"Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"

**NewAnonymousName** · 08-07-18 17:23

After the usual messages beating around the bush, this one said she is looking only for a platonic arrangement. No thanks, honey.

https://www.seeking.com/member/606ed...9-43135e040335

**SoonerFan72** · 08-07-18 16:42

Originally Posted by CuriousInquir [View Original Post]

Did you get into the specifics of her menu before abandoning the discussion?

Sorry bro, I did not get that far into discussions. She mentioned she had a few previous arrangements that lasted one or two visits, so I think is game for some fun.

**NewAnonymousName** · 08-07-18 16:01

Originally Posted by SoonerFan72 [View Original Post]

This little cutie sounded fun, but wanted to $350 per meet. Seems to know the drill though. She is the McDonough area. I wasnt in the mood to haggle, so I passed.

https://www.seeking.com/member/7c500...d-416e1e71794f

Did you get into the specifics of her menu before abandoning the discussion?

**SoonerFan72** · 08-07-18 15:19

This little cutie sounded fun, but wanted to $350 per meet. Seems to know the drill though. She is the McDonough area. I wasnt in the mood to haggle, so I passed.

https://www.seeking.com/member/7c500...d-416e1e71794f

**Sgt Soros** · 08-07-18 13:11

Originally Posted by JohnnyMapalo [View Original Post]

They're trying to cover their asses just incase Fosta or whatever it names tries to pin them as the next backpage with girls selling poontang. That's also why the same change from "Seeking Arrangements" to "Seeking". They're trying to cover their asses from all angles. Uncle LEO is on the prowl.

Uncle LEO basically shot themselves in the arse with FOSTA, or whatever the shit it's called, it just drove everything related to mongering into the dark. We now see Uncle LEO flying completely blind and why they pulled that BS on Uncle Johnny.

**AtlEyez** · 08-07-18 12:53

Who the hell pays for first meets? I get that a lot. "Can you compensate me for meeting in public?" Huh? No! This is supposed to be a first meet and go from there. Where am I going wrong? I told her first meets don't generally work like that. No response, naturally ool.

**Johnny Mapalo** · 08-07-18 12:34

Originally Posted by RedWine123 [View Original Post]

When asked about online this was their reply.

Originally Posted by CuriousInquir [View Original Post]

Right on cue, I got three consecutive messages today asking for online arrangements. There is more free porn out there than I can view in a lifetime. Why on earth would anyone pay for pics and videos from someone at SA, who may not even be the person you think you're communicating with. To each his own, I guess.

They're trying to cover their asses just incase Fosta or whatever it names tries to pin them as the next backpage with girls selling poontang. That's also why the same change from "Seeking Arrangements" to "Seeking". They're trying to cover their asses from all angles. Uncle LEO is on the prowl.

**NewAnonymousName** · 08-07-18 12:19

Originally Posted by RedWine123 [View Original Post]

When asked about online this was their reply.

Right on cue, I got three consecutive messages today asking for online arrangements. There is more free porn out there than I can view in a lifetime. Why on earth would anyone pay for pics and videos from someone at SA, who may not even be the person you think you're communicating with. To each his own, I guess.

**LogJammin18** · 08-07-18 10:05

Originally Posted by RedWine123 [View Original Post]

When asked about online this was their reply.

Instead of shutting down, they rebranded as a dating site and are hoping people know what it really is.

**SoonerFan72** · 08-07-18 08:03

Here is one for you North side mongers to check out, she hit me up last night. I don't know anything about her, but She has nice curves. If you have success, let me know, ill consider making the drive.

https://www.seeking.com/member/8b1ee...3-7e923a1856c3

**NewDude** · 08-07-18 03:14

Anyone tag this one? She's pretty stubborn on price so I figured she may be real.

https://www.seeking.com/member/cdfad...2-9d0a98b9aa73

**WhiteRabbit666** · 08-06-18 23:21

Guys I am a longtime lurker who wanted to give back a little.

Avoid this one at all costs, she appears normal at first but then goes weird. In my case I met her for coffee, she was cool and looked good so and we arranged to meet again at a hotel the following week. She arrived and we had a drink in the bar but its was clear she was a little odd maybe high. Anyway we went to the room and she tells me she has an infection and can't have sex until our next meeting. I ended up giving her some money to leave as it was not worth a scene in a hotel that I stay at often. So anyway guys do not waste your time going to Warner Robbins for the gal. I am still not sure if she was scamming me or not but am not going to waste my time to see here again and have out it down to experience. She is still texting to meet again which is also odd.

https://www.seeking.com/member/45fd5...a-e77c1e7a7081

**SoonerFan72** · 08-06-18 15:11

All you need is Google Voice on Android. Create a dummy Gmail account, sign up for GV. Download GV on your phone, and add the account in settings. Once added, you can switch between the accounts via a drop down menu in the GV app. Keeps it priviate, just remember to switch back to the legit one each time.

**RedWine123** · 08-06-18 13:36

Originally Posted by Jims2321 [View Original Post]

I really have to wonder about SA at this point. With the introduction of these quick options where you can check off what you are looking for (seeking). I noticed a lot of SB's are selecting "online only" (see pic1). But according to SA's rules, wanting an "online only" relationship is a reportable offense (pic2). Still waiting on an answer from SA.

When asked about online this was their reply.