Korean Agency BB

[Seriousfun]

Pros- cute, young, large soft breasts, soft rim, shower preview, BBBJ.

Cons- little touching or kissing allowed, CFS, a little too much canned verbal praise.

Don't expect a wild session. Let her direct you, and she'll treat you fine. She dozed off in bed with me for a few minutes, and she was actually a little sweeter when she realized this.

[Toungsten]

Hey bud, (tried PM, but was full) do you happen to know if new girl Karen is former Ms super-soaker girl Lia? One of the pics looks likes her along with similar stats. Any info would be appreciated. Thanks.

Looks a little like her but unfortunately no. Lia was one of my best fucks ever even though she wasn't one of the best looking ones.

[Toungsten]

What age would you put on Luna and also, how was her body? Fat rolls? Old? Young? Slim? Were her tits big or small? Hows her ass, flat or curvy? Any detailed info on her looks would be greatly appreciated, wouldn't want to show up and turns out she fugly LOL.

Probably 28 to 35 as virtually most of the girls who claim to be early twenties actually are. Slim, nice body with big tits and an average to round ass. You won't be disappointed although it's always YMMV.

[Toungsten]

Just throwing it out there to save me time replying to PMs and Posts:

My list of stand out favorites for the BB advertised kgirls I've seen as of this posting:

Sophia (SAG. OC): Older, but service is up there. High libido, great attitude that wants to devour you whole, very enthusiastic, aims to please.

Jamie (KTE. LA): Petite latin bodied cutie. Good service with great looks. Long black hair which sometimes gets in the way. Attitude is a bit standoffish and disconnected, especially during the interim and after popping.

Chloe (Passionkfruit. OC): JAV worthy looks, great smile, average service, friendly personality.

Chanel (SA. LA): Best looking to me so far, great tits and curvy body, good service, fun personality.

As an overall package that centers more on looks (all the girls listed above have decent or better service regardless) my assessment is:

1. Chanel.

2. Jamie.

3. Chloe.

4. Sophia.

I would add Jina to that list. Very pretty IMHO and a great natural swimsuit model's body. Starts off passive but if you hit the right spots she really gets going. Once you get the passive ones to that point of no return you get a memorable experience.

[Lazymotivated]

So I just got into the hobby 6 months ago. And would like to contribute some knowledge to all you fine people.

Acektown isn't' out of business just new website.

New website: acektownla.com.

Always had a great safe time with all their providers. Some have honestly been the most amazing beautiful girls ever. I always come back to the korean agencies since they have the best service from any independent girls working.

[Bastard Chorum]

So Chanel is skinny with big tits and a slightly above average Asian ass (not a bubble butt)?

Who would you say has a body like hers from today's current crop of kgirls or movie stars or online JAV or porn actresses?

Butt is between flat and bubble butt, Jamie has a better ass. Her figure is similar to when Amber initially just got back, just a bit slimmer and bigger tits. I wouldn't classify her as skinny, when I think of skinny I imagine Chanel / Sienna with M and Aurora with Kcup, she's thicker almost latina build.

[IAmGib1]

With Sexy Angels.

Photos: It's her. Some photoshop. The picture of her on her knees in a sheer black body stocking is the most representative.

Looks: Gorgeous face (this is heavily biased for me cause I really like that look), Magnificent soft man made DD's (she's got a lot to begin with but extra implants to round it out), decent ass, shaven pussy, 5'6". She's tan and not as pale as the pictures make it out to be. Some fading tan lines on her shoulders. Curvy frame.

English: Not much.

Attitude: Likes to laugh, aims to please, easy to get along with.

Service: Overall above average. DFK was decent. Her BBBJ starts with quick bursts of in and out tip action followed by more sensual DT and BLS. Really responsive to DATY (more on this later). Breast play should be one of the main attraction for her cause they were by far one of the looking I've come across. Skipped CG cause I wanted K9 and mish with that face and body right away. Both were good as her looks took it up a notch. As with all good things, some points of distraction: she takes her time in the shower routine and her enthusiasm/responsiveness is a bit contrived. I was also surprised how brightly lit the room was. She was hesitant for BB action, definitely YMMV.

Expense: $260.

Repeat: Yes, I'll preface this with how looks heavily played a part on the positive review which you should be aware of. Service was more likely slightly above average but man her looks are ATF level for me.

So Chanel is skinny with big tits and a slightly above average Asian ass (not a bubble butt)?

Who would you say has a body like hers from today's current crop of kgirls or movie stars or online JAV or porn actresses?

[XavierLee]

Just texted the number I use for Nana and was told she was available tonight. Booked her several times before.

Thoughts Gary Booker and Rose Nana? Is she good GFE / BBF / nice?

[Bastard Chorum]

Just throwing it out there to save me time replying to PMs and Posts:

My list of stand out favorites for the BB advertised kgirls I've seen as of this posting:

Sophia (SAG. OC): Older, but service is up there. High libido, great attitude that wants to devour you whole, very enthusiastic, aims to please.

Jamie (KTE. LA): Petite latin bodied cutie. Good service with great looks. Long black hair which sometimes gets in the way. Attitude is a bit standoffish and disconnected, especially during the interim and after popping.

Chloe (Passionkfruit. OC): JAV worthy looks, great smile, average service, friendly personality.

Chanel (SA. LA): Best looking to me so far, great tits and curvy body, good service, fun personality.

As an overall package that centers more on looks (all the girls listed above have decent or better service regardless) my assessment is:

1. Chanel.

2. Jamie.

3. Chloe.

4. Sophia.

[XavierLee]

Just texted the number I use for Nana and was told she was available tonight. Booked her several times before.

Are you talking about NANA with booker gray?

[Bastard Chorum]

With Sexy Angels.

Photos: It's her. Some photoshop. The picture of her on her knees in a sheer black body stocking is the most representative.

Looks: Gorgeous face (this is heavily biased for me cause I really like that look), Magnificent soft man made DD's (she's got a lot to begin with but extra implants to round it out), decent ass, shaven pussy, 5'6". She's tan and not as pale as the pictures make it out to be. Some fading tan lines on her shoulders. Curvy frame.

English: Not much.

Attitude: Likes to laugh, aims to please, easy to get along with.

Service: Overall above average. DFK was decent. Her BBBJ starts with quick bursts of in and out tip action followed by more sensual DT and BLS. Really responsive to DATY (more on this later). Breast play should be one of the main attraction for her cause they were by far one of the looking I've come across. Skipped CG cause I wanted K9 and mish with that face and body right away. Both were good as her looks took it up a notch. As with all good things, some points of distraction: she takes her time in the shower routine and her enthusiasm/responsiveness is a bit contrived. I was also surprised how brightly lit the room was. She was hesitant for BB action, definitely YMMV.

Expense: $260.

Repeat: Yes, I'll preface this with how looks heavily played a part on the positive review which you should be aware of. Service was more likely slightly above average but man her looks are ATF level for me.

[HapaBoy86]

Do you have the number for ca-kdoll?

Use the the search function and it will give ya hits or maybe scroll back several pages.

[HapaBoy86]

Can I book Cona? Which website or phone number?

No website and if you are not already on the bookers rolodex. Don't even try. Get ignored.

[The Real Cost]

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were largely argumentative. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!

[Kreme69]

She was a dud like other reviewers mentioned. Real short 4'11 to 5'. Average body. Decent breasts and flat butt. Like a dead fish when fucking. Took forever to coax into BBFS. After she agreed, my sex drive faded. Not a kisser and barely into the sex act. Would not repeat. Will try Sienna next even though CFS. Heard good things about her. Will report back.