Court Finds 'Happy Endings' To Be Legitimate Massage Procedure

**GamaDude** · 10-16-16 22:25

Originally Posted by Malibu1980 [View Original Post]

Its been the news all day and I'm sure if you haven't seen it you can google it but the two girls are married and the one named crystal used to post on CL back I want to say 2009 - 2010 . Not sure if anyone remembers or met her back but I do and thought I'd post it here just to see if it brings back memories to any of you who might have seen back in her day of CL prostituting.

Were these the two girls who see to do a 4 hand massage in Quincy? Taller strawberry blond and shorter brunette?

**Deb4512** · 10-16-16 13:00

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/loc...n_boston_johns

**Deb4512** · 09-04-16 16:50

http://bostonpolicebuyerbeware.ceasenetwork.org/#4 Q3 QkDFTShTt8 kJ0. 97.

**Malibu1980** · 08-22-16 17:34

Its been the news all day and I'm sure if you haven't seen it you can google it but the two girls are married and the one named crystal used to post on CL back I want to say 2009 - 2010 . Not sure if anyone remembers or met her back but I do and thought I'd post it here just to see if it brings back memories to any of you who might have seen back in her day of CL prostituting.

**MassageMama** · 08-21-16 18:14

Originally Posted by HowardSprague [View Original Post]

Framingham regs went into effect around the beginning of 2016 (December or January, wasn't it?) Waltham is the latest casualty. Its regs go into effect on the first of September. I've seen proposals in a few other cities. These municipalities are following the lead of others like Arlington who got tired of the proliferation of bodywork shops and concerns over trafficking. Many smaller towns which don't have too many shops ignore them. The regulations for bodywork are pretty much the same from city to city, with a few outliers. In each case, the shops which are serious adapt by getting licensed, usually for massage, which is regulated by the MA DPL and is actually less oppressive than the local boards of health. The shops in Waltham are already preparing, at least the smart ones are. Yes, we will lose providers there, but, like Framingham, they will come back. There's too much money to be made.

With the municipalities stepping up with regulations which are relatively uniform, it's unlikely the Commonwealth will increase its purview. I don't think this is Armageddon for the hobby, just an inconvenience.

There is also a commonwealth effort which worries me more but I agree in some time it will return. After all it has for 3,000.

Years in one form or another!!

**HowardSprague** · 08-21-16 16:00

Originally Posted by MassageMama [View Original Post]

For those of you that don't know what is happening below is an example from Framingham but there is also legislation moving forward at the state level. There abound to be changes in bodywork behavior.

Looking for a tool to help police, Framingham is the latest municipality writing regulations to close the loophole at the state level and require practitioners of bodywork. Which is different from traditional massage. To register with the local Board of Health. The new rules would allow for unannounced inspections, prohibit sexual activity and provocative advertising and require therapists to have certifications, documentation and to be "properly clothed. ".

Framingham regs went into effect around the beginning of 2016 (December or January, wasn't it?) Waltham is the latest casualty. Its regs go into effect on the first of September. I've seen proposals in a few other cities. These municipalities are following the lead of others like Arlington who got tired of the proliferation of bodywork shops and concerns over trafficking. Many smaller towns which don't have too many shops ignore them. The regulations for bodywork are pretty much the same from city to city, with a few outliers. In each case, the shops which are serious adapt by getting licensed, usually for massage, which is regulated by the MA DPL and is actually less oppressive than the local boards of health. The shops in Waltham are already preparing, at least the smart ones are. Yes, we will lose providers there, but, like Framingham, they will come back. There's too much money to be made.

With the municipalities stepping up with regulations which are relatively uniform, it's unlikely the Commonwealth will increase its purview. I don't think this is Armageddon for the hobby, just an inconvenience.

**MassageMama** · 08-21-16 10:58

For those of you that don't know what is happening below is an example from Framingham but there is also legislation moving forward at the state level. There abound to be changes in bodywork behavior.

Looking for a tool to help police, Framingham is the latest municipality writing regulations to close the loophole at the state level and require practitioners of bodywork. Which is different from traditional massage. To register with the local Board of Health. The new rules would allow for unannounced inspections, prohibit sexual activity and provocative advertising and require therapists to have certifications, documentation and to be "properly clothed. ".

**Aluver** · 03-31-16 13:41

Looks like a protracted free speech legal battle is gaining steam. With the contempt ruling now Senate lawyers can file a lawsuit against BP. I suspect though this will be one of those dragged out long legal battles so shouldn't have much immediate impact of our hobbying. But, just out of curiosity, what other advertising venues are out there? Legit Craigslist w 4 m posts have dried up after their troubles a few years back (yes, many providers still reply to m 4 w posts though), City Vibe seems hardly used anymore and Eros seems too expensive for most providers besides the big travelling agencies to advertise on. I know our beloved USASG has implemented providers ads but that really hasn't taken off yet.

http://www.engadget.com/2016/03/19/b...ngress-senate/

**Nrlmus** · 03-29-16 14:03

Originally Posted by Jeishein14 [View Original Post]

Is to bigger cocks, and that makes me happy because when it comes to my ass the cocks cannot be too large.

Somebody give me some COCK!

Oh, so that's who it is. But of course, how could I have thought otherwise. Toujula's umpteenth reincarnation, this time as a religious fanatic.

**Deb4512** · 03-28-16 21:25

What's wrong with posting now? When I was writing the words go straight so you can't form paragraphs. Is it just me? I just want to make it clear that I totally understand why a monger wouldn't want to take part in a sex worker's protest. It'd be crazy to do so unless you have no job and no significant other.

**Jeishein14** · 03-28-16 17:56

Is to bigger cocks, and that makes me happy because when it comes to my ass the cocks cannot be too large.

Somebody give me some COCK!

**Brooksy** · 03-28-16 03:04

Originally Posted by Deb4512 [View Original Post]

If the bill to decriminalize prostitution in NH, introduced by a group of women legislators recently passes, and / or Maxine Doogan is able to succeed in decriminalizing prostitution in California it will most likely be like a domino effect like legalizing / decriminalizing pot and permitting gay couples to marry. Amnesty International is trying to persuade all countries to decriminalize prostitution due to the studies that show criminalizing prostitution is harmful for the sex workers.

http://reason.com/blog/2016/02/01/pr...tion-debated-i

It's been tabled for now, but hope for the future.

http://www.sfweekly.com/sanfrancisco...nt?oid=4563075

**Deb4512** · 03-27-16 18:00

If the bill to decriminalize prostitution in NH, introduced by a group of women legislators recently passes, and / or Maxine Doogan is able to succeed in decriminalizing prostitution in California it will most likely be like a domino effect like legalizing / decriminalizing pot and permitting gay couples to marry. Amnesty International is trying to persuade all countries to decriminalize prostitution due to the studies that show criminalizing prostitution is harmful for the sex workers.

http://reason.com/blog/2016/02/01/pr...tion-debated-i

**Nrlmus** · 03-27-16 15:35

Originally Posted by Brooksy [View Original Post]

If this guy doesn't agree with the 4, 5, 6, and 14th amendments, he should resign and move to a different country. "Worth the other (unconstitutional) arrests" is anti-American.

That Cranston Police Chief Col. Michael J. Winquist would say anything that his job requires him to say and what would keep PC police happy with his department. In reality for all you know he maybe himself a hobbyist. I can't think of a single provider I spent time with that didn't tell me that she had members of our finest for clients. Moreover I'm sure that there are enough cops that do what many providers do for work: drive to neighboring state for hobbying.

Many cops are finding themselves being forced into a choice of either being two-faced about the whole thing or losing their jobs. Especially now when with in-cruiser cameras and smart phones all over and with Puritan housewives forever on watch, ladies can no longer get themselves off by trading in their pussies.

Imagine what would happen if the good colonel wouldn't say a thing like that? You know he wouldn't have made colonel, that's for sure. In fact for all you know that's how he probably became chief of police in the first place, and by the way he talks good'ol colonel is sure on the way to be a big time "super" somewhere. The way he works it who knows, one day he may even be your congressman!

As for the constitution. Sorry for being one cynical bastard but for a long time now and increasingly so I've come to the conclusion that constitution is nothing more then a notion used by the local elites to keep their "subjects" in the state of happy make believe in order to have ship going in the direction they want it to go without much interference. The long-overdue reaction to this we're seeing right now.

The only thing is that the "controlled" masses apparently are picking another rich boy and the certified member of the hereditary elite (still from daddy to son you know, no matter how you slice the pie) to bring their constitution back.

Well, remember what the last rich boy did to avenge his daddy almost being killed. He got us into Iraq for no apparent rhyme or reason, the long-term affects of which we are seeing now with ISIS and on the streets of Brussels. The only difference that I can see between the two is the latest one's big mouth.

If anybody doubts that this new rich boy is going to do anything different then the last one did they're living in the la-la land. He already wants to be able to sue the press for insulting him which probably is the paramount issue for him and his rich friends. Next thing you know he'd be threatening to send "his army" out if some world leader (like Russian Putin or the Chinese Xi Jinping) calls him a looser or somehow insults his wife. Rich kids do that. For them we all by definition are losers, numbers and the cannon meat. If he gets in - the United States will be "his dukedom" and US military will be "his army". This country reminds me more and more of my old country and by all appearances I expect this resemblance to increase.

Sorry, just had to say it. Somehow mentioning of constitution got it out of me.

**Brooksy** · 03-27-16 02:04

Originally Posted by ShortStroke [View Original Post]

In response, Cranston Police Chief Col. Michael J. Winquist said that the possibility of saving a 16-year-old girl from sex slavery is worth the other arrests for sexual conduct for a fee.

If this guy doesn't agree with the 4, 5, 6, and 14th amendments, he should resign and move to a different country. "Worth the other (unconstitutional) arrests" is anti-American.