Rubrankings.com
click for FREE hookups
Sex Vacation
High Class Companions
Best Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Adult Live Video Cam Chat Models 4U!        Watch Online Cams Girl Now!
Mix and Match Combo Pack

Viagra 100mg
This blog is moderated by Admin
  1. #8422

    Athenia Review

    http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...40662/35710613

    Hey Guys thanks for the PMs and the posts with Intel about Athenia.

    I went and saw her at her incall apartment.

    Half hour 120 and was a rush job.

    The pics in the ad match her and were taken at the incall location.

    BBBJ Covered FS in a couple of different positons but as I mentioned it was a total rush job hurry hurry my roommate will be back type of stuff. I doubt I will be repeating anytime soon.

    0662.

  2. #8421

    London

    Quote Originally Posted by Longjblues  [View Original Post]
    There is a new review for London, first link, which is not good. The reviewer, who has approximately 50 reviews posted, gave her very low marks for appearance & performance. Reviewer tends to giver lower marks, but these indicate that there was nothing positive about the appointment. The review is on the oThER place.

    (under # 306104).

    Please note that you only include links in your inquiry(no names, no tel nos., nothing else), so it means that neither you nor anyone else will know what ladies your inquiry is referring to, so I suggest that you include more than the links, so your inquiry has some value. IMHO.
    If anyone that has a membership can share the details of the London review it would be appreciated. I saw her first post on Thursday and was waiting til today to toftt with her. I just texted her this morning. $. 6 for a hh with Greek got me very interested but now I'm skeptical. Pics looked real to me too.

  3. #8420
    Anyone tried this before? Seems great.

    http://providence.backpage.com/Femal...e-true/5707786

  4. #8419

    Marie Braintree

    Hello. Anyone ever seen this provider?

    http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...-late/35700501

  5. #8418

    Recent update

    Quote Originally Posted by KentPlus  [View Original Post]
    Met her again for outcall to my place.

    She was running a little late due to her surroundings; but kept informing via txt.

    Very accommodating and nice session!

    Pics attached. Due to her request, facial part is removed.
    Recent Update. Met her last week.

    She said she has been busy with surroundings and has not advertised over BP for a while.

    But, she is still available if you can get in touch with her; her last 4 is still 5847.

    She seemed to lost some weight and in good shape than before.

    YMMV as usual; but I had a great time with her again.

    Safe Hobbying!!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails SH6874a.JPG‎   SH6875a.jpg‎   SH6876a.jpg‎   SH6878a.jpg‎   SH6879a.JPG‎  


  6. #8417

    Suggestion taken

    Quote Originally Posted by Longjblues  [View Original Post]
    There is a new review for London, first link, which is not good. The reviewer, who has approximately 50 reviews posted, gave her very low marks for appearance & performance. Reviewer tends to giver lower marks, but these indicate that there was nothing positive about the appointment. The review is on the oThER place.

    (under # 306104).

    Please note that you only include links in your inquiry(no names, no tel nos., nothing else), so it means that neither you nor anyone else will know what ladies your inquiry is referring to, so I suggest that you include more than the links, so your inquiry has some value. IMHO.
    Suggestion well taken. I asked for simple ice and they didn't provide. So I didn't go. Check Pyper. Why review is below your suggestion. She is good.

  7. #8416

    Texted

    Quote Originally Posted by Ambrose  [View Original Post]
    I have to agree with you completely. I have NO 1st hand knowledge about the place but everything you explained leads me to the same conclusion, a trap. Also, 1 girl, 1 hour 160, so you would think 2 girls would be, at the most, double that, 320 or less, in order to entice us into taking 2 girls, but no, the ad says 2 girls 360. Too bad, I would be interested also if not for all the negative signs from your post, so thanks for that.
    I texted the number an asked some questions. Same answers. Asked about BB, she said avaliable. Asked if thye are LE, answer was "no, we are cool".

    Told the girls are the ones on the photos.

    I never had so straight answers. And yes to everything. If its not a trap, is TGTBT.

  8. #8415

    London (1st Link) - Not recommended

    There is a new review for London, first link, which is not good. The reviewer, who has approximately 50 reviews posted, gave her very low marks for appearance & performance. Reviewer tends to giver lower marks, but these indicate that there was nothing positive about the appointment. The review is on the oThER place.

    (under # 306104).

    Please note that you only include links in your inquiry(no names, no tel nos., nothing else), so it means that neither you nor anyone else will know what ladies your inquiry is referring to, so I suggest that you include more than the links, so your inquiry has some value. IMHO.

    Quote Originally Posted by PSmith  [View Original Post]
    Guys. Do you know anything about them? Thinking of TOFTT but if there is some info or experience, that would help.

    http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...d-hhr/35690683

    http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...breed/35689560

  9. #8414

    Pyper

    http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...ddess/35364925

    Check this girl out. Great body, natural and right sized tits, 120 HH, all covered including BJ (slight disappointing), Greek. And oh yeah, awesome and smiley attitude. Great value. She is checking out from hotel now so I dunno where she would be. Get the digits from the ad before it goes away. Don't PM me. I have told everything here.

  10. #8413
    Quote Originally Posted by Ambrose  [View Original Post]
    I have to agree with you completely. I have NO 1st hand knowledge about the place but everything you explained leads me to the same conclusion, a trap. Also, 1 girl, 1 hour 160, so you would think 2 girls would be, at the most, double that, 320 or less, in order to entice us into taking 2 girls, but no, the ad says 2 girls 360. Too bad, I would be interested also if not for all the negative signs from your post, so thanks for that.
    I got curious end sent a message. Same responses. I asked if BBFS was avaliable. Answer $$ h. To suspicious.

  11. #8412

    Its OK

    Quote Originally Posted by PiddlePud  [View Original Post]
    Hey guys.

    So I always am scouring the BP to find those diamonds in the rough and inquired about this place via text. http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...ghton/35683448.

    So, first, rapid response via text, I get the standard message explaining rates and availability. But it seemed a little suspicious to me, as they mention GFE is "extra". Asked for the address and received it, with a follow up question asking for what I was looking for.

    I answered with a "dunno" and asked how many girls were available. *3 were available (though it advertises 4).

    Was then asked, "what you like baby FS or hs and how long" with a kissy emoji.

    Now, I am like thinking, definitely got to be a trap here, as these places never ask this kind of stuff.

    Playing dumb I asked "what is FS or hs?

    Got another quick response "just oral or everything? GFE too if you want baby".

    Asked "what is GFE and how much extra".

    "no condom $. 5 hh" (they also offer BBFS with the BBBJ apparently, but again it seems too suspicious).

    Just ended it there, saying I can't afford it and didn't pursue it. Seemed like they were trying to bait a response out of me.

    Anyways, the problem is that I have seen this ad many times before and it was even reviewed by a member earlier (I think it is like 2-3 pages before this front page of the thread). However, the discrepancy is that this ad is actually grammatically correct, and using a different number then the ones I had seen earlier and was reviewed. So I am thinking this might be a trap page to try to duplicate the other one? Anyways let me know what you think, and also to be aware of the situation. I would have liked this to be a real legit place though.
    There is no worry going to this place, can't guarantee you won't get an older lady but LE is not a worry. Don't listen to the alarmist who has never been.

  12. #8411
    Senior Member


    Posts: 1038

    Agreed

    Quote Originally Posted by PiddlePud  [View Original Post]
    Hey guys.

    So I always am scouring the BP to find those diamonds in the rough and inquired about this place via text. http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...ghton/35683448.

    So, first, rapid response via text, I get the standard message explaining rates and availability. But it seemed a little suspicious to me, as they mention GFE is "extra". Asked for the address and received it, with a follow up question asking for what I was looking for.

    I answered with a "dunno" and asked how many girls were available. *3 were available (though it advertises 4).

    Was then asked, "what you like baby FS or hs and how long" with a kissy emoji.

    Now, I am like thinking, definitely got to be a trap here, as these places never ask this kind of stuff.

    Playing dumb I asked "what is FS or hs?

    Got another quick response "just oral or everything? GFE too if you want baby".

    Asked "what is GFE and how much extra".

    "no condom $. 5 hh" (they also offer BBFS with the BBBJ apparently, but again it seems too suspicious).

    Just ended it there, saying I can't afford it and didn't pursue it. Seemed like they were trying to bait a response out of me.

    Anyways, the problem is that I have seen this ad many times before and it was even reviewed by a member earlier (I think it is like 2-3 pages before this front page of the thread). However, the discrepancy is that this ad is actually grammatically correct, and using a different number then the ones I had seen earlier and was reviewed. So I am thinking this might be a trap page to try to duplicate the other one? Anyways let me know what you think, and also to be aware of the situation. I would have liked this to be a real legit place though.
    I have to agree with you completely. I have NO 1st hand knowledge about the place but everything you explained leads me to the same conclusion, a trap. Also, 1 girl, 1 hour 160, so you would think 2 girls would be, at the most, double that, 320 or less, in order to entice us into taking 2 girls, but no, the ad says 2 girls 360. Too bad, I would be interested also if not for all the negative signs from your post, so thanks for that.

  13. #8410

    Info before trying

    Guys. Do you know anything about them? Thinking of TOFTT but if there is some info or experience, that would help.

    http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...d-hhr/35690683

    http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...breed/35689560

  14. #8409

    Too Suspicious?

    Hey guys.

    So I always am scouring the BP to find those diamonds in the rough and inquired about this place via text. http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...ghton/35683448.

    So, first, rapid response via text, I get the standard message explaining rates and availability. But it seemed a little suspicious to me, as they mention GFE is "extra". Asked for the address and received it, with a follow up question asking for what I was looking for.

    I answered with a "dunno" and asked how many girls were available. *3 were available (though it advertises 4).

    Was then asked, "what you like baby FS or hs and how long" with a kissy emoji.

    Now, I am like thinking, definitely got to be a trap here, as these places never ask this kind of stuff.

    Playing dumb I asked "what is FS or hs?

    Got another quick response "just oral or everything? GFE too if you want baby".

    Asked "what is GFE and how much extra".

    "no condom $. 5 hh" (they also offer BBFS with the BBBJ apparently, but again it seems too suspicious).

    Just ended it there, saying I can't afford it and didn't pursue it. Seemed like they were trying to bait a response out of me.

    Anyways, the problem is that I have seen this ad many times before and it was even reviewed by a member earlier (I think it is like 2-3 pages before this front page of the thread). However, the discrepancy is that this ad is actually grammatically correct, and using a different number then the ones I had seen earlier and was reviewed. So I am thinking this might be a trap page to try to duplicate the other one? Anyways let me know what you think, and also to be aware of the situation. I would have liked this to be a real legit place though.

  15. #8408
    Senior Member


    Posts: 279
    Quote Originally Posted by Longjblues  [View Original Post]
    Here is ad link, ad, & pics.

    http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...-wont/35459696

    lexi 5087141604.
    Hey LJB, this is Lexi / Alexis Cakes / Alexis / Bentley. Reviewed elsewhere and I think she's amply discussed in I want to say the (Worcester) board.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Top Tier Escorts
Top Escorts
Meet Sugar Babies
Ava Escorts
click for FREE hookups
Generic Cialis (Vidalista 20 mg) USA to USA Only

Mvitra 20 mg (Generic Levitra or vardenafil 20 mg pills)
Fast-Acting Kamagra Oral Jelly – Feel the Difference in Minutes! Best ED Solution – Powerful Combination for Peak Performance! Complete Protection – Stay Safe & Stress-Free!

click for FREE hookups
Protected by Copyscape