Thread: "Sugarbabies" / "Arrangements" Amateurs or Not?
+
Add Report
Results 7,621 to 7,635 of 23145
-
09-10-18 22:04 #15525
Posts: 454Sorry, I struck a deal with her right after the first date for two dates a week on a weekly allowance, I couldn't resist. She says she has time for only only SD. Although I am not sure I believe that, I am not inclined to share her details as of now. Anyway, I am (and SB) in Charleston, and if you are in Richmond, it may not work anyway. I come here to Richmond SB forum mainly to get general info, tactics etc, not really to get intel on girls.
Stay Safe.
Dr. S.
Originally Posted by RVASpider [View Original Post]
-
09-10-18 21:39 #15524
Posts: 128Originally Posted by DrSummer [View Original Post]
-
09-10-18 20:28 #15523
Posts: 118Viewing messages without premium
I'm a programmer, and I spend a good portion of my time doing web development. I've noted that SA has been rewriting portions of their site from a traditional "click link, wait for server return the new page" style to a "single-page application" approach. Turns out that due to some rather silly programming choices on their part, it's actually possible to view the text content of messages even if you don't have premium time enabled.
It involves opening up your browser's "development tools" window so you can inspect the contents of the page and the data being requested, and should work in either Chrome or Firefox.
Log in to SA and go to your inbox. Right-click anywhere on the page and choose "Inspect Element". The browser's dev tools should either pop up as a separate window, or as part of the main window. Click on the "network" tab in the dev tools. Then, back in the SA inbox screen, click on a conversation.
If you go back to the "network" tab, you should see a list of all the data requests the SA page asked for from the server. One of them should look like "/ inbox? Page=1&limit=25". Click on that one. It'll show a bunch of technical details of some of the message headers.
Now, look for a tab called "Response". If you click on that, you should see a tree with sections like "status", "message", "conversation", and "metadata". Expand "conversation" "messages" "data". You should see some numbered entries, 0 and up. Those represent each of the messages in the conversation, from both of you. (Side note: the "metadata" object has a whole bunch of info that they know about your own account. Some of it is info you entered yourself, like profile info. There's also things like "payments_total", which appears to be how much you've actually ever paid SA, unread message count, whether you're in the EU, and even fields labeled "has_under_age_punishment" and "has_unacknowledged_punishment". Very interesting.)
Each message entry has a field called "body", which is the text that's shown in your inbox. If you've got premium active, it's the actual message text. If not, it's "Upgrade to read".
Here's where they did something silly. They send back the text that should be shown, but *they also send back the original text too*. So, even if the "body" field says "Upgrade to read", the "original_body" field shows the actual no-kidding message that was sent. You can inspect each of the messages that was received, and effectively read the conversation.
It's not a substitute for reading messages in the inbox as usual, but it might be helpful for anyone who gets a message when they don't have premium active and wants to peek at it without having to immediately shell out the cash to read it.
As a programmer, I can tell that there's actually a _ton_ of useful information being returned whenever you view a profile page or inbox page. It would be possible for someone to write a browser extension that either extracted some of that info from a page, or re-requested that data from the server, and did something useful with it (up to and including modifying an inbox to show all the messages without needing premium enabled). Sadly, I don't have time to work on anything like that myself. I've got a lot of other things on my plate.
Hope that helps!
-
09-10-18 20:27 #15522
Posts: 454Turning Down Pussy
I know it was a stupid move from me. I thought she was bull shitting me about being pre-med etc, I didn't think all add up. I asked her for a confirmation of her age, she handed her drivers licence to me. Very unique name, I found all her info through social media etc, and all she told me turned out to be true. Good news is that I took her to FC after few days, she turned out to be an energizer bunny in bed. So, I didn't loose out. She is still little too big for my liking though.
Stay Safe.
Dr. S.
Originally Posted by InTight [View Original Post]
-
09-10-18 20:16 #15521
Posts: 454Confession of a SB
We all know that (at least the members here), and has been discussed here numerous times. The chances of success for girls looking for on-line, or "platonic" are slim and either they drop out of the scene or learn how to spread their legs little bit more to stay in business. I have about a year of experience with SA, and met at least 50 potential SB's in person. For the first time, I met a girl two days ago who confessed to that fact. She is a 20 year old college junior (exchange student). We got comfortable with each other very quickly. She told me she tried "online" first with no success at all. Then changed her profile to 'platonic', still very little interested parties. Only when she offered "intimacy", there were serious interest from SDs.
Fast forward, this girl is model quality (at least 9. 5 out of 10 in my scale), slim girl with curves at the right places, cute face and flawless body. Spent 2 hours at FC yesterday, the best erotic experience in my life. Not just the sex, the whole experience was far beyond what I expected. There are few gems out there if you are patient enough to find them.
Stay Safe.
Dr. S.
-
09-10-18 20:09 #15520
Posts: 213Feelingfriendly
Originally Posted by BStreet [View Original Post]
"I ask that on the first date we get to know each other & determine if we want to pursue an arrangement. By the end of the 1st date, if & ONLY if we both want to move forward I do ask 300 allowance which goes towards the monthly 600 that I ask for. This provides me with safety and comfort knowing you are genuinely interested in an arrangement and my value is not equated to simply sex=money. Otherwise I would just feel like a hooker. This is NOT upfront, it's only if we both decide to have a 2nd date".
-
09-10-18 19:44 #15519
Posts: 454Single Photo Profiles
In general, your statement on single photo profiles is correct in my experience. But, I can give you two examples where it turned out to be wrong. The SB I have found from SA that I dated for the longest had a single photo in her profile. It was my early days on SA, I was just sending messages to all. But I asked her more photos after few messages, she texted me. She turned out to be a great find. The key is to ask for more photos very early in communication, and see if they do it. I usually read the profile anyway even if she has a single photo. You can get some clues. Most recently I messaged a 19 year college girl who had a single face photo and profile said "curvy", a sure shot case of a fat girl. She texted me an additional photo, but it was not conclusive either, but the profile seemed genuine and communication was good. So, I took a chance for a "no obligation" meet. She turned out to be a well figured cute girl (I would call her "slim" actually). The arrangement didn't work out due to other issues (allowance etc) though. With 18-22-olds you never know what they think.
Stay Safe.
Dr. S.
Originally Posted by Ripvan12 [View Original Post]
-
09-10-18 19:13 #15518
Posts: 2803Originally Posted by Madaboutmax [View Original Post]
-
09-10-18 18:21 #15517
Posts: 10SA rarity
I dreamt of the absolutely most exquisite sb. 24. Body won't stop. Wet kitty. Expensive. But compared to broke crack hoes worth every penny. Got to catch myself. She's not into me. Just that $$. But she's a gen.
-
09-10-18 16:20 #15516
Posts: 18Did you read her profile?
Originally Posted by TheMarto1 [View Original Post]
-
09-10-18 12:39 #15515
Posts: 114Famous sugarbaby
Originally Posted by TheMarto1 [View Original Post]
-
09-10-18 12:30 #15514
Posts: 49Originally Posted by Ripvan12 [View Original Post]
-
09-10-18 10:18 #15513
Posts: 166SA being invaded with flakes, scammers and time wasters
Hey brothers. I also posted this in the Atlanta thread, but curious to hear your thoughts as well.
Let me be clear. There are plenty of gems still on the site, but the amount of time I have invested this go round weeding out flakes and scammers has been insane. By now most veterans know the rules to spot the spammers and old BP pros (talk of time limits, in town for only one night, send me money before meeting, can you cover my gas money, my mother is having a major surgery, blah blah).
But what are some other methods you guys are using to weed out the flakes and scammers?
For me. I have started to ignore females with only one picture on their profile! Sure I might be missing out on some goodies. But what woman you know is comfortable with just ONE pic of themselves. On a dating app with plenty of competition? My experience has been. Mostly. That these one-picture girls have one foot in and one foot out. Not really seeking anything quickly and prefer a lot of back and forth dialogue over 5-6 days.
Be safe. Ripper.
-
09-10-18 09:27 #15512
Posts: 448The Provacateur and The Baroness
She has been discussed several times before and used to go by "The Baroness". Crazy GPS that is really hard to understand. She has been doing the same stupid stuff for years, claims to be a keynote speaker at the Sugar Baby forum and all.
She is well below the quality of any of my past SB and an order of magnitude more expensive.
Run far, run fast!
Originally Posted by BStreet [View Original Post]
-
09-09-18 19:14 #15511
Posts: 1287Originally Posted by Assaholic [View Original Post]
What I've found is that "game" is not just the art of getting a woman to spread their legs for you. Game is just a social skill of handling women -- everything from the pickup to the breakup. As long as you do that skillfully, most of the time you won't have vengeful nut jobs trying to chase you down in court. Paternity -- yes, that is another issue and yes it's true pulling out doesn't always work, but the only time I'm aware of that I did get a girl pregnant, it was when I had cum inside on multiple occasions. Never to my knowledge, even in long-term relationships, has anyone gotten pregnant by me when I pulled out. And, all of my former girls know how to reach me by phone, so I'm guessing I would know about it if it ever happened. They usually continue to ask if I want to see them for some period of time, and slowly over time I come up with a story like I've found the one I want to marry and that usually sends them packing. Remember these girls are smoking hot and have guys chasing them constantly, they are not going to sit around and just continue to brood because a middle aged guy doesn't want to see them anymore, they have plenty of options and the next distraction will be along to catch her interest in no time.
Bottom line is, dating is what it is and going back to the guys place is part of the ritual. For them to say you offered them a job or whatever, well they would need some proof so hopefully no SDs are actually doing that (if they do they are taking on unnecessary risk). There was a guy a while back who was luring would-be SBs in with help-wanted ads for various non-sexual jobs, and I remember writing about what a bad idea I thought that was. Once professional rank enters the equation, it gets dangerous due to sexual harassment laws.
If concerned about pregnancy and STDs, get a vasectomy and some condoms, or just don't stay with one for too long. The longer you are with her, the higher the chances of something taking a turn for the worst.
I'm just saying that it's not a crime to bang a girl a few times then move on to another one, and if they want to go to the court stating they were the victim of a pickup artist, and cannot provide solid evidence they were victimized, I don't think any judge (female or otherwise) is likely to take them seriously.