BBFS Providers Manhattan

**UncleThrax** · 07-05-19 12:36

I figured this is a good place to put this. For those into porn stars, Sienna West is in NYC however note that she is extremely unfriendly to even the suggestion of BBFS. If you check out her Twitter posts from about a month ago, apparently the suggestion of it set her off into a multi post rant.

So steer clear, unless you're OK with CFS.

**Inertia204** · 07-05-19 10:42

Originally Posted by RedSonata [View Original Post]

Anyone ever been with that Roxi girl (the redhead).

220 for BBFS is really tempting.

Wouldn't recommend her. Last time I saw her I noticed she is much chubbier in person that in the pics. Her face is also very worn looking, like a 40 year old. Worst of all last time I was hitting her from the back the smell was so bad had to hold my breath. Man was I glad I was already so close to popping.

**Auscrosh** · 07-05-19 07:45

Got to see gina rollins for the first time a couple weeks ago. What an initiation! You guys know how she gets down. Non stop action from beginning to end. Super sweet and very accommadating. Definite repeat.

**Clyde2019** · 07-05-19 00:14

Originally Posted by MrFrench [View Original Post]

If you want Asian, then, yes, Gaga is probably the way to go. I haven't tried her myself and I've heard that BBFS isn't always available. However, if you're looking for a guaranteed good time I'd strongly recommend either Gina Rollins or Alexis Cain. Both are guaranteed BBFS, although neither are Asian.

Has anyone been with Alexis Cain recently, past month or 2? Is she available?

**MrFrench** · 07-04-19 22:01

Originally Posted by SpaspaHunter [View Original Post]

I agree with the not doing deposits if it can be helped.

Sad as it sounds more girls are requiring deposits at least on the higher end.

Way too many assholes doing NCNS and pulling last minute bullshit like trying to force them to accept a lower rate.

Yeah, ever since the new laws took effect, it's become a seller's market which allows them to do whatever the fuck they want. I won't do deposits under any circumstances and I don't need those "high end" bitches since I can get porn stars for the same rates and know what I'm getting. And I know where to find quality women like Gina Rollins for less and know I can get BBFS whereas the higher end ones are all "maybes" at best.

**SpaspaHunter** · 07-04-19 21:22

Originally Posted by Martin0028 [View Original Post]

I'm with you on this. Sorry-way too many fish in the sea to give a deposit to a stranger. Will never happen with me. Next!

I agree with the not doing deposits if it can be helped.

Sad as it sounds more girls are requiring deposits at least on the higher end.

Way too many assholes doing NCNS and pulling last minute bullshit like trying to force them to accept a lower rate.

**SpaspaHunter** · 07-04-19 21:03

Originally Posted by MrFrench [View Original Post]

There are an awful lot of assumptions in that post.

Let's take just one:

You assume that if person A "follows" person B that it means that person A has either seen person B or is considering it. What if person A "follows" person B in order to, well, keep an eye on them to see what scam they are using when they switch up their method? What if person A is a cop and is following person B to find out where person B is traveling to so they can be arrested? What if person A is the type of person that just "follows" everyone that follows them? What if you're a guy and you "follow" another guy to see his posts and who he sees because you have interests or tastes in common? All of those are reasons that a person might "follow" someone that I know are true in some cases. That is to say, all of those reasons have been used as reasons to "follow" someone that differs from your assumption.

The bottom line here is that what might be true for you is not necessarily true for me or for anyone else. And you shouldn't make assumptions about other people's activity based on your own.

Note: this is not to slam you at all. Please don't take my post that way.

No offense taken. It's a case by case scenario as you're indicating. Reasons don't matter, assumptions don't matter. What matters is if there is a connection that can be verified.

In G0's case however, he does have connecting references he has seen that are following him and he is pretty proactive in outing frauds.

I'm only pointing out that switter allows you to connect those dots easier as opposed to listing sites that don't have the social aspect.

Those tend to take multiple ads and different other methods to find the commonality of all involved.

**BBPornoGeek** · 07-04-19 12:18

Originally Posted by Chicago41 [View Original Post]

Have any of you guys done double BBFSCIP with Gina and any of her friends? I see she works with Ingrid and the idea of that just blew my mind.

You guys have it good here. Chicago hobbying sucks!

I had a duo of Gina and Alexis. You should load up on Gatorade before heading in. An hour of non stop fucking all 6 holes is a lot to take in!

**Chicago41** · 07-04-19 09:37

Have any of you guys done double BBFSCIP with Gina and any of her friends? I see she works with Ingrid and the idea of that just blew my mind.

You guys have it good here. Chicago hobbying sucks!

**Martin0028** · 07-04-19 05:51

Originally Posted by PWnyc69 [View Original Post]

Yeah but even the real and verified girls on switter asking for deposits and most have ridiculous screening policies. No thanks!!

I'm with you on this. Sorry-way too many fish in the sea to give a deposit to a stranger. Will never happen with me. Next!

**Kei0145** · 07-04-19 04:32

Originally Posted by Chris93 [View Original Post]

Finally saw Sabrina aka ivanka. She's legit still the guaranteed BBFS provider everyone has said she is. Her LE test is sucking your dick for a second to know if your cool or not. Kind of got scared when before even starting the BJ she went to get a rubber. But when it was time she asked me and I said no. Blew in her pussy and she was cool with it. Even asked if golden showers were ok and got up on the bed and pissed in a cup in front of me. Not my thing service wise she's easily the best I've had she was willing to do anything and the rate is extremely reasonable she has early bird deals so I advise to see her early. A day before she really did try me to get her friend involved.. Kindly said no thanks bit next time I'll consider it. Got the info for the friend and she is looking good and from what she told me she is younger then Sabrina. May consider if she does what Sabrina does. Also the famous stuffed animal I've heard about made an appearance but she didn't talk to it.

Can you please PM me Sabrina's number and rates?

**Red Sonata** · 07-03-19 23:37

Anyone ever been with that Roxi girl (the redhead).

220 for BBFS is really tempting.

**MrFrench** · 07-03-19 21:49

Originally Posted by SpaspaHunter [View Original Post]

Instead of focusing on the non verified fakes you can branch off from the existing network in literally both angles and extrapolate if a provider is legit or not.

Listings and such doesn't have that kind of networking capability. It's actually terrifying if you think about it.

Let's say you have an account there *cough*.

Who are you following? If you're following them it's likely you've either seen them or interested enough to consider it and then the question becomes are they following you back.

How about interactions? Without having to ask them directly you passively have a basic understanding of their status and their connections.

Let's go by that last connection talking about spotting fake ads.

I would say that connection is legit so the guy G-0 would likely also be legit.

I would surmise that any boost from G0 is likely not fake or has been a transaction without delving deeper. Such as the recent sky boost.

Not to name names directly or be painfully obvious but you can PM me if you want me to clarify LOL.

There are an awful lot of assumptions in that post.

Let's take just one:

You assume that if person A "follows" person B that it means that person A has either seen person B or is considering it. What if person A "follows" person B in order to, well, keep an eye on them to see what scam they are using when they switch up their method? What if person A is a cop and is following person B to find out where person B is traveling to so they can be arrested? What if person A is the type of person that just "follows" everyone that follows them? What if you're a guy and you "follow" another guy to see his posts and who he sees because you have interests or tastes in common? All of those are reasons that a person might "follow" someone that I know are true in some cases. That is to say, all of those reasons have been used as reasons to "follow" someone that differs from your assumption.

The bottom line here is that what might be true for you is not necessarily true for me or for anyone else. And you shouldn't make assumptions about other people's activity based on your own.

Note: this is not to slam you at all. Please don't take my post that way.