MEET AND FUCK TODAY
Click here for the best Sugarbabies
Ava Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Sex Vacation

Thread: Korean Agency BB

+ Add Report
Page 863 of 2811 FirstFirst ... 363 763 813 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 913 963 1363 1863 ... LastLast
Results 12,931 to 12,945 of 42161
This blog is moderated by Admin
  1. #29231
    Quote Originally Posted by LandOfKGirls  [View Original Post]
    New girl advertised on KGLA, Lacie. Pics look great. Is there any intel on her, rebrand, relocation, etc. ?
    I'm almost positive she's M Kara / CG Cara. Face matches (after the usual editing), and I saw her before with those jean panties.

  2. #29230

    KGLA Lacie +++

    New girl advertised on KGLA, Lacie. Pics look great. Is there any intel on her, rebrand, relocation, etc. ?

  3. #29229
    Quote Originally Posted by KalvinHobbs  [View Original Post]
    Nope the Bay Area fortunately does not do the mbpg system.
    Don't forget no up charge for the most part, SF has a true stronghold customer base over there and its quite funny how actual wealthy people are able to keep theirs prices low in bay area but here in LA we have found ways to ruin it.

  4. #29228

    Vixen

    Kind of meh. Slightly disappointed. I personally didn't think she was worth the admission ($340). From the beginning it felt very routine, like she was dead set on going through her regular motions. Didn't feel any passion from her whatsoever and dfk wasnt very enthusiastic on her end. I thought I'd be getting a kick ass PSE time like I did with Pepsi. Maybe I caught her on a bad day but its a one and done for me.

    Blonde, 5'6 to 5'7, she's leaning more towards GILF than MILF, also like one guy said I think her tits need a rework. She's still a busty C but its not as good as most boob jobs I've seen.

  5. #29227

    Sad

    Quote Originally Posted by Tony1628  [View Original Post]
    Timo is great, love her. She is def a high GFE provider who enjoys passionate DFK sessions.
    Timo does have great GFE service. We would always play this game where I hide the tip somewhere in her room when she goes to the bathroom after cleaning me up. She never watches the clock and one time I stayed for hours just talking since I was the last session. I don't know if anyone else noticed but there is sort of this sad look she has like she feels like she's losing her soul or something. Made me feel bad for her which is probably why I stopped seeing her. Anyway glad she's doing well and staying busy.

  6. #29226
    Banned Member


    Posts: 1333

    Stacy Face

    Quote Originally Posted by KingSenpai  [View Original Post]
    Mm I'm going based on the scale that 5 is Okay / Average and 6 is kind of cute, 7 is cute, etc. If you found her "not attractive" wouldn't that be lower than a 5? I found her face hard to look at which is why I rated it a 3. I did rate her body an 8-9 though. Bangin body.
    I think "3" is something that I would not hit at all. She is a "5" or "6" depending on one's taste. I would say that her body really makes up for the visual appearance.

  7. #29225
    Quote Originally Posted by KingSenpai  [View Original Post]
    Mm I'm going based on the scale that 5 is Okay / Average and 6 is kind of cute, 7 is cute, etc. If you found her "not attractive" wouldn't that be lower than a 5? I found her face hard to look at which is why I rated it a 3. I did rate her body an 8-9 though. Bangin body.
    May I suggest doggy? Then you don't need to see her face but that nice curvy ass with small waist.

  8. #29224
    Shill for some place called CG, ignore all posts


    Posts: 168

    For what it's worth

    Quote Originally Posted by TheAbc  [View Original Post]
    I did a quick look at the site and it looks to me girls at other places like CGLA, SAG. I don't understand what's with all these new junior bookers. What are they doing or offering better / different than the more well known ones?
    I would imagine it being catered to with a smaller customer base to take care of. Just think of how many texts CG, Booker Gray, MissKgirl, and M get in a day. It probably helps siphon off traffic that would other wise cause a build up and get us through more efficiently.

  9. #29223
    Quote Originally Posted by GG1234  [View Original Post]
    Is it only LA and its surrounding regions that uses the multiple-bookers-per-girl system? From LA, it seems to have bled through into OC, SD, and LV but it's not as pervasive in those areas. Does the Bay Area do this? What about on the East Coast?
    Bay area does not do this just yet, but I'm afraid it's going to get here eventually.

  10. #29222
    Quote Originally Posted by Calix  [View Original Post]
    "And I believe your post is borderline breaching ToS. " What the hell men, you are kidding me right? Most k-girls in L. A. Came here after doing the same work in other cities. But you said negative things only about Leah & even said the names all the Org she worked for and the names she used there. (Have you met only Leah in all here's you. S?) I felt that your actions were expressing personal malice, so I told you what I thought and what I saw. Did I advertise Leah's "org", like you? Or did I mention another review site? I never advertised to anyone and I never advertised negatively by mentioning the history of a girl. What was inappropriate about my behavior? You are so funny. I read your recommended comment about Leah. Um. Like other girls, she has both bad and good reviews. It seems like other girls I didn't feel any difference. Just as every man has his own girl style, his experience is different. I was wondering why are you.
    Sigh.

    1. The ToS breach I talked about was you attacking me and attempting to discredit me, over my evaluation of the girl. Moderator here has said it's not allowed.

    2. You haven't seen me say negative things about other girls or cite rebrands past orgs? Then you have not my read posts enough. I'm not singling out any girl, trust me. And trust me, you can do a lot worse than Angie / Leah too. I always state many of rebrands and their past names and orgs they've worked at (at least in Nor Cal, where org names still matter). I view it as my duty to tell others where the rebrand has been before and what names she has used so others could look up her reviews.

    3. I thought Google translate would be pretty good nowadays. Guess not.

  11. #29221

    Multiple bookers per girl

    Quote Originally Posted by GG1234  [View Original Post]
    Is it only LA and its surrounding regions that uses the multiple-bookers-per-girl system? From LA, it seems to have bled through into OC, SD, and LV but it's not as pervasive in those areas. Does the Bay Area do this? What about on the East Coast?
    Nope the Bay Area fortunately does not do the mbpg system.

  12. #29220

    1000% agree

    Quote Originally Posted by JrueArtist  [View Original Post]
    Timo is back and better than ever. I missed her, felt so good to be back inside her. I needed some sweet good loving haha. About 5'1 sexy face, skinny, white skin with full Cs and the bounciest jiggliest bubble butt. I just grab handfuls of that ass in CG and DG. I know there are a lot of Timo fans. If you don't know about her service and GFE experience, you should go find out.

    https://misskgirlla.escortbook.com/m...-im-back-56575
    Timo is great, love her. She is def a high GFE provider who enjoys passionate DFK sessions.

  13. #29219

    Stacy's Face

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack926  [View Original Post]
    I have seen Stacy once; I would not rate her face a "3" but maybe a "5" or "6". Her body is definitely 8. 5 or 9. Stacy can go cock hunting at night club and there will be plenty of guys that will go for her because of her body. I do concur that face is not attractive but definitely not a "3".
    Mm I'm going based on the scale that 5 is Okay / Average and 6 is kind of cute, 7 is cute, etc. If you found her "not attractive" wouldn't that be lower than a 5? I found her face hard to look at which is why I rated it a 3. I did rate her body an 8-9 though. Bangin body.

  14. #29218
    Quote Originally Posted by TDLeafs  [View Original Post]
    'Young and Pretty' that's what booker told me about new girl, f'ing lies bec she was neither young or pretty. I would bet she won't last a week.

    Used this agency for yrs but I'll no longer use her, at least her previous booker would not lie like that. No wonder your agency has been declining for some time now.

    Just say you don't know, Don't lie to your long time regular client.
    Do you mind telling us which girl and booker this is? You can PM if you like if you don't want to leave it out here.

  15. #29217

    Tuesday June 7 - SFK and Kbliss

    SFK- https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/models.

    Dana, Tiana, Lucy, Allie, and Joah.

    Kbliss- https://kbliss.net.

    Angel, Tiana, Lucy, Allie, and Joah.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Click here for the best sugar babies
Meet and Fuck Today!
Best Escorts
click for FREE hookups
The Velvet Rooms




click for FREE hookups

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape