"Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"

[SeekingHead]

Quote of the day! LOL.

SA should create something which identifies them as trans, & gives us the ability to filter them out.

I'm open to a lot of things but will probably never cross that line into gay sex.

[Niteluvr]

Yeah. The ones that are out about it are mildly annoying, kind of clogging up the site and wasting our time.

God help me. I'm going full on Lorena Bobbitt.

Quote of the day! LOL.

[DogBert77]

Got to give him credit for being honest about the trans thing, looks like the body could be a fooler. Better curves than lot of the females out there.

https://www.seeking.com/member/56a90...d-93c199328399

Yeah. The ones that are out about it are mildly annoying, kind of clogging up the site and wasting our time.

But I am convinced there are a shit load of trans on SA that aren't honest about it. I can't tell you how much time I spend scrutinizing jawlines and looking for adam's apples and man hands online. If I ever get fooled and reach down and find a sausage there, God help me. I'm going full on Lorena Bobbitt.

[NewAnonymousName]

Does anyone have scoop on this one? She looks familiar, which makes me wonder if she's been a backpage gal. Tineye came up empty, so maybe I'm just remembering the last time I clicked on her profile.

https://www.seeking.com/member/63741...8-1458bfeda934

[TheWolverineJP]

Met this number last night after being catfished by a beached whale. LOL.

I had deleted my SA profile but made a new one on the way to Atlanta.

She is hot and definately knows how to have fun. Talked her into spending the night for $$. She strips part time at Atlanta clubs. She's cool and has a sweet personality.

https://www.seeking.com/member/fe007...c-d8881c1c7053

[MrHobbyist]

That's actually coming from YOUR search history on Google. Or at least from the search history of the computer you are using to access SA. I googled some electronic parts from a place out west and boom, got a banner on SA. All the more reason to turn off tracking on Google and make sure you're logged out of Gmail.

Incognito mode.

[ElPerron]

Not sure what the heck I'm doing that attracted this one LMAO.

I'm not selfish so throwing this one out to the vultures. Got to give him credit for being honest about the trans thing, looks like the body could be a fooler. Better curves than lot of the females out there.

https://www.seeking.com/member/56a90...d-93c199328399

This one is like some kind of joke, every time I became premium member he'll be messaging me ,200 BJ LOL.

[Leep12]

Not sure what the heck I'm doing that attracted this one LMAO.

I'm not selfish so throwing this one out to the vultures. Got to give him credit for being honest about the trans thing, looks like the body could be a fooler. Better curves than lot of the females out there.

https://www.seeking.com/member/56a90...d-93c199328399

[WildOats]

Exoticxashh1.

Here's another time waster. Great convos, moved to text, said she can host, great rates. Then she ghosted as we were setting up the meeting.

https://www.seeking.com/member/2b341...1-804a27fa2deb

[Airmantroy]

Word must be getting around, now USPS has banner ads on the SA web site!

That's actually coming from YOUR search history on Google. Or at least from the search history of the computer you are using to access SA. I googled some electronic parts from a place out west and boom, got a banner on SA. All the more reason to turn off tracking on Google and make sure you're logged out of Gmail.

[Lono73]

Why would LE turn *you* down? They want to get you in and bust you. They don't care if you're asking for certain pics. She's probably not the girl in the pics or they are old.

I assumed because the le didn't have a female officer who looked anything like the pics sent up until that point. She sent pics of at least 2 different girls possibly 3 fully clothed (nothing came up in a google search of her number or photos). So sending me a selfie with specific requirements was too much hassle. There are easier fish for them to catch I'm sure. She was always willing to meet at a hotel as long as I provided it. Who knows if she was real or not. Her one word responses to my texts, the different set of girls photos sent, it all just felt like a set up. It was clear I wasn't meeting without the selfie so that's why I assumed LE, if she was real she could have sent the selfie. She also has since changed her name on SB.

May not mean anything but I go with my gut.

[Hal1957]

Word must be getting around, now USPS has banner ads on the SA web site!

[Dawgins]

Why would LE turn *you* down? They want to get you in and bust you. They don't care if you're asking for certain pics. She's probably not the girl in the pics or they are old.

She sent me a pic which I accidentally deleted it but it was a generic fully clothed shot that didn't look like the one on the SB site. I asked her for something more revealing, she said "real" I said no and explained less clothing. Then she sent me the one in the red top loaded here. She then said something about testing me with the first shots to see how many girls I was texting. Not sure what that means. Then she sent the one in the bathing suit. I asked for a selfie with four fingers up and she said I had trust issues and called it off. Sounds like LE to me.

[BrownSugaTwo]

Going to upload a few pictures, for posterity.

She's back to being MiszCuba.

https://www.seeking.com/member/3b8c1...f-2bdfa30af5ef

[ZeppDawg33]

She's still on secretbenefits, so if you're concerned about her potential status, like I am, then stay clear of this one:

https://www.secretbenefits.com/app/p...9de05a973440fa

I wonder which one she works at?