Thread: Streetwalker Reports
+
Add Report
Results 2,416 to 2,430 of 7791
-
01-24-22 15:59 #5376Senior Member

Posts: 483Agreed
There is no doubt, ST. You are 100% correct. The AA stroll is the last remaining, it's been dying for at least two years and is the number one target of law enforcement. They are going to wipe it out, just as they have with all the other strolls in this city. And yet another great Seattle tradition--predating the Klondike Gold Rush--will be gone forever.
Originally Posted by StreetTroller
[View Original Post]
That's the ultimate goal, anyway, and they are going to reach it within the year I suspect. But we'll still have fentanyl, tent cities, homeless on bicycles and garbage piled everywhere. Wonderful!
-
01-24-22 15:40 #5375Senior Member

Posts: 885Girls Who Are Just Not Into It
I agree that it is the biggest waste of money and a big boner killer when they just aren't into it at all.
Originally Posted by StreetTroller
[View Original Post]
-
01-24-22 14:36 #5374Banned Member

Posts: 964That's generally not what I see, but that is purely anecdotal. Further, regular traveling girls I do meet whenever they return to the area are telling me that their income in Seattle has been diminishing with each visit. Again, anecdotal and I haven't surveyed the SW population at large, but that seems to fit with what I see, at least. Impossible for me to know for sure, of course, but I really do think the city will put more of a squeeze on AA. Every other stroll in the metro area has pretty much been extinguished, AA is the last-remaining stand. When I picked-up an SW on Saturday night (see report a few posts below), she was a lot more cautious about how she approached and got in than they have been since 2020. I have to think that the police are definitely having an effect out there and as the city formulates their plans with the new mayor and city attorney I think we'll see more pressure. Up to this point, several girls have indeed told me that they are staying in Seattle as opposed to any other city on the West Coast because law enforcement and the city have been a lot more open to them. This is why girls are willing to stand in the rain, fog and colder temperatures as opposed to staying in Las Vegas during the winter. From what I understand vice has been pretty active on the strolls in Vegas, definitely different than up here. Regarding LA, there have been quite a few shootings and violence on the main stroll in South Central. So for now, Seattle is the big spot.
At the end of the day it really doesn't matter, though, because it simply is what it is and what's going to happen will happen. Aurora has changed a lot since 2020 and that will definitely continue to evolve. I remember when the signs of impending death began to show for the AAA stroll near Lake Union about 10 years ago and this feels similar. The girls on that stroll were very numerous, scantily-clad and thought they owned the place, very similar to how it's been on Aurora. The city took care of that, I think the same is coming for Aurora.
Originally Posted by BiggusAssus
[View Original Post]
-
01-24-22 07:55 #5373Banned Member

Posts: 16LOL to that!
Originally Posted by HH216
[View Original Post]
Sounds like a lot of work and time but I hear there is still some fun to be had out there within reason. Re the north precinct, I heard a funny story where last summer dude picks up a date and thought they found a nice spot to park, and look over and it turns out they are literally parked on the street next to the precinct. There's a bunch of their cars behind the fence, and some le milling around. They rolled out directly to a nearby spot cause they were in close direct view from le parking lot.
Originally Posted by GinVermo
[View Original Post]
Once it gets dark out most of the crowd of ladies seems to either get picked up or go on calls. Most of then are posted up online.
Originally Posted by StreetTroller
[View Original Post]
Seen a crowd of 7-10 by the Firestone and one after another gets picked up until all gone in less than 5 minutes. This narrative that they aren't getting picked up or making money doesn't match with reality. They wouldn't be here if they weren't making money. Heard they like it here better than fig in LA cause they make more and it isn't as dangerous.
-
01-24-22 03:35 #5372Banned Member

Posts: 964An Actual Date Report
I went out for a bit on Saturday evening and was only out for a few minutes when I spotted a nice, tall BSW in a very short minidress with orange and black print all over it near KK. She had long hair, nice legs and overall a killer body. She came over and asked if I might want a date, gave her rate of $100 and I told her to get in. She got in and directed me to her room, but I told her that we needed to talk services first. She asked, "full service?" and then said she'd do that for $140. I told her I wanted to do it uncovered and of course she said no. I expected that. So I turned to drop her back off and she said, "I can do head uncovered". So, to avoid a long, confusing round of negotiations which took forever to untangle and straighten-out, i'll just mentioned that we agreed to uncovered head with full-service with an ultra-thin condom. Okay, I'm willing to try this and see how it goes. As part of full-service I ask to do it doggy-style, no problem.
We get to her room and get ready and then tell her to come over to me. I just want to touch and feel a bit. She said that she doesn't like touching. I said that's going to be damn near impossible during doggy-style and that I was NOT doing this date without any touching. I started getting my shoes back on and told her I'll just go ahead and leave, so she changed her mind. We get started, the head is more like a hand-job, which again I'd expected, and I told her that if she just put it in her mouth that I'd get-up much faster so she could put the condom on. She's going really fast, tries to put the condom on me when I'm semi-hard and I told her to sloooooow down and just get it going. Taking a bit of time now will ensure that I get done in time. Remarkably, she complies. Then she wants me to lie-down so she can get on top. That's not what we had agreed to so I refused. So we finally get everything going. I'm not really enjoying the experience and even though her body is smoking-hot, I'm just not getting there. She asks if everything is okay. I finally finished and start getting ready to leave.
Then she says, "here, take my number for when you want to see me again next week". I looked at her with my mouth wide open and a dumb-founded expression on my face for several seconds. She said, "what? I said, "you really think I would? Seriously? You really think I would call you after this awful experience? Clearly you dislike what you are doing. Clearly. It just can't be any more clear than that. No amount of money is worth your happiness, Doll, you should just get a regular job". She had a very dejected expression on her face, looked down at the floor and said, "oh". Then she said, "come see me next time, I'll do it without a condom. I don't do it with everybody, and not on the first date". Honestly that would make me feel skeezy, so I declined.
Thing is, I'm a pretty constant regular, I'm good for at least once every week, sometimes more. She's hot enough that should could have had me on a regular basis. She and what I assume to be her crew are going to stay up here through summer. But instead, she's going to have to stand out in the rain and the fog hoping to snare another sucker she's not met before. Because I just can't see any man wanting to repeat that awful experience. But that does bring-up a question which I've asked previously on this forum. Are some guys so taken with meeting a sweet young thing that they'll just put-up with a shitty experience just because she's hot? I like hot girls, too, but encounters such as this one just don't work for me. Clearly someone sold this girl a bill of goods and promised her that she'd make all of this money out on the stroll. I don't think things worked-out the way she thought it might. But in the end this experience went the way I thought it would, as I think most of them will with the ghetto pimpy girls and their California crews these days. There's no joy in any of that.
-
01-24-22 00:40 #5371Senior Member

Posts: 118I must admit, I do like the summer "uniforms" much better than the winter ones.
Originally Posted by StreetTroller
[View Original Post]
-
01-23-22 22:26 #5370Banned Member

Posts: 964RE: Saturday
About 10 ears ago when the city wanted to shut-down the stroll in Lake Union area where Amazon HQ is now located, SPD started tailing guys they thought were cruising for SWs. I was followed very closely a few times all the way to the I-5 on-ramp, at which point the cruiser turned around and went back. One night I decided to go back and the same police cruiser pulled me over on Dexter. He approached and point-blank asked me why I was down there so late. I actually laughed and told him that I could be down there, there was no curfew of which I was aware. To that he smiled and said, "look, I'm taking a survey. Guys come down here at night and continually drive in circles around the area. Just circling the blocks for hours. I wondering why". By this point he was laughing, just couldn't keep a straight face. So I asked, "I guess I don't understand why you're asking me that question, I haven't circled, I'm just driving up Dexter". He said, "have a good night" and got back into his car. Never asked me for identification, either.
Generally SPD hasn't seemed to have been following suspected johns driving through Aurora since 2020. Perhaps now they're starting as a way to put the squeeze on. Spring is about two months away, at which time typically more traveling girls start returning to the area. So I'm wondering if there is going to start being more pressure applied to discourage the suspected coming activity. You have to admit that the past two summers have been pretty wild out there along Aurora, LOL, wondering if their trying to get ahead of that.
I don't know, every time i've parked and watched since 2020 I haven't really seen a lot of the girls get picked-up. I've watched cars line-up for an SW and they all drove away after a deal couldn't be reached. I've always wondered how they're able to make money out there these days. But two girls i've seen regularly have told me that they both made about $800-$1500 a day. Every day. My one regular from California did say that she was only making about $500/day during her last visit this past fall and that this was the lowest amount she's ever made in Seattle since she started coming up here in 2017. The other girl from LA told me that it can take 15 hours or longer out on Aurora to make $800 and some days she didn't make that. So in the end they are still making money, but they both seemed to indicate that it was taking longer and longer to do so. I would think rates and services would be more flexible during those times, but that doesn't seem to be the case. But one thing is clear - Aurora is pretty much the only remaining stroll in the entire metro area. I think the day is coming when it will be on it's last leg.
Originally Posted by HH216
[View Original Post]
But I was amazed at how much money they can make in one day out there. And tax-free, too. Just think that most of these girls are part of a crew where they're all generally bringing-in that much money per person. Somebody at the top is making a lot of money, even on a slow day.
I'm not really a day-cruiser, but the times I've driven through in daylight there isn't as much of a police presence out there which to me seems backward. I would think that girls out there at night when there is less traffic would be better for residents than having to see girls in miniskirts shaking their asses at traffic during the day. But hell what do I know.
Originally Posted by HH216
[View Original Post]
Originally Posted by HH216
[View Original Post]
-
01-23-22 18:44 #5369Senior Member

Posts: 604Kidd Valley
Some brazen younger talent by Kidd Valley. 145th and Aurora. Not bashful. One is tall, brunette. Damn. Looks expensive. More than my $16.50 burger and fries WTF Kidd Valley?
-
01-23-22 15:21 #5368Senior Member

Posts: 118I was out and about Saturday after 8 pm. Decided to see what was out since it was not raining. Saw quite a few girls and a few manatees on the drive south. A few LE parked, and one that was behind me for a while until he got bored with me doing the speed limit.
But, holy shit, after turning around past 85th and heading north I quickly had a cop behind me. Within 10 block another pulled in front of him. By the time I got by 145th there were 3 cars bunched up. That's got to affect business which I'm sure will increase prices, less customers, need more $$$ per trick, which will chase away more buyers.
I know the scene is pretty active during the day. Is there that much LE presence in the daytime also?
-
01-23-22 02:18 #5367Senior Member

Posts: 483Last Sentence
Your last sentence really says it all, ST. It's not the same, and will likely never be. On top of it all, we now have the entire North Precinct either parked or cruising around out there. It makes me skittish and unsure also, which I've never been until recently. Limited service and stratospheric rates only reinforce my reluctance to even bother burning fuel anymore.
Originally Posted by StreetTroller
[View Original Post]
-
01-22-22 13:08 #5366Banned Member

Posts: 964Friday Evening
With the clear night I decided to go out for a bit and see what I might find. Plenty of girls out, mostly from 137th down to the motels. I just couldn't really find any who appealed to me. Most were overly made-up with their wigs, eyelashes, eyebrows and make-up, a few almost looked as though they were in some sort of theater play, their make-up very much caked-on and pasty white. Quite a few were just too overweight for my taste. I parked in the usual spot and watched a few walk past, a couple of them walked over to the window and asked if I might be interested. Just not feeling it.
I did pass the ubiquitous, at least to me, BSW spinner who wears glasses. I don't stroll much these days, but whenever I do there is a good chance I'll see this girl out there. She's got a great little spinner body, usually in a short skirt. I've talked with her on two occasions over the past year, all safety, rate starts at $120 and from what I recall doesn't give head. Last time I talked with her she wanted to charge me $20 for giving her phone number and I immediately shut that down. No fuckin way I'd ever do that, and it ticked me off. But every time I see her, I want that body, LOL. I was stuck at a stoplight and she walked past from across the street, smiled at me and nodded. So tonight I actually had the fleeting thought of trying to go covered just to see what she's like. But then I remembered that I didn't have any condoms and whenever I do use them, I like to use certain brands. I didn't want to leave it up to her to supply one because often their options suck. So I talked myself out of it. It's hard to go on a description here, but anyone ever date her? She's from southern California but been up here for probably almost a year now. Told me she was 20, glasses, thin spinner body, nice brown skin, usually longer dark hair (probably a wig). Against my better judgement, I think the time is coming when I'll pull the trigger.
Really nice but very young-looking tiny BSW spinner approached me down near 107th. Had seen her earlier up near 125th. Tight yoga or stretch pants, attractive face. She came to the window but I was spooked by how young she might be. I shook my head "no" and pulled away. She was pretty damn hot though.
That was the most activity I've had out on Aurora in at least a couple of months. I feel like an amateur these days, all skittish and unsure. It's not that the girls out there are all bad-looking, it's a combination of factors which essentially causes me to talk myself out of a potential experience. That combination involves the overall feeling of the street-hustle, limited service, overall lack of connection. Try as I have been, I'm just not feeling it with these huslter girls from California since 2020. Something about it is just off and I've been unable to verbally describe nor articulate it in the same way that I'm feeling it whenever I'm out there. Just not the same anymore.
-
01-21-22 17:28 #5365Banned Member

Posts: 964RE: Transporting a Provider
Wow, that's a different case than the one I recall. From what I remember, the incident to which I referred happened in Seattle area, I think a casino up in Skagit county. But I'm not surprised that another case very similar to this one also occurred.
This just brings up a series of questions in my mind. For instance, out on the stroll we're all pretty much transporting the girls. So Hypothetically, if one of us brings her back out to the stroll after our date, are we committing a felony? We all know in our minds that she'll be working out there. She might not have an actual date set-up yet, but we know that at some point after we drop her that she will have another date. So, theoretically, we're assisting in her quest to commit sex work. I wonder where that boundary exists. In this current political climate of prosecutors focusing on johns, I'm wondering if this might be pursued at some point. I could see this being an option particularly in the case where an underage SW is involved.
Hell, I don't know, just thinking out loud here. The bottom-line is that john busts out on Aurora are coming, I think they're just formulating how they're going to go about it. The above just seems like another charge to throw at the wall.
Originally Posted by Alas5877
[View Original Post]
-
01-21-22 10:34 #5364Senior Member

Posts: 1106Transportation
I remember that on TNA. The issue with that guy was he lived in North Portland. She wanted to go to the casino north of vancouver. Your recollection was right that she ratted him out immediately, but the Washington DA ended up pressing for trafficking charges because he drove her across state lines to commit a felony. He admitted that he knew what she was doing in the casino. That's what got him busted. He admitted what her intentions were plus he drove her across state lines. That's the double whammy that got him convicted. Was like 7 years or something if I remember right.
Originally Posted by StreetTroller
[View Original Post]
-
01-20-22 16:05 #5363Banned Member

Posts: 964Being wordy is what I do, LOL.
Originally Posted by BusSit69
[View Original Post]
-
01-20-22 16:00 #5362Senior Member

Posts: 451Nice
Damn ST, that's a nice got damn break down. Honestly I wish more guys would report here often. I don't pick up, but have seen the view this past summa. Was AMAZING!
Originally Posted by StreetTroller
[View Original Post]








Reply With Quote



