Korean Agency BB

**Toungsten** · 05-15-21 13:09

M. Cona, Viki.

Sunny. Niya, Yumi.

Newtopasian.

Pink Angels. Sarah, Jool Gina.

Sexy Angels. Sophia, Jool Gina.

SFK.

PKL. Saki, Pink, Eunji.

Sesang. Hana.

Angelsinwla. Hana.

KGLA. Saki, Pink, Eunji.

**TheAbc** · 05-15-21 12:32

Anyone have any info? I might TOFT since I haven't seen anyone I liked for weeks.

https://www.losangelesasian.com/?lig...aItem-kopxwqfn

**John1715** · 05-15-21 12:10

I'm somewhat of a newcomer so I'm still learning about the different agencies. Who's this M I keep reading about? Also feel free to recommend some agencies, I don't understand the abbreviations.

**Toungsten** · 05-15-21 09:31

Originally Posted by Dlee9753 [View Original Post]

I will provide details on Pink's body so hopefully someone will do the same with Eunji's. All these vague descriptions like "chubby" "gymnast" "not like photos". WTF guys? Especially the "gymnast" thing. The only gymnasts I know of are the Olympic girls with bulging biceps and He-Man thighs. No thank you.

Pink is my expected standard of "average". She has a flat stomach, no love handles. Her thighs are thick for a k-girl but not BBW thick or body-positive-movement-bullshit thick. Most importantly, no cottage cheese on her thighs. She has a nice handful of butt but looks slightly squarish from behind. Her hips are a petite, hourglass curvy but not BBW curvy or body-positivity-movement-bullshit curvy. The hips do ride slightly high due to the slightly squarish butt. But again: No love handles, no flab, no cottage cheese. Accepted descriptions would be average, average-skinny, petite-hourglass, petite-curvy.

Can someone please provide similar details on Eunji?

Additional info on Pink: Her boobs are decent, natural B cups. Not particularly firm or perky but still nice. With makeup, she looks 30 or younger. I'd lean towards younger. I'd describe her face as cute or pretty but others may say GND. Chill, relaxed personality but she's trying to learn English so may want to practice with you.

Her BBBJ was okay, nothing special. She makes the effort but doesn't go particularly deep and doesn't use her tongue. Her massage was okay. She makes the effort but nowhere near masseuse level. She didn't offer rimming / catbath and I didn't ask for rimming / catbath. She wasn't into DFK but I personally don't go down on women I pay for so maybe YMMV.

Based on your description of Pink I would have to say that Eunji would be average-athletic, petite-hourglass, petite-curvy. Add to that great tits and service that can't be beat.

**Member #2210** · 05-15-21 05:30

Originally Posted by Dlee9753 [View Original Post]

I will provide details on Pink's body so hopefully someone will do the same with Eunji's. All these vague descriptions like "chubby" "gymnast" "not like photos". WTF guys? Especially the "gymnast" thing. The only gymnasts I know of are the Olympic girls with bulging biceps and He-Man thighs. No thank you.

Pink is my expected standard of "average". She has a flat stomach, no love handles. Her thighs are thick for a k-girl but not BBW thick or body-positive-movement-bullshit thick. Most importantly, no cottage cheese on her thighs. She has a nice handful of butt but looks slightly squarish from behind. Her hips are a petite, hourglass curvy but not BBW curvy or body-positivity-movement-bullshit curvy. The hips do ride slightly high due to the slightly squarish butt. But again: No love handles, no flab, no cottage cheese. Accepted descriptions would be average, average-skinny, petite-hourglass, petite-curvy.

Can someone please provide similar details on Eunji?

Additional info on Pink: Her boobs are decent, natural B cups. Not particularly firm or perky but still nice. With makeup, she looks 30 or younger. I'd lean towards younger. I'd describe her face as cute or pretty but others may say GND. Chill, relaxed personality but she's trying to learn English so may want to practice with you.

Her BBBJ was okay, nothing special. She makes the effort but doesn't go particularly deep and doesn't use her tongue. Her massage was okay. She makes the effort but nowhere near masseuse level. She didn't offer rimming / catbath and I didn't ask for rimming / catbath. She wasn't into DFK but I personally don't go down on women I pay for so maybe YMMV.

I also saw Pink and the above description is very accurate. I don't care how much you like a girl or what your preferences are (for spinner or chubby-chaser), you should describe the girl as exactly what she looks like.

**Humyiy** · 05-15-21 02:59

Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]

Any shills wanna hype this one up? Or maybe she's just that bad (not bad meaning good like in the 80s).

Jessie at sexyangels. Site.

Any info? She must be amazing and guys are keping her secret or horrible and guys are trying to forget they even stayed (been there many times).

**Jack926** · 05-15-21 02:16

Originally Posted by SuperMan333 [View Original Post]

Yeah I think this one is not that good, even the PO is trying to steer me away. Have you saw her personally?

Nope! I have been burned by that booker too many times; not even ONE good experience there.

It is a SHIT SHOW Place to visit.

**AverageGuy82** · 05-15-21 00:57

I got the all clear so once I see Viki I'm planning on seeing Cona. Does she resemble the pics or has she aged out of them? I did see Pink this evening and will be writing a report a little later once I have time to settle my thoughts.

**Francescoo** · 05-14-21 21:28

Just want to chip In!

I know everyone has their own type!

Or wants another Hana!

Eunji is hot! She's not fat! She's had a nice body! And is eager to please!

On my books she's hot and a good time!.

**BuddhaHead** · 05-14-21 21:21

Originally Posted by NintyNine [View Original Post]

All I care about is how different is the girl from the photoshop.

That's how girls should be described.

That is not a good measure either. I've seen guys say the picture is "representative" or that the picture resembles her 90%. WTF does that mean? Or that she is the one in the pictures except she's 10 lbs heavier and 10 years older. Oh ok, that's a big help. Many guys cannot tell whether the girl is the one in the picture and will swear that the fake picture taken from an Asian model is really the one they saw. I would guess if they saw any picture of an attractive Asian woman they might say it could be her, especially for someone who hasn't seen many Asian / Korean women and is mesmerized by meeting an attractive one, or at least someone who looks similar to what they saw in the pictures. Also, many guys are very bad at describing how a girl looks. E. g. , "she's not skinny, but not fat", "has that traditional Korean look". Many aren't consistent in their ratings and their descriptions. They will give a girl a 9 or 10 in looks, which should use such adjectives as ddg, stunning, hottest looking girl I've ever seen, but instead there is very little said about looks, and I see such things as "Her body is good, but maybe a little added weight" (this is for a 10, which should be damn near perfect).

**NintyNine** · 05-14-21 20:25

Originally Posted by BuddhaHead [View Original Post]

Saying that looks are YMMV is a cop out or that there's a separate rating scale for kgirls. It is irrelevant whether real 9's and 10's work for one of the Kgirl agencies or as a provider. It is irrelevant whether one has seen 100 Kgirls or 1 Kgirl. How do you judge looks based only on kgirls one has personally seen? Then, how would one judge looks of non-kgirls or independent providers? A much more objective measure is to compare against all women, not just Kgirls who you've seen, not just Kgirls who are providers, not just Asians who are providers, but all women. So, car show models aren't going to work for M? Well, there are Asian American car show models who have provided. Also, there are tons of civvies (e. G. , instagram models, "party" girls who go to clubs) who are much better looking than the so-called hot girls cited. Just because one hasn't seen hotter girls doesn't mean a young Kgirl should be rated a 9. But, those that do are just misleading other hobbyists into thinking that these girls are model quality. They are not.

All I care about is how different is the girl from the photoshop.

That's how girls should be described.

**Humyiy** · 05-14-21 19:03

Guys that adore toothpicks with 2 basketballs glued on the upper half.

And guys that love curvy ladies with big natural bouncy tits, decent waist, and curvy hips with a bouncy spankable ass.

Obviously I like them curvy.

But I don't usually go out of my way to bad talk or give 3/3 reviews on the Skeleton girls.

We should just acknowledge one another tastes and try to point out the good ones in your particular group.

I try to add comments like "if you don't like Yumi Kazama looking curvy miles, you should avoid. ".

Originally Posted by GoldDust58 [View Original Post]

Some of you guys really are ungrateful bastards hahaha. Eunji is very pretty and not chubby at all. Chubby is half of the other girls in LA. She is young she has great tits and you guys might have some wrong conception of what chubby is. She isn't a spinner but not chubby.

Also please enlighten me who is so much hotter because I would love to see these girls. Name them please if you dare.

**Toungsten** · 05-14-21 18:57

Originally Posted by Charley1004 [View Original Post]

I also find 30-35 year olds the sweet spot. Enough experience to know what they're doing and hopefully not burnt out.

I'm still looking for a new regular rotation but it's been very hard this past year. I wish we had a new Megan, Suri, Sugar, Rain, Stella, Yoco. I know the last two are still here but I need some new talent. I hope M is able to mount a comeback and doesn't go the way of Souplantation and closes shop.

Ah Souplantation. I miss it almost as much as I miss Suri.

**Toungsten** · 05-14-21 18:56

Originally Posted by BuddhaHead [View Original Post]

Saying that looks are YMMV is a cop out or that there's a separate rating scale for kgirls. It is irrelevant whether real 9's and 10's work for one of the Kgirl agencies or as a provider. It is irrelevant whether one has seen 100 Kgirls or 1 Kgirl. How do you judge looks based only on kgirls one has personally seen? Then, how would one judge looks of non-kgirls or independent providers? A much more objective measure is to compare against all women, not just Kgirls who you've seen, not just Kgirls who are providers, not just Asians who are providers, but all women. So, car show models aren't going to work for M? Well, there are Asian American car show models who have provided. Also, there are tons of civvies (e. G. , instagram models, "party" girls who go to clubs) who are much better looking than the so-called hot girls cited. Just because one hasn't seen hotter girls doesn't mean a young Kgirl should be rated a 9. But, those that do are just misleading other hobbyists into thinking that these girls are model quality. They are not.

I'm not sure what world you're living in but you and we don't have access to the instagram models, "party girls", etc. We are here in the world of Kgirls and regardless of how they compare (in your mind) there are others who may have a different perspective. That is the meaning of YMMV. How they look to you and if you are basing it on comparisons then let's stick to the world where they belong and we partake and that is the world of the Kgirl. Some love blondes and others brunettes. Some like spinners and some like BWW. Some short and some tall. You have your preferences and opinions but they are not universal and we deal with the current talent pool and not some aspiration list of other girls who would laugh at the offer of 250-300 for an hour including BBFS and MSOG. Maybe laugh so hard that they would pass out. That's why we're all here.