Arrangement Reports

**Samath2624** · 09-11-21 20:16

Originally Posted by Untitled [View Original Post]

Looks too good to be true. But please update if she ends up being legit!

Sorry, don't think I fully followed up on her (profile is now closed / blocked) but she messaged back / forth several times and said she would drive to Madison (from whitewater) and always expressed interest. Sent some super cute pics (clothed) and a topless pic without her face.

Had no assurance that she was legit so I asked her to send a full-mirror selfie (clothed) with her holding up 3 fingers and smiling. She kept delaying. So that and the fact she said "pay me whatever you think is fair" resulted in me cutting off contact.

Shame because the pics were cute. Early 20's chic with a few freckles and a hot bod! None of the pics failed my multiple reverse search engines, but fake is fake I guess.

https://www.seeking.com/member/4c85a...4-6fa48d3067d1

**Samath2624** · 09-11-21 16:30

Anyone have experience with this young lady?

https://www.seeking.com/member/be658...5-bf2f4144bbcc

Don't want to make assumptions, but welcome any info. Here or PM.

**Limeyincal** · 09-09-21 02:20

https://www.seeking.com/member/8a08d...b-e4230c123dc0

Usual MO. Quick responses, hot private pictures. Easy to get number for texting. Says yes to every request for a stupidly low amount of $. Settle on price.

Wants advance!

Nope.

Blocked.

**Natefarwell** · 09-07-21 02:31

Originally Posted by Samath2624 [View Original Post]

Ultimately yes I did meet with her. Her pics were edited, but she was cute and a genuinely nice person. Be gentle with her. Very nervous when we met. Don't expect it would be a long-term option and certainly not 2 k / month.

Can you share any details please?

**Samath2624** · 09-06-21 15:52

Originally Posted by Natefarwell [View Original Post]

Did either of you or anyone else actually meet her?

Ultimately yes I did meet with her. Her pics were edited, but she was cute and a genuinely nice person. Be gentle with her. Very nervous when we met. Don't expect it would be a long-term option and certainly not 2 k / month.

**Untitled** · 09-05-21 17:16

Did anyone see her?

**Natefarwell** · 09-04-21 09:52

Originally Posted by Samath2624 [View Original Post]

She told me $2 k / month would be ideal.

I told her that wasn't going to happen.

Did either of you or anyone else actually meet her?

**Flagrant** · 09-02-21 19:38

Originally Posted by MkePlayer [View Original Post]

The gal who was the subject of the original post isn't on my list of gals I'm interested in.

But as to the general concept of a monthly total allowance of 2 K, yeah I've done that or more about 5 times so far in the last couple years. However, either paid out ppm or weekly. Generally 1-2 meets per week, 3-6 hours per meet (not timed), sometimes overnight and / or short multi night getaway trips. Arrangements lasting from 3 months to about 9 months. As to hosting, I always host at my place. I might do a first meet in a hotel if I'm still vetting her or she is more comfortable. But my place is way nicer than any SB place and I would have no interest in spending 3-6 hours in any place occupied by an SB.

I always do a M&G first, and usually want to know their name so I can check ccap and their social media before I have them to my place. And for that amount on a regular basis, they have to be very hot by my standards and we have to be able to have fun apart from the bedroom too. With one exception, for those arrangements, the gal has taken down her SA profile and at least claimed I'm her only SD (yeah I take that with a grain of salt, but she has to at least do a good job of pretending). It could start to seem like regular dating I suppose, except they're anywhere from 25 to over 40 years younger than I am and I have no interest in their general lifestyle. They have to cater to my lifestyle when they're with me, and act convincingly like they enjoy it.

Only a small percent of SB's evolve into a longer term regular arrangement for me, though that is what I more specifically look for. Any gal who talks about a monthly allowance is probably a better candidate for me than ones who just talk ppm.

And some brothers are playing on a different level. Inspiring. Get it.

**Mke Player** · 08-29-21 13:24

Originally Posted by Flagrant [View Original Post]

If she hosts and you can see her at least once a week for a multi-hour session, possibly an overnight every now and then, would you do it? What about half that amount? $1 K per month. I would, easily. At least for one month. LOL.

The gal who was the subject of the original post isn't on my list of gals I'm interested in.

But as to the general concept of a monthly total allowance of 2 K, yeah I've done that or more about 5 times so far in the last couple years. However, either paid out ppm or weekly. Generally 1-2 meets per week, 3-6 hours per meet (not timed), sometimes overnight and / or short multi night getaway trips. Arrangements lasting from 3 months to about 9 months. As to hosting, I always host at my place. I might do a first meet in a hotel if I'm still vetting her or she is more comfortable. But my place is way nicer than any SB place and I would have no interest in spending 3-6 hours in any place occupied by an SB.

I always do a M&G first, and usually want to know their name so I can check ccap and their social media before I have them to my place. And for that amount on a regular basis, they have to be very hot by my standards and we have to be able to have fun apart from the bedroom too. With one exception, for those arrangements, the gal has taken down her SA profile and at least claimed I'm her only SD (yeah I take that with a grain of salt, but she has to at least do a good job of pretending). It could start to seem like regular dating I suppose, except they're anywhere from 25 to over 40 years younger than I am and I have no interest in their general lifestyle. They have to cater to my lifestyle when they're with me, and act convincingly like they enjoy it.

Only a small percent of SB's evolve into a longer term regular arrangement for me, though that is what I more specifically look for. Any gal who talks about a monthly allowance is probably a better candidate for me than ones who just talk ppm.

**LoveBoydodo** · 08-28-21 19:55

Originally Posted by Flagrant [View Original Post]

If she hosts and you can see her at least once a week for a multi-hour session, possibly an overnight every now and then, would you do it? What about half that amount? $1 K per month. I would, easily. At least for one month. LOL.

I will do it for 2-3 months.

**Flagrant** · 08-28-21 09:05

Originally Posted by Samath2624 [View Original Post]

She told me $2 k / month would be ideal.

I told her that wasn't going to happen.

If she hosts and you can see her at least once a week for a multi-hour session, possibly an overnight every now and then, would you do it? What about half that amount? $1 K per month. I would, easily. At least for one month. LOL.

**Samath2624** · 08-27-21 23:06

Originally Posted by LoveBoydodo [View Original Post]

I am still not premium in SA. Her account says she wants monthly allowance! How much you are paying? Or did she agreed to pay per play? If so how much the damage? Thanks for intel.

She told me $2 k / month would be ideal.

I told her that wasn't going to happen.

**LoveBoydodo** · 08-27-21 21:55

Originally Posted by Flagrant [View Original Post]

Some of the things girl list in their profile for what they are seeking are open to a wide latitude of interpretation. Like "Travel with you" is pretty clear. Or "marriage minded. " But "no strings attached"? I think we tend to interpret it like they are saying, "You can fuck my brains out just don't expect to spend the night or see me again afterwards. ".

But I think the girls intend it to mean, "I will take your money happily but don't expect to get into my pants (no strings). " It's a one-way kind of no strings. They reap all the benefit and at best you'll get a photo or conversation (via text, maybe).

I'd say kick these girls to the curb and focus on finding girls who are seriously open to mutual benefits.

But don't dump this problems to curb (as in curbfeeler). He will not enjoy it. LOL. JK.

**Flagrant** · 08-27-21 17:18

Originally Posted by MadJockey [View Original Post]

https://www.seeking.com/member/34b67...c-e3d74b26c87c RyanM.

https://www.seeking.com/member/22f41...2-66d6e5f469f1 Jennifer11.

Anyone hook with these gals yet?

Some of the things girl list in their profile for what they are seeking are open to a wide latitude of interpretation. Like "Travel with you" is pretty clear. Or "marriage minded. " But "no strings attached"? I think we tend to interpret it like they are saying, "You can fuck my brains out just don't expect to spend the night or see me again afterwards. ".

But I think the girls intend it to mean, "I will take your money happily but don't expect to get into my pants (no strings). " It's a one-way kind of no strings. They reap all the benefit and at best you'll get a photo or conversation (via text, maybe).

I'd say kick these girls to the curb and focus on finding girls who are seriously open to mutual benefits.