Los Angeles County Asian Providers

**HeyHoor** · 01-15-20 13:36

Originally Posted by IAmGib1 [View Original Post]

I recently saw 2 of the recent top K-booty contestants. Seems to me they both may have had butt implants to gain "Khardashian" proportions. Why? I hope this is not another plastic surgery trend that all these girls are buying into.

They were both in great shape before. With the best butts around among the current crop of beauties.

You know who I am talking about. Anyone else notice this from how they looked two months ago to two week ago?

I hope it isn't Ruby or Chanel. I was hoping to see them soon!

**McNutties** · 01-15-20 12:42

Originally Posted by DHorn420 [View Original Post]

Saids who? I wasn't a veteran client with J, merely months and rarely used her agency when I got to see Rebecca and Chloe after seeing their names pop up.

I would probably agree. Similar experience with myself. I don't think the booker cares as long as you are booking one of their girls.

**IAmGib1** · 01-15-20 11:39

I recently saw 2 of the recent top K-booty contestants. Seems to me they both may have had butt implants to gain "Khardashian" proportions. Why? I hope this is not another plastic surgery trend that all these girls are buying into.

They were both in great shape before. With the best butts around among the current crop of beauties.

You know who I am talking about. Anyone else notice this from how they looked two months ago to two week ago?

**Athelas** · 01-15-20 06:02

Originally Posted by Kent747 [View Original Post]

It is a sad state of market when 40 years old providers can command $350.

They can charge whatever they want. Value is still determined by the highest price someone is willing to pay. I personally value these kgirl services at $260-270. So, while they do their little experiment, I will be over in Brazil where the weather is better and you can get there what is offered here for $50-$100. It's legal and culturally acceptable. For what it's worth, every girl there makes Chanel's ass look small. And when I stop traveling, I intend to reduce my kgirl visits from four times a month, to just once. I will consider this an extra $800 of fun money saved on my end.

**Humyiy** · 01-15-20 04:59

Originally Posted by FiatVoluptas [View Original Post]

Thanks for the heads up. Rosie and Lumin both look DDG to me. I will probably book Lumin when she is available. Now that you mention it, Misty does look familiar. What's her deal?

Where are you seeing Rosie and Lumin?

Remember the good ol days when every girl was on CV and there wasnt so much confusion.

Here are some of the sites now. Please copy and add more.

Thetopgirls.com

Sixshop.com

Ktownescorts.com

Ca-kdolls. Ch.

Twentyone. creatorlink.net.

**DHorn420** · 01-15-20 00:55

Originally Posted by Tomatillo [View Original Post]

you probably wouldn't be allowed to see her and the other girls that aren't listed

Saids who? I wasn't a veteran client with J, merely months and rarely used her agency when I got to see Rebecca and Chloe after seeing their names pop up.

**Darth Diggler** · 01-14-20 23:34

Originally Posted by BastardChorum [View Original Post]

I liken the phenomenon to a honeymoon phase for mongers. At first, you're taken by her physical attractiveness, which may blindside your objectivity on her actual service and performance. But as you continue to repeat, you become more familiar and immune to her charms. This ultimately leads to a reevaluation of the reality of the session. On the other hand, the provider could just be giving her best to rope you into a loyal customer in the beginning but gradually diminish service in the long run. I've been at receiving ends of both scenarios, and now try as best I can to separate physical attractiveness and performance / service to better gauge the session. It's frightening how intrinsic and visceral physical attractiveness muddles my perception.

While the butt of many jokes, it's quite an apt exercise in comparative bias to imagine a bag over their face and go through the session from a purely service, performance, connection / interactivity, etc point of view. Once this phase ends though and in the absence of any other attraction, you'll begin to want to see other kgirls. Some guys will feel an obligation to still see her, but once it becomes an obligation, you've reach the point where you should end it. Hopefully you can or have a buddy that can whack some sense into you.

Well said. Brings a whole new meaning to YMMV.

**Darth Diggler** · 01-14-20 23:27

Originally Posted by Jack926 [View Original Post]

I am barely interested in Rebecca or Cami at $300. While Cami is good looking, she is HOT and COLD and very unpredictable and Rebecca is way TOO SCRIPTED. CAMI could be crazy great session and shit session the next day.

I used to like Chloe a lot and I saw her many times but the last two times that I saw her in LA in MW, it was not what it used to be when she was in Santa Monica location. I guess everything has its time.

Would I pay $350 for Chloe or Rebecca; Nope.

Would I pay $450 or $500 for Emma from EukGirls? Absolutely YES. I have been depressed since she has been gone. LOL.

With these rates, how are you fellas tipping. If at all. On top of the base? Assuming of course you enjoyed your time and your expectations were met if not exceeded. 10-20%?

**Mmmmm00** · 01-14-20 23:24

Originally Posted by Tomatillo [View Original Post]

She's an unlisted commodity with ca-kdolls and you probably wouldn't be allowed to see her and the other girls that aren't listed like Moli and Rebecca unfortunately.

Is Moli with CAKD?

**BonerAppetitty** · 01-14-20 23:07

It's because people don't want to TOFTT or don't share so other guys stick with the well known providers. What's sad to me are fewer mongers and fewer new girls.

Originally Posted by Kent747 [View Original Post]

It is a sad state of market when 40 years old providers can command $350.

**BonerAppetitty** · 01-14-20 23:04

I haven't seen her yet but when I see pics I get a few things that help me decide if a girl may make me happy. She is just not high on my list right now.

Originally Posted by FiatVoluptas [View Original Post]

Now that you mention it, Misty does look familiar. What's her deal?

**Qzion24** · 01-14-20 21:55

Originally Posted by Tomatillo [View Original Post]

She's an unlisted commodity with ca-kdolls and you probably wouldn't be allowed to see her and the other girls that aren't listed like Moli and Rebecca unfortunately.

I've given them some pretty solid business, are they really that exclusive? LOL. Not that I'm even particularly interested as I like younger girls, but I had no idea they had some so called "secret" girls.

**HapaBoy86** · 01-14-20 21:42

Originally Posted by CharlieMonger3 [View Original Post]

Would you please provide contact info for Chloe? Website, phone or HX?

If you've never seen her before and never used this booker. You're not getting in! Chloe doesn't advertise except if you know her or have been a previous client of her and currently seeing a few other girls with this booker.

If you somehow got the # and text. Booker will ask you where you got this #. If you say a friend and you give no response or give up the guy who gave it to you. She'll probably never respond to your texts again and will punish by possibly BL the dude who gave the out if its his real I'd or #.

Yes, if you're in goodstanding and a VIP with this booker you can recommend a friend by asking booker first. Than he provides his refs and can get in. But, if you're new just move onto other girls.

**DHorn420** · 01-14-20 21:25

Met her when she was at 300. I definitely don't see how she can command 350, when girls like Heri or Ruby can outmatch her in looks and performance. Chloe is hot but looks can be subjective and performance can be critiqued. A full hour session for 350? Pass.

Originally Posted by Jack926 [View Original Post]

Very true. I texed the booker for availability today at 11:00 AM and I was informed that she is open after 4:00 PM. Needless to say, I am playing tomorrow.