Massage Parlor Reports Only Sr Members with 50+ Reports

**CryMoarHoar** · 08-12-26 17:57

Visited luxury scalp in lake forest last week.

Tina's body was great with a little of age. Tits were amazing.

Entry. 5 and opted for BBBJ 1. 2.

Did not get to CIM as she moved away but her technique was great.

Will repeat again.

**Dopema** · 08-12-26 13:31

Originally Posted by Kevin80 [View Original Post]

There is no Coco working here despite a long list of fake reviews on the other site and comments from "Clown9". If you call and ask for Coco, mms will say yeah yeah sure you come, and will give you whoever's available.

I tend to ignore most of his posts. There doesn't seem to be much truth to them and grossly exaggerated claims.

**Kevin80** · 08-10-26 13:29

Originally Posted by Hornilius69 [View Original Post]

Some monger just posted about Summer on the other site. She is one of the popular one for FS. The new Fish and Chip has young Coco working. She look like young Nana at Lucky Feet. Her pussy is good to fuck for 140.

There is no Coco working here despite a long list of fake reviews on the other site and comments from "Clown9". If you call and ask for Coco, mms will say yeah yeah sure you come, and will give you whoever's available.

**Opi7001** · 08-08-26 21:54

I don't know how this place get this kind of talent so consistently.

I love a small spinner so this girl was basically a dream for me. And it's very true she walks the line of GFE / PSE very well. It didn't get crazy PSE like I've had in the kgirl apartment scene or anything but she was a nasty little girl in just the right ways.

I normally go first thing in the morning for first appointments but today was later in the day and I was happy to find that she cleaned up really well, wasn't sweaty in the least and smelled great.

I will say that her BBBJ was once again amazing. It's like these girls at BB spa specialize in it. Helen had that added bonus of forcing herself down on me to the point of gagging many times. She would hold almost all 7. 5 inches down through multiple gags. When we went into 69, she didn't have to, but she reached extra far and rimmed me very deep and was all over my taint while jerking me off.

She's gets good marks for being a girl that rubs your balls a lot while blowing you.

Her english is basically non existent so I'm not certain but it sounded like she's only here for another week then goes somewhere to LA. I think this one I actually will see again which I almost never do. I have a feeling a second session with her will be even better.

I keep wanting to see a BBFS girl with a kgirl agency but BB just keeps delivering and the cost is half as much compared to those girld who want 450 for BBFS.

I do miss fucking in a bed. But I know these spa's can't really be having beds in them.

**Admin2** · 08-08-26 20:53

Originally Posted by AnotherBogie [View Original Post]

Sorry I wasn't paying attention. I believe that is from the Sugar Spa Sponsor thread in San Diego if I remember correctly. I am in San Diego for work weekly.

It is Sugar Spa in San Diego and that's what it says, I would respect their wishes. Some of the spas are going to be more one way than others. We are working on giving them the ability to delete or edit posts but only on their thread. To you fuckers with Tourette's that always gotta be shouting shit out, I know that makes the reviews on their thread less believable but it's their fucking thread, they bought the ad, so long as they follow our rules they can make more restrictive ones if they want.

Think of those threads as being a signboard in the lobby of their shops. You guys still have the review thread and I don't give a fuck how much somebody pays for an ad this isn't TNA, I'd rather lose an advertiser than tell guys they can't post about what they experienced if it's in our review threads.

A2

**BombAssPizza0** · 08-08-26 16:53

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR's NOTE: This report was edited or deleted because the subject of the report was in direct violation of a posted Admin Restriction on the author, the thread, and/or the subject. This behavior will not be tolerated, and a 2nd violation will result in an automatic banning.

**AnotherBogie** · 08-08-26 15:01

Originally Posted by Admin2 [View Original Post]

Which thread did that come from because that is more restrictive than the rule I set. To be clear, those advertiser threads are for the shops, they aren't like review threads, if they want to make more restrictive rules I would say respect them. The rule I laid on them was no sex for money. If you want to talk about money then no explanation of services. However if they don't want reviews it's their thread, they paid for the ad that got the thread. I'm curious which place said it because I suspect there is some misunderstanding happening.

As far as the one that says "Please respect the Admins request and leave your reviews for us in THIS thread and not the main forums, and do not mention a tip or donation of any kind."

This is closer to what I said, you can review them on both threads if you want but in the advertiser thread no sex and money. In my mind "reviews" on the advertiser thread were meant to be more like "endorsements"

A2

Sorry I wasn't paying attention. I believe that is from the Sugar Spa Sponsor thread in San Diego if I remember correctly. I am in San Diego for work weekly.

**Admin2** · 08-08-26 13:01

Originally Posted by AnotherBogie [View Original Post]

Yeah it is a bit confusing. This is copied a from one sponsor thread.

" No reviews and no mention of services. For example, you can say things like "I saw this provider, she was fantastic, great attitude, caring, attentive". If you want to post a long full review then please use the MPR 50+ and 50- threads respectively.

And this is from another one.

"Please respect the Admins request and leave your reviews for us in THIS thread and not the main forums, and do not mention a tip or donation of any kind. ".

I don't know if this is a case by case with the sponsor or if there is a general rule but they all seem to say no mention of tip or donation.

Which thread did that come from because that is more restrictive than the rule I set. To be clear, those advertiser threads are for the shops, they aren't like review threads, if they want to make more restrictive rules I would say respect them. The rule I laid on them was no sex for money. If you want to talk about money then no explanation of services. However if they don't want reviews it's their thread, they paid for the ad that got the thread. I'm curious which place said it because I suspect there is some misunderstanding happening.

As far as the one that says "Please respect the Admins request and leave your reviews for us in THIS thread and not the main forums, and do not mention a tip or donation of any kind."

This is closer to what I said, you can review them on both threads if you want but in the advertiser thread no sex and money. In my mind "reviews" on the advertiser thread were meant to be more like "endorsements"

A2

**Hector58** · 08-07-26 15:37

Originally Posted by Hector58 [View Original Post]

Not in the sponsor threads.

Sorry, now I see your point. If all posts for a spa have to be posted in the sponsor thread, there is no way to post about services and $$ That is a problem.

**Hector58** · 08-07-26 13:16

Originally Posted by DildoBaggens [View Original Post]

I thought the whole reason for this forum was to compare service experiences and outlays $$.

Not in the sponsor threads.

**Dildo Baggens** · 08-07-26 11:42

I thought the whole reason for this forum was to compare service experiences and outlays $$.

Originally Posted by AnotherBogie [View Original Post]

Yeah it is a bit confusing. This is copied a from one sponsor thread.

" No reviews and no mention of services. For example, you can say things like "I saw this provider, she was fantastic, great attitude, caring, attentive". If you want to post a long full review then please use the MPR 50+ and 50- threads respectively.

And this is from another one.

"Please respect the Admins request and leave your reviews for us in THIS thread and not the main forums, and do not mention a tip or donation of any kind. ".

I don't know if this is a case by case with the sponsor or if there is a general rule but they all seem to say no mention of tip or donation.

**AnotherBogie** · 08-07-26 01:03

Originally Posted by JohnRichard [View Original Post]

Anyone can help me understand the new rules?

Yeah it is a bit confusing. This is copied a from one sponsor thread.

" No reviews and no mention of services. For example, you can say things like "I saw this provider, she was fantastic, great attitude, caring, attentive". If you want to post a long full review then please use the MPR 50+ and 50- threads respectively.

And this is from another one.

"Please respect the Admins request and leave your reviews for us in THIS thread and not the main forums, and do not mention a tip or donation of any kind. ".

I don't know if this is a case by case with the sponsor or if there is a general rule but they all seem to say no mention of tip or donation.

**ThePunisher50** · 08-07-26 00:30

Originally Posted by AsianPussy [View Original Post]

Wax queen said she's still there but no more massage. I assume she went legit.

Makes sense. I think she stopped seeing her old client list. Its ok. I don't think anyone ever got anything more than a HJ anyway.

**JohnRichard** · 08-06-26 23:13

I saw the rules in one of the sponsor spa threads. Looks like reviews are now supposed to be posted in the sponsored threads and the review posted in the sponsored threads cannot include $$.

I also did not see any posters mention details of service in their posts in that sponsor thread. So how to confirm that a given lady does a specific service that I am looking for. And how to plan expense?

Core of reviews for me has been to know who is offering what (and at what cost).

Anyone can help me understand the new rules?

**ShottyyPippen** · 08-06-26 00:49

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR's NOTE: This report was edited or deleted because the subject of the report was in direct violation of a posted Admin Restriction on the author, the thread, and/or the subject. This behavior will not be tolerated, and a 2nd violation will result in an automatic banning.