Asian PLEASER discussion forum (please post reviews in the review forum)

[King Kuts]

Going to give it a try with Chloe. Will report back. I think I may bring some extra $ in case I need more time or decide not to rush once I see her.

All the lakangels girls were off today and my appointment was canceled. I pivoted to MKC Amy and was underwhelmed. Nice enough and she did some light rimming but overall she was 6 at best. Skinny but more in the B cup range and had sort of a "yoko" face. If I pulled her at one of the fair dr parlors I wouldn't be pissed but definitely subpar for these bookers.

[BonerAppetitty]

LAK Zuri has the biggest rack I have seen recently: (click here).

You probably won't recognize her from the pics, which are way P.S. And max glam.

Anyone know which girl has the biggest rack currently working? Going to be free the next few days. If not I might just try Barbie since she is tiny.

[Hot Don]

Anyone know which girl has the biggest rack currently working? Going to be free the next few days. If not I might just try Barbie since she is tiny.

Barbie is 30 C. If you are looking for big racks. She is not the right one. Scarlett was the one which had big racks but now she is gone. Check on MKC website pretty much all girls are 32.

LAK SoHee and Chloe seems to be 34 per there website. I haven't seen them but there will be FR on the forum.

[SomeGuyCool]

Anyone know which girl has the biggest rack currently working? Going to be free the next few days. If not I might just try Barbie since she is tiny.

[Bastard Chorum]

I have seen your review and I respect that you have an opinion but just like you have one so do I. SAG Luv, CG Chloe, and KTE Baby Chloe IMHO are "chunky" and considered big girls to me. When we are talking 36 DD with a height of around 5'5+ where their tits are sagging down cause of their sheer mass is what I would call big. If you are insinuating that I am one of those people who are posting reviews just because a booker asked would be incorrect.

Based on your reference of what's big you would probably think that NAV Jamie is a chunky big girl when she isn't to me. It wouldn't be too presumptuous of me to believe there are others who agree with you but also agree with me as well. Let's respect that we disagree on standards and move on.

I could care less whether or not you posted a review at the behest of a booker or girl. I'm more interested in its content and how well it compares to what others and my own have experienced. There will always be bias and preferences at play and that's why both you and I have opinions on the matter. The great thing about this forum is that we can all express it without being flamed on. And if someone's is different you can raise your own. We all look to this forum to get the latest scoop on which girl to see next. If I were to see Siyeon, not because I wanted to TOFFT, but instead rely on your opinion that she was just a little thick, I would feel disappointed and misinformed on seeing her on that count. Hence, why I brought up my perspective about it being a huge understatement.

You don't need to guess on what I think about NAV Jamie as I've posted my views on her when she first came on the scene. I haven't seen her recently so my statements on her remain unchanged.

[King Kuts]

Actually might not be a bad option sometimes. In resent months I used to BBFS a YMMV non-bb advertising kgirl at cakdolls on the first shower. Bbfscip in about the first 15 min from entering. Second pop in the bedroom.

Going to give it a try with Chloe. Will report back. I think I may bring some extra $ in case I need more time or decide not to rush once I see her.

[BonerAppetitty]

Thanks for confirming Cyma. It helps me know my standard is not always out of whack LOL. If you read what I said about Barbie, you would see I never call her young. I thought Barbie is good to try if people like her real pics and tiny spinner. I can tell with one glance a girl's not under 30. I stop at one glance to keep boner alive. MILFs are usually boner killer. I was very energetic with Barbie.

Saw cyma recently and she is a solid option. She wasn't wearing much make up but if she did, she would be DDG. Her body is high caliber. It's worth it to pay just to see her topless at a strip club. Decent ass also. Body wise, she's hard to beat in the kgirl world. She's between 29 and 33 but most will think she's about 27 or so. It would be hard for her to play games with her age because she's a tall girl with a big head / face with minimal makeup.

Service wise, she was standard kgirl stuff and nothing over the top. I don't do BBFS or accept rim so I don't know about those activities.

With ravi and bella out of the picture in OC, cyma goes near the top in kgirl rankings (which honestly doesn't say much since OC kgirl scene is dreadful ATM) but make no mistake, Cyma is a hottie.

[Pand25]

Actually might not be a bad option sometimes. In resent months I used to BBFS a YMMV non-bb advertising kgirl at cakdolls on the first shower. Bbfscip in about the first 15 min from entering. Second pop in the bedroom.

I'm surprised that's an option. Given a normal kgirl routine, the bathroom routine and exit shower can and will eat a good chunk out of the 15 minutes depending on the girl.

[King Kuts]

I'm surprised that's an option. Given a normal kgirl routine, the bathroom routine and exit shower can and will eat a good chunk out of the 15 minutes depending on the girl.

I would imagine the shower routine is eliminated or drastically reduced in the situation. Its not really necessary in most cases. The showers do you a little time before and after to get into it and I don't mind not bolting out the door right after. I might just try this to see how it works are report back.

[Owliee]

I've already seen and reviewed Siyeon. Check it out on the review thread.

For those that don't know, the booker for MKC or at least someone associated with him has been known to reach out to members on this forum for the expressed purpose of getting reviews for their girls. Which, in and of itself, I'm fine by. It's a legitimate tactic to use to get exposure and establish a presence across a large cross section of the monger pool. What I'm not fine by is if the resultant review is a dishonest, inflated, or overly undeserving portrayal of the girl.

I won't comment on Barbie as I haven't seen her. But calling Siyeon "a little thick" IMHO is a gross mischaracterization of her weight class. While I do admit and respect those out there that love bigger girls, I believe the vast majority of mongers out there would not call her only a little thick.

I have seen your review and I respect that you have an opinion but just like you have one so do I. SAG Luv, CG Chloe, and KTE Baby Chloe IMHO are "chunky" and considered big girls to me. When we are talking 36 DD with a height of around 5'5+ where their tits are sagging down cause of their sheer mass is what I would call big. If you are insinuating that I am one of those people who are posting reviews just because a booker asked would be incorrect.

Based on your reference of what's big you would probably think that NAV Jamie is a chunky big girl when she isn't to me. It wouldn't be too presumptuous of me to believe there are others who agree with you but also agree with me as well. Let's respect that we disagree on standards and move on.

[Bastard Chorum]

Those pics of her are real BTW for anyone that is interested in a CYA with real pictures up. She's a little thick in a Latina kind of way.

https://cupcakes4u.escortbook.com/model-siyeon-55146

I've already seen and reviewed Siyeon. Check it out on the review thread.

For those that don't know, the booker for MKC or at least someone associated with him has been known to reach out to members on this forum for the expressed purpose of getting reviews for their girls. Which, in and of itself, I'm fine by. It's a legitimate tactic to use to get exposure and establish a presence across a large cross section of the monger pool. What I'm not fine by is if the resultant review is a dishonest, inflated, or overly undeserving portrayal of the girl.

I won't comment on Barbie as I haven't seen her. But calling Siyeon "a little thick" IMHO is a gross mischaracterization of her weight class. While I do admit and respect those out there that love bigger girls, I believe the vast majority of mongers out there would not call her only a little thick.

[HornyToad75]

Hmm interesting booker didn't mention BBFS to me, unless you have to specifically ask do they offer BBFS, other bookers will tell you when you book if BBFS is an option for upcharge or not w / o you asking.

I did ask specifically since it was mentioned in this forum.

[PsuGuy911]

Haven't seen Barbie but booker did say she offers BBFS. I think for the first time you either include the upcharge in the donation so she knew from the beginning or asked for BB when it's time.

Hmm interesting booker didn't mention BBFS to me, unless you have to specifically ask do they offer BBFS, other bookers will tell you when you book if BBFS is an option for upcharge or not w / o you asking.

[HornyToad75]

So I decided to book Barbie finally and when the door opened I have to say I was a little disappointed, Barbie is not 20's or 30's, maybe late late 30's but I'd say more low 40's, her face may have had some work done hard to tell, but definitely not young. There was lots of kissing at the door and nice BBBJ in the shower, when we got to the bedroom more BBBJ with some camel slides while I sat on the edge of the bed, I was thrusting myself towards her during the camel slide hinting that I wouldn't mind BBFS but there was no talk of uncharge cost for it and she put on the cover next, so I'm pretty sure she does not offer BBFS which is the only chance she would have of me seeing her again as her face just doesn't cut it for me but her body is still nice, I'd give it a 7/10 since I like spinners, maybe a 6. 8/10. The other thing I noticed was during the deed she stopped kissing me, just some light kissing here and there but she would turn her face away which was weird. In the end for $280 not really worth it when I compare her to girls like Dana where $320 gets me BBFS and msog but I'm not a msog type of guy but Dana always tries hard. The other thing with Barbie is I only got a 45 minute session even though paid for the hour.

Haven't seen Barbie but booker did say she offers BBFS. I think for the first time you either include the upcharge in the donation so she knew from the beginning or asked for BB when it's time.

[PsuGuy911]

If the dude think she's 45, then she is 45 to him. If you think she's 18, then she's 18 to you. This is not tweeter. We don't need to shut down different opinions. The more opposite opinions here, the better. People are smart enough to choose who to believe. It's their money that they loose if they choose to see the wrong girl base on wrong opinion.

So I decided to book Barbie finally and when the door opened I have to say I was a little disappointed, Barbie is not 20's or 30's, maybe late late 30's but I'd say more low 40's, her face may have had some work done hard to tell, but definitely not young. There was lots of kissing at the door and nice BBBJ in the shower, when we got to the bedroom more BBBJ with some camel slides while I sat on the edge of the bed, I was thrusting myself towards her during the camel slide hinting that I wouldn't mind BBFS but there was no talk of uncharge cost for it and she put on the cover next, so I'm pretty sure she does not offer BBFS which is the only chance she would have of me seeing her again as her face just doesn't cut it for me but her body is still nice, I'd give it a 7/10 since I like spinners, maybe a 6. 8/10. The other thing I noticed was during the deed she stopped kissing me, just some light kissing here and there but she would turn her face away which was weird. In the end for $280 not really worth it when I compare her to girls like Dana where $320 gets me BBFS and msog but I'm not a msog type of guy but Dana always tries hard. The other thing with Barbie is I only got a 45 minute session even though paid for the hour.