares to Elle? They were both in OC for a while and seem like they have a similar look.

Haven't seen Jane in 5+ years but she already looked old to me back then. Still fit, more tanned and taller than Elle if memories serve right. Elle has better BBBJ game.

**AlexisDavis** · 06-05-23 14:50

Looks like Jane from CAKD OC is in LA for a bit. Always wanted to try her, but OC was always too much of a hassle for me. Anyone know if it's worth the visit? I know she's a fit MILF type, but wondering how she compares to Elle? They were both in OC for a while and seem like they have a similar look.

**Thud1** · 05-29-23 17:48

Originally Posted by Xnaffie [View Original Post]

Anyone see Lucky? If so what did you think about her? I am interested since they are showing her as squirt and nuru. I feel like she might be a rebrand since I think I saw those pics before but I can't remember what name.

I saw her a couple years ago when she was here in LA for an extended period of time. She was a bubbly 30's provider with a nice butt. I am a magnum guy and she freaked on me and said she could not have sex with me. Very polite about it and returned the donation and I left. I was wondering if she has "loosened up" so to speak. Any of you magnum guys tried her lately?

**ItsEvoix** · 05-29-23 17:19

Originally Posted by HellOnEarth [View Original Post]

I have seen those photos before and have seen her in the past.

This girl has advertised at other forums, don't remember where: might have been sugar daddy sites.

How she got hooked up with K-org is beyond me. Business must be low in Seeking Arrangements. LOL.

Photos are real but these are professional glamor shots. She's probably in her 30's.

Lives at a pad in Hollywood and that's most likely where you'll go.

GFE with good BJ.

Just saw her recently! Pictures are 100% real and she's very good with her BBBJ. No BBFS but overall good GFE service. Something different than korean.

**HellOnEarth** · 05-29-23 12:51

I have seen those photos before and have seen her in the past.

This girl has advertised at other forums, don't remember where: might have been sugar daddy sites.

How she got hooked up with K-org is beyond me. Business must be low in Seeking Arrangements. LOL.

Photos are real but these are professional glamor shots. She's probably in her 30's.

Lives at a pad in Hollywood and that's most likely where you'll go.

GFE with good BJ.

**Cream Inside** · 05-23-23 07:15

Originally Posted by KGirlAddict [View Original Post]

Looks like Sexy Shannon is coming back to town with SAG in OC. Hope she comes back to visit LA too.

From what I remember back when she was here.

P. Real pics and one of the few girls that resembles IRL.

L. Older face, angular decent, looks young, good skin, but very tight body thin not an ounce of fat, big fake tits firm.

E. Good and likes to talk.

A. Very nice attitude, hard working, sensual, engaging, she's a pro in all the good ways.

S. BBBJ, NO RIM, CFS, CIM.

E. As advertised.

Repeat. Get her while you can. Always take for granted while they're here but miss them after they're gone.

https://www.sweetasiangem.com/

Pics aren't up yet on main page.

Looks like sugar daddy finally ran out of cash or got sick of her. Glad to have her back, she will be busy and was missed! I wonder if her service is going to be any good though since she did not anticipate ever doing this type of work again.