Non Pro's

[MartyByrde]

The link works for me.

https://www.seeking.com/member/0c78b...f-dfef0a42e6c0

Like before, it brings me to a sign on page. I do not have an account there. Other folks have provided direct links to women's ads, without the need to sign in.

[Aegean45]

Link sends one to a sign on page. Why can't you provide a link directly to her ad?

The link works for me.

https://www.seeking.com/member/0c78b...f-dfef0a42e6c0

[MartyByrde]

She does all. Loves cum in her. Cip, cia, swallow, facial, rim on you, rough, plays with other woman too and male gang on her. 300 half day and some times she would stay for sleep over and do some more waking up.

https://www.seeking.com/member/0c78b...f-dfef0a42e6c0

Link sends one to a sign on page. Why can't you provide a link directly to her ad?

[MyNickname]

She does all. Loves cum in her. Cip, cia, swallow, facial, rim on you, rough, plays with other woman too and male gang on her. 300 half day and some times she would stay for sleep over and do some more waking up.

https://www.seeking.com/member/0c78b...f-dfef0a42e6c0

[HuksAlot]

Same in Portland. A bunch of new profiles wanting to sell foot fetishes. It's got to be oversees scammers.

Anyone notice the sudden increase in the number of SA ladies that say they have pretty feet and / or are looking for guys into feet? Just seems like an odd clustering, like someone posted on a foot fetish website "hey check out SA".

[NerdyGuy12]

Yeah, she told me the same. It was pulling teeth, but I managed to meet her. I guess she's getting way more messages than she can meet up with.

I've tried to set up with her all week and it's always today is tough, maybe tomorrow, how about 1 am?

She real, flakey, or just stack the slots?

[DrSnatch]

I'm on for tomorrow. Thanks for the info.

I'm curious to know how it turned out. I'm setting something up this week.

[Twister100]

Anyone notice the sudden increase in the number of SA ladies that say they have pretty feet and / or are looking for guys into feet? Just seems like an odd clustering, like someone posted on a foot fetish website "hey check out SA".

[Gamper]

I'm on for tomorrow. Thanks for the info.

I've tried to set up with her all week and it's always today is tough, maybe tomorrow, how about 1 am?

She real, flakey, or just stack the slots?

[DrtyHarry]

I am not just looking to fuck, I am looking for a borderline nympho, so I am a bit descriptive, but at first it was too much. I still communicate what I want but without offending anybody.

I contact only women that are seeking FWB and just a small percentage reply but the ones that do, are not just DTF, are DTF the way I like it.

That really is the best strategy. I am picky to and descriptive about what I want. Had a few ladies flip out. But I have always responded politely and always giving them the benefit. But still holding my own needs first. Kind, polite but firm seems to either get you what you want. At the very least the ones that it does not work work, leave the conversation knowing that there are different kinds of people with different needs. No hard feelings. My profile also is very short. But straight to the point about what I expect from a meet.

[DrYellow]

So how do we get to the young hot 'newbies' (presumably) who say stuff like this;.

"Hello I want to see you, can you pay me so I can meet you".

I don't want to blow them off just like that. What would any of you say?

Blow them off, Darwin was right, they will adapt or die.

A2

[DrYellow]

I'm on for tomorrow. Thanks for the info.

Yeah, I dumped 2 loads in her bare. Paid 2. 5 for an hour.

[DelToro]

Before I killed my profile I mirrored what I saw on a lot of girl's profiles. I said I was looking for "casual fwb / nsa", "mutually beneficial", and "non-monogamous" arrangements. Never had a nasty message about my profile. Certainly got a few when they realized I was not going to meet their GPS needs.

I am not just looking to fuck, I am looking for a borderline nympho, so I am a bit descriptive, but at first it was too much. I still communicate what I want but without offending anybody.

I contact only women that are seeking FWB and just a small percentage reply but the ones that do, are not just DTF, are DTF the way I like it.

[Morgan Creamin]

My first profile was way too direct and straightforward that I got a few angry messages back telling me that I was disgusting, etc. So I change it, until I got to the point where they praise that I am so straightforward without being crass.

Before I killed my profile I mirrored what I saw on a lot of girl's profiles. I said I was looking for "casual fwb / nsa", "mutually beneficial", and "non-monogamous" arrangements. Never had a nasty message about my profile. Certainly got a few when they realized I was not going to meet their GPS needs.

[DelToro]

I am still learning when to bring up the subject of intimacy.
.

There are more women on SA that do not want to have intimacy than the ones that do.

So if you are not clear from the beginning you are going to waste a lot of time weeding out the ones with platonic only and online only intentions.

Writing down clearly on your profile that you expect intimacy would make things a lot more efficient, problem is how to do it without offending them.

That's why I said that you need to tune and hone your message.

My first profile was way too direct and straightforward that I got a few angry messages back telling me that I was disgusting, etc. So I change it, until I got to the point where they praise that I am so straightforward without being crass.

In general SA takes a lot more work, and its worth it if you are going to see a SB for a while.

And be patient and polite, my best SB started not wanting to host, condoms only and no greek. Now we do ATM, no rubbers, at her place for several hours for 2/3 of the original arrangement.