Massage Parlor Reports

[EightHornyInch]

Visited yumy several times previously; great massage 9+, good teasing (8) , good ending (8) , a little exploring. Discovered a and and a new one here; she is still learning. A Good massage (6-7) , ok ending (5) , no exploring. May be better with time, more visits. Fee was. 6.

Interesting reports lately on the legal issues. Beginning to feel like RI was supposed to be a while ago.

[Diogenesbarrel]

I found this PDF online, which appears to be instructions for the jury. It includes "masturbation of another person", so. DIY is the "safe" way to go.

I agree with your conclusion that skipping discussion of tips is the best route for all involved. Note that based on this arrest, rubbing ones finger's together to "sign" payment or holding fingers up for an amount is still an expression that is considered as binding as spoken terms.

http://www.mass.gov/courts/courtsand...-for-a-fee.pdf

Last page.

SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTION.

'Sexual conduct. ' The term 'sexual conduct' includes (sexual intercourse) (anal intercourse) (fellatio, or oral sex involving contact between the mouth of one person and the penis of another person) (cunnilingus, or oral sex involving contact between the mouth of one person and the female sex organs — the vagina, vulva or labia — of another person) (masturbation of another person) (or) (any other intrusion of a part of one person's body or some other object into the genital or anal opening of another person's body).

Obviously, the arresting officer had a broader definition of 'sexual conduct' in mind than the lawyer whose web cite I quoted in the above report. Since the Massachusetts statute does not define what is meant by 'sexual conduct', and the lawyer's web site defines the term in a way that does not include what the masseuse offered to do, I think she has a valid defense.

Nevertheless, forewarned is forearmed.

What Massachusetts masseuses need to do is go ahead with a hand job if the customer seems aroused but NOT ask for a separate fee for the hand job. In other words, forget the 'upselling' and hope the customer will tip generously. Asking for a separate fee for anything sexual, even a hand job, is asking for trouble. A customer accepting such an explicit offer is also asking for trouble although in my opinion if it winds up in court he also has a valid defense.

[Spaz2580]

The providers should never discuss or even motion a HJ when discussing money or tips. If they all did that then there wouldn't be any busts and they'd get a lot more repeat customers. We all pretty much hate the hagglers and upsellers. But greed and stupidity usually takeover.

[Eligrn101]

Will be heading to Weymouth soon and thinking of visiting Yezi again where I have had good experiences in the past. The turnover of providers seems high there, however, so I was wondering if anyone had been there recently and can recommend someone. Thanks, and will report back.

[Puckhead72]

I was told from a member that julia formerly at irene's in mdeford now works with amy, are you sure it was malu as I agree they do not like each other. Julia is 20 something and heavy build, massage quality not the best.

I stopped in one day last week for a visit. I had not been there in a very long time 3-4 years. I called to make an appointment as I was in area and said I would be there in 10-15 minutes. I was 10 minutes late as I had a phone call last longer than anticipated. I called back and she was about to leave but came back. I was greeted discretely at back area and let to office. Brazilian girl Julia bigger than I like but huge boobs and was hoping for an attempt at those. I lay on table and she comes back in shortly after. She starts massage with good pressure and playful flirting nice touch for 35 min. I flip and that continues I rub her leggs and butt, she giggles and likes from what I can tell. Several attempts up top roaming but kept getting deflected. Bummer I was hoping for those. Nice finish and cleanup.

Would probably go back if in area.

There was another woman sitting on couch in office could have been Amy but did not get a get a good look at her as she was focused on computer. She was a bit older and light brown hair.

[Member #4868]

PW,

I am trying to PM you but your inbox is full.

All set, cleared

[Param Ahmad]

http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/ne...y-sting?zc_p=1

Woman faces sex charge after undercover Sudbury sting.

By Brian Benson / Daily News staff.

The MetroWest Daily News.

Posted Dec 14, 2012

A Massachusetts masseuse whose customer was a law enforcement officer was charged with 'sexual conduct' for a fee after she did a gesture indicating she was offering to do a hand job for a fee. Using a gesture rather than quotable words did not protect her from being arrested and charged with a violation.

Only a month and a half before in my report on 10-29-2012, Report #207, in the Forum / Special Interests / Massages thread I'd written this about the Massachusetts law:

"

http://www.malegislature.gov/Laws/Ge.272/Section53A

"Chapter 272: Section 53A. Engaging in sexual conduct for a fee.

Section 53A. (a) Whoever engages, agrees to engage or offers to engage in sexual conduct with another person in return for a fee, shall be punished by imprisonment in the house of correction for not more than 1 year or by a fine of not more than $500, or by both such imprisonment and fine, whether such sexual conduct occurs or not.

[I wrote]:"I couldn't find a definition of "sexual conduct" in the Massachusetts statutes, but I did find this on a Massachusetts lawyer's web site:

"

http://www.bostoncriminallawyer.com/.y-1614225.html

"Accessed October 29, 2012:

"The legal definition of 'sexual conduct' in Massachusetts includes intercourse, oral sex and any intrusion of a part of someone's body or some other object into the genital or anal area of another person's body."

[I wrote]:"Since giving a man an orgasm with a hand or hands only doesn't involve an intrusion of a part of her body "into" any part of his body, I don't see how the Massachusetts law against "sexual conduct * * * in return for a fee" is violated when a masseuse gives a man an orgasm with only her hand or hands."

Obviously, the arresting officer had a broader definition of 'sexual conduct' in mind than the lawyer whose web cite I quoted in the above report. Since the Massachusetts statute does not define what is meant by 'sexual conduct', and the lawyer's web site defines the term in a way that does not include what the masseuse offered to do, I think she has a valid defense.

Nevertheless, forewarned is forearmed.

What Massachusetts masseuses need to do is go ahead with a hand job if the customer seems aroused but NOT ask for a separate fee for the hand job. In other words, forget the 'upselling' and hope the customer will tip generously. Asking for a separate fee for anything sexual, even a hand job, is asking for trouble. A customer accepting such an explicit offer is also asking for trouble although in my opinion if it winds up in court he also has a valid defense.

[wolfetone1970]

Drove down HandCock Street in S. Braintree and stopped in. Was there a few years ago and had a lousy experience with a very old chick. But since I was driving by I stopped in to scope it out to see if the place was even there still, it was. Much different chick this time. Alot younger, called herself Angel. Pretty goog massage, good tease and good ending. .5 for 1/2 hr, .4 tip. No signage on door or pretty much anywhere so they keep a low profile. Thinking about going back but I don't know if I'll get the same chick. I saw a place on rt. 18 in South Wey. Across form the old Navy Base in a strip mall with restaurant, convenient store, and salon. I think it's pretty new. Anyone been there yet?

[Fly Dangler]

RM sucks! Reports aren't as up to date as they are on here.

Also a fair number of their reports seem to be bogus. For example look at their reports on places in Providence and here in MA that have actually been closed for quite some time. I don't think we've seen that here.

[Bigelow]

Lost both licenses, and fined heavily, savings mostly depleted from legal fees, and has been forced out and moved on. Thank goodness it's finally over. A long process but I celebrate this weekend! I could care less about any of you and what you think or have to say about it, and I was a contributing complainant to the process, and had my reasons which will remain only between me, my wife and our close circle. Where she went is anybody's guess and I could care less. But she has been banished from Waltham, and I told you all it was going to happen (under different screen names of course.) Maybe try trolling chinatown and you can get her for a quickie 20 dollar car date, as she is broke and surely desperate now. Signed, You know who.

A typical fcking rat.

[Really69]

If only these cops took gun violence as seriously as they take prostitution. Just sayin.

I think Brockton has such a large dept. There better equipped then most, fact is Brockton PD that was the forefront and spearhead of taking out the alphabet spa's and now they are seemingly taking note of everyone coming in and going from some of the remaining left over Brockton Spa's, time to start going to Quincy & Weymouth I guess?

[Oeddeo]

Just driving through and spotted the supervisor delivering coffee and donuts to the unmarked in the church parking lot across the street. Snapped a quick pic and kept on drivin' LOL.

[IMG]

http://i48.tinypic.com/2qnz4tj.jpg

[/IMG]

If only these cops took gun violence as seriously as they take prostitution. Just sayin.

[TravisBooth]

I posted this yesterday: Drove past Foot Massage place around 6:45 on other business. Lights were out. On the way back I detoured past the Comforts place on Copeland, about a mile away. Their lights (on second floor above hair salon) also out. Before closing time for both, so something must be up.

TODAY: Again on other business, drove past in the daylight and noticed that Foot Massage was back to displaying the OPEN sign. Maybe they were sitting there in the dark last night, and only taking appointments, going lo-vis on account of the much more crowded center of town that comes with a Friday night. Something tells me not, because the Copeland place did not re-open. Pulled the door. Locked. Hard to say what's going on in Mansfield, but of the two I'd have expected the more visible foot place to have a shorter lifespan, because of its sore-thumb location. Maybe they were both investigated, and only Copeland was judged to have been up to something unsavory? Or maybe the hair place next door to Copeland called in the air strike. I did check CL, and noted that both had posted ads every day through Dec 13, but neither has done so since. Hmmm.

[Muddy53]

RM sucks! Reports aren't as up to date as they are on here. And they charge $15 a month for that? Not worth it. Makes me curious why that site is mentioned in court and not this site.

What a job that must be. Going to work, searching the internet for AMP's! Then you get to try them out for free. Wonder how many freebies they get under the table?

[Really69]

Done. Wish there was a warning.

Their is a warning. Buts its via email which suks. They should have a warn on the forum since alot of us never log on the email used to set up our accounts.