Craigslist Advertiser Reviews

[Cropsey]

Anybody have any information on Liz? She has been answering ads for a solid month now.

She called herself Gigi went she contacted me. I answered her and it went nowhere. Scam most likely.

[MikeGeorge]

Anybody have any information on Liz? She has been answering ads for a solid month now.

What do you mean she has been answering ads for a month?

[LBrad52]

Anybody have any information on Liz? She has been answering ads for a solid month now.

Nope, Looks like a nice set of tits though.

[Fun0410]

Anybody have any information on Liz? She has been answering ads for a solid month now.

[Stacks N Racks]

Keep seeing this ad pop up wording always changes and usually ends with something "see ya later alligator" or similar.

I'm hesitant since I've emailed the poster with no answer.

And a number search doesn't turn up anything except a few names in texas.

Anyone ever make contact?

https://providence.craigslist.org/mi...096695639.html

It's a scam.

[ConGorilla]

Keep seeing this ad pop up wording always changes and usually ends with something "see ya later alligator" or similar.

I'm hesitant since I've emailed the poster with no answer.

And a number search doesn't turn up anything except a few names in texas.

Anyone ever make contact?

https://providence.craigslist.org/mi...096695639.html

[OrlLovr69]

Got a hit this week by this one. Anyone meet her before? Pic looks pretty good.

I got an answer from a gal, pic looks like the same lady but different picture. I advertised in Worcester she answered as "Denise" Still trying to work out details.

[AloneButOkay]

Got a hit this week by this one. Anyone meet her before? Pic looks pretty good.

She looks like the lady name 'Sherri' who use to post on CL back in the NSA days. She's from Pawtucket. Huge tits, great ass but that pic does look to be a few years old.

[GD420]

Would be my best guess. That particular group of individuals feels like its thier domain and as such I'd bet anytime any of us come a looking they take it as encroachment on thier domain and its flag city.

Yea, I just don't get it. I mean. We did leave them truck stops LOL.

[GrafDog1]

Would be my best guess. That particular group of individuals feels like its thier domain and as such I'd bet anytime any of us come a looking they take it as encroachment on thier domain and its flag city.

Bingo! I think CG has hit the nail squarely on the head with his theory.

[Drewonhere]

What I find really interesting is that posts where guys are looking for other guys seem to not get flagged when the purpose of those posts are very obvious. But a post for a M looking for a F, or vice versa gets flagged quickly. I wonder why it's ok to post for gay sex partners but not for heterosexual partners.

When the feds shut down CL and BP it was " an attempt stop sex trafficking" period, but the underlying issue was they wanted to cripple the P4P transactions too. So the CL mods are flagging the M4W and F4M posts that have any hint of what could get that portion of the forum shutdown as happened to the personals.

It's the same rhetoric they use to try and shut down AMPs.

[ConGorilla]

Would be my best guess. That particular group of individuals feels like its thier domain and as such I'd bet anytime any of us come a looking they take it as encroachment on thier domain and its flag city.

What I find really interesting is that posts where guys are looking for other guys seem to not get flagged when the purpose of those posts are very obvious. But a post for a M looking for a F, or vice versa gets flagged quickly. I wonder why it's ok to post for gay sex partners but not for heterosexual partners.

[P Sil]

So I tried a little experiment and posted up an ad which included the word ladies and another with female.

Both got flagged and removed.

I reposted the same ad and removed those words and thus far the ads ran with no issue despite an out pour of hits from men.

Something to keep in mind for those on this route.

What I find really interesting is that posts where guys are looking for other guys seem to not get flagged when the purpose of those posts are very obvious. But a post for a M looking for a F, or vice versa gets flagged quickly. I wonder why it's ok to post for gay sex partners but not for heterosexual partners.

[ConGorilla]

So I tried a little experiment and posted up an ad which included the word ladies and another with female.

Both got flagged and removed.

I reposted the same ad and removed those words and thus far the ads ran with no issue despite an out pour of hits from men.

Something to keep in mind for those on this route.

[ConGorilla]

While researching a recent hit on my ad I came acrossa number of older posts with some really good looking prospects. Granted these went back as far as 2016 but I feel it couldn't hurt to see if any of you still have contract info for some of these women.