Trust me it was not everyday. Impossible. Something called life gets in the way. He said ALMOST everyday.
He said he hobbied every day. Not that he had an appointment every day. Just looking at who is available is considered part of the hobby with a loose interpretation of the word. So combine the almost with Hobbied and you may wind up with one or maybe two appointments a day or even less.
If you only saw Helena from the waist down, you might not be surprised to see a thicker top. She is like a thin girl on the chassis of a slightly thicker girl!
Am I the only one that thinks "slim thick" is for Khardashian look-alike figures? Fat asses and big oversize hips? I prefer hourglass and fit athletic shapes but I have been know too enjoy spinners and slim thick as well. Examples of slim-thick kgirls for me include Venus (not Elle/Venus the other one) and Jiyu.
IMHO opinion Helena is has a more youthful athletic build than a "slim thick". She is young and may or may not be athletically inclined. She does have good genetics to build on and is young enough not to have to work on it to stay tight and fit.
Another misnomer is calling a 5'6" kgirl a spinner. Unless you are 6"4"+ because then I guess most all girls are spinners for you. Just keeping it real.
I had already read some of the less than glowing reviews before I booked, but was up for seeing someone new on the scene. When I got in the apt, Helena danced around in a playful, quirky way. Probably as a replacement for not knowing a lot of English. She looked better with her hair down than up. Better with her mouth closed than open. She is not as good looking as Daisy. Slightly thigh heavy slim-thick, but she looked pretty good. No shower, but gave my unit an extensive cleaning followed by the most intense bedside BBBJ I've ever received, and placed her ass down low enough for some comfortable bedside dog. She didn't seem too into DATY, but took a good pounding! She was the first girl I've ever had leave the the FC for an extended period of time, ostensibly to get a drink of water. When she returned she gave me a water. She seemed to think I was done, and started giving me a hand job. When she realized I was ready to go, she rode me to the finish line in cowgirl. Her lower legs could stand a shave. I passed on the massage and we just cuddled. She gave me a little more BJ in the shower, and stuck me back in for a little standing dog, but most of the girls are too short for me in that position.
I try a new girl once in a while just to break things up and not get taken for granted buy the ATFs. The hype for Helena will probably die down in a week or two, but she can probably last for an extended stand in WLA, and she seems built for it. I still have Eunji as #1 non-upcharge girl, followed by still #2 Allie.
Am I the only one that thinks "slim thick" is for Khardashian look-alike figures? Fat asses and big oversize hips? I prefer hourglass and fit athletic shapes but I have been know too enjoy spinners and slim thick as well. Examples of slim-thick kgirls for me include Venus (not Elle/Venus the other one) and Jiyu.
IMHO opinion Helena is has a more youthful athletic build than a "slim thick". She is young and may or may not be athletically inclined. She does have good genetics to build on and is young enough not to have to work on it to stay tight and fit.
Another misnomer is calling a 5'6" kgirl a spinner. Unless you are 6"4"+ because then I guess most all girls are spinners for you. Just keeping it real.
LOL a lot of them end up kinda backing themselves into a corner. A certain site that is used for reviews only accepts a profile if it has a direct link to ad of the girl. Many an org were forced to drop the pwd requirement because they wouldn't be able to have reviews on that site. And good reviews are highly valued by the orgs / girls. So one can just report the profiles to that site. Monger power! LOL.
But anyway, checked out some profiles on that site for girls from that agency and found this link.
Not pwd protected, not sure how recent it is, but should help I think?
LOL a lot of them end up kinda backing themselves into a corner. A certain site that is used for reviews only accepts a profile if it has a direct link to ad of the girl. Many an org were forced to drop the pwd requirement because they wouldn't be able to have reviews on that site. And good reviews are highly valued by the orgs / girls. So one can just report the profiles to that site. Monger power! LOL.
But anyway, checked out some profiles on that site for girls from that agency and found this link.
Not pwd protected, not sure how recent it is, but should help I think?
This one is one of the Dumbest booker out there and she shares a lot of her inventory with CGLA. My story with her is that she was blowing up my phone (unsolicited texts) on weekly basis for visit and once I visited, I thought it went pretty smooth. I was there at exactly 11:00 AM, not a minute late, paid the amount and left exactly at 11:55 AM. I usually like to leave a bit earlier, so I don't run to the next monger. Afterward, she texted me and thanked me for coming: so far, so good you would think. The next week, I wanted see someone else and I inquired and she texted me back: "You have been banned". Interestingly, I have visited her place total of six times prior to that and I couldn't really give a shit as her inventories is jointly managed by CGLA but she definitely is the one that you want to avoid.
I do check her website because she tends to be also dumb enough to post photos of same girl in CGLA that are much less flattering.
Just got back from multiple trips to SF / SJ / SM and sadly the agencies up there are also playing the game of "guess which girl is behind the door. " LSC and BG are a few of the ones that are pretty close to the real photos. VF a few months back was photoshopping heads of girls onto bodies and it was just downright ridiculous. Agree with you that the days of realistic photos are long gone, especially in LA. The photos that M posts are often not representative either. And it's even sadder that there are some shills out there that hype up some of her girls that don't get repeat customers for good reason.
Been hobbying for basically 2 decades and lucky enough to have good rapport / relationships with the bookers so I can often get enough info and on some occasions real pics, but I know many others don't have that luxury. Best bet is to try to develop good relationship with the bookers and through that you often get better info from them, make a list of reviewers that you find are accurate and trust their reviews, find the shills as they are easy to spot and avoid their recommendations at all costs.
From about 2005 - 2019, I hobbied almost every day. I have cut back considerably and putting that money into other investments until the scene improves. I can afford the upcharge nonsense, but I have found that the new attitude with many of the girls is "I will upcharge and put in less work because I can or I will complain or spend time on my phone and rush you out 20 minutes early."
We just have a lot of girls that have a different ethic from the girls like Suri, Rain, etc.
The good days are over-Once in a while, you get a sweet heart like Hana who will put you in Coma but it is becoming less and less Frequent . As the new generation, does not know how to work hard for their money.
Just got back from multiple trips to SF / SJ / SM and sadly the agencies up there are also playing the game of "guess which girl is behind the door. " LSC and BG are a few of the ones that are pretty close to the real photos. VF a few months back was photoshopping heads of girls onto bodies and it was just downright ridiculous. Agree with you that the days of realistic photos are long gone, especially in LA. The photos that M posts are often not representative either. And it's even sadder that there are some shills out there that hype up some of her girls that don't get repeat customers for good reason.
Been hobbying for basically 2 decades and lucky enough to have good rapport / relationships with the bookers so I can often get enough info and on some occasions real pics, but I know many others don't have that luxury. Best bet is to try to develop good relationship with the bookers and through that you often get better info from them, make a list of reviewers that you find are accurate and trust their reviews, find the shills as they are easy to spot and avoid their recommendations at all costs.
From about 2005 - 2019, I hobbied almost every day. I have cut back considerably and putting that money into other investments until the scene improves. I can afford the upcharge nonsense, but I have found that the new attitude with many of the girls is "I will upcharge and put in less work because I can or I will complain or spend time on my phone and rush you out 20 minutes early."
We just have a lot of girls that have a different ethic from the girls like Suri, Rain, etc.