Rants Raves and Stupid Shit in Seattle.

[SkeletonKey6]

Baby, before you go. I hate to ask, I really do, but could you maybe help me out with my phone bill? Rent's due Tuesday, and I don't know what I'm going to do!
Honey lovin's, you know I want to. I would in a heart beat, but they've made that a felony, now! I would pay the whole damn thing for ya, but they'd AI my VenMo and be marching me out of work in handcuffs by this afternoon. You don't want me to go to prison, do ya, baby?

Tier 1	Capital Punishment & Corporal Sanctions	Afghanistan, Iran, Mauritania, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Yemen	Death penalty (stoning/execution), public flogging/caning, or long-term imprisonment under Zina laws.
Tier 2	Multi-Year Imprisonment & Penal Labor	Cameroon, China, Kuwait, Malaysia, North Korea, Oman, Qatar, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Vietnam	Up to 510 years prison, forced labor/re-education camps, mandatory whipping, and forced deportation.
Tier 3	Direct Criminalization & Incarceration	Algeria, Bahrain, Belarus, Burundi, DRC, Egypt, Eritrea, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Iraq, Jordan, Kenya, Libya, Malawi, Morocco, Myanmar, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, Rwanda, Somalia, South Korea, South Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Uzbekistan, Zimbabwe	Direct criminal records, arrests, and prison terms (6 months to 3+ years) specifically targeting the seller.
Tier 4	Indirect Criminalization / Restrictive Laws	Albania, Angola, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Cambodia, Chad, Croatia, Cuba, Georgia, Ghana, Guyana, India, Indonesia, Jamaica, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Lebanon, Lithuania, Madagascar, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Namibia, Nepal, North Macedonia, Papua New Guinea, Russia, Serbia, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan, Thailand, United States (49 states)	Restricted via loitering, vagrancy, or anti-solicitation laws. Punished via fines, misdemeanor records, or short jail terms.
Tier 5	Nordic / Neo-Abolitionist Model	Canada, France, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Norway, South Africa, Sweden, United Kingdom (Northern Ireland)	Zero penalty for selling sex. Law enforcement targets buyers (clients) and third-party organizers exclusively.
Tier 6	Decriminalized / Legal & Regulated	Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bangladesh, Belgium, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Honduras, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Senegal, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom (GB), Uruguay, Venezuela	Zero criminal penalties for selling sex. Recognized as formal labor subject to standard employment/tax frameworks or personal autonomy laws.

If you go to either Nana Plaza or Soi Cowboy in Bangkok the police have a desk where girls have to show ID to enter and in Pattaya as far as I can see the 5000 working girls on Beach Road are not worried about the law.

In Qatar the desk clerk asked me if I wanted company.

In Cuba infidelity is the national sport. The guy who's watching out for her is usually her husband.

Cambodia has brothels with hundreds of women on the street in front of them.

Cairo has a massive red light district.

Look up Penthouse Strip club in Moscow.

A2

[GuideMe999]

Republican-controlled legislatures authored and passed the legislation elevating buying sex to a felony in the following states, though Democratic governors in several states also signed the measures.

State Enacting Bill / Statute Legislature Control Governor (Party) Political Dynamic.

Arizona HB 2720 (2026) Republican (House & Senate) Katie Hobbs (D) Divided Government.

Georgia SB 547 (2026) Republican (House & Senate) Brian Kemp (R) Republican Trifecta.

Kansas HB 2347 (2026) Republican Supermajority Laura Kelly (D) Divided Government.

Missouri SB 893 (2026) Republican (House & Senate) Mike Kehoe (R) Republican Trifecta.

Montana MCA 45-5-601 Republican (House & Senate) Greg Gianforte (R) Republican Trifecta.

North Carolina HB 971 (2024) Republican Supermajority Roy Cooper (D) Divided Government.

Oklahoma 21 O. S. 1029 Republican (House & Senate) Kevin Stitt (R) Republican Trifecta.

Texas HB 1540 (2021) Republican (House & Senate) Greg Abbott (R) Republican Trifecta.

Baby, before you go. I hate to ask, I really do, but could you maybe help me out with my phone bill? Rent's due Tuesday, and I don't know what I'm going to do!

Honey lovin's, you know I want to. I would in a heart beat, but they've made that a felony, now! I would pay the whole damn thing for ya, but they'd AI my VenMo and be marching me out of work in handcuffs by this afternoon. You don't want me to go to prison, do ya, baby?

[CoolStud]

Wasn't sure where to put an anti-rant, but since I've seen the rants on the topic here.

This **new server** seems to be pretty freakin awesome! Performance is so much better!

Thanks to everyone involved with the upgrade, so much better now!!

Ok, anti-rant over, ever one can get back to bitching about GPS and hooker prices.

Good job on getting the site back better and faster than ever. Why'all don't get enough credit.

[Barnie]

Some fat old ladies on the other boaed are complaining that agency girls get to post ads in the indy section.

Thwy also wonder why guys see agency girls.

BECAUSE THEY ARE HOT AND NOT FAT AND DISGUSTING.

Plus, 90% are pimped anyway.

[TheRealSG]

I found it pretty humorous to read a thread from some "new" girl asking for suggestions, one was to remove mention of "VIP".

One provider tried explaining to her that men might interpret that to mean she does BBFS, and NOT see her because of that!

Every provider I knew of doing BBFS, at least with me, was popular enough to be difficult to schedule with, openly discussed or not.

She does do BBFS tho.

[ThisOneForYou]

Wasn't sure where to put an anti-rant, but since I've seen the rants on the topic here.

This **new server** seems to be pretty freakin awesome! Performance is so much better!

Thanks to everyone involved with the upgrade, so much better now!!

Ok, anti-rant over, ever one can get back to bitching about GPS and hooker prices.

[Meorme]

The mod s on tna can fix that by hammering the BBFS shaming that goes on.

I found it pretty humorous to read a thread from some "new" girl asking for suggestions, one was to remove mention of "VIP".

One provider tried explaining to her that men might interpret that to mean she does BBFS, and NOT see her because of that!

Every provider I knew of doing BBFS, at least with me, was popular enough to be difficult to schedule with, openly discussed or not.

[SkeletonKey6]

Buying sex is now a felony in Arizona. Selling sex remains just a misdemeanor. Make that make sense. Mandatory 15 days in jail first offense. What a crock of shit.

Who controls the statehouse and then look who the governor is, it kind of explains itself.

A2

Republican-controlled legislatures authored and passed the legislation elevating buying sex to a felony in the following states, though Democratic governors in several states also signed the measures.

State Enacting Bill / Statute Legislature Control Governor (Party) Political Dynamic.

Arizona HB 2720 (2026) Republican (House & Senate) Katie Hobbs (D) Divided Government.

Georgia SB 547 (2026) Republican (House & Senate) Brian Kemp (R) Republican Trifecta.

Kansas HB 2347 (2026) Republican Supermajority Laura Kelly (D) Divided Government.

Missouri SB 893 (2026) Republican (House & Senate) Mike Kehoe (R) Republican Trifecta.

Montana MCA 45-5-601 Republican (House & Senate) Greg Gianforte (R) Republican Trifecta.

North Carolina HB 971 (2024) Republican Supermajority Roy Cooper (D) Divided Government.

Oklahoma 21 O. S. 1029 Republican (House & Senate) Kevin Stitt (R) Republican Trifecta.

Texas HB 1540 (2021) Republican (House & Senate) Greg Abbott (R) Republican Trifecta.

[Ace McNasty]

I should add tbis.

There will always be White Knights that spend countless hours on the website.

TNAB is a "read only" app. ROM not RAM.

Only partake in monger-centric apps like this one.

[Hoballer]

This released today. Apparently they met via Instagram while she was living in Portland and he continued to build the relationship while he was in jail. She anticipated moving into an apartment with him. He moved her to Burien and then started forcing her onto Aurora. Apparently she worked AA from August 29 to September 6 and he drove her to dates with johns.

https://www.king5.com/article/news/c...8-6cf12b1cefa3

[Barnie]

I should add tbis.

There will always be White Knights that spend countless hours on the website.

They feel it is their duty and responsibily to "protect" the board.

Just realize that these people are in general not happy. Something in their life drives them to seek inline gratification.

Sometimes it is a bad marriage. Maybe they lack social skills in real life.

Perhaps they are dealing with a mental health issue like depression.

Whatever the case may be, just ignore them.

They are nothing but internet trolls..

Haha. We all know cuck wk number 1 is.

Fucking loser.

[TheRealSG]

I would caition anyone using a new board.

Regarding people wanging to fiscuss openly taboo items on tna, that has alwatlys been frowned upon.

The mod s on tna can fix that by hammering the BBFS shaming that goes on.

They don't have the stomach to do so. It is their board, they can do that.

Right now, BBFS providers can claim they don't and selectively choose to do so.

They can trash this site, then turn around and bareback their regulars.

Right now they have that protection and they want to keep it that way.
Expect them and their loyal supporters to bash any reports of bbfs..
It makes for a less enjoyable website.
The reality is they need to protect their business. They are barebacking some regulars but not others.
They need to keep the cash flowing. I think we all understand how some clients would be butthurt about beimg denied.

So, every once in a while, a provider will rant about the bs reports of bbfs on this site and the requests she is getting from clients.
This is just her protecting her business model. Nothing more..

Most providers do not want bbfs with every client. Tbey want to choose.

If you are a member of this board and other boards like ter, you can read reviews covering taboo topics.
There is plenty of reliable information out there.

I would be cautious of paying any website. Especially one run by a local escort with a questionable history.

I should add tbis.

There will always be White Knights that spend countless hours on the website.

They feel it is their duty and responsibily to "protect" the board.

Just realize that these people are in general not happy. Something in their life drives them to seek inline gratification.

Sometimes it is a bad marriage. Maybe they lack social skills in real life.

Perhaps they are dealing with a mental health issue like depression.

Whatever the case may be, just ignore them.

They are nothing but internet trolls.

The providers on the site will pay attention to them. They only do so to manipulate them.

If they White Knight someone, just put them on ignore. They bring zero value to the website.

They will accuse you of being someone you are not.

Honestly. It is sad. I feel bad for them.

[BigDumper]

Buying sex is now a felony in Arizona. Selling sex remains just a misdemeanor. Make that make sense. Mandatory 15 days in jail first offense. What a crock of shit.

Who controls the statehouse and then look who the governor is, it kind of explains itself.

A2

[Regularity]

I would caition anyone using a new board.

Regarding people wanging to fiscuss openly taboo items on tna, that has alwatlys been frowned upon.

The mod s on tna can fix that by hammering the BBFS shaming that goes on.

They don't have the stomach to do so. It is their board, they can do that.

Right now, BBFS providers can claim they don't and selectively choose to do so.

They can trash this site, then turn around and bareback their regulars.

Right now they have that protection and they want to keep it that way.
Expect them and their loyal supporters to bash any reports of bbfs..
It makes for a less enjoyable website.
The reality is they need to protect their business. They are barebacking some regulars but not others.
They need to keep the cash flowing. I think we all understand how some clients would be butthurt about beimg denied.

So, every once in a while, a provider will rant about the bs reports of bbfs on this site and the requests she is getting from clients.
This is just her protecting her business model. Nothing more..

Most providers do not want bbfs with every client. Tbey want to choose.

If you are a member of this board and other boards like ter, you can read reviews covering taboo topics.
There is plenty of reliable information out there.

I would be cautious of paying any website. Especially one run by a local escort with a questionable history.

Spot on. I couldn't have said it better.

[TheRealSG]

I did. She contacted me and asked if I might mention the new board over here. I wasn't going to say anything about it however someone had already created a thread here asking about it so I just posted what I'd learned. I asked VB some questions about why she was creating a new board, what topics and activities would be allowed, etc. I posted some of her answers on that thread. Essentially, she felt that most people were not happy with TNA and other boards and wanted to create a space where more taboo topics could be discussed and everything could be in the open. That's about as far as I got. I did not join her board, just wasn't interested.

I would caition anyone using a new board.

Regarding people wanging to fiscuss openly taboo items on tna, that has alwatlys been frowned upon.

The mod s on tna can fix that by hammering the BBFS shaming that goes on.

They don't have the stomach to do so. It is their board, they can do that.

Right now, BBFS providers can claim they don't and selectively choose to do so.

They can trash this site, then turn around and bareback their regulars.

Right now they have that protection and they want to keep it that way.
Expect them and their loyal supporters to bash any reports of bbfs..
It makes for a less enjoyable website.
The reality is they need to protect their business. They are barebacking some regulars but not others.
They need to keep the cash flowing. I think we all understand how some clients would be butthurt about beimg denied.

So, every once in a while, a provider will rant about the bs reports of bbfs on this site and the requests she is getting from clients.
This is just her protecting her business model. Nothing more..

Most providers do not want bbfs with every client. Tbey want to choose.

If you are a member of this board and other boards like ter, you can read reviews covering taboo topics.
There is plenty of reliable information out there.

I would be cautious of paying any website. Especially one run by a local escort with a questionable history.