LA LA Land Bullshit and Fight Club

[Toungsten]

LOL no, this isn't how it works. You just said that you don't attack anyone's reviews and experiences.

Then don't attack anyone's reviews or experiences. Let it be their own.

Saying someone didn't get something they wanted - which, by the way, no one has knowledge of - and that's why a review is negative, is the SAME attack against a reviewer.

There is no out here nor any excuses to make an attack of a YMMV review. No one gets to pick or choose. Otherwise, it's quite hypocritical. People will always come up with an excuse that someone is attacking a provider when someone is merely providing a negative review.

Either you don't attack others experiences, or you do attack others experiences using whatever excuses you have. It's pretty simple imo..

We never know why a review is negative but a real clue is when that review is an outlier compared with all the others. Same goes in the opposite direction. Read the reviews and read other reviews of reviewers and you will find the outliers can always be exposed. Don't have to attack reviews just point out the obvious.

[FiatVoluptas]

Yes, respecting other people's experiences, especially negative experiences that are criminally underreported, is key.

So I would advise everyone - and I hope you do agree - that the next time they get attacked and blamed for a bad or subpar session, to report posts of people who do the attacking and blaming. As Admin advised. I will also make sure to monitor closely. I've never reported anyone because I don't like snitching but enough is enough.

Here are some examples that I consider an attack on a reviewer: "If anyone thinks she doesn't come close to that level they either were rude and crude in their behavior which never gets good results or probably had a hidden agenda. ".

"I can't believe that any upstanding monger would give her a bad rating for performance".

"A girl who consistently gets 8, 9 and 10
in looks and 9 in performance cannot suddenly become a 6 and 5 to anyone unless there is a hidden agenda. Over 250 reviewers can't be wrong"..

I agree with this, and I think it goes both ways. I have been attacked for leaving good reviews, and I think that is a problem just as much as attacking someone for leaving a bad review. I have been seeing a lot of this happening:

A reviewer has a good experience with a particular girl. One or more other reviewers then attack that reviewer because they didn't have a good experience with said girl, and thus conclude that the positive reviewer is a "shill," is "unreliable," has "poor judgment," etc. This has been going on quite a bit across all of the Asian provider threads.

My advice is if you don't have the same tastes as a particular reviewer, then don't take their suggestions. Either ignore their reviews all together, or use their reviews as a indication of which providers you aren't going to see. It's unproductive and illogical to assume that differing experiences are the result of ulterior motives or a lack of credibility. Mongers and providers are all humans. We are not robots.

[RocketManP]

Let's not forget that attacks on a provider because a monger didn't get what he wanted are the most poisonous of all to the community. How can we differentiate between a legitimate attack and one from spite? The best way is to read the provider's reviews. When we see pages and pages of "great reviews" and one outlier that seems to be about another girl we have our first clue.

LOL no, this isn't how it works. You just said that you don't attack anyone's reviews and experiences.

Then don't attack anyone's reviews or experiences. Let it be their own.

Saying someone didn't get something they wanted - which, by the way, no one has knowledge of - and that's why a review is negative, is the SAME attack against a reviewer.

There is no out here nor any excuses to make an attack of a YMMV review. No one gets to pick or choose. Otherwise, it's quite hypocritical. People will always come up with an excuse that someone is attacking a provider when someone is merely providing a negative review.

Either you don't attack others experiences, or you do attack others experiences using whatever excuses you have. It's pretty simple imo.

Cheers.

[PervySage2018]

Could be a case of burnout. That happens when they are booked solid every day and especially last call of the day. Sometimes this is their clue to slow down a bit. I've seen a few times and each time with great DFK and a superb BBBJ with lots of spit and gagging. Couldn't have been better.

I completely agree, I saw her over the weekend and she was amazing. No upgrade costs either. Pics are real (a little glammed up), beautiful skin, teeth, eyes. She's got a little baby fat on her but no big deal. Great tits, perfect little pussy. Highly skilled with BBBJ with great eye contact. Titty fucked, CG, filled her up with a week's worth with her on the bed on her back and me standing. Super sweet and has lots of personality, great attitude. Def top 5 category for me this year. I did see her early in the day.

[Toungsten]

Yes, respecting other people's experiences, especially negative experiences that are criminally underreported, is key.

So I would advise everyone - and I hope you do agree - that the next time they get attacked and blamed for a bad or subpar session, to report posts of people who do the attacking and blaming. As Admin advised. I will also make sure to monitor closely. I've never reported anyone because I don't like snitching but enough is enough.

Here are some examples that I consider an attack on a reviewer: "If anyone thinks she doesn't come close to that level they either were rude and crude in their behavior which never gets good results or probably had a hidden agenda. ".

"I can't believe that any upstanding monger would give her a bad rating for performance".

"A girl who consistently gets 8, 9 and 10
in looks and 9 in performance cannot suddenly become a 6 and 5 to anyone unless there is a hidden agenda. Over 250 reviewers can't be wrong".

Those quotes directly attack a monger for posting a less-than-stellar review and effectively bullying them and berating their YMMV experiences. Hope everyone is on the same page here, and agrees such attacks are poisonous to the community.

Imo, the more such attacks are reported, the weaker the shill / org grasp of manipulating reviews is.

Thanks.

Let's not forget that attacks on a provider because a monger didn't get what he wanted are the most poisonous of all to the community. How can we differentiate between a legitimate attack and one from spite? The best way is to read the provider's reviews. When we see pages and pages of "great reviews" and one outlier that seems to be about another girl we have our first clue.

[RocketManP]

How can anyone reading a review determine if it is dishonest. It's the personal experience of the reviewer and if you look at this or other review boards you will find varying descriptions of that experience. For example one girl was described as no so good looking while most of her reviews describe her as very good looking, pretty and even beautiful. What you the writer experienced is your experience and yours alone. Others have sometimes a similar experience and at other times a vastly different experience. If you deem their review as a a lie then they can deem yours as a lie one as well. One man's meat is another's poison. What I always did is wait for several reviews and compare them as well as looking at past reviews of the reviewer. If most seem in sync as a good experience that would serve my tastes then I go for it. I don't waste my time attacking others reviews and experiences. I spend my time looking for the good providers. There are some who disagree with the experiences I've had and many others who have thanked me for turning them on to certain girls. YMMV.

Yes, respecting other people's experiences, especially negative experiences that are criminally underreported, is key.

So I would advise everyone - and I hope you do agree - that the next time they get attacked and blamed for a bad or subpar session, to report posts of people who do the attacking and blaming. As Admin advised. I will also make sure to monitor closely. I've never reported anyone because I don't like snitching but enough is enough.

Here are some examples that I consider an attack on a reviewer: "If anyone thinks she doesn't come close to that level they either were rude and crude in their behavior which never gets good results or probably had a hidden agenda. ".

"I can't believe that any upstanding monger would give her a bad rating for performance".

"A girl who consistently gets 8, 9 and 10
in looks and 9 in performance cannot suddenly become a 6 and 5 to anyone unless there is a hidden agenda. Over 250 reviewers can't be wrong".

Those quotes directly attack a monger for posting a less-than-stellar review and effectively bullying them and berating their YMMV experiences. Hope everyone is on the same page here, and agrees such attacks are poisonous to the community.

Imo, the more such attacks are reported, the weaker the shill / org grasp of manipulating reviews is.

Thanks.

[Toungsten]

Ever notice those who adamantly accuse and attack with ad hominem attacks are usually the ones who are most guilty of that behavior. Methinks he doth protest too much. Another lesson I've learned over the years of hobbying is that what one guy gets is not necessarily what others get. Then when they hear what the first reviewer got and don't get it themselves they resort to negativity about the girl. Personally as far as BBFS goes I've been getting it for many years from girls that most guys swear are CFS only. In the old days I didn't even write about it (just hinted) since it wasn't as mainstream and given up as readily as today. Now if that's lying and exaggerating then color me guilty or maybe color me knowing how to treat a woman that she is willing. Not even all the BBFS girls offer it to everyone and just think how pissed off the guy is who was refused. You can't always get what you want.

[BuddhaHead]

I think many times it's just that some self appointed kgirl experts cannot tolerate viewpoints that are different than their own, so their egos and reputation get hurt and they have to continually counter any opposing viewpoint. They want everyone to follow their recommendations and mislead people into thinking that kgirls are the only game in town, so that they can preserve their status as the "go to" experts. I don't call myself an expert, but I'll call BS when I see it.

[Jedi69]

I met Stephanie Sky last week. She is so elegant and sweet. Her photos are 100 real and her body is perfectly petite. You don't want to miss out on her.

https://www.eros.com/california/los_...0.htm?cat=6192

I love these One Post Wonders who come in here advertising 900 dollah pussies LOL.

Thank you daddy.

[CaptCaveman99]

You choose to stick in bare then you live with the consequences imo. This is why mongers get tested at confidential clinics as well. To stay private. I easily do 2-3 a week and if I caught one I wouldn't know which exact person gave it to me and really is all my fault. Just as he decided to post. He caught something and just a warning to get tested. Go to the doc and leave it at that. You live with it you choose to do it. Another issue, some mongers do not care to get taken care of either. Remember there are many sex addicts and they won't wait a day to get treatment. Don't think everyone here is some gentleman. There are sick men amongst us.

In some cases, you may not even exhibit symptoms. For example, if 'G' or 'C' bacteria are in your mouth, etc. Was told by a doctor and I was quite surprised. As a result, best to stay on a regular test schedule.

[TempletonRat]

You choose to stick in bare then you live with the consequences imo. This is why mongers get tested at confidential clinics as well. To stay private. I easily do 2-3 a week and if I caught one I wouldn't know which exact person gave it to me and really is all my fault. Just as he decided to post. He caught something and just a warning to get tested. Go to the doc and leave it at that. You live with it you choose to do it. Another issue, some mongers do not care to get taken care of either. Remember there are many sex addicts and they won't wait a day to get treatment. Don't think everyone here is some gentleman. There are sick men amongst us.

Than not know. Playing the odds.

[TempletonRat]

Sounds like ego is hurt because some people don't agree with your reviews. This is what happens when people get caught up with trying to be "influencers" and others have different opinions. Then, they try to defend their recommendations and push them on others. Submitting a review is one thing. Repeating it and reminding everyone about it is another.

That post was pretty Buddhist.

[GoldDust58]

I never understood anyone believing in confidentiality and privacy. You guys do realize this hobby isn't exactly legal or not moral, right? It is indeed plain and simple. I would share the name if I ever caught one. Not all girls will do the right thing and get it cleared before going back to work. Thats the scary part about it.

You choose to stick in bare then you live with the consequences imo. This is why mongers get tested at confidential clinics as well. To stay private. I easily do 2-3 a week and if I caught one I wouldn't know which exact person gave it to me and really is all my fault. Just as he decided to post. He caught something and just a warning to get tested. Go to the doc and leave it at that. You live with it you choose to do it. Another issue, some mongers do not care to get taken care of either. Remember there are many sex addicts and they won't wait a day to get treatment. Don't think everyone here is some gentleman. There are sick men amongst us.

[BuddhaHead]

She was one of my top ATFs but nobody cared when I shared LOL (click here). Most guys either complain a girl is not hot enough or service not good enough so I may stay silent for some time.

Sounds like ego is hurt because some people don't agree with your reviews. This is what happens when people get caught up with trying to be "influencers" and others have different opinions. Then, they try to defend their recommendations and push them on others. Submitting a review is one thing. Repeating it and reminding everyone about it is another.

[KingOfFours]

I'm not a frequent poster on these fight threads, and I rarely read them. But I have to put this somewhere:

When I post that I will send pics, links, etc, to CUNTRIBUTING SENIORS ONLY, I really do mean exactly that. If you PM me from a screen name with zero posts, requesting such things, I will not even bother to reply, I will simply ignore you. If you don't know the reasons for this, then you are not ready for prime time, as the saying goes. I'm not trying to be rude. But I've managed to stay out fof trouble for several decades in this "hobby". So I surely don't intend to start getting careless now.