Thread: "Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"
+
Add Report
Results 6,361 to 6,375 of 16349
-
05-30-22 11:16 #9989Senior Member

Posts: 213Well, she just changed her location from Union City to Salt Lake City, UT. Maybe just a pic seller.
Originally Posted by JohnnyMapalo
[View Original Post]
-
05-30-22 11:10 #9988Senior Member

Posts: 483Bro, did you miss the part where I said "I passed"? Just passing along info, so others know what they are up against.
Originally Posted by JohnnyMapalo
[View Original Post]
-
05-30-22 08:57 #9987Senior Member

Posts: 2044Bro. The red flags are all over that profile. That profile is only 2 days old. Red flag number 1. Theirs's only 1 picture in the profile. Red flag number 2. She's in Union City (most likely hood spot). Red flag number 3. She wants 400 ppm in the hood. Red flag number 4. Boy, some of you dudes must either be bored or just desperate.
Originally Posted by SoonerFan72
[View Original Post]
-
05-30-22 07:34 #9986Senior Member

Posts: 483Last Login
They can hide the last login, but when you do a search, they still show up between two people who last logged in before and after them, so you can deduce if it was an hour ago or last month.
Originally Posted by JoyDrop
[View Original Post]
-
05-30-22 00:02 #9985Senior Member

Posts: 1743I got together with them a couple of times. BFS for both and I think was 400. They were both very cool, and laid back. Not supermodel types, but fun.
Originally Posted by YeOldHornDawg
[View Original Post]
-
05-29-22 19:42 #9984Senior Member

Posts: 483SharpCutie
Pro vibe, straight to business, no chatting. Sent a few pics, if it was her, she is cute. Wanted 400 ppm, plus I had to get a room. I passed.
https://members.seeking.com/member/b...f-476ed8de9d62
-
05-29-22 19:36 #9983Senior Member

Posts: 61I had Marie solo once last year. Wasn't bad, BFS and all. She then tried to move me to CFS and raised her rates. I stopped responding.
Originally Posted by YeOldHornDawg
[View Original Post]
-
05-29-22 00:33 #9982Regular Member

Posts: 11Thank you
Thanks for the input, will follow your feedback.
Originally Posted by SoonerFan72
[View Original Post]
-
05-28-22 10:39 #9981Senior Member

Posts: 105There aren't many reasons for a girl to have a premium account. Here's what you get with a premium account:
Originally Posted by SugarDaddio
[View Original Post]
Communicate without a public photo.
Ability to hide profile from searches.
Ability to hide online status.
Ability to hide last login country.
Display multiple profile locations.
Able to view when their message has been read.
I've noticed a trend over the years where women who are playing the field pretty hard / value their privacy will pay for premium so they can hide their online status and last login date. It's easy to see how that might be worth paying for if you are seeing multiple guys and some of them want to think they're exclusive, or are otherwise stalking their account.
Apart from that, there's not really any reason for a woman to pay as they get to message guys for free. It's worth noting that college students with a. Edu address could upgrade to premium for free at one time, not sure if that's still the case now.
So to answer your question directly, a female premium member is most likely either:
- a college student with a free upgrade.
Or.
- a woman who feels it's worth paying for the additional privacy a premium subscription provides.
-
05-27-22 20:16 #9980Senior Member

Posts: 483ObscureMermaid
Pic and vid scammer.
https://members.seeking.com/member/5...0-c7559ab1be2f
-
05-27-22 17:22 #9979Senior Member

Posts: 85Marie and Rae
I did a report on them about mid summer last year and just sent you a PM.
Originally Posted by YeOldHornDawg
[View Original Post]
-
05-27-22 16:16 #9978Senior Member

Posts: 213Threesome in Cartersville
Anyone tried these ladies before? One is named Marie, don't know the other one. Not necessarily top shelf but I've never done a threesome before so what the hell? Quoting 450 for both and they can host. Only reservation is how quickly they pushed to meet which gives either pro or scam vibes.
https://members.seeking.com/member/a...8-c719320d9c42
-
05-27-22 15:47 #9977Senior Member

Posts: 1160Yeah, I wouldn't have bothered to waste my time messaging that profile. Most of the scammer red flags are there. Profile is only a few days old, only 1 photo on the profile, seems to constantly be online. Since "she's" opposed to messaging guys who use burner numbers, I'd bet this is setting up a phishing / blackmail scheme. She wants your legit number that she can look up to find your real I'd info. Likely she would initiate sexting, try to get a dick pic out of you, then use your real I'd to look you up on social media (facebook, linkedin, instagram, etc) and threaten to send your pic and / or embarassing texts to your wife / family unless you pay a "ransom. ".
Originally Posted by SoonerFan72
[View Original Post]
By filtering out any guy who is using text / burner app, she's ensuring the guys she does talk to will be a lot more likely to fall for the scam (since they weren't smart enough to have any OpSec) and "she'll" be able to get a lot more info from them, and they're more likely to send their real face pic.
-
05-27-22 15:36 #9976Senior Member

Posts: 1160One way is to do a reverse phone lookup and see who the listed carrier is. I use numlookup.com occasionally. When I look up my GV number, it tells me it "is a voip number serviced by Google (Grand Central) - SVR". If instead it says it's an AT&T, Verizon, or other carrier, then you know it's a "real" phone number. If it lists a company you haven't heard of, you can google it and will often find out it's a VOIP service instead of standard phone service.
Originally Posted by CuriousInquir
[View Original Post]
-
05-27-22 15:31 #9975Senior Member

Posts: 479How does anyone know if you're using google voice, a burner, or a regular phone? I didn't know it was detectable. I'd love to know how to tell.
Originally Posted by SoonerFan72
[View Original Post]












Reply With Quote










