Escort Reports

**Amp Slave** · 11-17-13 16:59

Originally Posted by Longjblues [View Original Post]

Just out of curiousity, how many times have you successfully sued for damages and collected damages of any significance? Significance being defined as in excess of the cost of litigation. Collection being actually receiving the money damages in hand.

Do not believe that he has, but just showing the law.

**Longjblues** · 11-17-13 16:24

Just out of curiousity, how many times have you successfully sued for damages and collected damages of any significance? Significance being defined as in excess of the cost of litigation. Collection being actually receiving the money damages in hand.

Originally Posted by HoHunter328 [View Original Post]

My feelings on "airbrushing" are that it's acceptable so long as it's about equal to what can be accomplished with good quality makeup. That's what I do in photo shoots anyway. Otherwise I'd have to be rescheduling all the time just because a girl happened to have a pimple or two on the day of the shoot. Then there's also concealing tattoos to preserve the girl's anonymity if so desired. Good escorts will mention if they have tattoos airbrushed in their pics, but that part isn't my responsibility, and it's beyond my control. Now more "creative" forms of digital manipulation (eg breast enlargements, waist slimming, etc) I'm opposed to, and in my opinion is just as bad as using fake pics.

As for using "representative" pics. So long as they tell you that's the case, and aren't trying to say they're really them, I suppose it's ok. But I can pretty much guarantee that they're violating someones copyright in using the images. I know I've had my images stolen before, and I'm very quick to initiate legal action when I find out. Statutory damages for copyright infringement can be $750 to $30,000 per image in a pre-trial agreement, or up to $150,000 per image if it goes to trial. I can also file suit against any websites which post the images on behalf of anyone if they ignore my DMCA Infringement Notification.

Stay safe, and happy hunting.

**Nrlmus** · 11-16-13 15:14

Moved to off-topic.

Originally Posted by HoHunter328 [View Original Post]

As for using "representative" pics. So long as they tell you that's the case, and aren't trying to say they're really them, I suppose it's ok. But I can pretty much guarantee that they're violating someones copyright in using the images. I know I've had my images stolen before, and I'm very quick to initiate legal action when I find out. Statutory damages for copyright infringement can be $750 to $30,000 per image in a pre-trial agreement, or up to $150,000 per image if it goes to trial. I can also file suit against any websites which post the images on behalf of anyone if they ignore my DMCA Infringement Notification.

Stay safe, and happy hunting.

**Trypt** · 11-16-13 07:21

You sure that service is real? I searched it for my town and it's nothing more than re-posting of today's backpage ads.

Originally Posted by Ccup2 [View Original Post]

The service is real, cannot speak for the girls but most places use fake pics, descirbe whatu are looking for and try it out...

**Ho Hunter 328** · 11-16-13 03:05

Originally Posted by Ccup2 [View Original Post]

Agree with you but if pics are airbrushed and etc... Are they really using real pics. Also some agencies use pics of girls that are similiar to get pics from the rear with no faces...many tricks they all use.

My feelings on "airbrushing" are that it's acceptable so long as it's about equal to what can be accomplished with good quality makeup. That's what I do in photo shoots anyway. Otherwise I'd have to be rescheduling all the time just because a girl happened to have a pimple or two on the day of the shoot. Then there's also concealing tattoos to preserve the girl's anonymity if so desired. Good escorts will mention if they have tattoos airbrushed in their pics, but that part isn't my responsibility, and it's beyond my control. Now more "creative" forms of digital manipulation (eg breast enlargements, waist slimming, etc) I'm opposed to, and in my opinion is just as bad as using fake pics.

As for using "representative" pics. So long as they tell you that's the case, and aren't trying to say they're really them, I suppose it's ok. But I can pretty much guarantee that they're violating someones copyright in using the images. I know I've had my images stolen before, and I'm very quick to initiate legal action when I find out. Statutory damages for copyright infringement can be $750 to $30,000 per image in a pre-trial agreement, or up to $150,000 per image if it goes to trial. I can also file suit against any websites which post the images on behalf of anyone if they ignore my DMCA Infringement Notification.

Stay safe, and happy hunting.

**JohnnyOceans2** · 11-15-13 10:01

So I came across this perfect latina on BP names Chelsea. She seems to be posting a variety of areas but she is near me and I need to know if she is for real. Has anyone met with her and some feedback will be much appreciated. She is sexy so I hope its not too good to be true.

**Ccup2** · 11-15-13 09:26

Originally Posted by HoHunter328 [View Original Post]

Most quality agencies use real pics...

Stay safe, and happy hunting.

Agree with you but if pics are airbrushed and etc... Are they really using real pics. Also some agencies use pics of girls that are similiar to get pics from the rear with no faces...many tricks they all use.

**Ho Hunter 328** · 11-14-13 18:34

Originally Posted by Ccup2 [View Original Post]

The service is real, cannot speak for the girls but most places use fake pics, descirbe whatu are looking for and try it out...

Most quality agencies use real pics...

Stay safe, and happy hunting.

**Harderik** · 11-14-13 15:40

Originally Posted by Fbrd68 [View Original Post]

I had texted Bree a few times asking about her donation. I also asked if she could send me a picture so I know she is real. She assured me the pictures were real yet they are flagged multiple times on tineye. That usually ends my discussion with them as I have been suckered in the past.

The first link sent me her rates then ignored me when I asked the GFE question. I didn't pursue any further.

Hope this is somewhat helpful.

Thanks for the feedback guys! That confirms what I was thinking. I'll probably stick with the first one (even thought Bree looks soooooo hot) since she seems a little more likely to be real.

-HE.

**Ccup2** · 11-14-13 14:10

Originally Posted by Fbrd68 [View Original Post]

I had texted Bree a few times asking about her donation. I also asked if she could send me a picture so I know she is real. She assured me the pictures were real yet they are flagged multiple times on tineye. That usually ends my discussion with them as I have been suckered in the past.

The first link sent me her rates then ignored me when I asked the GFE question. I didn't pursue any further.

Hope this is somewhat helpful.

The service is real, cannot speak for the girls but most places use fake pics, descirbe whatu are looking for and try it out...

**Fbrd68** · 11-14-13 08:50

I had texted Bree a few times asking about her donation. I also asked if she could send me a picture so I know she is real. She assured me the pictures were real yet they are flagged multiple times on tineye. That usually ends my discussion with them as I have been suckered in the past.

The first link sent me her rates then ignored me when I asked the GFE question. I didn't pursue any further.

Hope this is somewhat helpful.

Originally Posted by Harderik [View Original Post]

Guys,

I've been texting with these two girls. They sound good, available and friendly enough. However, I'm skeptical because I can't find reviews or info on them anywhere other than these postings. I even asked them both point blank if they have reviews anywhere and they both said no.

http://305-842-6436.escortsincollege...v-1357637.html

http://347-702-3382.escortsincollege...e-1357239.html

Both look amazing, but I'm hesitant to see them without at least some info in case they're LE. Anyone have any experience with either of them?

Thanks!

HE.

**Fbrd68** · 11-14-13 08:40

I had texted Bree a few times asking about her donation. I also asked if she could send me a picture so I know she is real. She assured me the pictures were real yet they are flagged multiple times on tineye. That usually ends my discussion with them as I have been suckered in the past.

The first link sent me her rates then ignored me when I asked the GFE question. I didn't pursue any further.

Hope this is somewhat helpful.

Originally Posted by Harderik [View Original Post]

Guys,

I've been texting with these two girls. They sound good, available and friendly enough. However, I'm skeptical because I can't find reviews or info on them anywhere other than these postings. I even asked them both point blank if they have reviews anywhere and they both said no.

http://305-842-6436.escortsincollege...v-1357637.html

http://347-702-3382.escortsincollege...e-1357239.html

Both look amazing, but I'm hesitant to see them without at least some info in case they're LE. Anyone have any experience with either of them?

Thanks!

HE.

**Iman2765** · 11-14-13 08:35

Originally Posted by Harderik [View Original Post]

Guys,

I've been texting with these two girls. They sound good, available and friendly enough. However, I'm skeptical because I can't find reviews or info on them anywhere other than these postings. I even asked them both point blank if they have reviews anywhere and they both said no.

http://347-702-3382.escortsincollege...e-1357239.html

Both look amazing, but I'm hesitant to see them without at least some info in case they're LE. Anyone have any experience with either of them?

Thanks!

HE.

I did a quick search on the following ads:

Ad http://305-842-6436.escortsincollege...v-1357637.html, the number search comes back with adds all in the same area Boston north shore to Maine and the picture area similar in the adds so this girl is definitely safer then the other ad, could find not reviews on her either.

The other ad is more sketchy for the picture and the numbers for this ad http://347-702-3382.escortsincollege...e-1357239.html and the number comes up with all kind of ads with different pictures and the picture comes up with all kind phone numbers across the country. IMHO I'd stay away from this one.

**Harderik** · 11-13-13 18:16

Guys,

I've been texting with these two girls. They sound good, available and friendly enough. However, I'm skeptical because I can't find reviews or info on them anywhere other than these postings. I even asked them both point blank if they have reviews anywhere and they both said no.

http://305-842-6436.escortsincollege...v-1357637.html

http://347-702-3382.escortsincollege...e-1357239.html

Both look amazing, but I'm hesitant to see them without at least some info in case they're LE. Anyone have any experience with either of them?

Thanks!

HE.