Thread: "Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"
+
Add Report
Results 6,586 to 6,600 of 17279
-
09-17-22 12:48 #10694Senior Member

Posts: 1843I just took a trip out West for 10 days and got 4 girls, and gave 150,200, 200, and 350 (hot 19 y/o college girl, BBFS and pics). My success rate was much, much higher than 1-2%.
Originally Posted by Zephyr69
[View Original Post]
And I am older, and not a good looking dude, and certainly not top 1% earner. I suppose I am somewhat skilled in my texting seduction abilities though. I just try to talk to them like a new friend, and that seems to help. Also you can ask them tips about the area, and that is good for conversation. I do need to take more sex vacations, because banging girls in different cities just feels more exotic and exciting, somehow.
I almost never do a M&G, even here in the Atlanta area. It is largely a waste of time. I text with the girls to build trust, and then we usually meet at a hotel (outside in the parking lot) to make sure they feel comfortable. Then I book the room and we go up there for some fun. When traveling, I already have the room, so that's even better.
I have met one or two for coffee, before going back to the hotel, but that is rare. As you suggest, I will start messaging girls, in advance. Usually 2 weeks in advance, if possible. As you point out, a lot of them don't log into the site every day, so you want to increase the chance they will even see your message. Then I just start to move things forward with them. Most will still flake out or disappear, but in a decent sized town / city, I can get something going.
Anyway, it sounds like you are doing most everything right and have a solid approach. I'm sure you could refine your technique, as most all of us could. But your strategy seems sound.
Once the temps cool down, I hope to take some trips to Bham, Asheville, Greenville, etc. Those are good towns for sb's, and will try to do some hiking in the area. But never travel somewhere just for the sb action, or then they will all flake on you, and it ends up being a waste of time and money. But having them spice up your trip is the way to go. Nashville is also a great town for girls, and some FL places like Jacksonville, or Tampa, but no mountains there, so I don't visit often.
You bring up a good topic, and I think many mongers miss out on out of town girls like this. They can add a lot to a vacation / travel adventure.
-
09-17-22 00:12 #10693Regular Member

Posts: 5SA on travel
Hi all, just got into this game and trying things out on SA. I read through quite a bit of posts here and on reddit, but certainly not enough.
I would like to share my experience so far when I am using SA on short trip to a mid-size / large city far away. Since I have no time to M&G while traveling, the message I sent is straight to the point and use hosting in a luxury hotel as a bonus. Then I asked for details in in the texting phase and my budget is $$$ (would like to be lower to $$.
Stats:
50 replied to SA message.
20 moved to text.
15 are scams, non-responsive, or out of budget (1 k ppm).
5 accepted $$$ and set to meet in hotel (1 became a prepaid scam after a length text, 2 agree to M&G).
Only 1 showed up and it is way out of the scheduled time. She is new and expected a quickie. I should have said no but I was too horny at that point. It ended in a mixed experience.
Lesson learned for using SA on business travel:
The 1-2% success rate is real.
Better to start messaging a week prior to the meeting day. Not everyone is always online and responsive on the same day.
I am not sure how many message need to be sent, but I would lock down at least 4-5 girls per date. Only 1-2 will show up.
Ask for what their expectation of the date is for clarification before date.
Any suggestion is appreciated. I don't fit in the SB's ideal target profile (age 30-50, top 1% earner, skilled in this hobby) so others may have a lot higher rate of success.
-
09-16-22 21:22 #10692Senior Member

Posts: 271Mr. Johnson point well taken. I am just having better luck on SDM and have to filter through less scamming.
Originally Posted by PeterJohnson
[View Original Post]
-
09-16-22 21:17 #10691Senior Member

Posts: 271LOL, interesting. All I am saying is that I was on Seeking for over one year and I had some good scores. With Sugar Daddy I have had more victories in a shorter time.
Originally Posted by Roddee
[View Original Post]
-
09-16-22 20:05 #10690Senior Member

Posts: 196I got some news for ya. . . LOL
https://members.seeking.com/member/2...d-25c1f1c90383
Originally Posted by LovePunnany
[View Original Post]
-
09-16-22 18:42 #10689Senior Member

Posts: 332This.
Originally Posted by PeterJohnson
[View Original Post]
Based on my experience, the cost is aligned with how I'd set your expectations for the site.
My largest gripe is you cannot search profiles you've viewed or messages. It takes a lot of time to weed through the profiles you've already took a shot.
-
09-16-22 18:29 #10688Senior Member

Posts: 1843Good point, and that's the way to dominate a findom c**t. Also got to think mostly the hottest girls can only pull off that findom worship nonsense. Yes there are a lot of pathetic guys out there, but still a limited supply.
Originally Posted by LovePunnany
[View Original Post]
And the same thing applies to some girls who are looking for "Platonic". I've had a couple of them tell me that they put that in there, so they don't get treated like a prostitute quite as much. I usually just hide/block those profiles but might not hurt to talk to a few of them and see what's up.
-
09-16-22 17:39 #10687Senior Member

Posts: 1843Do you really think that the girls on Sugardaddymeet are really that different from Seeking? It sounds like you are correct that you are having good luck on SDMeet, but the girls are not likely to be that different. Of course many girls are on both sites.
Originally Posted by LovePunnany
[View Original Post]
And doing more work, for the same reward, doesn't sound that attractive to me. I would get on SDmeet, just to see if I could find some undiscovered gems, but a naked. smiling 22 y/o who takes a load in her twat is going to be about the same, on either site.
Anyway it's a fun game to try to score girls from multiple sites and glad you are having so much success on there. That's what it's all about. Maybe I will try it, once I go through all my Seeking prospects, but that is going to take some time. I wish I was still in my 20's and could knock out three a week, but those days are long past....
-
09-16-22 16:40 #10686Senior Member

Posts: 176Not her
No, Kennesaw Jessica "Megan" is 5'8" at least and has never been connected to Lawrenceville as far as I know. I saw her in Kennesaw 2 days ago.
Originally Posted by Plisknoob1
[View Original Post]
-
09-16-22 16:34 #10685Senior Member

Posts: 271Sugar Daady Meet
I totally agree with you, I am having more luck and better quality women on Sugar Daddy. Now it does required more work but the pay off is far better that Seeking. I have had four meet this month and some of the best BBBJ I can recall plus they swallow.
Originally Posted by SeekingHead
[View Original Post]
-
09-16-22 16:14 #10684Senior Member

Posts: 271Sugar Daddy Meet Review
So have been communicating with this little beauty, scheduled to meet for lunch this Sunday to see if there is chemistry. If all goes well with the first meet then next week the fireworks will happen. Will keep you mongers posted.
Gentlemen I must say, Sugar Daddy requires more work than Seeking, but to me the pay off is better. There is little to no scammers on Sugar Daddy and the selection of women is better in my opinion.
https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...serId=71355961
-
09-16-22 16:03 #10683Senior Member

Posts: 271Ale
Dude, ignore all that fluff, money talks.
Originally Posted by Machintosh
[View Original Post]
-
09-16-22 14:58 #10682Senior Member

Posts: 332Based on reading her profile. I'm a bit surprised. She seems to only want to be paid with no work. She is asking for findom & subs only.
Originally Posted by LovePunnany
[View Original Post]
-
09-16-22 13:12 #10681Senior Member

Posts: 1843I don't get it either, but this could explain much of it:
Originally Posted by GoneForGood97
[View Original Post]
It is that findom bullshit:
https://www.businessinsider.com/side...ay-pigs-2022-7
-
09-16-22 10:04 #10680Regular Member

Posts: 9Yeah I've only seen the one review this far.
Originally Posted by BillGinn
[View Original Post]











Reply With Quote




