Bareback Providers

[PlayingJsea]

The new blonde chick Sara on TNA belongs here, I accidentally texted her instead of someone else asking for a VIP session and she responded asking for recent test results.

Long story short, she is not worth it. While yes she is young. She is has the skinny junky look, missing some teeth, is AWFUL at time management and had to reschedule like 5 times. Plus she cost way too much. I ended up holding back a few bills for her annoying lateness and she didn't say anything.

The only redeeming part was that she is in fact in her early 20's and has a very tight gorgeous pussy.

Not going to repeat.

[TheDarby254]

Has anyone seen her? She told me via text that she's down for BB.

Yeah, I met up with her a few times. Met her on seeking. Can confirm that she belongs here. She's a good time for sure and fun to chill with.

[DamianDono]

Saw her yesterday in seatac. Booked a hh at a negotiated rate not her posted rates but ended up staying over an hour. Not because of action but because she would not stfu and get busy. She was all over the place mentally. At least she didn't watch the clock and when she finally got started it was decent but not great.
As far as bb i wore a raincoat as bbfs is not my thing

Won't repeat.

That STG profile reads like the diary of a madwoman. Laying into all the "haters" out there. It's like, girl, I just want to shoot some ropes, ok?

I think I knew her a while back from FetLife. We never met but even through text she was in constant crisis, between housing and constantly fleeing / reuniting some mentally ill "dom" daddy with serious issues. You can guaran-goddamn-tee that her current tatted up "daddy" is helping how her out.

Buyer beware over here.

LOL that said I'd pound it.

[BluePony]

I don't recognize this one, anyone have intel?

https://skipthegames.com/posts/rento...-/475683431113

Saw her yesterday in seatac. Booked a hh at a negotiated rate not her posted rates but ended up staying over an hour. Not because of action but because she would not stfu and get busy. She was all over the place mentally. At least she didn't watch the clock and when she finally got started it was decent but not great.
As far as bb i wore a raincoat as bbfs is not my thing

Won't repeat.

[SocratesRvng]

I agree with your point that providers typically wouldn't confirm anything like that over text. It's a common sense approach to avoid leaving a paper trail that could compromise their safety or legality. As for BBFS being a "YMMV" (Your Mileage May Vary) situation, that absolutely seems to be the case.

Even among those with a reputation for being "non-bare friendly," experiences can vary based on things like mutual trust, chemistry, or how comfortable both parties feel in the moment. What one client experiences might not reflect another's interaction, which makes the landscape of these arrangements so nuanced.

Your insight about getting more bare with supposedly non-bare providers is a testament to how fluid and situational these boundaries can be. It underscores the importance of discretion, mutual respect, and understanding that no single experience is universal. At the end of the day, it really boils down to personal dynamics that can't always be predicted or generalized.

I've said this before and I continue to say it as a mantra — Do you remember when Neo freed Morpheus from the agents and pulled Trinity from the helicopter on the roof in the first Matrix? What was his words to Neo? "Neo, sooner or later you're going to have to realize just as I did, there's a difference between knowing the path and walking the path." - Morpheus.

I look at it like this, the oracle (the provider) told you "exactly what you needed to hear. " LOL.

Be well, fellas!

So-Crates.

[CreamerCity]

Anyone happen to have intel on these?

https://skipthegames.com/posts/belle...e/732781709105

https://skipthegames.com/posts/belle...c/854533567404

As always, appreciated.

[InHerGuts]

Agreed. Almost every provider that's been called out here for being BBFS friendly has confirmed it to me either via txt or in-person. And there's been only 2 instances where someone has falsely claimed they got BBFS with providers that I knew were not accurate.

As with any site, there are bound to be trolls. They get called out hard here. I have found most of the info here to be fairly accurate. For the price of admission, great value.

[StairGuy]

I don't recognize this one, anyone have intel?

https://skipthegames.com/posts/rento...-/475683431113

I pumped a few loads in her over the summer. Thought she was cool bit of a tummy but loves being a cum dump. And her boyfriend walked in on us and just apologized and left.

[GameMaker007]

She does not.

She was open about bb. How was the experience? Have seen her on seeking before.

[Techdork]

I don't recognize this one, anyone have intel?

https://skipthegames.com/posts/rento...-/475683431113

[ManOfSteel01]

Please tell me you guys have seen this- https://www.tnaboard.com/community/t...-bbfs.2962919/.

From all the white knights replies to Annie Vesper's long ass dramatic ramblings, this is gold. My favorite part is when Annie Vesper gave the guy a project to do in "a spirit of wanting to change and improve the community" which reads like a book report you have to do if you pissed off your teacher in grade school. You really can't make this shit up. Some of those people are really, really pathetic.

Side note- if Annie writes that much online think of all the bullshit she'd yap about in person.

[BbFunTimes]

Providers typically would not answer that in text. BBFS is pretty much YMMV in person even with well known bare providers. I've gotten more bare with said non-bare friendly providers than I care to count.

I agree with your point that providers typically wouldn't confirm anything like that over text. It's a common sense approach to avoid leaving a paper trail that could compromise their safety or legality. As for BBFS being a "YMMV" (Your Mileage May Vary) situation, that absolutely seems to be the case.

Even among those with a reputation for being "non-bare friendly," experiences can vary based on things like mutual trust, chemistry, or how comfortable both parties feel in the moment. What one client experiences might not reflect another's interaction, which makes the landscape of these arrangements so nuanced.

Your insight about getting more bare with supposedly non-bare providers is a testament to how fluid and situational these boundaries can be. It underscores the importance of discretion, mutual respect, and understanding that no single experience is universal. At the end of the day, it really boils down to personal dynamics that can't always be predicted or generalized.

[BbFunTimes]

One example of proof of what you're saying that I can corroborate is this: Based on someone's claim they had BBFS with someone, I contacted that provider using a burner number asking if they did it and if so, was there an upcharge? But their reply ended up being that they never do that. Then they thought it was weird that someone told me that they did do that.

I thank you for your comment, but I'm not so sure a provider is going to verify anything on a phone call, especially from a random burner number. Think about it—if they're cautious about their privacy and legality (as they should be), admitting to something like BBFS over the phone could put them in a risky situation. It's not just about trust; it's about protecting themselves from potential setups or legal consequences.

That said, it's entirely possible that they outright deny doing something even if they do, simply as a standard protective measure. Providers often operate in a world where discretion is paramount, and they may have a hard line when it comes to discussing certain activities.

While your investigative approach is understandable, I think it highlights how tricky it can be to rely on secondhand claims or try to confirm such details. People have their reasons for exaggerating, lying, or even misunderstanding what was offered or discussed. For every claim, there's often a whole backstory we're not privy to, and trying to piece it together can lead to more questions than answers.

Ultimately, unless you're dealing with firsthand knowledge, it's wise to take all such claims with a healthy dose of skepticism. It might save you time and energy in the long run!

Take care.

[BBPornoGeek]

One example of proof of what you're saying that I can corroborate is this: Based on someone's claim they had BBFS with someone, I contacted that provider using a burner number asking if they did it and if so, was there an upcharge? But their reply ended up being that they never do that. Then they thought it was weird that someone told me that they did do that.

Providers typically would not answer that in text. BBFS is pretty much YMMV in person even with well known bare providers. I've gotten more bare with said non-bare friendly providers than I care to count.

[SpankedMonkey]

Yes, there are those who lie and exaggerateit's kind of the nature of anonymous forums like this. Some people post for attention, others for entertainment, and a few might just be outright trolling. That said, not everyone is blowing smoke. There are definitely some genuine, thoughtful, and honest contributors in the mix. It just takes a little time to sift through and figure out who's being real and who's, well. Embellishing their stories for effect.

The key is to read with a healthy dose of skepticism but also keep an open mind. Some posts that might sound wild at first could have a kernel of truth, and others that seem totally believable might be completely fabricated. It's all part of the game on platforms like this. What matters is whether you find value, entertainment, or even just a good laugh in the process.

One example of proof of what you're saying that I can corroborate is this: Based on someone's claim they had BBFS with someone, I contacted that provider using a burner number asking if they did it and if so, was there an upcharge? But their reply ended up being that they never do that. Then they thought it was weird that someone told me that they did do that.