Thread: "Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"
+
Add Report
Results 5,656 to 5,670 of 16343
-
09-16-22 18:29 #10688Senior Member

Posts: 1743Good point, and that's the way to dominate a findom c**t. Also got to think mostly the hottest girls can only pull off that findom worship nonsense. Yes there are a lot of pathetic guys out there, but still a limited supply.
Originally Posted by LovePunnany
[View Original Post]
And the same thing applies to some girls who are looking for "Platonic". I've had a couple of them tell me that they put that in there, so they don't get treated like a prostitute quite as much. I usually just hide/block those profiles but might not hurt to talk to a few of them and see what's up.
-
09-16-22 17:39 #10687Senior Member

Posts: 1743Do you really think that the girls on Sugardaddymeet are really that different from Seeking? It sounds like you are correct that you are having good luck on SDMeet, but the girls are not likely to be that different. Of course many girls are on both sites.
Originally Posted by LovePunnany
[View Original Post]
And doing more work, for the same reward, doesn't sound that attractive to me. I would get on SDmeet, just to see if I could find some undiscovered gems, but a naked. smiling 22 y/o who takes a load in her twat is going to be about the same, on either site.
Anyway it's a fun game to try to score girls from multiple sites and glad you are having so much success on there. That's what it's all about. Maybe I will try it, once I go through all my Seeking prospects, but that is going to take some time. I wish I was still in my 20's and could knock out three a week, but those days are long past....
-
09-16-22 16:40 #10686Senior Member

Posts: 174Not her
No, Kennesaw Jessica "Megan" is 5'8" at least and has never been connected to Lawrenceville as far as I know. I saw her in Kennesaw 2 days ago.
Originally Posted by Plisknoob1
[View Original Post]
-
09-16-22 16:34 #10685Senior Member

Posts: 238Sugar Daady Meet
I totally agree with you, I am having more luck and better quality women on Sugar Daddy. Now it does required more work but the pay off is far better that Seeking. I have had four meet this month and some of the best BBBJ I can recall plus they swallow.
Originally Posted by SeekingHead
[View Original Post]
-
09-16-22 16:14 #10684Senior Member

Posts: 238Sugar Daddy Meet Review
So have been communicating with this little beauty, scheduled to meet for lunch this Sunday to see if there is chemistry. If all goes well with the first meet then next week the fireworks will happen. Will keep you mongers posted.
Gentlemen I must say, Sugar Daddy requires more work than Seeking, but to me the pay off is better. There is little to no scammers on Sugar Daddy and the selection of women is better in my opinion.
https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...serId=71355961
-
09-16-22 16:03 #10683Senior Member

Posts: 238Ale
Dude, ignore all that fluff, money talks.
Originally Posted by Machintosh
[View Original Post]
-
09-16-22 14:58 #10682Senior Member

Posts: 331Based on reading her profile. I'm a bit surprised. She seems to only want to be paid with no work. She is asking for findom & subs only.
Originally Posted by LovePunnany
[View Original Post]
-
09-16-22 13:12 #10681Senior Member

Posts: 1743I don't get it either, but this could explain much of it:
Originally Posted by GoneForGood97
[View Original Post]
It is that findom bullshit:
https://www.businessinsider.com/side...ay-pigs-2022-7
-
09-16-22 10:04 #10680Regular Member

Posts: 9Yeah I've only seen the one review this far.
Originally Posted by BillGinn
[View Original Post]
-
09-16-22 00:02 #10679Senior Member

Posts: 159Been positive reviews of her in the past in here someplace.
Originally Posted by StayActive
[View Original Post]
-
09-15-22 23:16 #10678Regular Member

Posts: 9Did you message her recently?
Originally Posted by StayActive
[View Original Post]
-
09-15-22 21:56 #10677Senior Member

Posts: 579What I like is knowing you don't have to send 10 messages a day as 8 out of 10 girls never reply. I send out maybe 1 or 2 a day & only to girls which I am very attracted to. I've found the site is more active with latinas as I've had really good success with them, especially 22-30 year old latina milfs.
Originally Posted by PeterJohnson
[View Original Post]
-
09-15-22 21:38 #10676Senior Member

Posts: 1155I don't recall a Kennesaw Jessica (only been doing SB and SA a year now) but. What in the actual fuck is that profile? The sense of entitlement is breathtakingly cunty.
Originally Posted by Plisknoob1
[View Original Post]
-
09-15-22 20:50 #10675Plisknoob1Guest
Jessica Kennesaw
Is this the famous Jessica from couple years back?
https://members.seeking.com/member/4...?locale=en_USS
-
09-15-22 19:57 #10674Senior Member

Posts: 1743I checked out that site yesterday, and it requires a phone number, so means additional expense is a burner phone, to be able to use the account. Or give them your real name, address, credit card, email, phone #, and SSN, if you like. But that's not how I roll.
Originally Posted by SeekingHead
[View Original Post]
But I was able to search on there, and seemed like very slim pickings in the area. I didn't see the point, with so much more on Seeking.com, but the lower cost of subscription is a factor, to be considered.












Reply With Quote











