Korean Agency BB

**Newbie032** · 08-24-19 22:41

Originally Posted by AmericanDog [View Original Post]

I saw Nayeon based on a RAVE review someone posted here. He said that her pictures are minimally photoshopped but in my opinion they are very photoshopped. Good service though. I had fun but won't repeat.

Couldn't agree more. Pictures are very photo-shopped. The body wasn't the babyback as I hope it would be, feels rundown. But good service. Was patient (I have PED) but she helped me to the finishline.

**Malicious** · 08-24-19 19:49

Two thumbs up!

Saw Lucia and Cona each solo on consecutive days this past week! After a long break from seeing any of M's ladies, glad I was able to book the appointments pretty easily.

Awesome service from both and concur with all the positive reviews posted. If I were to return, I'd see Lucia first just for the sheer level of her great service. Don't get me wrong, Cona is still great and I just can't get enough of her titties!

I'm sure a doubles session with those 2 is awesome but it may be sensory overload for me.

**BobLove** · 08-24-19 18:58

Originally Posted by HobbyVeteran [View Original Post]

I've seen M's crew for a long long time. I did the first Cona 2 girl show (now Rora), and several with Cona and Chloe O. Seen many many girls there. I've always been polite, kind and discreet. I've even sent happy New Years card with a small gift to M. She has sent me the occasional message that my appointment has to cancel because the girl is not feeling up to it and I always appreciated that. I also appreciated the significant discount M gave me for my next appointment if I didn't want to see a different girl.

I see a lot of grumbling about M and her crew right now. I respect everyone's differing opinions but I believe strongly that M and her crew outshine most others in the scene. To be honest BBFS isn't my thing but I still prefer going to M. Just me.

THEM site says Hannah at M's is a tranny. Is that true?

**NintyNine** · 08-24-19 17:21

Originally Posted by Toungsten [View Original Post]

M.
Lacey.......................................................... PV.
Cona, Lucia, Nikki, Hannah, Serena, Honey......................... WLA.
.

Did heidi get scared off?

**NintyNine** · 08-24-19 17:16

Originally Posted by JohnnyEm [View Original Post]

I totally agree! When We review these girls, we're not trying to slam M and her girls because all of us have had a blast there at some point. Cona has lost a big step! Lucia is hit or miss and IMO isn't very attractive and Nikki, who I just saw last weekend was a complete dud. I don't know why we continue to spend our $$ here.

What didn't you like about nikki?

Genuinely curious, because I don't know who to book.

I saw cona in 2017, so I'm not going to repeat. I can tell lucia has a funny looking face.

And due to miscommunication, I lost the chance to see chanel.

**NintyNine** · 08-24-19 17:07

Originally Posted by HapaBoy86 [View Original Post]

Come on T.

Being this is a bareback thread the guys only care about if they can jizz inside her with "no condom"! Not looks! LOL.

This isn't kstyleblog. .

No, bro.

We all have a minimum standard for looks. We don't want to fuck butterfaces.

I think people should at least review a girl's face a little.

**BbbjStan** · 08-24-19 15:44

I miss rain! My life hasn't been the same without her LOL. Yet to find anyone like her. Damn should've married that sexy girl. Wish she came back hahaha.

**Newbie032** · 08-24-19 15:26

https://www.instagram.com/p/Bzn7gvdnJXK/

If you do please pm or let me know!

**HobbyVeteran** · 08-23-19 23:02

Originally Posted by BastardChorum [View Original Post]

I just get the usual "broken water pipes" or she's want to end work early, or she has stuff to do, when I run into cancellations. I'm just surprised to see that M, or any booker for that matter, will elaborate to that extent. It would be nice to be told that she's too tired to service me right. I guess I'm just too vanilla and not that special LOL.

I've seen M's crew for a long long time. I did the first Cona 2 girl show (now Rora), and several with Cona and Chloe O. Seen many many girls there. I've always been polite, kind and discreet. I've even sent happy New Years card with a small gift to M. She has sent me the occasional message that my appointment has to cancel because the girl is not feeling up to it and I always appreciated that. I also appreciated the significant discount M gave me for my next appointment if I didn't want to see a different girl.

I see a lot of grumbling about M and her crew right now. I respect everyone's differing opinions but I believe strongly that M and her crew outshine most others in the scene. To be honest BBFS isn't my thing but I still prefer going to M. Just me.

**Bastard Chorum** · 08-23-19 22:42

I just get the usual "broken water pipes" or she's want to end work early, or she has stuff to do, when I run into cancellations. I'm just surprised to see that M, or any booker for that matter, will elaborate to that extent. It would be nice to be told that she's too tired to service me right. I guess I'm just too vanilla and not that special LOL.

**Toungsten** · 08-23-19 22:38

Originally Posted by BastardChorum [View Original Post]

Boner is spot on for M. She provides girls whose service and performance are consistent. There are, of course, outliers on both ends of the spectrum but she's got a better track record than most other bookers from my point of view. Unless you've been living under a rock and not paying attention to reviews / discussions of M's crew, you can get a pretty good idea of what to expect with any her girls: probably MILF look, ok body / looks, above average service, and BB is likely. All aspects are YMMV but as mentioned, M's pretty consistent. It's disingenuous when you compare and critique against legends like Rain, Suri, Queen, etc and take that as the norm. Celebrate and enjoy the legends but parity of service and / or looks should be compared with contemporaneous girls to provide all mongers an objective and pragmatic prospective of current girls. So how does the service of M's girls rank against the girls of other agencies? My take is that, except for a few individual gems in LA and OC that are better, as a collective group, M is better than most.

It's been my experience that I've gotten better overall sessions when there's a language barrier. Effective communication tends to be a wash as it'll either lead to a better time or she opens more and talks too much to the point it starts affecting her service. This is just in general terms for girls from all bookers I've seen. Although, I will note, that having elementary Korean skills will be for the most part beneficial. They tend to find it cute and the bumbling broken sentences earn laughs and short playful teaching opportunities for the girls that enhances the mood and service.

My limited Korean is the word bimil which I use when I know they don't want something repeated and yes they find it cute and it does enhance the mood and service.

**Bastard Chorum** · 08-23-19 22:27

Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty [View Original Post]

Speaking from experiences, M girls are one level above other agencies in term of performance. They work the hardest. No upcharge for MSOG and BBFS. Even refused to see me because they thought they would be too tired to give good service. Now that's service and commitment. I have many ATFs and star performers outside of M but I will always appreciate M.

Others may think I am advocating M girls but with a name like Boner, I already warned you guys to use your big head when reading my posts.

You are also talking about my ATF Rain. I didn't need English to feel connected with her but then again I prefer girls who don't talk a lot LOL.

Boner is spot on for M. She provides girls whose service and performance are consistent. There are, of course, outliers on both ends of the spectrum but she's got a better track record than most other bookers from my point of view. Unless you've been living under a rock and not paying attention to reviews / discussions of M's crew, you can get a pretty good idea of what to expect with any her girls: probably MILF look, ok body / looks, above average service, and BB is likely. All aspects are YMMV but as mentioned, M's pretty consistent. It's disingenuous when you compare and critique against legends like Rain, Suri, Queen, etc and take that as the norm. Celebrate and enjoy the legends but parity of service and / or looks should be compared with contemporaneous girls to provide all mongers an objective and pragmatic prospective of current girls. So how does the service of M's girls rank against the girls of other agencies? My take is that, except for a few individual gems in LA and OC that are better, as a collective group, M is better than most.

It's been my experience that I've gotten better overall sessions when there's a language barrier. Effective communication tends to be a wash as it'll either lead to a better time or she opens more and talks too much to the point it starts affecting her service. This is just in general terms for girls from all bookers I've seen. Although, I will note, that having elementary Korean skills will be for the most part beneficial. They tend to find it cute and the bumbling broken sentences earn laughs and short playful teaching opportunities for the girls that enhances the mood and service.

**Toungsten** · 08-23-19 14:09

Originally Posted by Jbjb1983 [View Original Post]

Saw her at the PV location, parking is bad during the morning! Anyways. Sasha is very cute looking, has a tattoo along her belly probably covering a scar or something. She has a nice body and with me she allowed BBFS and really got into it. She gets pretty vocal. She requested I nut outside, I obliged. She got me to cum twice. She does use a bit of teeth in her bbj and likes to bite, not hard, in a playful way. Overall Looks are good, service is excellent. Sucks she's leaving so soon.

That picture you referred to in your review is actually her friend that she's going to San Jose to see and will probably return with her in a few weeks if all goes well.

**Toungsten** · 08-23-19 14:03

Originally Posted by JohnnyEm [View Original Post]

I totally agree! When We review these girls, we're not trying to slam M and her girls because all of us have had a blast there at some point. Cona has lost a big step! Lucia is hit or miss and IMO isn't very attractive and Nikki, who I just saw last weekend was a complete dud. I don't know why we continue to spend our $$ here.

This is why we must do our due diligence on writing and reading reviews. I rarely see a girl before there are more than a few reviews and also before I can see who the reviewer is and what his track record is. I don't dispute what you experienced with Cona, Lucia or Nikki. I haven't seen Nikki so I have no basis for comparison and there are very few reviews of her but they seem to be quite positive. As far as Cona and Lucia I'm surprised to hear you say that Cona has lost a step since her reviews seem to be as good as ever. As for Lucia being hit or miss all I can say that it's always a hit for me and apparently for most others based on her reviews. Looks are certainly YMMV but the reviews of Lucia's performance is usually off the charts. That being said just shows how important it is for reviews here where most of us are looking for the same thing. Whether it's good or bad it gives us a basis for comparison.