NoVA SugarBabies

[Dimples572]

Sorry here is the right link.

https://www.seeking.com/member/c026e...a-de483d1c8277

You could get a smokin hot chick off Eros for that or less.

[Dimples572]

https://www.seeking.com/member/59183...0-5c5b5957397c

So arranged a meet. Walked her down to 350. Her face is different and she wears braces but the bod is the same. Kinda homely looking but she was dressed to the nines in a skimpy dress. She is from Chile and used to live in Miami. English isn't the greatest but picked her up and took her to my place. After a cup of wine she was ready and very oral. Covered and vocal. I don't know if I will repeat because of the language barrier. Hard to hold a conversation but she did perform well. Bbbjtcim to finish and she surprised me by swallowing

So those are her real pics / tats or no?

[Low Jack]

https://www.seeking.com/member/59183...0-5c5b5957397c

So arranged a meet. Walked her down to 350. Her face is different and she wears braces but the bod is the same. Kinda homely looking but she was dressed to the nines in a skimpy dress. She is from Chile and used to live in Miami. English isn't the greatest but picked her up and took her to my place. After a cup of wine she was ready and very oral. Covered and vocal. I don't know if I will repeat because of the language barrier. Hard to hold a conversation but she did perform well. Bbbjtcim to finish and she surprised me by swallowing.

[Grasshopping]

She told me she was late because she was coming from Annapolis. She said that she has to meet a counselor tomorrow morning at Georgetown. She didn't have a car, and didn't want to pay Lyft for the back and forth. Me being the fool told her it was OK to stay for the night. She rack up $48.38 in extra charges to the room.

I guess we all live and learn. I have had my shares of mishaps too. But yes count yourself as lucky that she only racked up $50 of charges to the room. Could be worse especially if there was illegal activity going on and the room is under your name.

[Grasshopping]

600 for BBFS / cip. She hit me up again, but don't think I will repeat.

http://www.seeking.com/member/c026e9...a-de483d1c8277

Profile is already turned off. That was quick.

[BookerTNelson]

So, with drinks, coffee and dinner pretty much out now, (I usually did drinks) I've recently considered chatting briefly with potential sb's with a video chat app like zoom, google duo, etc. I never used these apps before moving into the age of telework during COVID-19 but this non techy 47 y /o has found they are free and quite easy to download off of google play or whatever the I-phone equivalent is. I've done one video chat so far and it really helped me get a chance to see the gal and gauge comfort level. I haven't met her yet, but may soon. This helped me verify it was her and verify she didn't seem nutsy koo koo. . This is also creating perhaps a new redflag as I've brought this idea up to a few other girls and they quickly said, nah, let's just meet in person. Maybe I'm paranoid but to me that rings of, I'm not the girl in the pic and I don't want you to see that prior to meeting me. Note for purposes of this discussion these were all girls that had already given me their numbers and were texting. What do you all think of this option in lieu of our current situation. Anyone else tried it? Thoughts?

Sure, it is and has always been an option. I think its nice to save time, etc but for me I don't think it is something I will use. It destroys the whole discreet thing because they can just screenshot the video chat.

[DCowboy77]

So, with drinks, coffee and dinner pretty much out now, (I usually did drinks) I've recently considered chatting briefly with potential sb's with a video chat app like zoom, google duo, etc. I never used these apps before moving into the age of telework during COVID-19 but this non techy 47 y /o has found they are free and quite easy to download off of google play or whatever the I-phone equivalent is. I've done one video chat so far and it really helped me get a chance to see the gal and gauge comfort level. I haven't met her yet, but may soon. This helped me verify it was her and verify she didn't seem nutsy koo koo. . This is also creating perhaps a new redflag as I've brought this idea up to a few other girls and they quickly said, nah, let's just meet in person. Maybe I'm paranoid but to me that rings of, I'm not the girl in the pic and I don't want you to see that prior to meeting me. Note for purposes of this discussion these were all girls that had already given me their numbers and were texting. What do you all think of this option in lieu of our current situation. Anyone else tried it? Thoughts?

[Je2010]

Pulled the same trick on me too. 2 years back. Stay away.

She got you as well? Scared the hell out of me.

[PickyMonger]

Thanks for all your feedback. Totally not worth the price. Thanks for saving me 400 or 500 so I spend it on other SB that's worthwhile.

She's also a flake. I've tried a few times and have talked to a few others. She flaked on all of them.

So, odds are she would cancel or ask for help. But even if she shows it sounds pretty lame.

[Grasshopping]

I meetup with her, she was 90 minutes late. Yes, she has a nice face, her body is a little curvy. She has small tits, which isn't a big deal for me. Kissing, BBBJ and cfs were on the menu. She BBBJ was OK, but during cfs she laid there with not much reaction. Asked about allowance she wanted 4000. She told me her normal ppm was 600.

Thanks for all your feedback. Totally not worth the price. Thanks for saving me 400 or 500 so I spend it on other SB that's worthwhile.

[Shinshi]

The "with you" is silent when they're saying they don't want sex at all. That's it, that's the game. This is what really separates them from Pros and UTRs.

Oh, fair enough. I don't claim to be some Brad Pitt-lookalike sporting a 12-in shlong. If I'm not some girl's type, that's perfectly fine (though I'd also add that I'm no Chris Farley with a 2-in member either, haha). I don't ask questions or take it personal if a girl isn't attracted to me and won't force the issue. Plenty of fish in the sea. Where I start having problems is whenever they post pics or write in a manner which suggests they're 100% all about one-night stands before feigning offense no matter how tastefully the subject is apporached.

And whenever we negotiate a meet (or the meet actually occurs) and they express disinterest in a FWB arrangement while still asking for 300+, 400+, 500+, etc? That's another fucking problem. A total disconnect, delusions of grandeur, a severe case of GPS, take your pick. That kind of nonsense is something I have little patience for and also explains why my block / hide list is so extensive on that site.

[InSearch69]

I got 400 her down to 400 but the minute she said she was in an accident and needed help getting to me I stopped talking to her.

https://www.seeking.com/member/c37ee...d-12a90e49c712

Would not budge from 500, plus I have to host. Her pics are verified although I noticed some of the non-face pics in her profiles don't belong to her from google search. But I think all the face pics are actually her.

I'm not willing to pay that much but she does look fine with a petite body so some of you might be willing to meet her at that price point. Good luck.

[DickLongwood]

Any intel on this cutie?

https://www.seeking.com/member/7c12a...a-11d01fb9f364

[Grasshopping]

https://www.seeking.com/member/c37ee...d-12a90e49c712

Would not budge from 500, plus I have to host. Her pics are verified although I noticed some of the non-face pics in her profiles don't belong to her from google search. But I think all the face pics are actually her.

I'm not willing to pay that much but she does look fine with a petite body so some of you might be willing to meet her at that price point. Good luck.

[BookerTNelson]

I agree with you both, paying that much for no sex is nuts. And for *her*, at that rate? Pfffft.

The other thing that baffles the mind is when a girl says she doesn't want sex at all despite having a profile pic posing in underwear, or tastefully nude, or clutching stuffed animals, or with lollipops / finger (s) in their mouths. Even more bizarre is when they claim to be seeking "FWB," only to walk that back within the first few messages (or if they have FWB and platonic listed).

The "with you" is silent when they're saying they don't want sex at all. That's it, that's the game. This is what really separates them from Pros and UTRs.