Rants, Raves and Opinions AKA "The Octagon"

[Smokey Gringo]

How often are you accusing me of posting a review? (And these nonsense arguments don't count.) What am I posting, like once every three or four months?

If everyone followed your logic, there would be no need to post a review of anyone ever if someone else already posted a similar sentiment.

The fact this site exists prove you wrong.

Can somebody else chime in and tell if what I said made sense?

It couldn't be clearer what I said. If you've seen her, post how great it is ONCE. I don't need to know every time you've seen her is "AMAZING AND JUST KEEPS GETTING BETTER" because she may not be that way with me or anyone else. Cause that's going to lead to disappointment. OTHER mongers can comment that she was "Great", "Fantastic", "Mind blowing", etc.

But the SAME monger posting the same shit about the SAME dumpster gets old and reeks of simp / cuckold. And the fact you keep fighting to prove you're right leads me to believe you are her (fighting like a chick) or an associate.

And I know if didn't post about when she was fucking me for FREE.

That's my last word on it. I'm not triggered just didn't want to see a fellow monger turn a ho into a housewife.

[RufusFirefly]

Great you really like her. You give the girl a great review and move on. I hate when people keep posting what a great time they had again, again, and again. We only need to know once if it's great from the SAME monger. Only other times you should post about whatever favorite provider you're seeing again is if the experience has A- declined or B- fallen off a cliff or C- shady ripoff shenanigans are abound or we are in danger.

I really liked May one of EE's. Shit we started banging for free, recording it as well, and just hanging out in general. I'd have to look to see if I even reviewed her, come to think of it.

Pearish had a good point as well though, I may not have reviewed May because I didn't want to now be complicit in making her a cum dumpster. I mean she was an escort so it's built in but the less dicks I know about, the better.

I hate when mongers review a girl they saw years ago that is not providing anymore. What good is that for us.

[RufusFirefly]

Thanks for the statistical breakdown. Truly remarkable analysis. And once again, based on practically nothing, you're absolutely certain about your position. Windbag. LOL.

Remember 80% of all statistics are made up.

[Rimme]

May was a great time! Haven't heard that name in a decade!

Great you really like her. You give the girl a great review and move on. I hate when people keep posting what a great time they had again, again, and again. We only need
to know once if it's great from the SAME monger. Only other times you should post about whatever favorite provider you're seeing again is if the experience has A- declined or B- fallen off a cliff or C- shady ripoff shenanigans are abound or we are in danger.

I really liked May one of EE's. Shit we started banging for free, recording it as well, and just hanging out in general. I'd have to look to see if I even reviewed her, come to think of it.

Pearish had a good point as well though, I may not have reviewed May because I didn't want to now be complicit in making her a cum dumpster. I mean she was an escort so it's built in but the less dicks I know about, the better.

[Simp4ebony]

Great you really like her. You give the girl a great review and move on. I hate when people keep posting what a great time they had again, again, and again. We only need to know once if it's great from the SAME monger. Only other times you should post about whatever favorite provider you're seeing again is if the experience has A- declined or B- fallen off a cliff or C- shady ripoff shenanigans are abound or we are in danger.

I really liked May one of EE's. Shit we started banging for free, recording it as well, and just hanging out in general. I'd have to look to see if I even reviewed her, come to think of it.

Pearish had a good point as well though, I may not have reviewed May because I didn't want to now be complicit in making her a cum dumpster. I mean she was an escort so it's built in but the less dicks I know about, the better.

How often are you accusing me of posting a review? (And these nonsense arguments don't count.) What am I posting, like once every three or four months?

If everyone followed your logic, there would be no need to post a review of anyone ever if someone else already posted a similar sentiment.

The fact this site exists prove you wrong.

[Simp4ebony]

For 90%+ of us this hobby is about sampling pussy far and wide as possible with minimal BS. The few guys exclusively seeing a provider are not out trying to complicate shit and make her that much bigger of a community cum dumpster. This is her or somebody she associates with for business. And if the posts weren't cringe as fuck I wouldn't poke back at them.

What's complicated? You fuck tons of cum dumpsters, I spend time with my ATF, who has a relatively small number of regulars compared to the revolving door of dicks you are apparently proud to follow.

Now, why did I start seeing her exclusively? Because it got to the point that I always regretted seeing other girls. They were never as good as her. It started to feel like a waste. Any money given to other girls was just a subpar experience.

So I gradually started seeing only her. Do I like her? Big deal. I've known her for five years. Sometimes, she takes on a few new clients. When that happens, I post a review. And, given the messages I received, some guys are interested and follow the lead.

Your fixation on us is weird.

[PaiMei]

For 90%+ of us this hobby is about sampling pussy far and wide as possible with minimal BS. The few guys exclusively seeing a provider are not out trying to complicate shit and make her that much bigger of a community cum dumpster. This is her or somebody she associates with for business. And if the posts weren't cringe as fuck I wouldn't poke back at them.

Thanks for the statistical breakdown. Truly remarkable analysis. And once again, based on practically nothing, you're absolutely certain about your position. Windbag. LOL.

[Smokey Gringo]

Great you really like her. You give the girl a great review and move on. I hate when people keep posting what a great time they had again, again, and again. We only need to know once if it's great from the SAME monger. Only other times you should post about whatever favorite provider you're seeing again is if the experience has A- declined or B- fallen off a cliff or C- shady ripoff shenanigans are abound or we are in danger.

I really liked May one of EE's. Shit we started banging for free, recording it as well, and just hanging out in general. I'd have to look to see if I even reviewed her, come to think of it.

Pearish had a good point as well though, I may not have reviewed May because I didn't want to now be complicit in making her a cum dumpster. I mean she was an escort so it's built in but the less dicks I know about, the better.

[PearishBA]

I'm def team ilvblckgrls.

And team Elly. Go Red Legs!

OK, I'll admit it: I snorted pretty hard at the last sentence, well played.

That said, maybe I wasn't clear. I do understand what this thread is for. I remember when it was A2's pet experiment back in the day (and it was a wild success, I'd say). The thing is, I wasn't saying this wasn't the place to put shit talking. I was asking what it was about Blckgrls posting history that triggered you into said shit talking so hard.

Is your position really that Thalia has taken over this guys account, and / or that it was her all along? I just went through the post history and that seems entirely baseless; like, QAnon baseless. I honestly thought your first post (of this most recent batch) was a joke that just kinda went over Blkgrls' head. I was clearly mistaken, so I'll ask again: What's the thought process here? I'm dying to know. Is there a piece I'm missing somewhere?

Maybe two or three complimentary posts per year and change does not an account hijacking make, and its also not really out of character for the forum. Is it an above-average amount of praise? Maybe? I'm not going to scour the boards to analyze but it doesn't feel excessive, and he spends far more time defending himself here than talking about her. That seems like a shitty recipe for drumming up business for her (or herself, if we're going full conspiracy theory here).

For 90%+ of us this hobby is about sampling pussy far and wide as possible with minimal BS. The few guys exclusively seeing a provider are not out trying to complicate shit and make her that much bigger of a community cum dumpster. This is her or somebody she associates with for business. And if the posts weren't cringe as fuck I wouldn't poke back at them.

[PaiMei]

I'm def team ilvblckgrls.

And team Elly. Go Red Legs!

[Member #6847]

she made a joke. I honestly laughed at it. So sure, i'm a simp, and you are a humorless cum splat. Cheers!

She made a funny?

Hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

[Simp4ebony]

For the record, this post is a very simp-why post. You talk about Talia like she's your best fuckin friend, like you done wifed her. And then you want to pretend like you aren't simping. Thing is, none of us are buying it. You're a simp. Own it.

You're a cheerleader, it's. Well it's not okay, but you do you boo.

She made a joke. I honestly laughed at it. So sure, I'm a simp, and you are a humorless cum splat. Cheers!

[TheRatch]

I was laughing with Thalia about all this drama. She said some of you need to grow some real balls so she can juggle them.

LOL. I love that girl.

For the record, this post is a very simp-why post. You talk about Talia like she's your best fuckin friend, like you done wifed her. And then you want to pretend like you aren't simping. Thing is, none of us are buying it. You're a simp. Own it.

You're a cheerleader, it's. Well it's not okay, but you do you boo.

[Vilnius]

Exactly, this is the place for talking shit and calling out shit. And this is where we end up when a provider pretends to be a customer, or at best one of their male 'friends' of whatever association is benefiting from steering them traffic.

The rest of you gentle souls with your lotion soaked hands-across america sentiments should start a new forum section.

OK, I'll admit it: I snorted pretty hard at the last sentence, well played.

That said, maybe I wasn't clear. I do understand what this thread is for. I remember when it was A2's pet experiment back in the day (and it was a wild success, I'd say). The thing is, I wasn't saying this wasn't the place to put shit talking. I was asking what it was about Blckgrls posting history that triggered you into said shit talking so hard.

Is your position really that Thalia has taken over this guys account, and / or that it was her all along? I just went through the post history and that seems entirely baseless; like, QAnon baseless. I honestly thought your first post (of this most recent batch) was a joke that just kinda went over Blkgrls' head. I was clearly mistaken, so I'll ask again: What's the thought process here? I'm dying to know. Is there a piece I'm missing somewhere?

Maybe two or three complimentary posts per year and change does not an account hijacking make, and its also not really out of character for the forum. Is it an above-average amount of praise? Maybe? I'm not going to scour the boards to analyze but it doesn't feel excessive, and he spends far more time defending himself here than talking about her. That seems like a shitty recipe for drumming up business for her (or herself, if we're going full conspiracy theory here).

[Simp4ebony]

Exactly, this is the place for talking shit and calling out shit. And this is where we end up when a provider pretends to be a customer, or at best one of their male 'friends' of whatever association is benefiting from steering them traffic.

The rest of you gentle souls with your lotion soaked hands-across america sentiments should start a new forum section.

This isn't the "Make up bullshit lies about people" forum, so WTF do you mean?

Yes, when Thalia had a bunch of people seeing her back in the day, there was a mixup with phones and the infamous post some of you can't stop thinking about. But here is the thing: if she's "fake" or something, what are you actually saying? Her reviews by multiple people on here from a few years back are also all fake? And on TER? All fake? Private delights. All fake? Get a grip!

It makes me wonder. Is there something about Thalia that makes certain guys motivated to be negative? Hmmm. I wonder what about her might make people hate on her?