I saw Molly recently at her location near Mayfair. I found her to be sweet and in a good mood. If you like petite, her body is to die for. Simply amazing. After some light kissing and groping, she went to her knees, took down my pants, and delivered some BBBJ. I had to slow her down a bit, but she took direction well. The teeth issues mentioned by others are very very real. 1. 5 for half hour. I will try to talk her down a bit for repeat. I will probably repeat simply because groping that little body is so sweet.
While I am acutely aware that the system commits injustices against people, going as far as wrongfully convicting people sometimes (for various crimes), I contend that these instances comprise fewer than 1% of cases. If a "provider" or a client has not committed a crime, then I doubt that either would be convicted from a sting. When you read into the details of the case, you usually discover that the convicted party incriminated herself by blatantly stating to a co-conspirator what crime she was planning on committing, or by confessing to law enforcement. Therefore, I think that one should not consider the penalty, but instead make sure one is not committing a crime, until the grope check has been performed. One street prostitute, however, told me that a male cop allowed her to feel check him and take his $20, but then informed her that he's a cop and is seeking information on some John who was hurting slores (he did not arrest her, and allowed her to keep his $20). So, perhaps there is some amount of danger, however tiny, of a male cop actually allowing an escort to grope him. I doubt, however, that he would ever dare to arrest her after he has broken the law and allowed such a thing to occur.
I would definitely agree with this. But lets remember that 1% of 100 on our end is 1 and 1% of 1000 on her end is 10 chances. I'd also argue that it's their word against everyone else. Unless you or her leave DNA like saliva or oils from your hand on the other, that still only lessens the chance.
These outlying counties are too damn risky to get busted in. There is a state statute agains prostitution, and the fine is at $240 or somewhere in there. These counties prosecute on a local ordinance and the fine is $600+ . Even Waukesha prosecutes on a local ordinance. A provider I know showed up at a Notel. Five UC were there to bust her. They used the condoms in her purse as probable cause for writing the ticket and they stole the weed she had brought along because the "guy" was 420 friendly. She never got charged with possession, because of course, they'd have to submit it as evidence. If you're going to pay for play, Milwaukee county is your safest bet. Same with Dane. If it's off the street, it's outa sight outa mind.
Coochie (outa my mind) Eater.
God Bless You All.
While I am acutely aware that the system commits injustices against people, going as far as wrongfully convicting people sometimes (for various crimes), I contend that these instances comprise fewer than 1% of cases. If a "provider" or a client has not committed a crime, then I doubt that either would be convicted from a sting. When you read into the details of the case, you usually discover that the convicted party incriminated herself by blatantly stating to a co-conspirator what crime she was planning on committing, or by confessing to law enforcement. Therefore, I think that one should not consider the penalty, but instead make sure one is not committing a crime, until the grope check has been performed. One street prostitute, however, told me that a male cop allowed her to feel check him and take his $20, but then informed her that he's a cop and is seeking information on some John who was hurting slores (he did not arrest her, and allowed her to keep his $20). So, perhaps there is some amount of danger, however tiny, of a male cop actually allowing an escort to grope him. I doubt, however, that he would ever dare to arrest her after he has broken the law and allowed such a thing to occur.
I did the mom when they were in port Washington and last I heard is she was in West Bend as well. I have talked to some providers that won't even come to Ozaukee co. Cause it's its too risky cause people don't mind their own business. I too would pay a premium for a decent local provider! They could make a lot of money with little effort in oz, wash, sheb cty.
These outlying counties are too damn risky to get busted in. There is a state statute agains prostitution, and the fine is at $240 or somewhere in there. These counties prosecute on a local ordinance and the fine is $600+ . Even Waukesha prosecutes on a local ordinance. A provider I know showed up at a Notel. Five UC were there to bust her. They used the condoms in her purse as probable cause for writing the ticket and they stole the weed she had brought along because the "guy" was 420 friendly. She never got charged with possession, because of course, they'd have to submit it as evidence. If you're going to pay for play, Milwaukee county is your safest bet. Same with Dane. If it's off the street, it's outa sight outa mind.
The ad interested me so I searched thee ad history on stg by searching on the last four digits of the phone number in the ad. While the ad text is the same in the ads, the photos make a change in the more recent ads. Considering the ad claims the photos are real, certainly one set of the photos or the other or both sets are fake. To me, the newer photos are more appealing. She does offer Google duo and FaceTime verification. Definitely verify before setting an appointment.