Rubrankings.com
The Velvet Rooms
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Top Tier Escorts

Thread: Escort Reviews

+ Add Report
Page 759 of 2185 FirstFirst ... 259 659 709 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 809 859 1259 1759 ... LastLast
Results 11,371 to 11,385 of 32763
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #21393

    Adorable is exactly that, adorable.

    After the last mishap with scheduling I reached out. We had a date set but I got strep and had to reschedule. Reached back out after I healed up and I'm glad I did.

    She is the sweet and dirty little MILF next door, not afraid to tell you what she likes, wants, needs, and will then return it in spades. Pics on her ad were very accurate, as are the previous reviews. If you have her number and are on her keep list, you're very fortunate. Fairly open menu, no cim, otherwise all the standard acronyms plus GFE. Have fun! Stay safe!

  2. #21392

    Amber

    Reposting on Amber. My last post was pretty negative. As I have seen her twice. Once good once bad. The second time was bad location. Room a mess. And was definitely not straight. However, she is very attractive. Probably better than her pictures. Very thin but great if you like spinner. Nice dirty blonde hair and cleanly shaved tight pussy. Good menu with BBBJ cim finish. No BBFS. Plenty of positions tried. Appears she's in a new better location and better frame of mind. With the good reports, probably need to try her again.

    Quote Originally Posted by JayHan  [View Original Post]
    Earlier this week I got together with Amber for the first time. I really wasn't sure what I'd be getting into, given that the reviews here have either been glowing or pretty bad.

    Set up was relatively easy. As others have said, she requires a video chat as a very light form of identification, and I was actually happy about that, because I thought that it might give me a chance to see how she looked without filters. However, our schedules for doing a video chat kept not aligning, and finally she was just like "fuck it, just drive down to see me" (I'm about an hour north of her incall). I think we'd been texting enough that she'd kind of gotten a feel for me, and knew I wasn't LEO (I'd have been worried that she was if it hadn't been for all of the posts about her here).

    We had some miscommunication about what time we were going to meet, and she was a long way away from her incall at the only time that evening that was going to work for me, so she had me meet her at a place in Westwood. I definitely had some trepidation about that, mostly because of the longer drive I had in store, but the little head was definitely the one in charge, so I headed further south than I'd planned..

  3. #21391

    Nikki

    Quote Originally Posted by Eb206  [View Original Post]
    Text back quick. Said service covered. I declined. As far as I got. She's close to me. PB.

  4. #21390
    Senior Member


    Posts: 257
    Quote Originally Posted by Eb206  [View Original Post]
    Has anyone seen this one? Need to know really quick.
    Sorry, here is the link.

    https://escortalligator.com.listcraw...nnati/68307028

  5. #21389
    Senior Member


    Posts: 257

    Nikki

    Has anyone seen this one? Need to know really quick.

  6. #21388
    Quote Originally Posted by Cincy2015  [View Original Post]
    Not going to put the name because it seemed weird & I'm a bit paranoid. Did anyone else get a random text from a well known Kentucky UTR. This person within the last year had a new 859 #. But the text I got was from the original 513 number. Something seems off to me. Just wondering if anyone had this happen.
    I would be careful with this one. Spent time in the Gray Bar hotel not long ago. With the stings going on in NKY.

    LEO could have her phone or she could even be working with them. She never was one to be trusted.

  7. #21387

    Amber

    Earlier this week I got together with Amber for the first time. I really wasn't sure what I'd be getting into, given that the reviews here have either been glowing or pretty bad.

    Set up was relatively easy. As others have said, she requires a video chat as a very light form of identification, and I was actually happy about that, because I thought that it might give me a chance to see how she looked without filters. However, our schedules for doing a video chat kept not aligning, and finally she was just like "fuck it, just drive down to see me" (I'm about an hour north of her incall). I think we'd been texting enough that she'd kind of gotten a feel for me, and knew I wasn't LEO (I'd have been worried that she was if it hadn't been for all of the posts about her here).

    We had some miscommunication about what time we were going to meet, and she was a long way away from her incall at the only time that evening that was going to work for me, so she had me meet her at a place in Westwood. I definitely had some trepidation about that, mostly because of the longer drive I had in store, but the little head was definitely the one in charge, so I headed further south than I'd planned.

    The house itself was really nice. Amber met me at the door, and was *much* more attractive than I was expecting her to be. As I was driving down we'd talked on the phone some, and she'd said that she was going to get made up. I told her that if time was an issue I'd much prefer that she be freshly showered than made up, which she went along with, but she seemed to think I was going to be disappointed not to see the make up version of her face. I was not. Honestly, I have no idea why she uses the filters that she does on her ads; she's definitely attractive enough not to need them, and looks quite a bit better in person. I almost wouldn't think she was the same person.

    She was upfront about past drug use, and there were signs of past use, but nothing that looked recent, and she wasn't high when I was there. She was talkative and friendly, with a tight, toned body, small breasts, and a freshly (and completely) shaved pussy. Her head game is really good, probably one of the best I've had from a provider in the hobby, and her pussy was tight. My only complaint was that I came a lot more quickly than I would liked, but that's not her fault.

    Damage was $$50, as others have reported. I'm definitely going to be seeing her again.

    https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/h...today/39414120#&gid=1&pid=2.

  8. #21386
    Quote Originally Posted by Espartan  [View Original Post]
    I used to see Chanel frequently when a QV was only 60. She was a cool chick and we got along. She had the tightest kitty and body of anybody I've seen in Cincy but the session was nothing to brag about. Everything was covered and she did rush but that body had me coming back. Haven't heard from her in months and given my experience there's no way I would pay her current rates.
    Another one with GPS.

    NEVER been worth her new rates.

  9. #21385
    Quote Originally Posted by TallyHo450  [View Original Post]
    Hey guys, AnnieGirl asked me to pass along that she's in the Tri County area now and would love to see you all.
    Might as well be back in Middletown that's just about as far away.

  10. #21384

    Rub Ratings

    Has anyone seen her? I text a few messages to girls on rub ratings asking how much it is for a massage. This one text back she was in the 45226 area. Too far for me and I was just inquiring about a massage. So I told her it was too far. I did send out a lot of feelers. But that is in district 2 now I'm getting phone calls from Cincy police. Has anyone seen her or is she LEO.

    https://cincinnati.rubratings.com/247088

  11. #21383

    AnnieGirl in new area

    Hey guys, AnnieGirl asked me to pass along that she's in the Tri County area now and would love to see you all.

  12. #21382

    Same Experience For Me

    Quote Originally Posted by Espartan  [View Original Post]
    I used to see Chanel frequently when a QV was only 60. She was a cool chick and we got along. She had the tightest kitty and body of anybody I've seen in Cincy but the session was nothing to brag about. Everything was covered and she did rush but that body had me coming back. Haven't heard from her in months and given my experience there's no way I would pay her current rates.
    I saw her once several months back. If all you want is a tight body that seems to not be involved with serious drugs, she's not a bad choice. If you want someone who is actually engaged in the act, move along. She gets into sex about as much as a wife that is guilted into fucking her husband. You can tell she'd rather be watching Lifetime or some bull-shit like that. I'd rather have someone a little less hot that either really enjoys sex or at least fake sit well enough to fool me.

  13. #21381
    Quote Originally Posted by JustaFunHabit  [View Original Post]
    Have seen this provider a few times. Based out of Columbus but travels to Cincy and will be here this weekend 10/8 - 10/10. I would recommend if you like tall, very very thin and a bit older types (north of 40). I'd compare her to CristenCremes (may she RIP) with teeth and without the substance abuse habit. Body type and menu is very similar or almost spot on. Really gets into the session with pretty much anything goes except Greek and BBFS. Finish how you want where you want!

    Her ad is on Eros, but she's not a hot young Eros provider, nor are her rates Eros rates. She only provides hour rates in $$. 25 ad but will do hhr for $. 25. Ad also says verification required. Don't remember what I provided. Possibly a face pic.

    I've also included a few pics she provided me when texting her. Which I believe are better than her Eros ad pics. So hopefully a few take up on this. I'm hoping she gets a set of regulars in Cincy so she visits more often. Let her know one of her Cincy friends recommended her.

    https://www.eros.com/ohio/files/3895029.htm?cat=3859

    Jfh.
    North of 40? More like north of 60.

  14. #21380

    Chanel

    I used to see Chanel frequently when a QV was only 60. She was a cool chick and we got along. She had the tightest kitty and body of anybody I've seen in Cincy but the session was nothing to brag about. Everything was covered and she did rush but that body had me coming back. Haven't heard from her in months and given my experience there's no way I would pay her current rates.

    Quote Originally Posted by TitsNAss1313  [View Original Post]
    What's up gents, starting to post more often long time viewer of the board. Has anybody seen Chanel recently I know she has been on different sites for quite a while I just never pulled the trigger back in the day. Just wondering if anybody has any recent experience and if she is still legit.

    https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/chanel-e...lorence-911227#erotic.

  15. #21379
    Senior Member


    Posts: 114
    Quote Originally Posted by TitsNAss1313  [View Original Post]
    What's up gents, starting to post more often long time viewer of the board. Has anybody seen Chanel recently I know she has been on different sites for quite a while I just never pulled the trigger back in the day. Just wondering if anybody has any recent experience and if she is still legit.

    https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/chanel-e...lorence-911227#erotic.
    Have not seen her in 2 years didn't have much of a personality but her body was something else watching her in CG and RCG.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Best Escorts
Live Escorts
High Class Companions
Top Escorts

Protected by Copyscape