click for FREE hookups
Organized German FKK Club Tours since 1995
Click here for the best sugar babies
click for FREE hookups
Best Escorts
Sex Vacation
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
This blog is moderated by Fahq1
  1. #1595
    Any intel on this one? Hot. One pic. Looks TGTBT.

    https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...9-0402e4193fde

  2. #1594

    Scammer on WYP

    https://members.whatsyourprice.com/~Laur_xox

    I connected with Lauren on WYP a few weeks ago. We had a nice lunch, but I had to get back to work, so we made arrangements to meet the next week. A couple of days later, I texted her and she gave me a story about getting her purse jacked while trying to get birthday presents for her son. I know what you'll say, I've been in the Craigslist / BP game for more than a decade and I've been scammed once or twice. I let my guard down and she scammed me for $150. It could have been worse. On the other hand, I've had a lot of success on WYP, especially with women ranging from mid-30's to 40's. Some just want a drink and then get a room.

    Just thought you all should know.

    Dobson.

  3. #1593
    Quote Originally Posted by BuffBill75  [View Original Post]
    I'm getting asked more and more to give money for a meet and greet. My response is always. Getting to know each other isn't an arrangement. I don't mind discussing it when we meet but I'm not going to pay you money to see if we like each other.

    Question is:

    Are you guys paying for meet and greets?
    No. Some one out there is. Some one out there is paying these girls just for pics. I wouldn't if I were you.

  4. #1592
    Quote Originally Posted by BuffBill75  [View Original Post]
    I'm getting asked more and more to give money for a meet and greet. My response is always. Getting to know each other isn't an arrangement. I don't mind discussing it when we meet but I'm not going to pay you money to see if we like each other.

    Question is:

    Are you guys paying for meet and greets?
    I don't and have never encountered any resistance to it. It's just something that doesn't make any sense to me. The purpose is to see if we're into each other, not to see if I pass the test.

  5. #1591

    Question

    I'm getting asked more and more to give money for a meet and greet. My response is always. Getting to know each other isn't an arrangement. I don't mind discussing it when we meet but I'm not going to pay you money to see if we like each other.

    Question is:

    Are you guys paying for meet and greets?

  6. #1590

    Re: amberwoods

    Quote Originally Posted by BuffBill75  [View Original Post]
    Wants to meet right away. 300 roses no anal. I'm getting a pro vibe.

    https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...a-52c3afaa4e2b
    She's been discussed before:

    Quote Originally Posted by JDavis999  [View Original Post]
    (snip)
    There are a couple of more definite pros that have hit me up. I didn't pursue. One was too aggressive and the second had a bad attitude--just bitchy.

    https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...6-228000108015 aggresive.

    https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...a-52c3afaa4e2b bitchy.
    Quote Originally Posted by WhoKnows  [View Original Post]
    Tried sparking something with this one.

    https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...a-52c3afaa4e2b

    Want's $300 per meet. Not very talkative. We messaged maybe 13 times and she said 16 words total in reply. Finally told me to stop interrogating her. Kind of a piss poor attitude.
    Her name has also been changed, but I don't remember her previous name. Josie-something?

  7. #1589

    Three SBs

    1) Nicole__94.

    https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...9-0402e4193fde

    Nothing physical.

    2) hopexxx.

    https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...f-aeb19f2664db

    Nothing physical. To be fair, her profile does state "not looking for a hook up", but I contacted her anyway.

    3) luckyy13.

    https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...7-79d71c8643b1

    I've posted about her before; this is her 3rd account (that I know of).

    Quote Originally Posted by YeongIl  [View Original Post]
    The girl set up a 2nd account (luckygirl13), after deactivating the 1st (Luckygirl1313). I can no longer view the profile, so I don't know if she blocked me or deactivated it. Can someone check?
    https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...3-02f1f4c1f60e
    Info available only to trusted seniors via PM.


    I'm going to ease up on chatting and / or meeting with SBs for a while -- it's getting expensive for me.

  8. #1588
    Itsajungloutthere.

    Not pro not P4 P. Dtf freaky civ. Bigger gal. On sa looking for secret hook up friends.

  9. #1587
    Quote Originally Posted by BuffBill75  [View Original Post]
    Wants to meet right away. 300 roses no anal. I'm getting a pro vibe.

    https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...a-52c3afaa4e2b
    Definitely a real college chick. Number checks out. Still pro or acts pro. No bb no swallow. Not giving that $ for a non GFE exp.

  10. #1586

    Pinkieurge

    I believe she is the Asian from PG Co. I've seen her twice. She wants too much and I'm not seeing her anymore. MW.

    Quote Originally Posted by LoveTheMerch  [View Original Post]
    I've been working SA really hard for a few weeks. My current intel is as follows:

    Young rose: Looking to trade pictures and videos for a few hundred. Talks a while to butter you up and then when you push for a meet, brings out the game plan to get your money. Claims to be willing to meet after initial installment. Please, let me know if you fall for this and it ends up not being a scam.

    XBebe: May or may not be a pro. Acted like a pro in that she gave her number right away and went right into wanting to meet. I did not pursue. Never brought up money. Has social media, but sparse and not sure real.

    SummerTimeBaby: Seems real. Travels to DC on the regular. Does not get on line very much. Not met and waiting for reply.

    XDress: Not sure if she is my type or not. Not met. Seems real and never mentioned money.

    Julescatshee: Wanted to plan a date pretty quick. Seems real with a slight hint of pro due to her interest in meeting right away. No mention of money and no phone jump from site.

    Kylee Marie 519: Friendly. Was down to meet. Number was confirmed and social media was real. Seemed really sweet and cute, but not enough my type for the distance. No mention of money or arrangements.

    Isa_Bellaz: Goes back and forth to and from NY. Was down to meet right away. Had a hotel, so likely pro. Asked about a gift for a meeting. Did not pursue, as when I said to just meet and no gift till after we meet first. She said no sex without a gift. She only has one picture too, which is a red flag for me.

    Tracking Siren: Seems sweet and real and willing to travel. But have not met yet. Social media checks out. Wanted 550 a week plus travel money.

    Daddysgirl016: KIK request. Seems to be a pro or wanting a lot of money. Is likely real and willing to discuss. She eventually couldn't hide it any more and mentioned money despite my clear directive not to. Never met. Seemed sweet and funny, just not what I am looking for.

    Katherine RR: Started chatting and then ghosted me.

    Sweetie_Bella: Seemed genuine and sweet, but never could get her to commit to a meeting. Would present days available. I would agree and then wouldn't say anything else. Probably shy or playing games. But if you can get her out, she seems to have a good vibe.

    Bunnybabez: Never could get off of SA. Seemed real otherwise.

    Faye4: Really cute. Really responsive. Did not ask for private pictures. Ghosted when did. LOL.

    AmazingAlicia139: Rarely on the site. Responsive when she is. Super good looking. Seems cool. Have not pursued, but was able to take off the site with ease.

    Meljw1: Mentioned before. Reached out. Prices have gone up and she stopped responding.

    PorshT: Seems real. I lost interest after a few back and forth messages.

    AgentDarSteele: Real, nice and willing to meet. No mention of arrangement. Not my type.

    CanYouHandleLeos: Real as confirmed by social media. No mention of arrangement. Skeptical, but will meet in person.

    Happyhippie47: Is very shy and doesn't seem to really want to have SD / SB relationship. Seemed real. Confirmed with social media.

    Collegekitten001: Talked for a while. She eventually ghosted me. Set up times to meet and she never followed through. Seems that she would be super hot in person.

    Pinkglitter00: Good to go. Rockin' body. Shy. Lets just say she has high hopes for allowance. But never mentioned prior to meeting.

    Chelleyg: Still trying to get to meet. Very flaky. But still on the string. Wants to know if we are getting intimate, but no mention of allowance.

    Nicole Lucas: Social media pans out. Seems real. If any of you have info, please share. Super hot.

    Ste1 lbaby: Seems to be unique. Could never get her off the site. Seems real and could be fun for the right guy that can get her to commit.

    Chocomg: Got number, but lost interest. No mention of allowance.

    Littleblonde7788: Ghosted day before meeting and never heard from again. Got off line, but could not verify on social media.

    Livi333: Ghosted the day before a meet was set.

    Classic sugarstudent: messaged on site back and forth. Would not send phone. She never responsed.

    DahliaJune: Social media checks out. Super hot. Face to face meeting and is a pro. Worth every penny as she is GFE.

    Nicebuttinyogapants: Real as confirmed by social media. Looks hot and seem DTF. Great conversationalist. Not met yet.

    Pinkieurge: Super cool and chill. Real. I am pretty sure would be good to go is pursued right. Did not get that far with me.

    Jesscassi24: Total pro. 400 per was what she said. Did not take up on it. I think she has a new profile now.

    JLR99: Seems real. Super cool and fun banter on site and off site. Never met and lost contact. A little far for fun to be had.

    CallmeMissV: She was interested and followed up. No allowance mentioned. I lost interest.

    Morzelll: Ghosted me. Suggest checking I'd.

    I have a few I am currently working on getting to meet or am currently seeing that I am not ready to give up yet. Will be forthcoming.

  11. #1585

    Pro

    Got the same vibe.

    Quote Originally Posted by BuffBill75  [View Original Post]
    Wants to meet right away. 300 roses no anal. I'm getting a pro vibe.

    https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...a-52c3afaa4e2b

  12. #1584
    Quote Originally Posted by BuffBill75  [View Original Post]
    Wants to meet right away. 300 roses no anal. I'm getting a pro vibe.

    https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...a-52c3afaa4e2b
    I talked to her. Verified she was real, but definitely a pro vibe. She only wanted to talk about meeting then and there and just got annoying.

    This one:

    https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...a-a3be8861c370

    Is just stay away, brings all the drama with her of her very insane life. Doesn't want any assistance though. Strange bird.

  13. #1583

    On the Line

    Wants to meet right away. 300 roses no anal. I'm getting a pro vibe.

    https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...a-52c3afaa4e2b

  14. #1582

    Dumb Girls

    https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...f-dd80892e4e75

    Online only. Blocked me after I reminded her porn is free on the web.

  15. #1581
    Pinkglitter00: Good to go. Rockin' body. Shy. Lets just say she has high hopes for allowance. But never mentioned prior to meeting.

    Chelleyg: Still trying to get to meet. Very flaky. But still on the string. Wants to know if we are getting intimate, but no mention of allowance.

    Yes to both above.

    Pinkglitter was very willing to deal but wanted a high allowance. High 7 asking 10 prices. Haven't met in person yet.

    ChellyG very very willing to meet. Flaky though. Made plans. Reasonable price. Fully agreed fun. Haven't gotten down there yet.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Click here for the best Sugarbabies
The Velvet Rooms
Ava Escorts





Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape