Bareback Beauties

[Guy Man Dude]

Any Intel on this one boys? Looks like a hot fuck that could be open to the baresies if pics are real as ad claims.

GMD.

http://www.********.com/koreatown/Es...friend/1867671

[TD Leafs]

Just like every BB case, it's always YMMV.

Because Sera did BB with guy A does NOT mean you'll get BB.

Same for Rebecca, Megan or even Lohan.

[Pmanhere]

I think the replies to my comment underscore precisely what I'm taking about as it relates to the BayArea AAMP SCENE, no sure BB options and the information is almost always subjective and YMMV. LASera has a lot of reviews on TER and not one even hints at BB. Compare that to TER reviews of well known BB ladies in LA like Nana, Yoona, MistressX, or Pepsi which either explicitly state it or hint at it.

[NintyNine]

I think this is another example of grass always being greener. I live in the Bay and feel the same way about you guys in LA. We just don't have the likes of Yoona, Nana, Pepsi, etc. I've asked those posting about how great the Bay is for Bareback Beauties and have already gotten a name or two via PM or on this thread. Don't believe the hype!

Greener, maybe. But I like to direct the session, so as long as I'm fucking bare, and she's not a dead fish, I'm happy; I walk out of the session feeling like it was worth it.

I think you guys overhype our LA girls. While they may be a little nastier, I wouldn't say they're orders of magnitude better to fuck. They are also not the best looking. I'd rather rawdog prettier girls, and it sounds like the bay area has better looking BBFS girls.

[LAHobbyist2013]

Really agree with your post, it sums up my experiences with the 2 cities exactly. I think that the bay is a great place for k-girls, but the problem is that it has to compete with LA, which of course is no contest. Compared to any other area in the USA for a fob korean girl SF is fantastic.

I wonder if that's why she came up to the bay. To tone down her expectations? My session with Sera was nowhere near what I've done with Nana.

I also thought Sera was no where the PSE experience of Nana. Sera's reviews were over hyped like Yelp reviews and Sera does not come close to Nana IMHO.

[EzraPound]

Really agree with your post, it sums up my experiences with the 2 cities exactly. I think that the bay is a great place for k-girls, but the problem is that it has to compete with LA, which of course is no contest. Compared to any other area in the USA for a fob korean girl SF is fantastic.

I wonder if that's why she came up to the bay. To tone down her expectations? My session with Sera was nowhere near what I've done with Nana.

Agree. Sera was cool, rim was great, but I didn't get BBFS. YMMV.

[YodamaDashi]

Are you saying Sera DOES or DOES NOT do BBFS? I know my friends and I have not gotten BBFS from Sera and several people tried. Sera does charge $250 in San Mateo compared to the Bay Area average of $200, so we expected BBFS but did NOT get BBFS. Other girls in Viola's previous org gave up BBFS with multiple CIP with no expectations of using a condom at $200.

I have not seen Sera yet since I stopped bringing my own condoms. I have not gotten BBFS from her but I've had other people claim that she does give it up as a big YMMV. Of course this is bad guesswork so I will say Sera does not give BBFS until otherwise (she has been on vacation since I've arrived in the bay area). My original comment was moreso directed that Sera runs a very similar PSE to Nana (at least in my experience). I will definitely report back if I do manage to see Sera during this month long trip. My guess is her $30 premium (bay area girls are now $220 standard) is for her "fame / legend status" as she has been doing it for a while. Frida has also done it and they are both advertised as "LA <NAME " girls, but it is just a guess.

[TD Leafs]

Are you saying Sera DOES or DOES NOT do BBFS? I know my friends and I have not gotten BBFS from Sera and several people tried. Sera does charge $250 in San Mateo compared to the Bay Area average of $200, so we expected BBFS but did NOT get BBFS. Other girls in Viola's previous org gave up BBFS with multiple CIP with no expectations of using a condom at $200.

When Sera was in LA, I think she was very selective on BBFS.

[LAHobbyist2013]

As I am finally visiting the bay area after many visits to LA, the bay area girls do have their charm. Sure, you don't have a crazy nympho girl who will let you do anything to her like Nana, but you have someone like Sera who is well versed in PSE and if she likes you enough you can get a lot of things similar to Nana. My first visit to Sera last year involved a crazy PSE filled session which only Nana topped. Both cities have their fair share of fob newbies (bay area definitely has more though) and both cities have various types of girls, from cute to MILF to sexy to spinners, etc.

Now in my past week of experience, I can definitely say that finding BB and dealing with the bay area POs are much easier than LA. In fact, almost every booker I've used in the bay area has allowed me to prebook and this gets rid of all the annoying anxiety of trying to book a girl. So far I have seen 5 girls and have gotten BB from 3 of them, granted 1 of them seems very YMMV from what I've heard (so I must have gotten lucky). And my first BB experience was from the bay area before I even started searching for it (I'll blame Amber for showing me the BB life). The bay area also has a lot more "newer" (FOB) girls straight from Korea that are basically "testing" the waters of the profession. If you like testing the waters with new fob girls, bay area is definitely great for it, however don't expect much English and communication.

Now what LA has is a higher standard of girls, at least in my opinion. BB may not be on the menu often but normally the girls are very attractive and they have good service / techniques to back it up. In addition, a lot of girls in the bay area are not thrilled by the location, as there is not much to do in San Mateo or even in San Jose (not as bad as San Mateo though). Meanwhile there are a lot of kgirls that I've talked to in LA that say they enjoy going out to eat or to clubs and it does show in their attitudes. LA also has more "legend" or popular girls such as Chloe, Cia, Megan, Jenny O, Kiss, Nana, etc, while the bay area generally rotates girls so often that there are only a few girls that get a reputation going there (so far it's Sera, Frida, Honii, Virgin, Viola for the ones I recognize in the past year).

I can definitely say that both cities have their specialties and I love both cities almost equally. At this exact moment (probably because I'm in SF) I prefer the bay area girls. I love not having to pussyfoot around the BB issue and their fobness is not an obstacle for me communication wise. However, ask me a month ago and I probably would have told you that I love the LA girls more. Unfortunately there is not a bareback beauties forum thread for the bay area and I don't believe this is the best place to do so. All I can say is, if you are curious about one city, just visit it sometime and find out for yourself. As always, most experiences are YMMV but I haven't had a bad experience at either city yet.

Currently I'm at 5 visits to LA this year and 4 visits to the bay area. Had 2 ATFs in bay area (just 1 now), and 2 ATFs in LA.

Oh but I will say this: If you love getting rimmed, LA seems to be your city. Rimming seemed to be a lot more common in LA but I've had none so far in bay area, besides one from a previous trip. Could be YMMV (I never explicitly ask or motion for it) as I don't care for rimming so this is fine by me!

Are you saying Sera DOES or DOES NOT do BBFS? I know my friends and I have not gotten BBFS from Sera and several people tried. Sera does charge $250 in San Mateo compared to the Bay Area average of $200, so we expected BBFS but did NOT get BBFS. Other girls in Viola's previous org gave up BBFS with multiple CIP with no expectations of using a condom at $200.

[RubberDuck208]

Really agree with your post, it sums up my experiences with the 2 cities exactly. I think that the bay is a great place for k-girls, but the problem is that it has to compete with LA, which of course is no contest. Compared to any other area in the USA for a fob korean girl SF is fantastic.

My first visit to Sera last year involved a crazy PSE filled session which only Nana topped.

I wonder if that's why she came up to the bay. To tone down her expectations? My session with Sera was nowhere near what I've done with Nana.

[YodamaDashi]

I think this is another example of grass always being greener. I live in the Bay and feel the same way about you guys in LA. We just don't have the likes of Yoona, Nana, Pepsi, etc. I've asked those posting about how great the Bay is for Bareback Beauties and have already gotten a name or two via PM or on this thread. Don't believe the hype!

As I am finally visiting the bay area after many visits to LA, the bay area girls do have their charm. Sure, you don't have a crazy nympho girl who will let you do anything to her like Nana, but you have someone like Sera who is well versed in PSE and if she likes you enough you can get a lot of things similar to Nana. My first visit to Sera last year involved a crazy PSE filled session which only Nana topped. Both cities have their fair share of fob newbies (bay area definitely has more though) and both cities have various types of girls, from cute to MILF to sexy to spinners, etc.

Now in my past week of experience, I can definitely say that finding BB and dealing with the bay area POs are much easier than LA. In fact, almost every booker I've used in the bay area has allowed me to prebook and this gets rid of all the annoying anxiety of trying to book a girl. So far I have seen 5 girls and have gotten BB from 3 of them, granted 1 of them seems very YMMV from what I've heard (so I must have gotten lucky). And my first BB experience was from the bay area before I even started searching for it (I'll blame Amber for showing me the BB life). The bay area also has a lot more "newer" (FOB) girls straight from Korea that are basically "testing" the waters of the profession. If you like testing the waters with new fob girls, bay area is definitely great for it, however don't expect much English and communication.

Now what LA has is a higher standard of girls, at least in my opinion. BB may not be on the menu often but normally the girls are very attractive and they have good service / techniques to back it up. In addition, a lot of girls in the bay area are not thrilled by the location, as there is not much to do in San Mateo or even in San Jose (not as bad as San Mateo though). Meanwhile there are a lot of kgirls that I've talked to in LA that say they enjoy going out to eat or to clubs and it does show in their attitudes. LA also has more "legend" or popular girls such as Chloe, Cia, Megan, Jenny O, Kiss, Nana, etc, while the bay area generally rotates girls so often that there are only a few girls that get a reputation going there (so far it's Sera, Frida, Honii, Virgin, Viola for the ones I recognize in the past year).

I can definitely say that both cities have their specialties and I love both cities almost equally. At this exact moment (probably because I'm in SF) I prefer the bay area girls. I love not having to pussyfoot around the BB issue and their fobness is not an obstacle for me communication wise. However, ask me a month ago and I probably would have told you that I love the LA girls more. Unfortunately there is not a bareback beauties forum thread for the bay area and I don't believe this is the best place to do so. All I can say is, if you are curious about one city, just visit it sometime and find out for yourself. As always, most experiences are YMMV but I haven't had a bad experience at either city yet.

Currently I'm at 5 visits to LA this year and 4 visits to the bay area. Had 2 ATFs in bay area (just 1 now), and 2 ATFs in LA.

Oh but I will say this: If you love getting rimmed, LA seems to be your city. Rimming seemed to be a lot more common in LA but I've had none so far in bay area, besides one from a previous trip. Could be YMMV (I never explicitly ask or motion for it) as I don't care for rimming so this is fine by me!

[Pmanhere]

I need to move up there. Sounds like those FOB girls give it up easy just to retain customers.

I think this is another example of grass always being greener. I live in the Bay and feel the same way about you guys in LA. We just don't have the likes of Yoona, Nana, Pepsi, etc. I've asked those posting about how great the Bay is for Bareback Beauties and have already gotten a name or two via PM or on this thread. Don't believe the hype!

[EzraPound]

Re: amy, holy shit that's awful. I've seen big titty Amy once before, and she seems like a sweet girl. Knocked out and just stole a computer? Probably raped her too.

At least with some bookers, you can be blacklisted, and if the guy ever shows up again, hit the panic button.

I think I saw it here on another forum. ? (it might have been somewhere in the HX forum thread here.).

Or maybe it was another forum but it had pictures showing the text messages the booker sent to the guy asking him to bring back her stuff and stating that what he gave her sent her to the hospital. Thats why her handle on another forum insists on heavy screening now.

Ridiculous what some guys do. Seriously mentally ill jerks out there.

And if the hobby was legal these girls would have protection and options but our govt is so stupid.

[NintyNine]

Bay Area:

Too many to list that allow BBFS, CIP.

I need to move up there. Sounds like those FOB girls give it up easy just to retain customers.

[NintyNine]

Has anyone seen her yet?

I think it's very YMMV, but review is full of shit too, trying to dissuade others from going bare with her. A thread on ter got deleted where several confirmed otherwise. Kind of like how megan tells some guys she never does bb and threatens to blacklist, but she's been doing bb ever since she's been a hooker.