NoVA SugarBabies

[ProCatHunter]

Recently it feels like a lot of girls I chat with and who seem legit stop activity in SA (with or sometimes without deleting their SA) and show up on SB, where they show as active on the regular. Does anyone else see this? I've never used SB because I don't like the pay-to-unlock model, but does anyone find it more effective or feel like it gives better results? Are these girls just playing the odds by using multiple sites or do you think they are finding some advantage over on SB? Notwithstanding the drought of talent and the ridiculous expectations we are seeing, wondering if SB is coming up. Feedback appreciated, and I take full responsibility for any typos.

Girls get overwhelmed by the number of messages they get from guys on seeking.

Guys prefer seeking because it's a buffet style, pay once and message as much as you want.

[Stm001]

Recently it feels like a lot of girls I chat with and who seem legit stop activity in SA (with or sometimes without deleting their SA) and show up on SB, where they show as active on the regular. Does anyone else see this? I've never used SB because I don't like the pay-to-unlock model, but does anyone find it more effective or feel like it gives better results? Are these girls just playing the odds by using multiple sites or do you think they are finding some advantage over on SB? Notwithstanding the drought of talent and the ridiculous expectations we are seeing, wondering if SB is coming up. Feedback appreciated, and I take full responsibility for any typos.

[IronMan40]

This babe has an interesting wish list of sexy clothes, sex toys, and other things. She's a little oder than most, at 42, but she seems cute and horny. Any intel?

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...5-d79a6895a833

I've been chatting with her as well. I may TOFT next week if I can find a spot in my schedule.

[Dimples572]

Usually-- means often, most of the time, not every time.

One of my hottest coed scores was a Virginia, Virginia listing because one of you assholes all but raped her, so I get the privacy concerns.

State / State usually have other redflags if they are scammers and easy to weed out -- Adjective / Noun user name, profile pics that are revealing, minor grammar / spelling mistakes, quick to move to text.

First of all I'm pretty sure I wasn't talking to you. Second of all, check your Merriam Webster:

Definition of Not Necessarily:

: possibly but not certainly —used to say that something is not definitely true.

[CuriousVaMan]

You are just getting usernames here rather than links, because I immediately block them without a reply when they say something stupid like wanting to be paid (often a lot) for a M&G. Who does that BTW? I feel like there must be guys in this market that actually agree to pay these girls to meet up without any expectations whatsoever. And there are definitely those paying exorbitant amounts of money for a roll in the hay, which is driving the uptick in expectations for PPM etc. , imo.

Emma.t - time waster. Exchanged a handful of messages but said she never sleeps with anyone on first meet. I said that's fine and I also like to assess chemistry and mutual desire to move forward, so no expectations on m&g but I'm decidedly NOT seeking a platonic arrangement. She went quiet for a few days then replied saying she's no longer interested and prob not a good fit anyway.

Scarlettelle98 - in her very first reply she said her "first dates typically are typically shopping followed by dinner and drinks". I blocked her.

Cutiepiegirl123 - exchanged a handful of sameday messages and acted like she wanted to meet that evening, then said she requires a "first date incentive of $400". Blocked her.

Small handful of others have recently moved to text but then gotten quiet / sporadic with correspondence. Reserving those until I can further determine if they're serious or not. The bowl sure isn't what it was pre-pandemic. The proliferation of catfish, scammers and time wasters is starting to make this feel as fruitless as Tinder.

And for the love of god. Do not tell SBs, providers, SOs or ANY woman about this site. Some of the best contributors to this board (I am admittedly not one of them) have gone virtually silent of late, and I can't help but think it's because of the white knighting that goes on when their solid, valuable reviews get regurgitated back to them by some pissed off chick who was the subject of said review.

Excellent report Highway. Regarding Scarlettelle98, I always bypassed her profile as it's tagline is "Why spend mine, when I can spend yours?" Ugh. That's really appealing. WTF.

[HighwayGuy]

You are just getting usernames here rather than links, because I immediately block them without a reply when they say something stupid like wanting to be paid (often a lot) for a M&G. Who does that BTW? I feel like there must be guys in this market that actually agree to pay these girls to meet up without any expectations whatsoever. And there are definitely those paying exorbitant amounts of money for a roll in the hay, which is driving the uptick in expectations for PPM etc. , imo.

Emma.t - time waster. Exchanged a handful of messages but said she never sleeps with anyone on first meet. I said that's fine and I also like to assess chemistry and mutual desire to move forward, so no expectations on m&g but I'm decidedly NOT seeking a platonic arrangement. She went quiet for a few days then replied saying she's no longer interested and prob not a good fit anyway.

Scarlettelle98 - in her very first reply she said her "first dates typically are typically shopping followed by dinner and drinks". I blocked her.

Cutiepiegirl123 - exchanged a handful of sameday messages and acted like she wanted to meet that evening, then said she requires a "first date incentive of $400". Blocked her.

Small handful of others have recently moved to text but then gotten quiet / sporadic with correspondence. Reserving those until I can further determine if they're serious or not. The bowl sure isn't what it was pre-pandemic. The proliferation of catfish, scammers and time wasters is starting to make this feel as fruitless as Tinder.

And for the love of god. Do not tell SBs, providers, SOs or ANY woman about this site. Some of the best contributors to this board (I am admittedly not one of them) have gone virtually silent of late, and I can't help but think it's because of the white knighting that goes on when their solid, valuable reviews get regurgitated back to them by some pissed off chick who was the subject of said review.

[BadHabits21]

Wants $500 to meet and see if we click. Nope, next.

https://members.seeking.com/member/0...d-581f3df2f669

[TheYoungMonger]

https://members.seeking.com/member/0...2-08347e22c853

Just broke up with her boyfriend and is into the revenge fuck. First time I bagged a girl on the first day her profile was up. Not going to repeat. Her armpits aren't shaved. Maybe she will shave them for you?

I love a little Bush.

[DickLongwood]

Sadly my luck with her was not as good as it's been with others. Looks like one of our brothers bagged her and took her off the site. Her account has been deleted and I wish I could have said that I had the chance to tap it.

Probably a lurker who took her down and now we will never know the details.

There are lots of reasons for a SB deleting her profile. She may have found a SD, was turned off by the website, etc.

[ProCatHunter]

She looks very cute to me, but didn't reply to my messages. Her profile is only 4 days old, so she could be untapped. Good luck! Let us know!

Sadly my luck with her was not as good as it's been with others. Looks like one of our brothers bagged her and took her off the site. Her account has been deleted and I wish I could have said that I had the chance to tap it.

Probably a lurker who took her down and now we will never know the details.

[BobLobLa]

Not necessarily true. I've had several scenarios where they turned out to be legit, just trying not to specify their location due to privacy concerns.

Usually-- means often, most of the time, not every time.

One of my hottest coed scores was a Virginia, Virginia listing because one of you assholes all but raped her, so I get the privacy concerns.

State / State usually have other redflags if they are scammers and easy to weed out -- Adjective / Noun user name, profile pics that are revealing, minor grammar / spelling mistakes, quick to move to text.

[Max #01]

Not necessarily true. I've had several scenarios where they turned out to be legit, just trying not to specify their location due to privacy concerns.

Makes sense, guess I was following the conventional wisdom on several SD / SB forums.

[ProCatHunter]

https://members.seeking.com/member/0...2-08347e22c853

Just broke up with her boyfriend and is into the revenge fuck. First time I bagged a girl on the first day her profile was up. Not going to repeat. Her armpits aren't shaved. Maybe she will shave them for you?

[DickLongwood]

https://members.seeking.com/member/e...3-c12a4f4cdc52

Trying to figure out how high volume this one is. How many of you mongers out there are tapping this one?

She looks very cute to me, but didn't reply to my messages. Her profile is only 4 days old, so she could be untapped. Good luck! Let us know!

[ProCatHunter]

https://members.seeking.com/member/e...3-c12a4f4cdc52

Trying to figure out how high volume this one is. How many of you mongers out there are tapping this one?