Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 32,146 to 32,160 of 49190
-
01-10-21 15:22 #17045
Posts: 4Originally Posted by Toungsten [View Original Post]
-
01-10-21 15:18 #17044
Posts: 1945Piper's pics are of ara on pkl site.
Originally Posted by Toungsten [View Original Post]
-
01-10-21 13:47 #17043
Posts: 1668K Girl
Originally Posted by Veni1 [View Original Post]
-
01-10-21 13:41 #17042
Posts: 3480Sunday Jan. 10
M. Annie, Hana, Hazel.
Sunny. Semi, Joy.
Sexy Angels. Hami, Sophia, Helen, Jenny.
SFK. Viki, Allie.
PKL. Ara, Moni.
-
01-10-21 13:38 #17041
Posts: 3480Originally Posted by Veni1 [View Original Post]
-
01-10-21 13:37 #17040
Posts: 3480Originally Posted by PussyDestroyr [View Original Post]
-
01-10-21 13:25 #17039
Posts: 551Originally Posted by Toungsten [View Original Post]
-
01-10-21 13:22 #17038
Posts: 415New Agency in LA
I was contacted this week via text by a booker who indicated a new agency was available. Booker indicated that gals were BBFS and msog with no up charge. Quoted fees were 220 half hr and 280 hr. Location in MW. I haven't tried it out yet since MW is a bit of a trip for me. Anyway the website is:
https://kgirlsinla.Wordpress.com/home/
-
01-10-21 12:46 #17037
Posts: 1945Why is the post put up with 2 different user IDs? Doubt many here would know what an abg is unless you grew up around sgv area and certain parts of oc. LOL.
Originally Posted by Daiyutabc [View Original Post]
-
01-10-21 12:14 #17036
Posts: 1945Agree with you on booker being the weak link and not doing proper screening. In addition it also doesn't help when there's blabber mouths here that divulge too much info out to newbs by telling how to get past screening or who's easiest on screening.
Originally Posted by JHeezy [View Original Post]
-
01-10-21 11:49 #17035
Posts: 2369Originally Posted by JHeezy [View Original Post]
-
01-10-21 11:15 #17034
Posts: 3480Originally Posted by Daiyutabc [View Original Post]
-
01-10-21 08:29 #17033
Posts: 4Multiple Reviews
Been adventuring around for months and trying out a lot of the new talent. Figured I'd share my 2 cents for people with similar preferences since it seems the group of guys with similar tastes is small. Just to give you a background, I'm in my mid 30's and prefer them skinny (any slight pudge or happy weight kills it for me), cute / sexy face (sharp and seductive features, not into cutesy or innocent looking), big chest (real or fake is okay with me); imagine an ABG, IG model, or Vietnamese coffee shop girl look.
FAVORITES: Lyn (Sunny) / Chanel (SA** believe she's with M now?
J:
Wynnie** (she might have moved): Looks - 7 / Performance - 7. 75 / Repeat. No / Notes: She has a definite ABG look and gives you that PSE, however she look to be in her mid 30's and had a little stomach pooch. DATY and BBBJ was enjoyable, but she has one of the worst DFK; it's like she was licking the inside of a yogurt cup. She's definitely fiesty / freaky and fun to some extent but not memorable. CFS but I decided to CIM.
Mio: Looks - 7 / Performance - 8 / Repeat. No / Notes: She has a cute-ish looking face but her teeth could use some work. Very shy but will slowly open up. Skinny with natural C / D but they kinda droop. Doesn't do DFK. Her BBBJ and CIM is good, but sadly not worth a 2nd try.
Sunny:
Lyn: Looks - 8 / Performance - 8. 75 / Repeat. Yes / Notes: This is my go to and definitely takes care of you with that GFE. She's tall (around 5'5" skinny with little to no body fat (you can see some ribs but not starving skinny, athletic skinny), C / D fake but round and perky, cute / sexy face (can definitely imagine her having RBF or be intimidating to others if she doesn't smile), young / mid 30's. DATY, BBBJ (one of the best), CIM, CFS, GFE, and absolutely loves nonstop DFK. I usually go for a while and she's a trooper and can definitely keep up.
Joy: Looks - 6. 5 / Performance - 6. 5 / Repeat. No / Notes: To be honest, I can't remember much on her because it was that unexciting. She definitely wasn't into it and was very delicate. I'm average size and she wouldn't DT, about 75%. Not a fan of LFK / DFK and was just trying to get it over with in a passive / aggressive approach.
Niya** (might be on break): Looks - 7. 5 / Performance - 9 / Repeat. Yes / Notes: Jumps between here and norcal. Face is good but not great, a little on the fobbier side. She's definitely a little more on the meaty side, but not fat, just curvy. Real DDD, perky, and doesn't sag. Performance was probably one of the best I've had as she's really into it and wants to make sure you loving every moment of it. DATY, BBBJ (good but not great), rimming, CIM. She'll also do a nuru massage (did it without any oil) and it's not like Bangkok but pretty good to me. I don't repeat many but she definitely earned it.
M:
Bella: Looks - 7 / Performance - 5. 5 / Repeat. No / Notes: Has a cute-ish face but has some happy weight. Very soft spoken, shy, and more the sensual type. LFK but no much. BBBJ but won't DT and doesn't like her head being touched. Just like Joy (see above), she's very delicate and you can't be rough so I had to dial it back. I don't pump very hard and she was low key complaining when doggy so had to finish in missionary. I wasn't thrilled but at least now I know she's not worth a 2nd visit.
SFK:
Viki: Looks - 6. 5 / Performance - 6. 5 / Repeat. No / Notes: I saw her back in June so my memory is hazy but what I remember most what her looks. Her photos are her but probably what she looked like 7 - 10 years ago. She's definitely in her late 30's, more likely in her 40's. She's got happy weight and a little pooch in the front. She still looked cute but definitely not my taste.
SA:
Chanel** (Think she's with M): Looks - 8. 5 / Performance - 8. 5 / Repeat. Yes / Notes: She was my first experience in the LA market and she definitely set the bar high. I've been hearing that she's back with M / Gray but her personality and performance has definitely changed. I can't remember the exact details but she did BBFS, CIM, DFK, GFE, and was definitely a pleaser. Had a great conversation with her and she was really into it. Sadly I'm hearing a different story, can anyone confirm where she is now? Would love to revisit.
If you've read this far, I applaud you. My reviews aren't great at the moment only because it's late and most of these visits were a while back. For future experiences I'll share more details, I have a couple new appointments for this upcoming week. I'm the type that's willing to try anything so if any of you have a request, I'm more than happy to TOFTT and report back. Just keep in mind, my taste may be different from yours; for example I can tell Toungsten and I have opposites tastes, nothing wrong with that, just enjoy different flavors. With that said, can anyone recommend others similar to Lyn or Chanal (from SA)? Thank you everyone!
-
01-10-21 08:14 #17032
Posts: 1Multiple Reviews
Been adventuring around for months and trying out a lot of the new talent. Figured I'd share my 2 cents for people with similar preferences since it seems the group of guys with similar tastes is small. Just to give you a background, I'm in my mid 30's and prefer them skinny (any slight pudge or happy weight kills it for me), cute / sexy face (sharp and seductive features, not into cutesy or innocent looking), big chest (real or fake is okay with me); imagine an ABG, IG model, or Vietnamese coffee shop girl look.
FAVORITES: Lyn (Sunny) / Chanel (SA** believe she's with M now?
J:
Wynnie** (she might have moved): Looks - 7 / Performance - 7. 75 / Repeat. No / Notes: She has a definite ABG look and gives you that PSE, however she look to be in her mid 30's and had a little stomach pooch. DATY and BBBJ was enjoyable, but she has one of the worst DFK; it's like she was licking the inside of a yogurt cup. She's definitely fiesty / freaky and fun to some extent but not memorable. CFS but I decided to CIM.
Mio: Looks - 7 / Performance - 8 / Repeat. No / Notes: She has a cute-ish looking face but her teeth could use some work. Very shy but will slowly open up. Skinny with natural C / D but they kinda droop. Doesn't do DFK. Her BBBJ and CIM is good, but sadly not worth a 2nd try.
Sunny:
Lyn: Looks - 8 / Performance - 8. 75 / Repeat. Yes / Notes: This is my go to and definitely takes care of you with that GFE. She's tall (around 5'5" skinny with little to no body fat (you can see some ribs but not starving skinny, athletic skinny), C / D fake but round and perky, cute / sexy face (can definitely imagine her having RBF or be intimidating to others if she doesn't smile), young / mid 30's. DATY, BBBJ (one of the best), CIM, CFS, GFE, and absolutely loves nonstop DFK. I usually go for a while and she's a trooper and can definitely keep up.
Joy: Looks - 6. 5 / Performance - 6. 5 / Repeat. No / Notes: To be honest, I can't remember much on her because it was that unexciting. She definitely wasn't into it and was very delicate. I'm average size and she wouldn't DT, about 75%. Not a fan of LFK / DFK and was just trying to get it over with in a passive / aggressive approach.
Niya** (might be on break): Looks - 7. 5 / Performance - 9 / Repeat. Yes / Notes: Jumps between here and norcal. Face is good but not great, a little on the fobbier side. She's definitely a little more on the meaty side, but not fat, just curvy. Real DDD, perky, and doesn't sag. Performance was probably one of the best I've had as she's really into it and wants to make sure you loving every moment of it. DATY, BBBJ (good but not great), rimming, CIM. She'll also do a nuru massage (did it without any oil) and it's not like Bangkok but pretty good to me. I don't repeat many but she definitely earned it.
M:
Bella: Looks - 7 / Performance - 5. 5 / Repeat. No / Notes: Has a cute-ish face but has some happy weight. Very soft spoken, shy, and more the sensual type. LFK but no much. BBBJ but won't DT and doesn't like her head being touched. Just like Joy (see above), she's very delicate and you can't be rough so I had to dial it back. I don't pump very hard and she was low key complaining when doggy so had to finish in missionary. I wasn't thrilled but at least now I know she's not worth a 2nd visit.
SFK:
Viki: Looks - 6. 5 / Performance - 6. 5 / Repeat. No / Notes: I saw her back in June so my memory is hazy but what I remember most what her looks. Her photos are her but probably what she looked like 7 - 10 years ago. She's definitely in her late 30's, more likely in her 40's. She's got happy weight and a little pooch in the front. She still looked cute but definitely not my taste.
SA:
Chanel** (Think she's with M): Looks - 8. 5 / Performance - 8. 5 / Repeat. Yes / Notes: She was my first experience in the LA market and she definitely set the bar high. I've been hearing that she's back with M / Gray but her personality and performance has definitely changed. I can't remember the exact details but she did BBFS, CIM, DFK, GFE, and was definitely a pleaser. Had a great conversation with her and she was really into it. Sadly I'm hearing a different story, can anyone confirm where she is now? Would love to revisit.
If you've read this far, I applaud you. My reviews aren't great at the moment only because it's late and most of these visits were a while back. For future experiences I'll share more details, I have a couple new appointments for this upcoming week. I'm the type that's willing to try anything so if any of you have a request, I'm more than happy to TOFTT and report back. Just keep in mind, my taste may be different from yours; for example I can tell Toungsten and I have opposites tastes, nothing wrong with that, just enjoy different flavors. With that said, can anyone recommend others similar to Lyn or Chanal (from SA)? Thank you everyone!
-
01-10-21 07:18 #17031
Posts: 176Not sure why ya'll think it's a location issue with this bust that supposedly took place at Norton. As shady and well-known as that spot is.
It's clearly the booker's fault for not putting in the work to make sure the girls are safe. It's not like these vice are randomly kicking down doors in a apartment complex looking for these establishments, they were clearly given a room number by the booker. This could have happened at literally any spot.
Nothing on the news means the vice didn't find anything useful and the girl ended up with a warning. Or had to give up a free session. Either way, I'd be careful using the booker associated with the girl that got busted. They're clearly not into keeping things as tight as other bookers. I'd hate to be that guy that's balls deep in the roommate while vice is kicking down the doors.