News and Media Reports

[Tom McAn]

https://www.wect.com/2021/06/22/six-...lor-operation/

Stay Safe out there!!

Thanks for the info, but that would be much more useful to mongers heading to eastern North Carolina than mongers in this area. Still, this reminds us we always need to be vigilant when visiting our favorite AMP's and other places.

[PhillUponThese]

https://www.wect.com/2021/06/22/six-...lor-operation/

Stay Safe out there!!

[RedBaron Daron]

Do-gooders who label all sex for pay as "human trafficking," regardless of whether any actual human trafficking is occurring, have emerged as the primary forces against legalization. We'll see what the courts do.

I once thought it was a matter of time before laws against prostitution were struck down after the United States Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage six years ago. After all, that seemed like the next logical step. Today I'm not so sure. District attorneys choosing not to prosecute prostitution cases is a small step, but that still doesn't stop our least favorite uncle from making arrests and ruining people's lives.

It's all about low hanging fruit, Police patrol low income areas and arrest people on minor offenses to rack up fines and demonstrate to the "Good" people that their tax dollars are making a difference. They set up prostitution stings for the same reason. Results mean an easier time getting budget requests. Same with Civil forfeiture and officers dedicated to speed traps all in the interest of "Public Safety" when it is really about the money. As far as ruining lives, posting mugshots of Johns in a sting for a misdemeanor offense serves no benefit but to embarrass and intimidate.

RBD out.

[Tom McAn]

Once the tight ass moralistic boomers die out the push for legalization will prolly start.

Do-gooders who label all sex for pay as "human trafficking," regardless of whether any actual human trafficking is occurring, have emerged as the primary forces against legalization. We'll see what the courts do.

I once thought it was a matter of time before laws against prostitution were struck down after the United States Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage six years ago. After all, that seemed like the next logical step. Today I'm not so sure. District attorneys choosing not to prosecute prostitution cases is a small step, but that still doesn't stop our least favorite uncle from making arrests and ruining people's lives.

[Bob O Rama]

Once the tight ass moralistic boomers die out the push for legalization will prolly start.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/21/n...stitution.html

[Korman23]

https://www.arlnow.com/2021/04/29/fe...girls-for-sex/

The scary thing is that he "likely knew." What if they told him they were 18? I guess we need to check IDs.

Part of the report says he even posed as 18-19 himself so I am betting he very well knew what he was doing and how old the girls were.

[Tom McAn]

https://www.arlnow.com/2021/04/29/fe...girls-for-sex/

The scary thing is that he "likely knew." What if they told him they were 18? I guess we need to check IDs.

I heard about that on a local radio station. I don't play at SA or similar sites and can't afford "sugar daddy" prices, but this reminds all mongers about being careful out there when hobbying.

[Tophat31]

https://www.arlnow.com/2021/04/29/fe...girls-for-sex/

The scary thing is that he "likely knew." What if they told him they were 18? I guess we need to check IDs.

[RockSwithSalt]

https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.htmlOnly 13 cases so far. Previous week it was 10.

With 100 million vaccinated it is a surprise that only 13 cases of reported ED. The early vaccinated is heavily skewed to over 65 and studies have shown that 70% of males over 70 will experience some form of ED.

If the data is correct the vaccine prevents ED. Can I get another dose please?

[Mpduration]

https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html

Only 13 cases so far. Previous week it was 10.

[PSmith0380]

Funny story that one of my old ATFs told me during her tenure working at an AMP. She once got caught by a police raid mid HJ, totally topless. The client kept his mouth shut and when the police tried to arrest her and take her to court. She told them that her shirt had accidentally come off during the massage and it was simply a case of poor and unfortunate timing when the police came into the room. Because this took place in the dark she said what the officer saw in the room was misinterpreted as the client was just helping her to put her shirt back on.

She won that case and no further charges were ever pursued. Again, it's extremely difficult to PROVE either scenario so always always always deny and keep your mouth shut.

That's a ridiculous story to actually stick. LOL!

[TheOuroboros]

If Kraft wins and survives the appeals in the state Supreme Court, will the other defendants cases automatically receive the same consideration? Or do they need to pursue the same legal avenues each separately? Also, what about the poor saps that plead out or no contest?

You're pretty much fucked. That's why no matter the case you always keep your mouth shut. I imagine the video surveillance would be thrown out on all of the defendants not just Kraft as it is 100% illegally obtained evidence. It's very difficult to prove illicit services that occur at a massage parlor, even when you're caught mid act as there's ultimately a ton of ways to spin things in your favor under the court of law as long as you adamantly deny you paid money for sexual services. This is why cops will always lie to you and try the "friendly" approach where they say they'll reduce your charges or went press charges at all as long as you admit to them why you went to the massage parlor. Cops aren't your friend, and they want you to admit guilt because of how difficult it is to actually win this case in court.

Funny story that one of my old ATFs told me during her tenure working at an AMP. She once got caught by a police raid mid HJ, totally topless. The client kept his mouth shut and when the police tried to arrest her and take her to court. She told them that her shirt had accidentally come off during the massage and it was simply a case of poor and unfortunate timing when the police came into the room. Because this took place in the dark she said what the officer saw in the room was misinterpreted as the client was just helping her to put her shirt back on.

She won that case and no further charges were ever pursued. Again, it's extremely difficult to PROVE either scenario so always always always deny and keep your mouth shut.

[JonFisher]

https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html

Posted on https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html.

VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination. Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to VAERS. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. Most reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.

The strengths of VAERS are that it is national in scope and can quickly provide an early warning of a safety problem with a vaccine. As part of CDC and FDA's multi-system approach to post-licensure vaccine safety monitoring, VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also known as "safety signals. " If a safety signal is found in VAERS, further studies can be done in safety systems such as the CDC's Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) or the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) project. These systems do not have the same limitations as VAERS, and can better assess health risks and possible connections between adverse events and a vaccine.

Key considerations and limitations of data:

Reports may include incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental and unverified information.

The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted or used to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines.

Data are limited to vaccine adverse event reports received between 1990 and the most recent date for which data are available.

Data data do not represent all known safety information for a vaccine and should be interpreted in the context of other scientific information.

[Mpduration]

https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html

[SlyFrog]

The Guardian: Are police the biggest threat to massage parlor workers' safety?.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...-threat-safety