Korean Agency BB

[SixDNine]

Pun intended. Thanks for the warning GD58. Got a bit intrigued about the Bay area gangster session you described. Is this the GPS to skip?

https://2020lsc.com/hera/

That is a different girl. I think the one he's referring to was Pink at BGC.

[ReDtoLaunch]

Yes Fanny / NY Orange same. She has been on the east coast for a few months. I did not like her, saw her in wla before.

Speaking about girls named Hera. That horrible GPA girl Hera / Jane is roaming the west coast again. She was in NorCal recently with new pics and got a horrendous / violent review on another site the Bay Area uses. Poor guy was grabbed by his collar. She was gone the next day. Check out her new pics in Seattle currently at Kangels org. I would guess she'll come down here next. Beware LOL.

Pun intended. Thanks for the warning GD58. Got a bit intrigued about the Bay area gangster session you described. Is this the GPS to skip?

https://2020lsc.com/hera/

[Toungsten]

You started the conversation by saying.

"You have no leverage. This is an illegal operation. Can't call the Better Business Bureau, leave a bad review on Yelp, or complain on to the corporate account on Twitter. They want your business but don't need your business".

And I merely said that we have leverage. That leverage is in publicly being able to talk about blacklists and bad product. If one person walks and doesn't talk about it, it's one thing. If five people walk and post about it publicly, that's another. When twenty people walk and post the name of org in big scarlet letter, that's twenty hours and 3 k.

You are absolutely right that one should be prepared for the consequences. I disagree with you vehemently about us having no leverage tho. There's plenty of leverage. And just like one should be prepared for the consequences, he should be prepared to strike back.

They come and go through the revolving door and the cash keeps rolling in. The demand outweighs the supply by far. Always has and always will.

[LandOfKGirls]

You started the conversation by saying.

"You have no leverage. This is an illegal operation. Can't call the Better Business Bureau, leave a bad review on Yelp, or complain on to the corporate account on Twitter. They want your business but don't need your business".

And I merely said that we have leverage. That leverage is in publicly being able to talk about blacklists and bad product. If one person walks and doesn't talk about it, it's one thing. If five people walk and post about it publicly, that's another. When twenty people walk and post the name of org in big scarlet letter, that's twenty hours and 3 k.

You are absolutely right that one should be prepared for the consequences. I disagree with you vehemently about us having no leverage tho. There's plenty of leverage. And just like one should be prepared for the consequences, he should be prepared to strike back.

Maybe you should share some intel on your recent visits with k-girls in this forum. Move the other topic (s) to a new thread.

[PussyDestroyr]

Anyone TTOFT on this one yet? I'm a bit weary when they describe 5'4 115 lb. Usually means fake pics and is fat.

https://www.candygirlla.com/%EB%85%B8%EB%B0%94

Anyone meet her yet? My ears and cock are perked.

[Cricket79]

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were largely argumentative. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!

[RocketManP]

This conversation is boring and crops up every month, somehow the simple response "be prepared for any consequence if you walk out on an appointment" gets twisted and morphed into a grander argument. Nobody said don't share reviews and intel -- by all means, is that not why we are all here? But if someone asks what might happen if they walk out, well they have to be prepared to accept any consequence. Somehow this irrefutable, incontrovertible fact spawns multiple paragraphs of whining every time. Can we please turn the page?

You started the conversation by saying.

"You have no leverage. This is an illegal operation. Can't call the Better Business Bureau, leave a bad review on Yelp, or complain on to the corporate account on Twitter. They want your business but don't need your business".

And I merely said that we have leverage. That leverage is in publicly being able to talk about blacklists and bad product. If one person walks and doesn't talk about it, it's one thing. If five people walk and post about it publicly, that's another. When twenty people walk and post the name of org in big scarlet letter, that's twenty hours and 3 k.

You are absolutely right that one should be prepared for the consequences. I disagree with you vehemently about us having no leverage tho. There's plenty of leverage. And just like one should be prepared for the consequences, he should be prepared to strike back.

[Ramen25]

Interestingly, she reminds alot of Allie in many ways, though they have totally different faces, body wise I think they are pretty much the same. Petite and curvy.

Also they both kind of have that classy vibe to them (done up hair / make up, etc). Sweet is just a younger version in my opinion.

[Eponymously]

Orgs and even girls read this forum. Good. They will lose money on each PUBLIC negative review and feedback. Good. The more they lose on shitty practices, the better. Zero sympathy for "businesses" that deceive. Reviews matter. If they didn't, the orgs wouldn't muster up fake reviews, use shills, or get panties in a bunch each time a negative review went public. They should worry about providing better quality instead of keeping feedback under wraps. When you're worried about the public finding out more than you do about public consuming inferior product, you show what you really think about customers.

This conversation is boring and crops up every month, somehow the simple response "be prepared for any consequence if you walk out on an appointment" gets twisted and morphed into a grander argument. Nobody said don't share reviews and intel -- by all means, is that not why we are all here? But if someone asks what might happen if they walk out, well they have to be prepared to accept any consequence. Somehow this irrefutable, incontrovertible fact spawns multiple paragraphs of whining every time. Can we please turn the page?

[ICloud319]

Hello, can anyone recommend someone who is not really spinner but offers bare and kind of newbie friendly like hotklovers? Thanks!

[Jack926]

As another poster said I think Yoojin and Lola might be the same person. The pics of CG Yoojin if I remember correctly are from NorCal's Lola old ad. The current pictures used for CG Lola now are the new pics she uses for Redhot org in NorCal. Double posted based off pics. Search for Lola pics from Welcome2kcuties and Lola from RedhotK, same girl. Wait for her to go back to NorCal soon and see her for much cheaper if youre interested. Shes been around for a couple years, tall skinny and older than pics suggest.

Thanks for the Intel. Chanel from "M" was a great F**K. I would have spin that P**SY one more time for the road.

[SuperMan333]

As another poster said I think Yoojin and Lola might be the same person. The pics of CG Yoojin if I remember correctly are from NorCal's Lola old ad. The current pictures used for CG Lola now are the new pics she uses for Redhot org in NorCal.

Hey bro I would stay away from Yoojin. She looks about 40. I saw how she looks since she was Kara's room mate.

[GoldDust58]

The photo of her face and description matches to T with old Chanel from the booker "M". I wonder if that is her as she was a solid provider with booker "M".

As another poster said I think Yoojin and Lola might be the same person. The pics of CG Yoojin if I remember correctly are from NorCal's Lola old ad. The current pictures used for CG Lola now are the new pics she uses for Redhot org in NorCal. Double posted based off pics. Search for Lola pics from Welcome2kcuties and Lola from RedhotK, same girl. Wait for her to go back to NorCal soon and see her for much cheaper if youre interested. Shes been around for a couple years, tall skinny and older than pics suggest.

[GtsServe99]

Woo wee this activity is expensive. Wish I chose a hobby less addicting like gambling or snorting cocaine perhaps.

[RocketManP]

Got to love this one. Discussing business ethics with transactions being made on both sides that are unethical and illegal. Living in an upside down world. Let's get back to what this forum is all about. Pussy.

I've already said that its unfair and dishonest to cherry pick whenever it's convenient that it's an illegal biz, yet also try to compare it to "any business" when it suits an argument.

Discussion about business practices that sell pussy and how to deal with pussy that is hyped up and then dumped on us is part of discussion about pussy.

Stale pussy, rebranded pussy, hyped up pussy, pussy that some want to walk from. Pussy that is so different from advertised pussy in a bad way, people should say "don't give money to this pussy store" . NOT just not go there themselves. Actively discouraging others from buying pussy there and making sure they lose money. The argument always goes like "your money don't matter". Yeah but collective money does. If orgs and subpar girls don't get it, they will when a bad review hits all forums every time this girl is rebranded and starts.

Good example is this Hera nutcase GoldDust just mentioned. She isn't worth a single penny to fuck. She needs to pay me a G to fuck her again. I'll follow her rebrand journey tho and make sure to warn mongers in any corner of the globe what she's about.

I consider it my duty to other mongers. Each time she turns a trick that a monger is upset about, it resonates with me as well.

Guys forget that this is an illegal / UTR "business" that is not required to follow the usual rules and protocol of regular businesses. Both and business and customer take risks in engaging in transactions. Customers may not like the way the business conducts itself, but that's the way it goes. When the business is also an oligopoly, then that allows the business to have the upper hand. Also, when certain practices are known (e. G. , "tricking" customers with fake pictures, or Bling customers who don't follow their strict rules, unchanging), then customers shouldn't be surprised or start complaining about how these organizations are bad businesses and need to change. As has been pointed out, this is a free market, and customers do not have to use these bookers. If these agencies were not the best deal for the price, then hobbyists would be leaving and going to other sources. Instead, we are seeing an influx of new customers, who want to get in on this.

This is what happens when you go from "any business" to "secret exclusive club" mantra. Suddenly biz rules don't apply and there's fear of being kicked out.

customers shouldn't...start complaining about how these organizations are bad businesses and need to change.

I don't see the connection. All I'm saying is that we have control. All we need is to publicly blast the org and / or girl (given its a truthful recap) on active forum threads. You walked? Put this experience on the forum. The girl was awful and you stayed only to avoid facing a bl threat? Put this shit up on the forum.

Orgs and even girls read this forum. Good. They will lose money on each PUBLIC negative review and feedback. Good. The more they lose on shitty practices, the better. Zero sympathy for "businesses" that deceive. Reviews matter. If they didn't, the orgs wouldn't muster up fake reviews, use shills, or get panties in a bunch each time a negative review went public. They should worry about providing better quality instead of keeping feedback under wraps. When you're worried about the public finding out more than you do about public consuming inferior product, you show what you really think about customers.

Again, not enough to just not give money yourself. It's natural to tell others to not give them money. That's how you deal with it. The girl was so off you walked? Let everyone know on the forum. Now all those guys on the fence about toftting won't do it. Boom. People who trust the reviewer won't go. Boom. It's a domino game. It's not a domino game if you just tell the PO and hence keep the info under wraps. Public posts is what they fear most. So that's where mongers have most control. Call them out publicly.