Korean Agency BB

[SplendidOrchid]

Saw Aubrey and had a great time, like everyone else (except for the one monger that only complained about her a couple days ago). Fantastic figure, great energy, and definitely works to please! I definitely wish I had the funds to see her every week.

[BonerAppetitty]

I know they are rebrand too. I am not coming if I recognize pics from the past and don't remember anything good about them. I don't need to remember names.

Yoojin was Lola in the Bay. CandyGirl Lola also looks familiar. I almost thought CG Lola and CG Yoojin are the same girl.

Sunny / Sujin may be Queen Hera in the Bay.

HappyKBunny Collin / Seolah was also in the Bay and here before too.

Jewelry's Monica may be Cara's Angel Sharon. Sharon was my favorite actually.

AOV Minka was here before and was previously VAC CL.

These other girls look familiar so they were here before: 2 pop Giselle, CG Roxy, BG Joy5, AOV Beti, MissKgirlLA Jemini, M Rose, M Leah might be CG Riah, CG Fanny / BG NY_Orange look like same girl and were here before.

M Sarah is former gray / CG Aubrey (someone already mentioned this one).

M Kara / CG Cara is former Victoria with gray / CG.

CG Jiwoo / gray Jiu is from Norcal as Jun with Viola and Coco with Bunnygirls. Her face and body lower ratings but good service.

CG Sammy from NorCal Lana at SweetAngels (someone might have already mentioned this).

If you all recognize any rebrands or NorCal transplants please post. A few rough ones coming from SweetAngels in NorCal are mixed in down her I'm hearing. Do not want to walk into some of them. I want to say rebrand reporting is not always a bad thing and sometimes girls change because new org. I dont want it to be seen as always a negative thing.

[Estrange]

Had a chance to see Tiana recently, was looking forward to it given good things I heard but it just wasn't that great.

LFK / DFK was nmcot, her lips were rough and felt chapped. When we got down to business, she felt pretty loose and it was hard to finish. Granted, I'm not the biggest out there but I haven't had any issues with other gals in the past. I'm beginning to wonder if I got someone else.

She has a tattoo on her collar bone, if she didn't have that then you got someone else.

Yes, Tiana has a tattoo on the collarbone. I disagree on two counts.

Count 1: her dfk gave me an instant hard on. The moment I entered, she had me locked in dfk with my clothes still on. I have visited her multiple times and so she might be giving me preferential treatment. I guess YMMV.

Count 2: her pussy is the best I ever had. My cock is below average and even I found her pussy tight last time I visited her. In fact, as I was inserting, she slightly gasped. I felt bad and really slowed down. Once it was in all the way, I went to town with her. Other mongers have attested to the glory of her pussy. Not sure what went wrong with you.

[BustedStr8]

My take on ads that state age:

21 = 22-30.

22 = 28-35.

23 = 30-39.

24 = 35-45.

25 = 40-49.

26 = fuggetabouddit.

Personally I think there is a high correlation between age and quality of service (e. G. , Allie, Cona, Pepsi, Nana and the other service queens), but the ads keep the ages low because men in Asian cultures treat working girls like Christmas cake: no good after the 25th.

[BustedStr8]

Visit on time, she was prompt to let me in at appt time. Door opens, she was older than pictures and looks about average kgirl. Used bathroom to pee, came back, she pulls my jogging pants down and went on her knees to give a satisfying sloppy BBBJ. I picked her up with her arm around my neck as I banged her standing up, legs starting to get tired, I dropped her on the bed and proceeded to mish, pounded her hard, unloaded cip. She wiped herself with tissues and proceeded to give me another BBBJ, then went in for cg, she bounced hard on me, unloaded another cip. She wiped off again, the gave HJ and BBBJ with dt, made me blow my load cim. I spent five minutes over the hour total and it was great, considering Shower was skipped before action started. Will repeat for service wise.

Apparently somebody gave her the message. You're welcome.

[Toungsten]

Well, yeah. Nothing you said contradicted what I said. Generating profit is the goal of any business.

The question is how business is done. Is it done in a way to trick you and then strongarm you, or is the business transparent? Ethics are a thing in business. There are mechanisms in legal biz world to prevent consumer from being taken advantage of.

And if someone thinks a company is unethical, it is well within their right to not only not give the company the money, but also to try to get others to not give them money. In our world, it is done through giving bad reviews / minis (as long as they're truthful) or shitting on the org in an active thread such as this one.

My point was that people always say mongers lack control. The reviews are what mongers control fully. The reviews directly affect the biz money. The same orgs become hypocritical and practice double standards with good reviews and bad reviews. They encourage good reviews and then either threaten bl or request that the feedback doesn't go public with bad ones. As a result, many positive reviews might as well be called advertising, because they bring in money. I have no doubt many positive reviews are monetized in some way, shape, or form. Same goes for walking. If the girl looks 40 pounds heavier and 20 years older and you can't get it up for her, you walk and then post publicly on the forum. If your opinion is trusted, that will hit an org where it hurts - $. Good. That's the point. Every monger with just a tiny bit of cred has that power.

Got to love this one. Discussing business ethics with transactions being made on both sides that are unethical and illegal. Living in an upside down world. Let's get back to what this forum is all about. Pussy.

[JoyTraveller]

Nice, high-quality BBFS. From start to finish, high-quality kind of a girl and service to boot.

A little porn-star cuttie. She met me at the door with very scanty black leathers, kind of a dominatrix look, her big beautiful tits in the air and a little black G-string. She is very pretty, reminiscent of Daisy's sweet hotness, and much more pretty in person than in her pictures, even though her pics are quite good (real photos BTW). She's colored her hair to a lighter brown color, which suits her well.

I think she's very pretty, her look kind of characteristic of a traditional Korean or Japanese beauty: big oval eyes, a somewhat sharp nose, and a very delicate mouth. Good LKF / DFK in my opinion.

She took control pretty much from the start of the session like only a pro knows how to do. For example, bathroom, washing hands and doing mouthwash. She kisses me and drops straight to her knees for very nice sloppy BJ. Then ends up hoisting her own left leg up onto the sink, asking for some reciprocity. That quickly went to some doggy.

She was imaginative too. She had us change positions a number of times doing different variations of doggy, so that we could look at one another in different mirrors. That was fucking sweet (in the sense that I had never gotten into mirrors like that).

She was dirty in the sweetest and exhilarating ways. I believe it's called 'Russian' for you pros out there, but her getting on her knees, me sitting on the edge of the bed, and her sandwiching my sword between very nice big natural Cs (I don't know how to estimate tit sizes), and drooling down her own tits before going to town on me, over and over again. I had no idea how good that feels when done correctly. Amen.

Anyway, she was young, very cute, and very good at everything. Highly recommend for you guys wanting that younger, tighter, curvy kind of a body. She is fun and very enthusiastic. Good in bjj, foreplay, and enthusiastically fucking across a whole gambit of positions.

Kgla. Jane is I think is a good booker.

[BuddhaHead]

"Any business" has bbb and yelp reviews and can easily be (and does get) sued for false advertisement.

My initial response was to the claim that there aren't such mechanisms here. It's true, but it doesn't mean mongers don't get control and can't influence money flowing to pocket of offending orgs.

I don't think it's fair to pick and choose when it's convenient to call it "any business" and then turn around and say "but it's illegal" to justify any other transgressions. Either its like any business and hence entitled to same consumer protection mechanisms, or it is not and its a wild wild west.

If any business like a cake business offers me a stale or expired product on the shelf, I'm going to blast both the business and product. In most business I can return this product for a full refund if it was an expired product. And when people find out your cool festival is fyre festival, they going to be mad and will demand refunds. It's natural. Most businesses operate under assumption that customer is always right. Not that the seller is always right and the seller can do whatever it wants to do.

Any business don't have constant threat of bl and encouraging appeasement, explicit suppression of negative feedback and so forth.

Guys forget that this is an illegal / UTR "business" that is not required to follow the usual rules and protocol of regular businesses. Both and business and customer take risks in engaging in transactions. Customers may not like the way the business conducts itself, but that's the way it goes. When the business is also an oligopoly, then that allows the business to have the upper hand. Also, when certain practices are known (e. G. , "tricking" customers with fake pictures, or Bling customers who don't follow their strict rules, unchanging), then customers shouldn't be surprised or start complaining about how these organizations are bad businesses and need to change. As has been pointed out, this is a free market, and customers do not have to use these bookers. If these agencies were not the best deal for the price, then hobbyists would be leaving and going to other sources. Instead, we are seeing an influx of new customers, who want to get in on this.

[RocketManP]

"The reviews have very little effect. The long time providers i.e. 10 years or more may have 300 or 400 reviews. If they have 1,200 customers a year that indicates that reviews reflect less than 3% or less of their business. The superstars and UTRs really have as much business as they want and are quite rich (and also get expensive presents such as Rolex watches and Cartier jewelry from their regulars). The 90 day wonders just work as hard as they can and walk away with much more than they could make in a year in an ordinary job in Korea. There are some providers who are long termers and who are doing well by civilian standards but nothing like the Superstars. They probably would like to have better reviews - e.g. Nuri, Yoona. ".

I agree about established / star providers.

But we were talking about walking, so presumably a new or rebranded entity we have no idea of. We have a great idea of what a superstar who's 5 years deep in the game is and how she looks and how good service is.

The ratio of reviews to visit doesn't matter much. If the first several reviews of a new girl are negative, she is going to get far less business. If this wasn't the case, the orgs wouldn't balk at bad reviews, especially of new / rebranded girls. I know for a fact an agency who upon receiving a bad ter review contacts the monger either by phone or dm demanding to know why they haven't withheld the review. If the reviews didn't matter they wouldn't give a shit. With established providers they don't care as much for a random bad review. For a new provider? Oh yeah they do and if you write that you walked ont on the first day (as long as it was true), it will lose them money. Good.

[LandOfKGirls]

I've been quiet because most of my sessions have been spent with Remi lately.

Remy. Hmmmm. Maybe I should check her out. Pics look good but I hadn't noticed much chatter about her so I haven't yet taken the plunge.

[BuildingGuy]

Well, yeah. Nothing you said contradicted what I said. Generating profit is the goal of any business.

The question is how business is done. Is it done in a way to trick you and then strongarm you, or is the business transparent? Ethics are a thing in business. There are mechanisms in legal biz world to prevent consumer from being taken advantage of.

And if someone thinks a company is unethical, it is well within their right to not only not give the company the money, but also to try to get others to not give them money. In our world, it is done through giving bad reviews / minis (as long as they're truthful) or shitting on the org in an active thread such as this one.

My point was that people always say mongers lack control. The reviews are what mongers control fully. The reviews directly affect the biz money. The same orgs become hypocritical and practice double standards with good reviews and bad reviews. They encourage good reviews and then either threaten bl or request that the feedback doesn't go public with bad ones. As a result, many positive reviews might as well be called advertising, because they bring in money. I have no doubt many positive reviews are monetized in some way, shape, or form. Same goes for walking. If the girl looks 40 pounds heavier and 20 years older and you can't get it up for her, you walk and then post publicly on the forum. If your opinion is trusted, that will hit an org where it hurts - $. Good. That's the point. Every monger with just a tiny bit of cred has that power.

"The reviews have very little effect. The long time providers i.e. 10 years or more may have 300 or 400 reviews. If they have 1,200 customers a year that indicates that reviews reflect less than 3% or less of their business. The superstars and UTRs really have as much business as they want and are quite rich (and also get expensive presents such as Rolex watches and Cartier jewelry from their regulars). The 90 day wonders just work as hard as they can and walk away with much more than they could make in a year in an ordinary job in Korea. There are some providers who are long termers and who are doing well by civilian standards but nothing like the Superstars. They probably would like to have better reviews - e.g. Nuri, Yoona. ".

[RocketManP]

Orgs have the freedom to unilaterally set rules with mongers and get the rewards or suffer the consequences of doing so.

Mongers have the freedom to unilaterally choose whether to see the girls, pay the prices, patronize the orgs, etc. , etc. , etc. And get the rewards or suffer the consequences of doing so.

If I feel compelled enough to walk from a session or post a bad review or comments then I won't hesitate to do so. I have my big boy pants on and will deal with whatever happens next.

Reviews and other forums help spread the word both good and bad and do influence other mongers' decisions.

These orgs, in my opinion, pay attention to reviews and are generally anonymous participants in most private chat rooms as well. They do see what's being said and oftentimes to react in a favorable way. We don't always see what the orgs are doing behind the scenes. They want their businesses to continue and generate profits.

Well, yeah. Nothing you said contradicted what I said. Generating profit is the goal of any business.

The question is how business is done. Is it done in a way to trick you and then strongarm you, or is the business transparent? Ethics are a thing in business. There are mechanisms in legal biz world to prevent consumer from being taken advantage of.

And if someone thinks a company is unethical, it is well within their right to not only not give the company the money, but also to try to get others to not give them money. In our world, it is done through giving bad reviews / minis (as long as they're truthful) or shitting on the org in an active thread such as this one.

My point was that people always say mongers lack control. The reviews are what mongers control fully. The reviews directly affect the biz money. The same orgs become hypocritical and practice double standards with good reviews and bad reviews. They encourage good reviews and then either threaten bl or request that the feedback doesn't go public with bad ones. As a result, many positive reviews might as well be called advertising, because they bring in money. I have no doubt many positive reviews are monetized in some way, shape, or form. Same goes for walking. If the girl looks 40 pounds heavier and 20 years older and you can't get it up for her, you walk and then post publicly on the forum. If your opinion is trusted, that will hit an org where it hurts - $. Good. That's the point. Every monger with just a tiny bit of cred has that power.

[LandOfKGirls]

M Sarah is former gray / CG Aubrey (someone already mentioned this one).

M Kara / CG Cara is former Victoria with gray / CG.

CG Jiwoo / gray Jiu is from Norcal as Jun with Viola and Coco with Bunnygirls. Her face and body lower ratings but good service.

CG Sammy from NorCal Lana at SweetAngels (someone might have already mentioned this).

If you all recognize any rebrands or NorCal transplants please post. A few rough ones coming from SweetAngels in NorCal are mixed in down her I'm hearing. Do not want to walk into some of them. I want to say rebrand reporting is not always a bad thing and sometimes girls change because new org. I don't want it to be seen as always a negative thing.

Always appreciate learning of rebrands, many thanks for your shining the light on these.

Also, I also do not think rebranding is negative, not at all. Have seen girls who changed orgs and were given a new name and had fun with them. I've also followed some favs to new orgs and under new names when they just wanted a better location or situation. K-girl drama extends to roommate conflicts and I've known a couple k-girls who changed orgs just to get away from roommates.

I also want to learn of rebrands so I can avoid girls I've seen and who I don't want to repeat with.

[Pyhan83]

Anyone TTOFT on this one yet? I'm a bit weary when they describe 5'4 115 lb. Usually means fake pics and is fat.

https://www.candygirlla.com/%EB%85%B8%EB%B0%94

[GoldDust58]

I've been quiet because most of my sessions have been spent with Remi lately.

Sora- new girl at lavixen / pkl crew. I got a text as soon as my monger buddy got out saying she was worth a dive so I made an afternoon time. Agree with him is that she is pretty. Not stunning but def a pretty face. Her build is between Remi and Berry / Cosmo. Not as rail thin as Remi but more fit body than Berry. Perky C MM and with grabable booty not flat. She has pretty good energy, first day excitement, and did all she could to please. I would compare her closest to Remi but more energetic and better BBBJ. Remi still my number one but Sora can def take up some of my time. Solid 8. 5 overall. Nice addition. I'm laughing because there are some characteristics of Hana in some of these girls. Their trainer needs a nice tip whoever she is.

Nicole. Had not seen Nicole since her last her and before she went up to NorCal. She has def lost weight and is more spinner build now. She denies being skinner but she is def skinner. C tits look great on her figure and reminded me of Hana's body from the front but from the back she is missing Hana's ass. Spinner lovers will like Nicole. Huge energy, this girl can go. Rode CG for a while and then let me pick her up for some heated standing mish. Not my usually body style but her little body with good size tits made for a good time. Still a solid 8 overall. She is the spinner version of Allie in service.