Massage Parlor Reports Only Sr Members with 50+ Reports

[Opi7001]

Had a super quick visit with Amy today. I've been seeing too many girls lately so at my age I went in not really all that horny but I'm making a point to see the new girls right away from this spa. I saw Helen 3 times because her performance was so ridiculously good so I want to make sure I have the time.

My take away with Amy is 1 she's a great kisser and 2 she has an fan-fucking-tastic body. I'm mostly a spinner guy, small and skinny. She has the body type that some would incorrectly call spinner but to me she is the next size up but everything is perfectly in proportion and she is young so the skin is smooth and tight. Attaching an image of her body type. The pic has ever so slightly larger breasts than Amy, otherwise I'd say it's dead on. And she has a nice round butt. Not a flatty.

Apparently she just did a tour in LA, will be here for 2 weeks and then heads to SD.

Session was fine, nothing mind blowing but I didn't have it in me for that anyway. I skipped massage and went right to foreplay. Loved playing with her tits. I'm like 90% sure they are real but someone else could correct me. I could be wrong. They felt real anyhow.

Finished CIM in a nice long 69. As I was starting to climax she did a good job taking the que and increased the speed and started aggressively massage my balls. A+ for that.

I probably won't repeat but once again BB brings in a really pretty girl with a great body and good service. I would say the recent girls Yoyo, Sally and Helen gave a bit better service but Amy was sexier by a bit. Amy might have the potential for better service but I really just wasn't super excited today.

I also think my fucking pill didn't work for some reason today. Normally for hours after the session I'm walking around with a semi in the house. Today just limp so I don't know what's up with that.

[Sticker]

Anna landed at OA Spa in Orange yesterday, and here's my "LASER" report:

L: Super pretty and eye engaging. Probably 5'4", slim with curves, including great c-cups (can't tell whether they're natty or not), a thin waist with a horizontally floral tattoo on her lower tummy, a shaved sweet pink taco and a small but shapely bootie (tall butt crack).

A: Anna is more-than-friendly and fun, flexible, and she was ready to romp at the outset.

S: She's no stranger to service and is likely a pre-MILF who knows how to please. Solid BBBJ / BLS skills (no rimming, but I didn't push for that this time. She's a talented DFK kisser, always smiling with great eye contact, and doesn't need guidance. Super receptive in 69 and DATY, and while she cums well, she seems more focused on my pleasure. After the bagging with my own glove, we tried multiple positions, and all were fun. Ended up in 69 again after ditching the bag, and she drained me well.

E: She can converse in English fairly well. She's from Shanghai and told me to visit there sometime because it has so many pretty girls. We laughed when I agreed, since Shanghai is my favorite visited city in China.

Repeat: Anna is one of the girls that meets my main looks preferences along with a great attitude and service. Totally repeatable. That said, I had a nice meet-and-greet with Sunny, too. She's probably 5'2" and gorgeous (similar body type, just shorter) so I might need to explore that option as well. And her goodbye kisses and "come see me next time" intrigued me.

Hhr HF: $50; dono $150.

[LabiaFedora]

I tend to ignore most of his posts. There doesn't seem to be much truth to them and grossly exaggerated claims.

Helping out Admin2 per their request of reporting those with under 50+ posts being reported. May the force be with you. Repo'd.

[CryMoarHoar]

Visited luxury scalp in lake forest last week.

Tina's body was great with a little of age. Tits were amazing.

Entry. 5 and opted for BBBJ 1. 2.

Did not get to CIM as she moved away but her technique was great.

Will repeat again.

[Dopema]

There is no Coco working here despite a long list of fake reviews on the other site and comments from "Clown9". If you call and ask for Coco, mms will say yeah yeah sure you come, and will give you whoever's available.

I tend to ignore most of his posts. There doesn't seem to be much truth to them and grossly exaggerated claims.

[Kevin80]

Some monger just posted about Summer on the other site. She is one of the popular one for FS. The new Fish and Chip has young Coco working. She look like young Nana at Lucky Feet. Her pussy is good to fuck for 140.

There is no Coco working here despite a long list of fake reviews on the other site and comments from "Clown9". If you call and ask for Coco, mms will say yeah yeah sure you come, and will give you whoever's available.

[Opi7001]

I don't know how this place get this kind of talent so consistently.

I love a small spinner so this girl was basically a dream for me. And it's very true she walks the line of GFE / PSE very well. It didn't get crazy PSE like I've had in the kgirl apartment scene or anything but she was a nasty little girl in just the right ways.

I normally go first thing in the morning for first appointments but today was later in the day and I was happy to find that she cleaned up really well, wasn't sweaty in the least and smelled great.

I will say that her BBBJ was once again amazing. It's like these girls at BB spa specialize in it. Helen had that added bonus of forcing herself down on me to the point of gagging many times. She would hold almost all 7. 5 inches down through multiple gags. When we went into 69, she didn't have to, but she reached extra far and rimmed me very deep and was all over my taint while jerking me off.

She's gets good marks for being a girl that rubs your balls a lot while blowing you.

Her english is basically non existent so I'm not certain but it sounded like she's only here for another week then goes somewhere to LA. I think this one I actually will see again which I almost never do. I have a feeling a second session with her will be even better.

I keep wanting to see a BBFS girl with a kgirl agency but BB just keeps delivering and the cost is half as much compared to those girld who want 450 for BBFS.

I do miss fucking in a bed. But I know these spa's can't really be having beds in them.

[Admin2]

Sorry I wasn't paying attention. I believe that is from the Sugar Spa Sponsor thread in San Diego if I remember correctly. I am in San Diego for work weekly.

It is Sugar Spa in San Diego and that's what it says, I would respect their wishes. Some of the spas are going to be more one way than others. We are working on giving them the ability to delete or edit posts but only on their thread. To you fuckers with Tourette's that always gotta be shouting shit out, I know that makes the reviews on their thread less believable but it's their fucking thread, they bought the ad, so long as they follow our rules they can make more restrictive ones if they want.

Think of those threads as being a signboard in the lobby of their shops. You guys still have the review thread and I don't give a fuck how much somebody pays for an ad this isn't TNA, I'd rather lose an advertiser than tell guys they can't post about what they experienced if it's in our review threads.

A2

[BombAssPizza0]

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR's NOTE: This report was edited or deleted because the subject of the report was in direct violation of a posted Admin Restriction on the author, the thread, and/or the subject. This behavior will not be tolerated, and a 2nd violation will result in an automatic banning.

[AnotherBogie]

Which thread did that come from because that is more restrictive than the rule I set. To be clear, those advertiser threads are for the shops, they aren't like review threads, if they want to make more restrictive rules I would say respect them. The rule I laid on them was no sex for money. If you want to talk about money then no explanation of services. However if they don't want reviews it's their thread, they paid for the ad that got the thread. I'm curious which place said it because I suspect there is some misunderstanding happening.

As far as the one that says "Please respect the Admins request and leave your reviews for us in THIS thread and not the main forums, and do not mention a tip or donation of any kind."

This is closer to what I said, you can review them on both threads if you want but in the advertiser thread no sex and money. In my mind "reviews" on the advertiser thread were meant to be more like "endorsements"

A2

Sorry I wasn't paying attention. I believe that is from the Sugar Spa Sponsor thread in San Diego if I remember correctly. I am in San Diego for work weekly.

[Admin2]

Yeah it is a bit confusing. This is copied a from one sponsor thread.

" No reviews and no mention of services. For example, you can say things like "I saw this provider, she was fantastic, great attitude, caring, attentive". If you want to post a long full review then please use the MPR 50+ and 50- threads respectively.

And this is from another one.

"Please respect the Admins request and leave your reviews for us in THIS thread and not the main forums, and do not mention a tip or donation of any kind. ".

I don't know if this is a case by case with the sponsor or if there is a general rule but they all seem to say no mention of tip or donation.

Which thread did that come from because that is more restrictive than the rule I set. To be clear, those advertiser threads are for the shops, they aren't like review threads, if they want to make more restrictive rules I would say respect them. The rule I laid on them was no sex for money. If you want to talk about money then no explanation of services. However if they don't want reviews it's their thread, they paid for the ad that got the thread. I'm curious which place said it because I suspect there is some misunderstanding happening.

As far as the one that says "Please respect the Admins request and leave your reviews for us in THIS thread and not the main forums, and do not mention a tip or donation of any kind."

This is closer to what I said, you can review them on both threads if you want but in the advertiser thread no sex and money. In my mind "reviews" on the advertiser thread were meant to be more like "endorsements"

A2

[Hector58]

Not in the sponsor threads.

Sorry, now I see your point. If all posts for a spa have to be posted in the sponsor thread, there is no way to post about services and $$ That is a problem.

[Hector58]

I thought the whole reason for this forum was to compare service experiences and outlays $$.

Not in the sponsor threads.

[Dildo Baggens]

I thought the whole reason for this forum was to compare service experiences and outlays $$.

Yeah it is a bit confusing. This is copied a from one sponsor thread.

" No reviews and no mention of services. For example, you can say things like "I saw this provider, she was fantastic, great attitude, caring, attentive". If you want to post a long full review then please use the MPR 50+ and 50- threads respectively.

And this is from another one.

"Please respect the Admins request and leave your reviews for us in THIS thread and not the main forums, and do not mention a tip or donation of any kind. ".

I don't know if this is a case by case with the sponsor or if there is a general rule but they all seem to say no mention of tip or donation.

[AnotherBogie]

Anyone can help me understand the new rules?

Yeah it is a bit confusing. This is copied a from one sponsor thread.

" No reviews and no mention of services. For example, you can say things like "I saw this provider, she was fantastic, great attitude, caring, attentive". If you want to post a long full review then please use the MPR 50+ and 50- threads respectively.

And this is from another one.

"Please respect the Admins request and leave your reviews for us in THIS thread and not the main forums, and do not mention a tip or donation of any kind. ".

I don't know if this is a case by case with the sponsor or if there is a general rule but they all seem to say no mention of tip or donation.